TRY ME!
Disciplinary Proceedings Fairness Concerns
Summary
Suri faces disciplinary proceedings with concerns about natural justice. All evidence must be discussed during hearings to ensure fairness. Missing evidence can invalidate the inquiry. Relevant judgments include Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel (1985) and State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha (2010). Consulting an administrative law lawyer is advisable.Full Conversation
if not discussed any evidence in above proceedings - will not take into consideration of prepare the inquiry report
It sounds like Suri may have a valid concern regarding the principles of natural justice. Here’s some general information:
- Right to a Fair Hearing: All evidence must be discussed, and Suri should be able to respond.
- Inquiry Report: If evidence is not discussed, it may be excluded from the report.
Has Suri considered filing a formal grievance or appealing the decision based on these grounds?
- Right to a Fair Hearing: All evidence must be discussed, and Suri should be able to respond.
- Inquiry Report: If evidence is not discussed, it may be excluded from the report.
Has Suri considered filing a formal grievance or appealing the decision based on these grounds?
based on the above any judgment is avialble
Suri's case appears to have merit, particularly concerning the principles of natural justice. Here are a few relevant points:
*. Right to be Heard: All evidence should be presented and discussed during the disciplinary hearing.
*. Fair Inquiry: Any evidence not discussed may potentially be excluded from the inquiry report.
For specific judgments, you can refer to:
- Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel (*): Emphasized the importance of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.
- State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha (*): Highlighted that not considering relevant evidence could vitiate the inquiry.
Has Suri considered consulting a lawyer specializing in administrative law for detailed advice?
*. Right to be Heard: All evidence should be presented and discussed during the disciplinary hearing.
*. Fair Inquiry: Any evidence not discussed may potentially be excluded from the inquiry report.
For specific judgments, you can refer to:
- Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel (*): Emphasized the importance of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.
- State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha (*): Highlighted that not considering relevant evidence could vitiate the inquiry.
Has Suri considered consulting a lawyer specializing in administrative law for detailed advice?
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha (*): Highlighted that not considering relevant evidence could vitiate the inquiry.
It seems Suri has a strong case regarding the principles of natural justice. If the evidence was not discussed during the hearing, it may indeed vitiate the inquiry. Consulting a lawyer specializing in administrative law would be advisable for in-depth guidance and potential next steps.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with filing a formal grievance or appealing the decision?
Would you like more information on how to proceed with filing a formal grievance or appealing the decision?
wherein the departmental enquiry was set aside on finding that there was non-supply of essential documents to the delinquent. -when it is supply of esstenail documents - before the inquiry, in inquiry and after the inqurity
In disciplinary proceedings, the supply of essential documents is crucial at every stage:
- Before the Inquiry: All necessary documents and evidence should be provided to the delinquent to prepare a defense.
- During the Inquiry: Each piece of evidence should be discussed and the delinquent should have the opportunity to respond.
- After the Inquiry: The report should consider only the evidence discussed during the inquiry.
Would you like to know the next steps for filing a grievance or appeal in such cases?
- Before the Inquiry: All necessary documents and evidence should be provided to the delinquent to prepare a defense.
- During the Inquiry: Each piece of evidence should be discussed and the delinquent should have the opportunity to respond.
- After the Inquiry: The report should consider only the evidence discussed during the inquiry.
Would you like to know the next steps for filing a grievance or appeal in such cases?
Highlighted that not considering relevant evidence could vitiate the inquiry - meaning
Not considering relevant evidence during a disciplinary inquiry could vitiate the inquiry, which means it could invalidate or nullify the entire process. This means the disciplinary proceedings could be considered unfair and the outcome could be challenged.
Would you like guidance on how Suri can file a grievance or appeal based on this ground?
Would you like guidance on how Suri can file a grievance or appeal based on this ground?
SUPRESSION OF FACTS BY INQUIRY AUTHROITY AND PRESENTING OFFICER
It seems Suri has a strong case regarding the suppression of facts and the principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings. Here are some key points:
- Right to a Fair Hearing: All evidence must be presented and discussed during the hearing.
- Inquiry Report: Any evidence not discussed may potentially invalidate the inquiry.
Would you like more detailed information on how to file a formal grievance or appeal based on these grounds?
- Right to a Fair Hearing: All evidence must be presented and discussed during the hearing.
- Inquiry Report: Any evidence not discussed may potentially invalidate the inquiry.
Would you like more detailed information on how to file a formal grievance or appeal based on these grounds?
suppression of witness full details in disciplinary proceedings
Case Rating: *
Suppression of witness and evidence in disciplinary proceedings is a serious issue. Here are the key points:
- Right to Present Evidence: All witnesses and evidence must be discussed during the inquiry.
- Natural Justice: Any suppression can invalidate the inquiry.
- Judgments:
- *Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel (*)*
- *State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha (*)*
Would you like to know how to file a grievance or appeal based on this suppression?
Suppression of witness and evidence in disciplinary proceedings is a serious issue. Here are the key points:
- Right to Present Evidence: All witnesses and evidence must be discussed during the inquiry.
- Natural Justice: Any suppression can invalidate the inquiry.
- Judgments:
- *Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel (*)*
- *State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha (*)*
Would you like to know how to file a grievance or appeal based on this suppression?
suppression of witness full details due to that two persons with same name and same company and both are partners- one person is attended
It seems there's a significant issue of suppression of evidence and witness testimony in Suri's disciplinary proceedings, which could invalidate the inquiry.
For clarity: Are you asking how to proceed with filing a grievance or appeal based on the suppression of evidence and witness testimony?
For clarity: Are you asking how to proceed with filing a grievance or appeal based on the suppression of evidence and witness testimony?
invalidate the inquiry proceedings - parameters
It sounds like Suri has a potentially strong case to challenge the disciplinary proceedings based on the principles of natural justice. Here are the parameters to potentially invalidate the inquiry proceedings:
- Right to a Fair Hearing: Ensure all evidence and witness testimonies are presented and discussed.
- Right to Know the Evidence: All documents and evidence must be supplied before, during, and after the inquiry.
- Non-Suppression of Facts: Any suppression of evidence or witness details can invalidate the inquiry.
- Judgments:
- *Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel (*)*
- *State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha (*)*
Would you like to know how to proceed with filing a grievance or appeal based on these grounds?
- Right to a Fair Hearing: Ensure all evidence and witness testimonies are presented and discussed.
- Right to Know the Evidence: All documents and evidence must be supplied before, during, and after the inquiry.
- Non-Suppression of Facts: Any suppression of evidence or witness details can invalidate the inquiry.
- Judgments:
- *Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel (*)*
- *State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha (*)*
Would you like to know how to proceed with filing a grievance or appeal based on these grounds?
prepare the RTI questions ".What is the ruling for conducting DPC for selecting postal assistants to SBCO branch ?
*.Who are identified as Postal Assistants in SBCO branch of Nellore HO and Ongole HO?
*.Please intimate whether the selected Postal Assistants are working in Nellore HO SBCO branch or not ? Or any internal mutual exchanges are made
? If so on whose order and whether they are competent to order
*.pease intimate the names of the officials working in the SBCO branch and also intimate the branch and place of working of the officials working in SBCO officials for the last 10 years ."
It seems you need to prepare an RTI application regarding the selection and placement of Postal Assistants. Below are the questions you can include in your RTI application:
*. What are the rules and regulations for conducting the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for selecting Postal Assistants to the SBCO branch?
*. Who are identified as Postal Assistants in the SBCO branch of Nellore HO and Ongole HO?
*. Are the selected Postal Assistants currently working in the Nellore HO SBCO branch, or have any internal mutual exchanges been made? If so, on whose order and are they competent to make such orders?
*. Please provide the names of the officials working in the SBCO branch and also the branch and place of working of these officials for the last 10 years.
Would you like more information on how to file this RTI application?
*. What are the rules and regulations for conducting the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for selecting Postal Assistants to the SBCO branch?
*. Who are identified as Postal Assistants in the SBCO branch of Nellore HO and Ongole HO?
*. Are the selected Postal Assistants currently working in the Nellore HO SBCO branch, or have any internal mutual exchanges been made? If so, on whose order and are they competent to make such orders?
*. Please provide the names of the officials working in the SBCO branch and also the branch and place of working of these officials for the last 10 years.
Would you like more information on how to file this RTI application?
Start a new chat