Summary
NAPOLCOM Resolution 2016-002 outlines administrative liabilities for police personnel, such as neglect of duty and insubordination. Grounds for neglect include failure to perform duties and disregard of orders. Evidence like attendance records, witness testimonies, and documented orders can strengthen a case. A non-original medical certificate and failure to file a sick leave may indicate neglect, but context matters. Absence without leave and verbal orders from superiors are strong evidence. A Chief Clerks sworn testimony on attendance is credible. Non-notarized submissions against instructions can show non-compliance. For affidavits, include the Chief Clerks role, orders for daily attendance, and collaboration details.Full Conversation
In this document, there is a memorandum of explanation and answer. What is the possible administrative liability of Pat Macainding, who is directly responsible for the explanation letter falling under NAPOLCOM Resolution *-*?
Hi Noel! Based on NAPOLCOM Resolution *-*, possible administrative liabilities for police personnel like Pat Macainding can include:
- Neglect of Duty
- Inefficiency and Incompetence in the Performance of Official Duties
- Inefficiency and Incompetence in the Performance of Official Duties
- Conduct Unbecoming of a Police Officer
If you need more specific details, feel free to ask!
What are the grounds to indict Pat Macainding in Neglect of Duty?
Hi Noel! To indict Pat Macainding for Neglect of Duty under NAPOLCOM Resolution *-*, the grounds may include:
- Failure to perform official duties
- Deliberate disregard of official orders or directives
- Incompetence resulting in harm or loss
- Repeated tardiness or absenteeism affecting service delivery
Is there a specific incident or detail you need more information on?
What evidence required to strengthen the administrative liability of Pat Macainding?
Case Rating: *
To strengthen the administrative liability of Pat Macainding for Neglect of Duty, you may need the following evidence:
- Records of missed assignments or duties
- Documented orders or directives that were disregarded
- Witness testimonies regarding incompetence or negligence
- Attendance records showing repeated tardiness or absenteeism
Is there a specific incident you're looking into?
He submitted his medical certificate; however, it is not the original copy, and he did not file a sick leave while absent as stated in his notice of explanation. Is it concrete evidence of neglect of duty and insubordination?
Case Rating: *
Hi Noel! The submission of a non-original medical certificate and failing to file a sick leave could indicate neglect of duty or insubordination, but it may depend on the context and the rules of your organization. Additional evidence or context may be required to strengthen your case.
Would you like more detailed information or have a specific question about the process?
The daily attendance for a period of more than 5 days absent without leave and the verbal order his superior officer is considered as strong evidence to indict him for neglect of duty and insubordination?
Case Rating: *
Hi Noel! The daily attendance records showing more than 5 days absent without leave and the verbal order from his superior officer can be strong evidence for neglect of duty and insubordination. However, additional supporting documents and witness testimonies can further strengthen the case.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with the administrative case?
When the sworn testimony of the Chief Clerk of the office who incharge the attendance, is it strong as evidence?
Case Rating: *
The sworn testimony of the Chief Clerk in charge of attendance can be strong evidence, especially if it is supported by attendance records and other documentation. It adds credibility and official confirmation of the facts.
Would you like more details on how to proceed with the administrative case?
Pat Macainding submitted his answer explanation without notarized contrary to the instruction of his notice of explanation. It is another evidence that he did not comply or insubordination to the directives of his superior officer?
Case Rating: *
Hi Noel! The submission of an answer explanation without notarization, contrary to the instructions, can be considered as non-compliance or insubordination, especially if notarization was explicitly required.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with the administrative case?
gawan nyo lang ng sworn affidavit si chief clerk nyo na sya ang incharge sa attendance ni Pat Macainding na may order si CS sa kanya na kailangan mag attendance sya everyday sa PCADG Hq despite na under investigation sya sa kanyang admin case naifile ng C, RPCADU4A at habang hinihintay yung kanyang re assignment order sa PCADG Hq muna sya magrereport everyday para mag collaborate at suportahan yung attendance at yung report ng C, RPCADU4A
Case Rating: *
Hi Noel! To create a sworn affidavit for the Chief Clerk, you'll need to include the following details:
- Name and position of the Chief Clerk
- Statement that the Chief Clerk is in charge of attendance for Pat Macainding
- Orders from the CS regarding Pat Macainding's daily attendance at PCADG Hq despite the ongoing investigation
- Mention that Pat Macainding is to report daily to collaborate and support the attendance and report of C, RPCADU4A
Would you like guidance on drafting the specific sections of the affidavit?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat