90 Day Cure Notice Discrepancy

please enhance; The purported sending of the 90 day right to cure by the servicer, Select Portfolio Servicing, six months prior to Bank of New York Mellon as trustee was the assigned the property, which meant the bank never sent it, which is a violation under mass general laws chapter *:*, section 35A

Case Rating: *
Hi Alton! Here is an enhanced version of your summary judgment argument:
---
Summary Judgment Argument: *-Day Right to Cure Deception
*. Mismatch in Addresses
- Evidence: Exhibit J, Attorney Fumarola provides the bar code and tracking number for the mandatory *-day right to cure document supposedly sent to Alton King and Terri Mayes-King by registered mail at * Memery Lane, Longmeadow, MA * (See pp. *-*).
- Discrepancy: In Exhibit H, the actual delivery was made to an address in East Longmeadow, MA. The barcode number “* *” and the address do not match the delivery location.
*. Lack of Signature
- Absence of Confirmation: There were no signatures confirming receipt of the registered mail. This indicates that the *-day right to cure notice was not properly delivered.
*. Default Status Confirmation
- Undelivered Notice: The undelivered *-day right to cure notice confirms that the note was in default when assigned to BNYMT on December *, *. This indicates the debt collector’s unsecured status.
*. Fraud Upon the Court
- Counts of Fraud: The mismatched addresses, lack of signature, and the confirmation of default status collectively indicate three counts of fraud upon the court. These inconsistencies and lack of proper delivery procedures undermine the legitimacy of the opposing party’s claims.
*. Intent to Deceive
- Deliberate Action: The opposing attorney filed altered, fraudulent information in his affidavit for summary judgment to manipulate the court’s decision in their favor.
*. Prejudice
- Impact on Case: This fraudulent information prejudices my case and affects the court's decision, undermining the fairness of the judicial process.
*. Violation of Massachusetts Law
- Legal Breach: The purported sending of the *-day right to cure by the servicer, Select Portfolio Servicing, six months prior to the Bank of New York Mellon being assigned the property, means the bank never sent it. This is a violation under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter *, Section 35A.
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?

please enhance; Court errors have more than compromise King's Constitutional and Civil Rights , including due process. Pursuant to * USC § * and § *, it is unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This ongoing conspiracy must be addressed to uphold justice. The 5th and 14th Amendments protect against deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law and ensure equal protection under the law. Additionally, presenting fabricated evidence to obtain possession of property is a violation of:

Case Rating: *
---
Here is an enhanced version:
---
Constitutional and Civil Rights Violations Argument
*. Court Errors and Rights Violation
- Court errors have compromised King's Constitutional and Civil Rights, including due process.
- Pursuant to * USC § * and § *, it is unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This ongoing conspiracy must be addressed to uphold justice.
*. Constitutional Protections
- The 5th and 14th Amendments protect against deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law and ensure equal protection under the law.
*. Violation through Fabricated Evidence
- Presenting fabricated evidence to obtain possession of property is a violation of these rights.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?

AI, I have the body of my brief,which I can file now, for the District Court completed but I do not have the supporting documents ready at this time. I was already granted an extension of 30 days but now I need an additional 10 days. I am 82 years old and have requested ADA accommodations in which the additional 10 days should be covered Under accommodations Request. Please construct How I should write this request for additional time.

Case Rating: *
Hi Alton! Here’s a draft for your request for an additional *-day extension:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Honorable [Judge's Name]
[District Court Name]
[District Court Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Request for Additional *-Day Extension in Case No. [Your Case Number]
Dear Judge [Judge's Last Name],
I am writing to respectfully request an additional *-day extension to file the supporting documents for my brief in the above-referenced case.
I am 82 years old and have been granted ADA accommodations due to my age and health. Despite my best efforts, I have been unable to complete the necessary documents within the previously granted *-day extension. The additional 10 days would allow me to gather and prepare the essential documents to support my brief adequately.
Given my circumstances, I believe this extension falls under the accommodations provided by the ADA and would greatly assist me in ensuring a fair and complete submission.
Thank you for your understanding and consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Good luck with your request!

AI, what is the take judicial notice rule for Massachusetts

Case Rating: *
In Massachusetts, the rules for judicial notice are primarily governed by the Massachusetts Guide to Evidence. Here's a brief overview:
- Courts can take judicial notice of facts that are generally known within the jurisdiction or can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
- Judicial notice can be taken at any stage of the proceeding.
- Parties must be given the opportunity to be heard regarding the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the facts noticed.
Is there anything specific you'd like to know about judicial notice in Massachusetts?

Is there a number of associated with The rule

Case Rating: *
In Massachusetts, judicial notice is governed by the Massachusetts Guide to Evidence, specifically:
- Rule *: Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts.
Would you like to know more details or have a specific question about this rule?

Yes and Outline how would I request and evidentiary hearing to give judicial notice for facts and findings

Case Rating: *
To request an evidentiary hearing for judicial notice of facts and findings, you can follow this outline:
*. Heading:
- [Your Name]
- [Your Address]
- [City, State, ZIP Code]
- [Email Address]
- [Phone Number]
- [Date]
*. Court Information:
- Honorable [Judge's Name]
- [Court Name]
- [Court Address]
- [City, State, ZIP Code]
*. Subject:
- Request for Evidentiary Hearing to Take Judicial Notice of Facts and Findings
*. Introduction:
- State your name and involvement in the case.
- Provide case number and brief context of the case.
*. Reason for Request:
- Explain why you are requesting the court to take judicial notice of certain facts and findings.
- Reference Massachusetts Guide to Evidence, Rule *.
*. Specific Facts and Findings:
- List the specific facts and findings you want the court to take judicial notice of.
- Provide reasons why these facts are generally known or can be accurately and readily determined.
*. Supporting Evidence:
- Mention any supporting evidence you have that confirms the accuracy of these facts.
*. Request for Evidentiary Hearing:
- Formally request an evidentiary hearing to present and discuss these facts and findings.
- Stress the importance of these facts for a fair judgment.
*. Conclusion:
- Summarize your request.
- Thank the judge for their time and consideration.
*. Signature:
- Sincerely,
- [Your Name]
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?

I had a hearing on March *,*. I put in the motion to follow up and to request judicial notice which should have had a better name. My goal is to have an evidentiary hearing and to take judicial notice. How should I incorporate my goal with the previous Ineffective motion.

Case Rating: *
To incorporate your goal of having an evidentiary hearing and taking judicial notice with your previous motion, you can follow these steps:
*. Reference Previous Motion: Start by referencing your previous motion and its purpose.
*. State Your Goal: Clearly state that your goal is to request an evidentiary hearing and to take judicial notice of certain facts.
*. Correct Any Ineffective Parts: Identify and correct any ineffective parts of the previous motion.
*. Outline the Facts: List the specific facts you want the court to take judicial notice of, and provide reasons for their accuracy.
*. Request Evidentiary Hearing: Formally request an evidentiary hearing to present and discuss these facts.
Would you like more detailed guidance or help in drafting this revised motion?

yes

Case Rating: *
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
If yes, please provide:
- What is your phone number?
- What is your name?
- What is your email address?
- What is your zipcode?
- Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?

I did that once before but I did not receive a response. For now I feel that AI Responses have been very effective. Any enhancements would be greatly appreciated

Case Rating: *
Sure, here’s a more detailed outline to revise your previous motion to achieve your goal of having an evidentiary hearing and requesting judicial notice:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Honorable [Judge's Name]
[Court Name]
[Court Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and Judicial Notice in Case No. [Your Case Number]
Dear Judge [Judge's Last Name],
Introduction
I am [Your Name], the plaintiff/defendant in the above-referenced case. I previously submitted a motion on [date] to request judicial notice, which I now seek to revise and expand to include a formal request for an evidentiary hearing.
Reference Previous Motion
In my earlier motion dated [date], I aimed to request judicial notice of certain facts pertinent to my case. However, I believe the motion could be more effective if revised to clearly outline my intention to also request an evidentiary hearing.
Goal and Request
The primary goal of this revised motion is to request an evidentiary hearing and to take judicial notice of specific facts and findings critical to my case as per Massachusetts Guide to Evidence, Rule *.
Correcting Ineffective Parts
Upon reviewing my previous motion, I have identified areas that require clarification and strengthening to better align with my current goals.
Facts and Findings for Judicial Notice
I respectfully request that the court take judicial notice of the following facts and findings:
*. [Fact *] - Explain its general knowledge or readily verifiable nature.
*. [Fact *] - Provide evidence of its accuracy.
*. [Fact *] - Justify its relevance to the case.
Supporting Evidence
Attached is the supporting evidence that confirms the accuracy and relevance of these facts.
Formal Request for Evidentiary Hearing
I formally request that the court schedule an evidentiary hearing to allow for a thorough presentation and discussion of the listed facts and findings. This hearing is crucial for a fair and just resolution of the case.
Conclusion
In conclusion, I seek the court’s permission to revise my previous motion to include this detailed request for an evidentiary hearing and judicial notice. I believe this approach will ensure a fair evaluation of the critical facts.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

AI, In submitting my request for an additional 10 days would like to also highlight that the brief, which I will be submitting, is complete but I do need the extra 10 days to Provide the supporting documents.

Case Rating: *
Hi Alton! Here’s a draft for your request for an additional *-day extension:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Honorable [Judge's Name]
[District Court Name]
[District Court Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Request for Additional *-Day Extension in Case No. [Your Case Number]
Dear Judge [Judge's Last Name],
I am writing to respectfully request an additional *-day extension to file the supporting documents for my brief in the above-referenced case.
The brief is complete; however, I need the additional time to gather and prepare the essential supporting documents. I am 82 years old and have been granted ADA accommodations due to my age and health. Despite my best efforts, I have been unable to complete the necessary documents within the previously granted *-day extension.
Given my circumstances, I believe this extension falls under the accommodations provided by the ADA and would greatly assist me in ensuring a fair and complete submission.
Thank you for your understanding and consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Good luck with your request!

AI, Please construct an appeal of the following: A dismissal of an order for reconsideration was based both on King's failure to file claims against the Bank of New York Mellon (Bank) in this civil action, and due to the res judicata effect on his claims challenging the Bank's foreclosure from prior litigation. Second: Given prior rulings on this issue within this litigation, should Mr. King again file a motion for reconsideration or an affirmative motion to add the Bank to this civil action in the future, such motion shall be brought to the attention of the undersigned judge prior to it being marked for hearing.

Case Rating: *
Hi Alton! Here's a draft for your appeal:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Honorable [Judge's Name]
[Appeals Court Name]
[Appeals Court Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Appeal of Order Dismissing Motion for Reconsideration in Case No. [Your Case Number]
Dear Judge [Judge's Last Name],
I, [Your Name], respectfully submit this appeal against the order dismissing my motion for reconsideration dated [Order Date]. The dismissal was based on two grounds: (*) my alleged failure to file claims against the Bank of New York Mellon (Bank) in the current civil action, and (*) the res judicata effect on my claims challenging the Bank's foreclosure from prior litigation.

Grounds for Appeal:
*. Failure to File Claims Against the Bank:
- Background: The dismissal of my motion for reconsideration was partly based on my purported failure to include claims against the Bank in the current civil action.
- Argument: I assert that my motion for reconsideration was improperly dismissed on this ground because [provide specific reasoning, e.g., claims were included but overlooked, procedural errors, etc.].
*. Res Judicata Effect:
- Background: The dismissal also cited the res judicata effect of previous litigation on my current claims against the Bank.
- Argument: I contend that the application of res judicata was incorrect because [provide specific reasoning, e.g., new evidence, different legal issues, etc.].

Future Motions:
The order also stated that any future motions for reconsideration or motions to add the Bank to this civil action must be brought to the attention of the undersigned judge before being marked for hearing. I believe this directive is overly restrictive and may unjustly limit my ability to seek redress.

Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, I respectfully request that the Appeals Court overturn the dismissal of my motion for reconsideration and allow my claims against the Bank to proceed.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

Here are the 1st * charges against the re-enjoinment of The bank. *. The parties that paid a company, Race St. Properties, without a proper moving license or a MA approved warehouse should be enjoined. *. Undisputed evidence indicates that the party claiming ownership was based on fraud on the court. *. Undisputed evidence indicates that the parties were not creditors. *. Undisputed evidence indicates that the note was time-barred. *. Undisputed evidence indicates that the mortgage was never properly assigned by a party with the authority to do so. I also mentioned the bank's actual name in the conclusion. Can the judge now claim failure to file claims against the bank

Case Rating: *
It's possible the judge may claim a failure to file claims against the bank if the claims were not properly included or highlighted in your previous filings. However, if the charges and evidence against the bank were mentioned, you may argue that the claims were indeed part of the case.
Would you like to provide more details or need assistance in addressing this issue?

yes

Case Rating: *
Sure, Alton! Here’s a revised draft that incorporates the charges against the bank and addresses the issue of the judge potentially claiming failure to file claims against the bank:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Honorable [Judge's Name]
[Appeals Court Name]
[Appeals Court Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Appeal of Order Dismissing Motion for Reconsideration in Case No. [Your Case Number]
Dear Judge [Judge's Last Name],
I, [Your Name], respectfully submit this appeal against the order dismissing my motion for reconsideration dated [Order Date]. The dismissal was based on two grounds: (*) my alleged failure to file claims against the Bank of New York Mellon (Bank) in the current civil action, and (*) the res judicata effect on my claims challenging the Bank's foreclosure from prior litigation.

Grounds for Appeal:
*. Failure to File Claims Against the Bank:
- Background: The dismissal of my motion for reconsideration was partly based on my purported failure to include claims against the Bank in the current civil action.
- Argument: I assert that my motion for reconsideration was improperly dismissed on this ground because the following charges against the bank were indeed included:
- The parties that paid a company, Race St. Properties, without a proper moving license or a MA approved warehouse should be enjoined.
- Undisputed evidence indicates that the party claiming ownership was based on fraud on the court.
- Undisputed evidence indicates that the parties were not creditors.
- Undisputed evidence indicates that the note was time-barred.
- Undisputed evidence indicates that the mortgage was never properly assigned by a party with the authority to do so.
- These points were explicitly mentioned in the conclusion and are integral to my claims against the Bank.
*. Res Judicata Effect:
- Background: The dismissal also cited the res judicata effect of previous litigation on my current claims against the Bank.
- Argument: I contend that the application of res judicata was incorrect because [provide specific reasoning, e.g., new evidence, different legal issues, etc.].

Future Motions:
The order also stated that any future motions for reconsideration or motions to add the Bank to this civil action must be brought to the attention of the undersigned judge before being marked for hearing. I believe this directive is overly restrictive and may unjustly limit my ability to seek redress.

Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, I respectfully request that the Appeals Court overturn the dismissal of my motion for reconsideration and allow my claims against the Bank to proceed.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

Res judicata does not apply when the origin of all of the subsequent motions were based on Initial fraud on the court lack of jurisdiction. The original assignment of the mortgage was not assigned by MERS and it was not approved by the Northern California bankruptcy court as the original lender was in bankruptcy. Add the non party to the original contract never provided the promissory note or established Article * standing.

Case Rating: *
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?

Please enhance for Res judicata effect; Res judicata does not apply when the origin of all of the subsequent motions were based on Initial fraud on the court lack of jurisdiction. The original assignment of the mortgage was not assigned by MERS and it was not approved by the Northern California bankruptcy court as the original lender was in bankruptcy. Add the non party to the original contract never provided the promissory note or established Article * standing.

Case Rating: *
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, please provide:
- What is your phone number?
- What is your name?
- What is your email address?
- What is your zipcode?
- Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?

Not again. Please enhance; Argument: I contend that the application of res judicata was incorrect because Res judicata does not apply when the origin of all of the subsequent motions were based on Initial fraud on the court lack of jurisdiction. Undisputed evidence indicates the original assignment, December *, *, of the mortgage was fabricated, not authenticated, and not assigned by MERS It also was not approved by the Northern California bankruptcy court as the original lender was in bankruptcy From January *, *, until November *, *. Additionally, Undisputed is that the non party to the original contract never provided the promissory note or established Article * standing.

Case Rating: *
Here is an enhanced version of your argument regarding the application of res judicata:
---
Argument: Incorrect Application of Res Judicata
I contend that the application of res judicata was incorrect for the following reasons:
*. Initial Fraud on the Court and Lack of Jurisdiction:
- Res judicata does not apply when subsequent motions are based on initial fraud on the court and lack of jurisdiction.
*. Fabricated Mortgage Assignment:
- Undisputed evidence indicates that the original assignment of the mortgage on December *, *, was fabricated and not authenticated.
*. Improper Assignment by MERS:
- The mortgage was not assigned by MERS, and this assignment was not approved by the Northern California bankruptcy court.
*. Bankruptcy Status of the Original Lender:
- The original lender was in bankruptcy from January *, *, until November *, *, which further invalidates the assignment.
*. Lack of Standing by Non-Party:
- Undisputed evidence shows that the non-party to the original contract never provided the promissory note or established Article * standing.
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, please provide:
- What is your phone number?
- What is your name?
- What is your email address?
- What is your zipcode?
- Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?

The beginning of my motion included the following; *. Clarification and a written explanation of which docket number to submit Rule *(b)(*) and *(b)(*) claims. *. Pursuant to Massachusetts Rule *, a written explanation, based on findings of fact, of the orders docketed January *, *. These were also omitted but should it be included in the appeal?

Case Rating: *
It's a good idea to include all relevant information in your appeal to strengthen your argument. Here’s a revised version that incorporates the beginning of your motion:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Honorable [Judge's Name]
[Appeals Court Name]
[Appeals Court Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Appeal of Order Dismissing Motion for Reconsideration in Case No. [Your Case Number]
Dear Judge [Judge's Last Name],
I, [Your Name], respectfully submit this appeal against the order dismissing my motion for reconsideration dated [Order Date]. The dismissal was based on two grounds: (*) my alleged failure to file claims against the Bank of New York Mellon (Bank) in the current civil action, and (*) the res judicata effect on my claims challenging the Bank's foreclosure from prior litigation.
Grounds for Appeal:
*. Failure to File Claims Against the Bank:
- Background: The dismissal of my motion for reconsideration was partly based on my purported failure to include claims against the Bank in the current civil action.
- Argument: I assert that my motion for reconsideration was improperly dismissed on this ground because the following charges against the bank were indeed included:
- The parties that paid a company, Race St. Properties, without a proper moving license or a MA approved warehouse should be enjoined.
- Undisputed evidence indicates that the party claiming ownership was based on fraud on the court.
- Undisputed evidence indicates that the parties were not creditors.
- Undisputed evidence indicates that the note was time-barred.
- Undisputed evidence indicates that the mortgage was never properly assigned by a party with the authority to do so.
- These points were explicitly mentioned in the conclusion and are integral to my claims against the Bank.
*. Incorrect Application of Res Judicata:
- Argument: I contend that the application of res judicata was incorrect for the following reasons:
- Res judicata does not apply when subsequent motions are based on initial fraud on the court and lack of jurisdiction.
- Undisputed evidence indicates that the original assignment of the mortgage on December *, *, was fabricated and not authenticated.
- The mortgage was not assigned by MERS, and this assignment was not approved by the Northern California bankruptcy court.
- The original lender was in bankruptcy from January *, *, until November *, *, which further invalidates the assignment.
- Undisputed evidence shows that the non-party to the original contract never provided the promissory note or established Article * standing.
Additional Points:
- Clarification and a written explanation of which docket number to submit Rule *(b)(*) and *(b)(*) claims.
- Pursuant to Massachusetts Rule *, a written explanation, based on findings of fact, of the orders docketed January *, *.
Future Motions:
The order also stated that any future motions for reconsideration or motions to add the Bank to this civil action must be brought to the attention of the undersigned judge before being marked for hearing. I believe this directive is overly restrictive and may unjustly limit my ability to seek redress.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, I respectfully request that the Appeals Court overturn the dismissal of my motion for reconsideration and allow my claims against the Bank to proceed.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

AI, Is there information available as to the training required by the the western mass Sheriff's Department and who is qualified to perform a physical eviction?

Case Rating: *
In Massachusetts, specific training and qualifications are required for sheriff's deputies who perform physical evictions. Generally, the following applies:
- Sheriffs and deputies must complete training programs approved by the Massachusetts Sheriffs' Association.
- Physical evictions are typically performed by deputy sheriffs or constables who are authorized to execute court orders.
Would you like more detailed information on this topic or have any other questions?

yes, And is there a list of who is qualified and when they were trained?

Case Rating: *
In Massachusetts, the qualifications and training of sheriff's deputies who perform physical evictions are generally governed by the Massachusetts Sheriffs' Association. Each department maintains records of deputies' training and qualifications. You can request this information from the specific sheriff's department.
Would you like more detailed assistance or have any other questions?

Being one of their victims it's not likely that they would cooperate with me so how would I get this list?

Case Rating: *
You can request this information through a public records request under the Massachusetts Public Records Law. Here’s how you can go about it:
*. Identify the Records Officer: Find out who the public records officer is for the Western Massachusetts Sheriff's Department.
*. Draft a Request: Write a formal letter requesting the training records and qualifications of deputies involved in physical evictions.

Sample Public Records Request
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Public Records Officer
[Western Massachusetts Sheriff's Department]
[Department Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Public Records Request
Dear Public Records Officer,
Pursuant to the Massachusetts Public Records Law, M.G.L. c. *, § *, I hereby request the following records:
*. A list of individuals qualified to perform physical evictions.
*. Documentation of the training they have received, including training dates and the content of the training programs.
Please provide these records in electronic format if possible. If there are any fees associated with this request, please inform me before processing.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any additional guidance or modifications to this draft?

Where does one find an outline for pro se to filing a brief in the federal district court, Or might AI be able to provide one?

Case Rating: *
Hi! Here’s a brief outline for filing a pro se brief in a federal district court:
*. Title Page:
- Case Caption (Plaintiff v. Defendant)
- Case Number
- Title of the Brief (e.g., "Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment")
- Your Name, Address, and Contact Information
*. Table of Contents:
- List each section with page numbers.
*. Table of Authorities:
- List all legal authorities cited (cases, statutes, regulations, etc.)
*. Introduction:
- Brief summary of the case and the purpose of the brief.
*. Statement of Facts:
- Present a clear and concise account of the relevant facts of the case.
*. Argument:
- Legal arguments with headings and subheadings.
- Cite relevant legal authorities.
*. Conclusion:
- Summarize the arguments and state the specific relief or action you are requesting from the court.
*. Signature Block:
- Your signature, printed name, and date.
*. Certificate of Service:
- Statement that you have served a copy of the brief to the opposing party.
*. Appendix (if needed):
- Attach supporting documents or exhibits.
If you need more detailed information or specific guidance, feel free to ask!

I know there's some leeway for prose litigants. What might be left out

Case Rating: *
Pro se litigants are often given some leeway by courts, but there are still essential elements that should not be omitted from a brief:
- Proper citation of legal authorities.
- Clear and concise Statement of Facts.
- Logical and structured Argument section.
- Compliance with formatting and procedural requirements.
Would you like to know more about any specific part of filing a brief as a pro se litigant?

AI, A warehouser, who did not have the Massachusetts license to to remove property and did not take the possessions to a approved facility has sent me interrogatories. They are asking who I spoke with, when, And what was the conversation about. Can I answer with I don't remember As it was two years ago.

Case Rating: *
You can respond with "I don't remember" if you genuinely do not recall the details of the conversations from two years ago. However, be prepared to explain why you do not remember if questioned further. It's essential to answer truthfully.
Would you like more advice on how to handle these interrogatories?

Yes, And I am 82 years old and no way I could remember almost any of those details

Case Rating: *
Given your age and the time elapsed, you can provide a truthful response while explaining your situation. Here’s a draft for answering the interrogatories:
---
Interrogatory Response:
*. Who did you speak with?
- I do not remember the specific individuals I spoke with regarding this matter, as it occurred over two years ago.
*. When did the conversation occur?
- I am unable to recall the exact dates or times of the conversations due to the significant time that has passed.
*. What was the conversation about?
- Due to the passage of time and my age (82 years old), I do not remember the specific details or content of the conversations.
---
You can include a brief statement explaining your memory issues due to age and the time that has passed to provide context for your answers. This is a truthful and reasonable response given your circumstances.
Would you like any additional help or modifications to this draft?

yes

Case Rating: *
Sure, here’s an enhanced version of your response to the interrogatories:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Opposing Party’s Name]
[Opposing Party’s Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Interrogatory Responses in Case No. [Your Case Number]
Dear [Opposing Party’s Name],
I am responding to the interrogatories you have sent me. Due to the passage of time and my age (82 years old), I have difficulty recalling specific details from over two years ago. Therefore, my responses are based on the best of my recollection.
*. Who did you speak with?
- I do not remember the specific individuals I spoke with regarding this matter, as it occurred over two years ago.
*. When did the conversation occur?
- I am unable to recall the exact dates or times of the conversations due to the significant time that has passed.
*. What was the conversation about?
- Due to the passage of time and my age, I do not remember the specific details or content of the conversations.
Please understand that my inability to recall these details is genuine and not an attempt to withhold information. If you have any further questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Thank you for your understanding.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

I have also put in for ADA accommodations, I have disabilities, and I am receiving mental therapy

Case Rating: *
Hi Alton! Here’s an enhanced version of your response to the interrogatories that includes your ADA accommodations and disabilities:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Opposing Party’s Name]
[Opposing Party’s Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Interrogatory Responses in Case No. [Your Case Number]
Dear [Opposing Party’s Name],
I am responding to the interrogatories you have sent me. Due to the passage of time and my age (82 years old), I have difficulty recalling specific details from over two years ago. Additionally, I have disabilities and am currently receiving mental therapy, which further affects my memory and ability to recall details. Therefore, my responses are based on the best of my recollection.
*. Who did you speak with?
- I do not remember the specific individuals I spoke with regarding this matter, as it occurred over two years ago.
*. When did the conversation occur?
- I am unable to recall the exact dates or times of the conversations due to the significant time that has passed.
*. What was the conversation about?
- Due to the passage of time, my age, and my current disabilities, I do not remember the specific details or content of the conversations.
Please understand that my inability to recall these details is genuine and not an attempt to withhold information. If you have any further questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Thank you for your understanding.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

AI, Warehouser has put in a request for admissions. Please enhance my replies; “The possessions that were removed from my former home located at * Memery Lane, Longmeadow, MA (hereafter Subject Premises) were removed at the instruction of the Hampden County Sheriff’s Office who was hired by The Bank of New York Mellon (hereafter Bank)”. I have not seen a contract as to who hired who. Defendants attorney claimed In court there wasn't a written lease for the Storage facility. This further validates that the storage facility was unapproved by the state of Massachusetts, in addition to the warehouser did not have a license from the Massachusetts board of licensures to remove any property.

Case Rating: *
Sure, here’s an enhanced version of your response to the request for admissions:
---

~Admissions Response:
*. The possessions that were removed from my former home located at * Memery Lane, Longmeadow, MA (hereafter "Subject Premises") were removed at the instruction of the Hampden County Sheriff’s Office, who was hired by The Bank of New York Mellon (hereafter "Bank").
*. I have not seen a contract detailing who hired whom for the removal of my possessions.
*. The defendant's attorney claimed in court that there wasn't a written lease for the storage facility. This further validates that the storage facility was unapproved by the state of Massachusetts.
*. Additionally, the warehouser did not have a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure to remove any property.
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

“The movers hired to remove the items were Race Street Properties, LLC (hereafter Race Street).” I can't answer that I have not seen any contracts

Case Rating: *
Here’s an enhanced version of your response to the request for admissions:
---
Admissions Response:
*. The possessions that were removed from my former home located at * Memery Lane, Longmeadow, MA (hereafter "Subject Premises") were removed at the instruction of the Hampden County Sheriff’s Office, who was hired by The Bank of New York Mellon (hereafter "Bank").
*. I have not seen a contract detailing who hired whom for the removal of my possessions.
*. The defendant's attorney claimed in court that there wasn't a written lease for the storage facility. This further validates that the storage facility was unapproved by the state of Massachusetts.
*. Additionally, the warehouser did not have a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure to remove any property.
*. The movers hired to remove the items were Race Street Properties, LLC (hereafter "Race Street"). I can't answer that as I have not seen any contracts.
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

“Approximately * to * pallets of my possessions were removed from the Subject Premises.” I, along with my associates we're not allowed to see what was happening.

Case Rating: *
Here's an enhanced version of your response to the request for admissions:
---
Admissions Response:
*. Removal of Possessions:
The possessions that were removed from my former home located at * Memery Lane, Longmeadow, MA (hereafter "Subject Premises") were removed at the instruction of the Hampden County Sheriff’s Office, who was hired by The Bank of New York Mellon (hereafter "Bank").
*. Hiring Contracts:
I have not seen a contract detailing who hired whom for the removal of my possessions.
*. Storage Facility Lease:
The defendant's attorney claimed in court that there wasn't a written lease for the storage facility. This further validates that the storage facility was unapproved by the state of Massachusetts.
*. Licensure of Warehouser:
Additionally, the warehouser did not have a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure to remove any property.
*. Movers Information:
The movers hired to remove the items were Race Street Properties, LLC (hereafter "Race Street"). I can't answer that as I have not seen any contracts.
*. Pallets of Possessions:
Approximately * to * pallets of my possessions were removed from the Subject Premises. I, along with my associates, were not allowed to see what was happening.
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

“I have not paid any money or other compensation to Race Street for the storage of my belongings.” My possessions were illegally seized by a party without a required license and taken to an unapproved Massachusetts storage facility. I have not seen a bonding agreement, a legal insurance document for the facility or a license from the Massachusetts board of licensure.

Case Rating: *
Here's an enhanced version of your response to the request for admissions:
---
Admissions Response:
*. Removal of Possessions:
- The possessions that were removed from my former home located at * Memery Lane, Longmeadow, MA (hereafter "Subject Premises") were removed at the instruction of the Hampden County Sheriff’s Office, who was hired by The Bank of New York Mellon (hereafter "Bank").
*. Hiring Contracts:
- I have not seen a contract detailing who hired whom for the removal of my possessions.
*. Storage Facility Lease:
- The defendant's attorney claimed in court that there wasn't a written lease for the storage facility. This further validates that the storage facility was unapproved by the state of Massachusetts.
*. Licensure of Warehouser:
- Additionally, the warehouser did not have a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure to remove any property.
*. Movers Information:
- The movers hired to remove the items were Race Street Properties, LLC (hereafter "Race Street"). I can't answer that as I have not seen any contracts.
*. Pallets of Possessions:
- Approximately * to * pallets of my possessions were removed from the Subject Premises. I, along with my associates, were not allowed to see what was happening.
*. Payment to Race Street:
- I have not paid any money or other compensation to Race Street for the storage of my belongings. My possessions were illegally seized by a party without a required license and taken to an unapproved Massachusetts storage facility. I have not seen a bonding agreement, a legal insurance document for the facility, or a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure.
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

“Pursuant to a mediated agreement in the Western Division Housing Court, I went to the place where my possessions were being stored by Race Street.” The storage facility was South of * Race St. Not * race St.

Case Rating: *
Here's an enhanced version of your response to the request for admissions:
---
Admissions Response:
*. Removal of Possessions:
- The possessions that were removed from my former home located at * Memery Lane, Longmeadow, MA (hereafter "Subject Premises") were removed at the instruction of the Hampden County Sheriff’s Office, who was hired by The Bank of New York Mellon (hereafter "Bank").
*. Hiring Contracts:
- I have not seen a contract detailing who hired whom for the removal of my possessions.
*. Storage Facility Lease:
- The defendant's attorney claimed in court that there wasn't a written lease for the storage facility. This further validates that the storage facility was unapproved by the state of Massachusetts.
*. Licensure of Warehouser:
- Additionally, the warehouser did not have a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure to remove any property.
*. Movers Information:
- The movers hired to remove the items were Race Street Properties, LLC (hereafter "Race Street"). I can't answer that as I have not seen any contracts.
*. Pallets of Possessions:
- Approximately * to * pallets of my possessions were removed from the Subject Premises. I, along with my associates, were not allowed to see what was happening.
*. Payment to Race Street:
- I have not paid any money or other compensation to Race Street for the storage of my belongings. My possessions were illegally seized by a party without a required license and taken to an unapproved Massachusetts storage facility. I have not seen a bonding agreement, a legal insurance document for the facility, or a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure.
*. Mediated Agreement and Storage Facility Location:
- Pursuant to a mediated agreement in the Western Division Housing Court, I went to the place where my possessions were being stored by Race Street. The storage facility was South of * Race St., not * Race St.
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

“I was provided with box cutters or similar object by Race Street.” Yes “At that time, I did not remove any items from Race Street property where my possessions were being stored.” I did remove some papers as I was looking for my federal passport, which I did not find.

Case Rating: *
Here’s an enhanced version of your response to the request for admissions:
---
Admissions Response:
*. Removal of Possessions:
- The possessions that were removed from my former home located at * Memery Lane, Longmeadow, MA (hereafter "Subject Premises") were removed at the instruction of the Hampden County Sheriff’s Office, who was hired by The Bank of New York Mellon (hereafter "Bank").
*. Hiring Contracts:
- I have not seen a contract detailing who hired whom for the removal of my possessions.
*. Storage Facility Lease:
- The defendant's attorney claimed in court that there wasn't a written lease for the storage facility. This further validates that the storage facility was unapproved by the state of Massachusetts.
*. Licensure of Warehouser:
- Additionally, the warehouser did not have a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure to remove any property.
*. Movers Information:
- The movers hired to remove the items were Race Street Properties, LLC (hereafter "Race Street"). I can't answer that as I have not seen any contracts.
*. Pallets of Possessions:
- Approximately * to * pallets of my possessions were removed from the Subject Premises. I, along with my associates, were not allowed to see what was happening.
*. Payment to Race Street:
- I have not paid any money or other compensation to Race Street for the storage of my belongings. My possessions were illegally seized by a party without a required license and taken to an unapproved Massachusetts storage facility. I have not seen a bonding agreement, a legal insurance document for the facility, or a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure.
*. Mediated Agreement and Storage Facility Location:
- Pursuant to a mediated agreement in the Western Division Housing Court, I went to the place where my possessions were being stored by Race Street. The storage facility was South of * Race St., not * Race St.
*. Provided with Box Cutters:
- I was provided with box cutters or a similar object by Race Street.
*. Removal of Items:
- At that time, I did remove some papers as I was looking for my federal passport, which I did not find.
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

*. “Race Street has offered to return my possessions to me.” Yes, but not back to where they illegally took them from. *. “Race Street has offered to deliver (move) my possessions to a storage place of my choosing.” Yes

Case Rating: *
Here’s an enhanced version of your response to the request for admissions:
---
Admissions Response:
*. Removal of Possessions:
- The possessions that were removed from my former home located at * Memery Lane, Longmeadow, MA (hereafter "Subject Premises") were removed at the instruction of the Hampden County Sheriff’s Office, who was hired by The Bank of New York Mellon (hereafter "Bank").
*. Hiring Contracts:
- I have not seen a contract detailing who hired whom for the removal of my possessions.
*. Storage Facility Lease:
- The defendant's attorney claimed in court that there wasn't a written lease for the storage facility. This further validates that the storage facility was unapproved by the state of Massachusetts.
*. Licensure of Warehouser:
- Additionally, the warehouser did not have a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure to remove any property.
*. Movers Information:
- The movers hired to remove the items were Race Street Properties, LLC (hereafter "Race Street"). I can't answer that as I have not seen any contracts.
*. Pallets of Possessions:
- Approximately * to * pallets of my possessions were removed from the Subject Premises. I, along with my associates, were not allowed to see what was happening.
*. Payment to Race Street:
- I have not paid any money or other compensation to Race Street for the storage of my belongings. My possessions were illegally seized by a party without a required license and taken to an unapproved Massachusetts storage facility. I have not seen a bonding agreement, a legal insurance document for the facility, or a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure.
*. Mediated Agreement and Storage Facility Location:
- Pursuant to a mediated agreement in the Western Division Housing Court, I went to the place where my possessions were being stored by Race Street. The storage facility was South of * Race St., not * Race St.
*. Provided with Box Cutters:
- I was provided with box cutters or a similar object by Race Street.
*. Removal of Items:
- At that time, I did remove some papers as I was looking for my federal passport, which I did not find.
*. Race Street's Offer to Return Possessions:
- Race Street has offered to return my possessions to me, but not back to where they illegally took them from.
*. Race Street's Offer to Move Possessions:
- Race Street has offered to deliver (move) my possessions to a storage place of my choosing.
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

“During the time my possessions have been at Race Street, I have not had a place to store my personal property.” Had my possessions not been illegally seized I would not have needed a place to store my personal property. *. “I have stated in Court to Judge Robert Fields that I do not have sufficient money to pay for the storage of my possessions at an alternate location. Far more important, why should I have to pay for an unauthorized entity to illegally seize my property.

Case Rating: *
Here’s an enhanced version of your response to the request for admissions:
---
Admissions Response:
*. Removal of Possessions:
- The possessions that were removed from my former home located at * Memery Lane, Longmeadow, MA (hereafter "Subject Premises") were removed at the instruction of the Hampden County Sheriff’s Office, who was hired by The Bank of New York Mellon (hereafter "Bank").
*. Hiring Contracts:
- I have not seen a contract detailing who hired whom for the removal of my possessions.
*. Storage Facility Lease:
- The defendant's attorney claimed in court that there wasn't a written lease for the storage facility. This further validates that the storage facility was unapproved by the state of Massachusetts.
*. Licensure of Warehouser:
- Additionally, the warehouser did not have a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure to remove any property.
*. Movers Information:
- The movers hired to remove the items were Race Street Properties, LLC (hereafter "Race Street"). I can't answer that as I have not seen any contracts.
*. Pallets of Possessions:
- Approximately * to * pallets of my possessions were removed from the Subject Premises. I, along with my associates, were not allowed to see what was happening.
*. Payment to Race Street:
- I have not paid any money or other compensation to Race Street for the storage of my belongings. My possessions were illegally seized by a party without a required license and taken to an unapproved Massachusetts storage facility. I have not seen a bonding agreement, a legal insurance document for the facility, or a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure.
*. Mediated Agreement and Storage Facility Location:
- Pursuant to a mediated agreement in the Western Division Housing Court, I went to the place where my possessions were being stored by Race Street. The storage facility was South of * Race St., not * Race St.
*. Provided with Box Cutters:
- I was provided with box cutters or a similar object by Race Street.
*. Removal of Items:
- At that time, I did remove some papers as I was looking for my federal passport, which I did not find.
*. Race Street's Offer to Return Possessions:
- Race Street has offered to return my possessions to me, but not back to where they illegally took them from.
*. Race Street's Offer to Move Possessions:
- Race Street has offered to deliver (move) my possessions to a storage place of my choosing.
*. Lack of Storage Place:
- During the time my possessions have been at Race Street, I have not had a place to store my personal property. Had my possessions not been illegally seized, I would not have needed a place to store my personal property.
*. Statement to Judge:
- I have stated in Court to Judge Robert Fields that I do not have sufficient money to pay for the storage of my possessions at an alternate location. Far more important, why should I have to pay for an unauthorized entity to illegally seize my property.
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

please add; These are violations of mass general laws C * Section *. The warehouser has yet to provide documentation of being bonded, licensed, and insured.

Case Rating: *
Here’s an enhanced version of your response to the request for admissions, including the additional information about the violations of Massachusetts General Laws:
---
Admissions Response:
*. Removal of Possessions:
- The possessions that were removed from my former home located at * Memery Lane, Longmeadow, MA (hereafter "Subject Premises") were removed at the instruction of the Hampden County Sheriff’s Office, who was hired by The Bank of New York Mellon (hereafter "Bank").

*. Hiring Contracts:
- I have not seen a contract detailing who hired whom for the removal of my possessions.

*. Storage Facility Lease:
- The defendant's attorney claimed in court that there wasn't a written lease for the storage facility. This further validates that the storage facility was unapproved by the state of Massachusetts.

*. Licensure of Warehouser:
- Additionally, the warehouser did not have a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure to remove any property.

*. Movers Information:
- The movers hired to remove the items were Race Street Properties, LLC (hereafter "Race Street"). I can't answer that as I have not seen any contracts.

*. Pallets of Possessions:
- Approximately * to * pallets of my possessions were removed from the Subject Premises. I, along with my associates, were not allowed to see what was happening.

*. Payment to Race Street:
- I have not paid any money or other compensation to Race Street for the storage of my belongings. My possessions were illegally seized by a party without a required license and taken to an unapproved Massachusetts storage facility. I have not seen a bonding agreement, a legal insurance document for the facility, or a license from the Massachusetts Board of Licensure.

*. Mediated Agreement and Storage Facility Location:
- Pursuant to a mediated agreement in the Western Division Housing Court, I went to the place where my possessions were being stored by Race Street. The storage facility was South of * Race St., not * Race St.

*. Provided with Box Cutters:
- I was provided with box cutters or a similar object by Race Street.

*. Removal of Items:
- At that time, I did remove some papers as I was looking for my federal passport, which I did not find.

*. Race Street's Offer to Return Possessions:
- Race Street has offered to return my possessions to me, but not back to where they illegally took them from.

*. Race Street's Offer to Move Possessions:
- Race Street has offered to deliver (move) my possessions to a storage place of my choosing.

*. Lack of Storage Place:
- During the time my possessions have been at Race Street, I have not had a place to store my personal property. Had my possessions not been illegally seized, I would not have needed a place to store my personal property.

*. Statement to Judge:
- I have stated in Court to Judge Robert Fields that I do not have sufficient money to pay for the storage of my possessions at an alternate location. Far more important, why should I have to pay for an unauthorized entity to illegally seize my property.

*. Violations of Massachusetts General Laws:
- These actions are violations of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. The warehouser has yet to provide documentation of being bonded, licensed, and insured.
---
Would you like any additional enhancements or modifications to this draft?

Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

90 Day Cure Notice Discrepancy

Summary

Full Conversation

Related Chats