Forensic Accountant Findings

Sure, here's the updated section without the outline:
---
BACKGROUND
*. On February *, *, Classic Display, Inc. (“Debtor”) filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter * of the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”). On July *, *, Joseph M. DiOrio was appointed Chapter * trustee.
*. By Order dated September *, *, the Trustee sold the assets of the Debtor pursuant to § * of the Code to Ralph Grieco, James Michael Cronan, and James Tiernan or their nominee.
*. On November *, *, the case was converted to Chapter * and DiOrio was appointed Chapter * trustee.
*. On May *, *, the Trustee filed adversary proceedings against the Debtor’s principal, James Cronan (“J. Cronan”), and Cronan’s ex-wife, Karen Cronan (“K. Cronan”), seeking to recover funds the Debtor fraudulently transferred to them.
*. On November *, *, the Trustee obtained the Judgment.
- At the time of the lawsuit, my financial advisor, Ralph Grieco, formed a partnershipwith me and purchased my business assets through the bankruptcy court, including a promissory note and the sale of the business from me to Ralph Grieco (Exhibit A).
- Subsequently, we opened a new business together. He advised me to give my shares of that business to the third partner, James Tiernan, for a tax shelter, promising to return my name to the stock power documents the following year. He did not, and I never received any money for the share transfer (Exhibit B).
- Throughout the partnership, the two partners continually made promises to me. They advised me to move from Chapter * on the commercial building, * Fountain Street, Rhode Island, that was in my name as the title owner Cronan Realty, LLC and part of the bankruptcy estate, to Chapter * to liquidate. They assured me they would buy the building from the court and, once the transfer was done, they would add my name back onto the title of the property. I have the deed transferring the commercial property from the bankruptcy court to my advisor and James Tiernan (Exhibit C).
- It was not in my best interest to move from Chapter * to Chapter * in the absence of fulfilled promises. I had a due process

Sure, here is the continuation:
---
- It was not in my best interest to move from Chapter * to Chapter * in the absence of fulfilled promises. I had a due process right to know that my partners had no intent to keep their promise. I would have stayed in Chapter * and taken other actions. The betrayal of fiduciary duties by my partners, shareholders, and trusted personal advisor is evident. They should not have title to my business and property. They should not be rewarded and aided and abetted by this court to perpetuate the crime against not only myself but also the bankruptcy estate and its creditors. This court must recognize the severity of their fraudulent actions and ensure justice is served.
- They subsequently executed an illegal self-help eviction by changing the locks to the building, stripping me of my business and property, and then illegally foreclosed on my children's and former wife's home in Massachusetts using a usury rate of *% interest. This action is pending in two court cases: one in Superior Court, Massachusetts, against the financial advisor, and one in Federal Court, Rhode Island, against the private lender, who is my partner in this bankruptcy case buying the judgment (Exhibit D).
- I filed a lawsuit against themin Superior R.I. court, but due to financial strain, the case is still pending. During my counsel's representation, I hired a forensic accountant to review the financials required by the court to dissolve the partnership. The forensic accountant uncovered extensive commingling of funds, tax evasion, sham transactions, and other fraudulent activities. This is supported by:
- Exhibit E: Forensic accountant’s report.
- Exhibit F: Forensic accountant’s deposition.
- Deposition Highlights:
- Page *, Section *-*: Commingling of funds between * Fountain Street, LLC, and The Classic Group, Inc.
- Page *, Section *-*: Sham transactions demonstrating financial misconduct.
- Page *, Section *-*: Tax avoidance practices.
- Page *, Section *-*: Questionable stock transfer without proper documentation.
- Exhibit G: Curriculum Vitae of Lorraine A. Horton, CPA/CFF, CFE, CICA.
- Plaintiff’s Answer to Defendants’ Expert Interrogatory:
- Ms. Horton will testify that the profit-sharing arrangement at * Fountain Street, LLC is highly unusual and indicates tax avoidance.
- The Classic Group,

---
It was not in my best interest to move from Chapter * to Chapter * in the absence of fulfilled promises. I had a due process right to know that my partners had no intent to keep their promise. I would have stayed in Chapter * and taken other actions. The betrayal of fiduciary duties by my partners, shareholders, and trusted personal advisor is evident. They should not have title to my business and property. They should not be rewarded and aided and abetted by this court to perpetuate the crime against not only myself but also the bankruptcy estate and its creditors. This court must recognize the severity of their fraudulent actions and ensure justice is served.
They subsequently executed an illegal self-help eviction by changing the locks to the building, stripping me of my business and property, and then illegally foreclosed on my children's and former wife's home in Massachusetts using a usury rate of *% interest. This action is pending in two court cases: one in Superior Court, Massachusetts, against the financial advisor, and one in Federal Court, Rhode Island, against the private lender, who is my partner in this bankruptcy case buying the judgment (Exhibit D).
I filed a lawsuit against them in Superior R.I. court, but due tofinancial strain, the case is still pending. During my counsel's representation, I hired a forensic accountant to review the financials required by the court to dissolve the partnership. The forensic accountant uncovered extensive commingling of funds, tax evasion, sham transactions, and other fraudulent activities. This is supported by:
- Exhibit E: Forensic accountant’s report.
- Exhibit F: Forensic accountant’s deposition.
- Deposition Highlights:
- Page *, Section *-*: Commingling of funds between * Fountain Street, LLC, and The Classic Group, Inc.
- Page *, Section *-*: Sham transactions demonstrating financial misconduct.
- Page *, Section *-*: Tax avoidance practices.
- Page *, Section *-*: Questionable stock transfer without proper documentation.
- Exhibit G: Curriculum Vitae of Lorraine A. Horton, CPA/CFF, CFE, CICA.
- Plaintiff’s Answer to Defendants’ Expert Interrogatory:
- Ms. Horton will testify that the profit-sharing arrangement at * Fountain Street, LLC is highly unusual and indicates tax avoidance.
- The Classic Group, Inc. paid officer wages to Cronan, who was not identified as

I understand your concern about breaking up the forensic accountant's section for clarity. Here’s the continuation from where we left off:
---
It was not in my best interest to move from Chapter * to Chapter * in the absence of fulfilled promises. I had a due process right to know that my partners had no intent to keep their promise. I would have stayed in Chapter * and taken other actions. The betrayal of fiduciary duties by my partners, shareholders, and trusted personal advisor is evident. They should not have title to my business and property. They should not be rewarded and aided and abetted by this court to perpetuate the crime against not only myself but also the bankruptcy estate and its creditors. This court must recognize the severity of their fraudulent actions and ensure justice is served.
They subsequently executed an illegal self-help eviction by changing the locks to the building, stripping me of my business and property, and then illegally foreclosed on my children's and former wife's home in Massachusetts using a usury rate of *% interest. This action is pending in two court cases: one in Superior Court, Massachusetts, against the financial advisor, and one in Federal Court, Rhode Island, against the private lender, who is my partner in this bankruptcycase buying the judgment (Exhibit D).
I filed a lawsuit against them in Superior R.I. court, but due to financial strain, the case is still pending.
Forensic Accountant's Discovery:
During my counsel's representation, I hired a forensic accountant to review the financials required by the court to dissolve the partnership. The forensic accountant uncovered extensive commingling of funds, tax evasion, sham transactions, and other fraudulent activities. This is supported by:
- Exhibit E: Forensic accountant’s report.
- Exhibit F: Forensic accountant’s deposition.
- Deposition Highlights:
- Page *, Section *-*: Commingling of funds between * Fountain Street, LLC, and The Classic Group, Inc.
- Page *, Section *-*: Sham transactions demonstrating financial misconduct.
- Page *, Section *-*: Tax avoidance practices.
- Page *, Section *-*: Questionable stock transfer without proper documentation.
- Exhibit G: Curriculum Vitae of Lorraine A. Horton, CPA/CFF, CFE, CICA.
- **Plaintiff’s Answer to Defendants’ Expert Interrogatory:

Here’s the continuation from where we left off:
---
- Plaintiff’s Answer to Defendants’ Expert Interrogatory:
- Ms. Horton will testify that the profit-sharing arrangement at * Fountain Street, LLC is highly unusual and indicates tax avoidance.
- The Classic Group, Inc. paid officer wages to Cronan, who was not identified as an officer in state corporate filings from * to *.
- The entities illegally paid employees in cash, misclassified employees as independent contractors, and engaged in sham transfers of funds disguised as "management fees" for tax avoidance purposes.
Would you like to proceed with the next section, “Legal Grounds”?

---
- Exhibit G: Curriculum Vitae of Lorraine A. Horton, CPA/CFF, CFE, CICA.
Plaintiff’s Answer to Defendants’ Expert Interrogatory:
- Ms. Horton will testify that the profit-sharing arrangement at * Fountain Street, LLC is highly unusual and indicates tax avoidance.
- The Classic Group, Inc. paid officer wages to Cronan, who was not identified as an officer in state corporate filings from * to *.
- The entities illegally paid employees in cash, misclassified employees as independent contractors, and engaged in sham transfers of funds disguised as "management fees" for tax avoidance purposes.
Would you like to proceed with the next section?