Appellate Issues Overview

Summary

The appellate issues involve claims of fraud, attorney misconduct, and jurisdictional errors, particularly regarding usury and the statute of limitations. The trial courts decisions are challenged for relying on fraudulent evidence and ignoring critical legal principles, leading to significant prejudice. Relief is sought under Rule 60(b)(4) and 60(b)(6) to address these errors and protect the appellants rights. The Massachusetts Land Courts decision on the statute of limitations and the noncompliance with the Power of Sale are also contested. A stay of foreclosure proceedings is requested to allow for ongoing litigation for damages.

Full Conversation

Yes. One moment I will send my last chat.

Got it. It sounds like you're working on an appellate issue. To help you better, what specific legal error are you contending in your appeal? This will help tailor the statement accurately.

Based on the arguments provided, they seem to address key elements that could support a claim of abuse of discretion. Here are the points that align with this claim: *. Standard of Review: - You’ve identified a misapplication of legal principles by the trial judge (e.g., statute of limitations inconsistencies). *. Specific Errors: - Illegal Lending Practices: Failure to address TILA violations and HUD counseling. - Attorney Misconduct: Ignoring evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury. - Jurisdiction Issues: Misjudgment on the court’s authority to handle criminal issues like usury. - Fraud Upon the Court: Reliance on fraudulent evidence. *. Consequences: - Highlight the harm and prejudice suffered due to these errors. These points collectively argue that the judge’s decisions were unreasonable and beyond the bounds of acceptable judicial conduct.

It looks like you've got a substantial basis for an appeal based on abuse of discretion. Here's a concise short statement for your appellate issue:

~Short Statement:
"The Appellant argues that the trial court committed an abuse of discretion by misapplying legal principles, ignoring critical evidence, and making erroneous jurisdictional determinations, leading to significant harm and prejudice."
Would you like more detailed assistance on any of these points?

In violation of Rule *(b)* and * and *. Opposing counself knowingly filed a fruadulant forclosure deed claiming ownership of the property.

It sounds like you have a solid basis for an appeal, especially under Rule *(b) for fraud and misrepresentation. Massachusetts has specific rules for these kinds of appeals.
To help refine your argument, what's the primary evidence you have for the fraudulent foreclosure deed?

*. testimony from the private lender in federal court confessing that he charged compound interest that was not in the Note to forclose on the property. Also that for the length of the so called loan he secrettly had charged this comopund interest and never sent any staments or periodical ststements to me. And that he would agree with me if I contested the loan. *. I have the accounting of the loan used to forclsose on the property *. the opposing counsel has entered into a client-lawyer relationship with all of the parties in this case. He is the clue who orchestrated the illegal forclsure in violation of chapter * section *. He has committed fruad upon the court.

It sounds like you have substantial evidence to support your claim of fraud and misrepresentation. Here are some key points that can strengthen your appeal:
- Testimony: The private lender's confession about charging undisclosed compound interest.
- Accounting Records: Documentation of the loan details used to foreclose the property.
- Opposing Counsel Misconduct: Evidence of the attorney's unethical client relationships and orchestration of the foreclosure.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with your appeal in Massachusetts?

My Reguest for Relief is to stay all the proceeding of forclosure and eviction on both properties , * Brayton Woods Rehoboth, MA and * Oak Street Norton Mass which is the second piece of property invold in this case that despite knowingly conducting an illegal forclosure the private lender has threated to forclsoe on it while i file an independant lawsuit in suerior court against the oppsoing counself for misconducta nd the third party.

Case Rating: *
You seem to have a strong basis for your appeal and legal actions. To stay the proceedings, you may need to file a motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and/or preliminary injunction in Massachusetts Superior Court.
Would you like more information on how to draft and file these motions?

Yes but first lets complete my Civil Docketing Statement. Given my information could you please draft * Appeal Issues?

Sure! Here are six potential appeal issues based on your provided information:
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and HUD counseling requirements, resulting in prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues such as usury, resulting in improper rulings.
*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Violation of Rule *(b): The opposing counsel knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed, claiming ownership of the property, which constituted fraud and misrepresentation.
Would you like more details on any of these appeal issues?

*. *. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and HUD counseling requirements, resulting in prejudicial harm to the Appellant. specifically the court made a wrong ruling in regards to Chapter 183C: PREDATORY HOME LOAN PRACTICES.

To refine your appeal issue related to illegal lending practices, you could say:
"The court failed to address violations of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and HUD counseling requirements, specifically ruling incorrectly under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant."
Would you like help with any other appeal issues or drafting motions?

*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues such as usury, resulting in improper rulings. In the case the judge completely ignoref my claim of usury.

For the issue of jurisdictional errors, you could refine the statement as follows:
"The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice."
Would you like help with drafting a motion or any other specific section?

At one point I filed a notice of appeal due to a procdural error and not the underlying merits of the case. I won the full panel appeal. They stated that the housing court judge dening my jury trail due to my inabiity to pay the interim use and occupancy was in appropriate. Should I cite this and the exact quote here? Or should I cite the ruling of the full panel appeal some where else on the docketing statement?

For your Civil Docketing Statement, you should cite the ruling of the full panel appeal in the section relevant to procedural history or prior proceedings. Include the exact quote from the panel to strengthen your argument. Would you like assistance with any other part of your docketing statement?

Could you please provide me with my brief statement?

Sure! Here’s a brief statement based on the provided information:
"The Appellant argues that the trial court committed various legal errors, including the misapplication of legal principles and jurisdictional errors, resulting in significant prejudice. Specifically, the court failed to address violations of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and HUD counseling requirements, ruled incorrectly under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, and ignored the Appellant's claim of usury. Additionally, the trial court relied on fraudulent evidence and documents presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*). The Appellant requests a stay of all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties involved, while filing an independent lawsuit against the opposing counsel for misconduct."
Would you like to refine any part of this statement or need help with another section?

To clarify does it matter that I never argued TILA ? I only argues Chaoter 183C?

It's great that you're clear on your arguments. Since you only argued Chapter 183C and not TILA, you should focus your appeal issues on the misapplication of Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, and omit references to TILA. Would you like help revising your appeal issues or drafting specific sections?

Yes and please state the most powerful issues on appeal to the least. In addition I must incude the violation of my constutional rights to due process and fairness.

Appeal Issues (From Most to Least Powerful):
*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations.
*. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in a violation of the Appellant's constitutional rights to due process and fairness.
Would you like assistance with any specific sections or motions?

do I include the relief requested? Do I write it like the above format?

Yes, you should include the relief requested in your Civil Docketing Statement. Typically, it's presented in a separate section titled "Relief Requested" or "Request for Relief." Here's a concise format you can use:

~Relief Requested:
The Appellant requests:
*. A stay of all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties, * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and * Oak Street, Norton, MA.
*. Permission to file an independent lawsuit in Superior Court against the opposing counsel for misconduct and the third party involved in the illegal foreclosure.
Would you like help drafting any other sections or clarifying any points?

Is it permission?

It looks like you have a strong case with substantial evidence and multiple legal errors to address. To clarify, are you asking if you need permission to file the requested relief, or are you asking if the format provided is correct for your Civil Docketing Statement?

I am asking to clarify if I need permission from the appeals court to file an independent lawsuit . for example I do not need permission from them to file the lawsuit. Right? So I am confused.

You generally do not need permission from the appeals court to file an independent lawsuit in Superior Court. Appeals courts handle appellate matters, and filing a new lawsuit in Superior Court typically falls outside their jurisdiction.
Is there any other part of your docketing statement or appeal that you need assistance with?

So why kindly am i stating that in my relief here: *. Permission to file an independent lawsuit in Superior Court against the opposing counsel for misconduct and the third party involved in the illegal foreclosure.

You don't need permission from the appellate court to file an independent lawsuit in Superior Court. Instead, you should focus on the relief directly related to the appeal. Here's an updated format:

~Relief Requested:
*. A stay of all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties, * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and * Oak Street, Norton, MA.
*. A reversal of the trial court's decision due to the identified errors and a remand for further proceedings.
Would you like help with any other sections or clarifying any points?

My issue with relief requested is that I am in the process to sue for damages in * other courts against the private lender and my financial advisor who orginated the illegal loans. So if the appeals court voids the forclosure on "* brayton woods " it will negatively affect my reward for damage amount. So I seek a stay so that I can continue litigation for damages on "* Brayton woods" and protect my second property from an illegal forclosure "Oak street" and seek to file another lawsuit against oppossing counsel and the third party who aided the private lender and my financial advisor.

Got it! Here's a refined version of your "Relief Requested" section that aligns with your goals:

~Relief Requested:
*. A stay of all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties, * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and * Oak Street, Norton, MA, to allow for ongoing litigation for damages.
*. A reversal of the trial court's decision to protect the Appellant's ability to seek damages and prevent negative impacts on the Appellant’s reward for damages.
*. Any further relief deemed just and equitable by the court.
Would you like assistance with any other sections or drafting specific motions?

no could you please send me the final statement in the format necessry to copy it in the Docketing Statement?

Sure! Here is your final statement formatted for the Docketing Statement:

~Appellate Issues:
*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations.
*. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in a violation of the Appellant's constitutional rights to due process and fairness.

~Relief Requested:
*. A stayof all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties, * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and * Oak Street, Norton, MA, to allow for ongoing litigation for damages.
*. A reversal of the trial court's decision to protect the Appellant's ability to seek damages and prevent negative impacts on the Appellant’s reward for damages.
*. Any further relief deemed just and equitable by the court.
Would you like any additional assistance with your Docketing Statement?

Should i include rule * (b)(*) too?

Yes, including Rule *(b)(*) can strengthen your appeal as it covers "any other reason that justifies relief," providing a broader basis for your argument. Here's an updated version:

~Appellate Issues:
*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations.
*. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in aviolation of the Appellant's constitutional rights to due process and fairness.
*. Relief Under Rule *(b)(*): The trial court's decision should be reversed for additional reasons justifying relief, including significant prejudicial errors and misconduct.

~Relief Requested:
*. A stay of all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties, * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and * Oak Street, Norton, MA, to allow for ongoing litigation for damages.
*. A reversal of the trial court's decision to protect the Appellant's ability to seek damages and prevent negative impacts on the Appellant’s reward for damages.
*. Any further relief deemed just and equitable by the court.
Would you like any further assistance with your Docketing Statement or any other legal documents?

Please update here *. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).

Here's the updated version including Rule *(b)(*):

~Appellate Issues:~
*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations.
*. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in a violation of the Appellant's constitutional rights to due process and fairness.
*. Relief Under Rule *(b)(*):The trial court's decision should be reversed for additional reasons justifying relief, including significant prejudicial errors and misconduct.

~Relief Requested:~
*. A stay of all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties, * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and * Oak Street, Norton, MA, to allow for ongoing litigation for damages.
*. A reversal of the trial court's decision to protect the Appellant's ability to seek damages and prevent negative impacts on the Appellant’s reward for damages.
*. Any further relief deemed just and equitable by the court.
Would you like any further assistance with your Docketing Statement or any other legal documents?

Oh! My apologies. i got it!

Absolutely, here's your updated final statement including the requested changes:

~Relief Requested:
*. A stay of all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties, * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and * Oak Street, Norton, MA, to allow for ongoing litigation for damages.
*. A reversal of the trial court's decision to protect the Appellant's ability to seek damages and prevent negative impacts on the Appellant’s reward for damages.
*. Any further relief deemed just and equitable by the court.
Would you like any further assistance with your Docketing Statement or any other legal documents?

*. A reversal of the trial court's decision to protect the Appellant's ability to seek damages and prevent negative impacts on the Appellant’s reward for damages. At this stage should I cite the courts that I am in currently pending the properties outcome?

You don't need to cite the specific courts for cases currently pending in your "Relief Requested" section. It's typically not necessary for the appellate docketing statement. However, you can mention that there are ongoing litigations if you think it adds weight to your request for a stay. Here's the final format for your Civil Docketing Statement:

~Appellate Issues:
*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly withrespect to the statute of limitations.
*. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in a violation of the Appellant's constitutional rights to due process and fairness.
*. Relief Under Rule *(b)(*): The trial court's decision should be reversed for additional reasons justifying relief, including significant prejudicial errors and misconduct.

~Relief Requested:
*. A stay of all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties, * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and * Oak Street, Norton, MA, to allow for ongoing litigation for damages.
*. A reversal of the trial court's decision to protect the Appellant's ability to seek damages and prevent negative impacts on the Appellant’s reward for damages.
*. Any further relief deemed just and equitable by the court.
Would you like any further assistance with your Docketing Statement or any other legal documents?

For some reason I could not copy/paste it into the given space. Do I attach it as a document or just retype it?

You should be able to retype the information into the given space on the Docketing Statement form. If the form allows for attachments, you could also attach a document with the information. However, if you're required to use the provided space, retyping it is often the safest bet to ensure everything is included correctly.
Would you like any suggestions on how to format the document if attaching is an option, or need help with anything else?

Agreed. I will retype it. In this section is this where I state my postive judgement with the full panel in the Related Appeals Are there any pending, past, or anticipated future appeals or original appellate proceedings ?

Yes, the section on "Related Appeals" is where you should state any positive judgments from the full panel in past appeals. You should include information about pending, past, or anticipated future appeals or original appellate proceedings that are related to your current appeal. Here's how you can format it:

~Related Appeals:
*. Previous Appeal:
- Case Title: [Case Title]
- Case Number: [Case Number]
- Court: [Court Name]
- Outcome: The full panel ruled in favor of the Appellant, stating that the housing court judge's denial of the jury trial due to the inability to pay interim use and occupancy was inappropriate. The exact quote from the ruling is: "[Exact Quote]."
*. Pending Appeal:
- Case Title: [Case Title]
- Case Number: [Case Number]
- Court: [Court Name]
- Status: Currently pending, with the outcome potentially affecting the proceedings in this appeal.
*. Anticipated Future Appeal:
- Description: The Appellant anticipates filing an appeal related to [specific issue or case] in the near futureWould you like more help with formatting or any additional sections for your Docketing Statement?

Im confused. So *. Pending Appeal I state the appeal Im presently docketing?

For "Pending Appeal," you should not list the appeal you are currently working on. Instead, you list any other appeals that are currently pending and related to your case. Here's a refined format for clarity:

~Related Appeals:
*. Previous Appeal:
- Case Title: [Case Title]
- Case Number: [Case Number]
- Court: [Court Name]
- Outcome: The full panel ruled in favor of the Appellant, stating that the housing court judge's denial of the jury trial due to the inability to pay interim use and occupancy was inappropriate. The exact quote from the ruling is: "[Exact Quote]."
*. Pending Appeal:
- Case Title: [Case Title]
- Case Number: [Case Number]
- Court: [Court Name]
- Status: Currently pending, with the outcome potentially affecting the proceedings in this appeal.
*. Anticipated Future Appeal:
- Description: The Appellant anticipates filing an appeal related to [specific issue or case] in the near future.
Would you like further assistance with any other sections or clarifications?

I do not have any other pending appeals.

Got it. Since you don't have any other pending appeals, you can simply mention your previous positive judgment. Here's how you can format the "Related Appeals" section:

Ok. Thank I see you tomorrow morning after I review the full panels judgement. Thank you so much for all your help.

You're welcome! It sounds like you have a well-prepared appeal. If you need any further assistance or have more questions tomorrow, feel free to reach out. Good luck with your review and your case. Have a great evening!

This is about my docketing statement I recently discovered that the private lenders The Bristol Superior Court allowed the sale of property at forclosurre based on fraud committing criminal usry and a brach of the Power of Sale. Should I state this in the statement or I am already citing fraud?

You should definitely state that the sale of the property was based on fraud, criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale. While you are already citing fraud, specifying these additional points strengthens your argument and provides a comprehensive view of the issues at hand.
Would you like help drafting this specific statement for your docketing statement?

Let me send you * sections that we already have. *. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*). *. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings. *. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant. *. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.

Your appellate issues are strong, but adding that the sale was based on fraud, criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale will further solidify your case. Here’s a refined version:

~Appellate Issues:~
*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations.
*. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in a violation of the Appellant's constitutional rights to due process and fairness.
*. Relief Under Rule *(b)(*): The trial court's decision should be reversed for additional reasons justifying relief, including significant prejudicial errors and misconduct.
*. Fraudulent Foreclosure Sale: The Bristol Superior Court allowed the sale of the property based on fraud, criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale.

~Relief Requested:~
*. A stay of all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties, * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and * Oak Street, Norton, MA, to allow for ongoing litigation for damages.
*. A reversal of the trial court's decision to protect the Appellant's ability to seek damages and prevent negative impacts on the Appellant’s reward for damages.
*. Any further relief deemed just and equitable by the court.
Would you like further assistance with any other sections or clarifying any points?

*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations. *. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in a violation of the Appellant's constitutional rights to due process and fairness. *. Relief Under Rule *(b)(*): The trial court's decision should be reversed for additional reasons justifying relief, including significant prejudicial errors and misconduct.

Great, here’s the updated section for your Civil Docketing Statement, incorporating the newly discovered information about the sale of the property based on fraud, criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale.

~Appellate Issues:
*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations.
*. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in a violation of theAppellant's constitutional rights to due process and fairness.
*. Relief Under Rule *(b)(*): The trial court's decision should be reversed for additional reasons justifying relief, including significant prejudicial errors and misconduct.
*. Fraud, Criminal Usury, and Breach of Power of Sale: The Bristol Superior Court allowed the sale of the property at foreclosure based on fraud, committing criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale.

In addition the Massachusetts Land court based its decision that the mortage was not past the stute of limiatatiosn to collect as oppsoed to the Promissory Note based of fraud,committing criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale. As a result, the opposing counsel and a third party knowingly filed a fraudulent floclsoure deed into Southeast Housing Court to perpetuate the fiancial crimes against Karen Merritt and her family since approximately * to present casuing significant damages.

Here's the updated and comprehensive "Appellate Issues" section, including the new information:

~Appellate Issues:~

*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations.
*. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in a violation of the Appellant's constitutional rights to due process and fairness.
*. Relief Under Rule *(b)(*):The trial court's decision should be reversed for additional reasons justifying relief, including significant prejudicial errors and misconduct.
*. Fraud, Criminal Usury, and Breach of Power of Sale: The Bristol Superior Court allowed the sale of the property at foreclosure based on fraud, committing criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale.
*. Statute of Limitations Misinterpretation:** The Massachusetts Land Court incorrectly determined that the mortgage was not past the statute of limitations to collect, as opposed to the Promissory Note, based on fraud, criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale.

~Relief Requested:~

*. A stay of all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties, * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and * Oak Street, Norton, MA, to allow for ongoing litigation for damages.
*. A reversal of the trial court's decision to protect the Appellant's ability to seek damages and prevent negative impacts on the Appellant’s reward for damages.
*. Any further relief deemed just and equitable by the court.
Would you like any further assistance or clarifications?

Here's an updated and refined version of your Civil Docketing Statement considering the new information:

~Appellate Issues:~
*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations.
*. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in a violation of the Appellant's constitutional rights to due process and fairness.
*. Relief Under Rule *(b)(*):The trial court's decision should be reversed for additional reasons justifying relief, including significant prejudicial errors and misconduct.
*. Fraudulent Foreclosure Sale: The Bristol Superior Court allowed the sale of the property at foreclosure based on fraud, committing criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale.
*. Statute of Limitations Error: The Massachusetts Land Court incorrectly determined that the mortgage was not past the statute of limitations for collection, as opposed to the Promissory Note, based on fraud, criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale.

~Related Appeals:~
*. Previous Appeal:
- Case Title: [Case Title]
- Case Number: [Case Number]
- Court: [Court Name

Thank you so much.

You're very welcome! It looks like you have a comprehensive and strong set of appellate issues and requests for relief. Here's your final Civil Docketing Statement formatted for your convenience:

~Appellate Issues:~
*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations.
*. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in a violation of the Appellant's constitutional rights to due processand fairness.
*. Relief Under Rule *(b)(*): The trial court's decision should be reversed for additional reasons justifying relief, including significant prejudicial errors and misconduct.
*. Fraudulent Foreclosure Sale: The Bristol Superior Court allowed the sale of the property at foreclosure based on fraud, committing criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale.
*. Statute of Limitations Error: The Massachusetts Land Court incorrectly determined that the mortgage was not past the statute of limitations for collection, as opposed to the Promissory Note, based on fraud, criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale.

~Related Appeals:~
*. Previous Appeal:
- Case Title: [Case Title]

Should i add this too or no? The Public Auction at *:* a.m. on May *, * was scheduled to be sold by “virtue in execution of the POWER OF SALE contained in a certain mortgage given by Merritt to the IRA. The IRA however was noncompliant to the POWER OF SALE.

Including the details about the Public Auction and the IRA's noncompliance with the Power of Sale can strengthen your argument by providing additional context and evidence of procedural and legal violations. Here's how you can incorporate it:

~Appellate Issues:~
*. Fraud Upon the Court: The trial court relied on fraudulent evidence presented by the opposing counsel, violating Rule *(b)(*) and (*).
*. Attorney Misconduct: The trial court ignored evidence of fraudulent documents and perjury by the opposing counsel, undermining the integrity of the proceedings.
*. Illegal Lending Practices: The court failed to address violations under Chapter 183C: Predatory Home Loan Practices, causing prejudicial harm to the Appellant.
*. Jurisdictional Errors: The trial court misjudged its authority to handle criminal issues, particularly usury, resulting in improper rulings and completely ignoring the Appellant's claim of usury, causing significant prejudice.
*. Abuse of Discretion: The trial court erred in its application of legal principles, leading to an unjust outcome, particularly with respect to the statute of limitations.
*. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The court’s actions resulted in a violation of the Appellant's constitutional rights to due process and fairness.
*. Relief Under Rule *(b)(*): The trial court's decision should be reversed for additional reasons justifying relief, including significant prejudicial errors and misconduct.
*. Fraudulent Foreclosure Sale: The Bristol Superior Court allowed the sale of the property at foreclosure based on fraud, committing criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale.
*. Statute of Limitations Error: The Massachusetts Land Court incorrectly determined that the mortgage was not past the statute of limitations for collection, as opposed to the Promissory Note, based on fraud, criminal usury, and a breach of the Power of Sale.
*. Noncompliance with Power of Sale: The Public Auction at *:* a.m. on May *, *, was scheduled to be sold by virtue of the Power of Sale contained in a certain mortgage given by Merritt to the IRA. However, the IRA was noncompliant with the Power of Sale, further invalidating the foreclosure proceedings.

~Relief Requested:~
*. A stay of all foreclosure and eviction proceedings on both properties, * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and * Oak

We have been working on a Bankr motion for reconsideration due to judicial misconduct as his order to lift my stay was based upon fraud. Rather tan filing this type of motion what are your ideas for this :OMNIBUS RULE * (b)(*) AND * (b)(*) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION TO VACATE THE VOID AB INITIO ORDER TO LIFT MY AUTOMATIC STAY BECAUSE THE HONORABLE COURT WAS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO GRANTING RELIEF TO OPPOSING COUNSEL WHO FILE FRAUD AND FAILED TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM AS REQUIRED BY BANKRUPTCY RULE * WHO WOULD NOT SECURE CREDITORS AND WHO WERE NOT REAL PARTING INTEREST TO MY PROMISSORY NOTE AND MORTGAGE CONTRACT. AND AND MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE *.

Given the complexity and seriousness of your claims, including judicial misconduct and fraud, it would be wise to consider filing an Omnibus Rule *(b)(*) and *(b)(*) Motion for Reconsideration, as you suggested. Here are some key points to include:

Key Points for Omnibus Rule *(b)(*) and *(b)(*) Motion:
*. Void Judgment (Rule *(b)(*)):
- Argue that the court's order lifting the stay is void because the court lacked jurisdiction to grant relief to the opposing counsel.
*. Any Other Reason Justifying Relief (Rule *(b)(*)):
- Highlight significant errors and misconduct justifying relief, including fraud and lack of jurisdiction.
*. Failure to File Proof of Claim:
- Emphasize that the opposing counsel failed to file a proof of claim as required by Bankruptcy Rule *.
*. Fraudulent Claims:
- Provide evidence that the opposing counsel is not a real party in interest to your promissory note and mortgage contract.
*. Judicial Notice (Federal Rules of Evidence *):
- Request the court to take judicial noticeof specific facts and evidence supporting your claims, ensuring that these are admissible and verifiable.

Suggested Format for Your Motion:
*. Introduction:
- Briefly introduce the motion, citing Rule *(b)(*) and *(b)(*) as the basis for reconsideration.
*. Background:
- Provide a concise history of the case, including the original order lifting the stay and any relevant judicial actions.
*. Void Judgment Argument (Rule *(b)(*)):
- Detail why the court's jurisdiction was lacking in granting relief to the opposing counsel.
*. Relief Justified by Significant Errors (Rule *(b)(*)):
- Discuss the substantial errors and misconduct, including fraudulent claims and lack of jurisdiction.
*. Failure to File Proof of Claim:
- Explain how the opposing counsel’s failure to file a proof of claim under Bankruptcy Rule * affects the case.
*. Real Party in Interest:
- Argue that the opposing counsel is not a legitimate party to the promissory note and mortgage contract.
*. Request for Judicial Notice:
- Formally request the court to take judicial notice of specific evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence

Can we take it one section at a time? Please sart with the Motion title.

Absolutely! Let's start with the motion title. Here’s a suggested title for your motion:

~OMNIBUS RULE *(b)(*) AND *(b)(*) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION TO VACATE VOID AB INITIO ORDER TO LIFT AUTOMATIC STAY AND MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE *
Does this title look good to you, or would you like any modifications?

How is judicial notice per rule * different that general notice?

Judicial notice under Rule * of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows a court to recognize certain facts as true without requiring formal evidence, provided these facts are not subject to reasonable dispute because they are either generally known within the court’s territorial jurisdiction or can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
General notice, on the other hand, typically refers to notifying parties of procedural or substantive matters in a case, such as a hearing date or the existence of a lawsuit, and does not involve the court's acceptance of facts without evidence.
Would you like more detailed information on how to draft your motion to take judicial notice?

Appellate Issues Overview

Summary

Full Conversation

Related Chats