TRY ME!
Motion To Deny Extension
Summary
The motion involves responding to opposing counsels request to deny an extension in a bankruptcy case. Key points include addressing significant legal issues, fraudulent circumstances, and the need for thorough examination and preparation. The motion highlights the purchase of a default judgment as part of a broader conspiracy involving mortgage and bankruptcy fraud. It also discusses the involvement of Mr. Grieco in fraudulent conveyance and breach of fiduciary duty. The defendants seek to contest the writ of execution and request an emergency stay, emphasizing the need for additional time to address these complex issues.Full Conversation
MOTION TO RESPOND TO OPPOSING COUNSEL'S REQUEST TO DENY EXTENSION
Now come the Defendants, Mr. James Cronan and Karen Merritt, respectfully submitting this motion to respond to the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension regarding the case related to Classic Display, Inc. (Case No: *:*-bk-*) by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island. The opposing counsel's objections are based on incorrect assertions and a failure to consider the fraudulent circumstances and significant legal issues involved in this case.
In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows:
*. Fraud on the Court:
Of course, I'd be happy to help you draft your motion. Let's start by addressing the key points clearly and concisely. Here is a suggested continuation:
---
In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows:
*. Fraud on the Court:
- The opposing counsel has failed to acknowledge the substantial evidence proving fraudulent activities by the plaintiffs.
- Defendants have documented instances where critical information was intentionally misrepresented.
*. Significant Legal Issues:
- The case involves complex legal matters that require thorough examination, which justifies the need for an extension.
- Denying the extension would result in undue hardship and could compromise the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Precedent and Fairness:
- Granting extensions is a common practice in similar cases to ensure all parties have adequate time to prepare.
- The court’s primary goal should be to ensure a fair trial, which necessitates considering the defendants' request for additional time.
---
In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows:
*. Fraud on the Court:
- The opposing counsel has failed to acknowledge the substantial evidence proving fraudulent activities by the plaintiffs.
- Defendants have documented instances where critical information was intentionally misrepresented.
*. Significant Legal Issues:
- The case involves complex legal matters that require thorough examination, which justifies the need for an extension.
- Denying the extension would result in undue hardship and could compromise the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Precedent and Fairness:
- Granting extensions is a common practice in similar cases to ensure all parties have adequate time to prepare.
- The court’s primary goal should be to ensure a fair trial, which necessitates considering the defendants' request for additional time.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, Defendants respectfully request that the court deny the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension and grant the necessary time to address the significant legal issues and fraudulent circumstances involved in this case.
---
Would you like any
For the reasons stated above, Defendants respectfully request that the court deny the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension and grant the necessary time to address the significant legal issues and fraudulent circumstances involved in this case.
---
Would you like any
Please keep updating *. Significant Legal Issues: The case involves substantial legal questions that require thorough examination and preparation, which cannot be adequately addressed without the requested extension.
*. Fraudulent Circumstances: There are fraudulent circumstances surrounding the case that need to be investigated and documented properly. Adequate time is essential to gather all relevant evidence.
*. Incorrect Assertions by Opposing Counsel: The objections raised by the opposing counsel are based on incorrect assertions that do not reflect the true nature of the case or the evidence available.
*. Health-Related Challenges:
Sure, I'll help you incorporate those points into your motion. Here's an updated draft:
---
---
MOTION TO RESPOND TO OPPOSING COUNSEL'S REQUEST TO DENY EXTENSION
Now come the Defendants, Mr. James Cronan and Karen Merritt, respectfully submitting this motion to respond to the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension regarding the case related to Classic Display, Inc. (Case No: *:*-bk-*) by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island. The opposing counsel's objections are based on incorrect assertions and a failure to consider the fraudulent circumstances and significant legal issues involved in this case.
In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows:
*. Significant Legal Issues:
- The case involves substantial legal questions that require thorough examination and preparation, which cannot be adequately addressed without the requested extension.
- Denying the extension would result in undue hardship and could compromise the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Fraudulent Circumstances:
- There are fraudulent circumstances surrounding the case that need to be investigated and documented properly. Adequate time is essential to gather all relevant evidence.
- The opposing counsel has failed
Now come the Defendants, Mr. James Cronan and Karen Merritt, respectfully submitting this motion to respond to the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension regarding the case related to Classic Display, Inc. (Case No: *:*-bk-*) by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island. The opposing counsel's objections are based on incorrect assertions and a failure to consider the fraudulent circumstances and significant legal issues involved in this case.
In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows:
*. Significant Legal Issues:
- The case involves substantial legal questions that require thorough examination and preparation, which cannot be adequately addressed without the requested extension.
- Denying the extension would result in undue hardship and could compromise the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Fraudulent Circumstances:
- There are fraudulent circumstances surrounding the case that need to be investigated and documented properly. Adequate time is essential to gather all relevant evidence.
- The opposing counsel has failed
*. Fraud on the Court: - The judgment in question was entered under fraudulent circumstances. Rule *(b)(*) explicitly states that judgments obtained through fraud are void. The opposing counsel's assertion that this is a purely administrative proceeding is incorrect, as it fails to consider the fraudulent actions that invalidate the judgment. - The purchase of the alleged default judgment is the latest overt act stemming from a foreclosure rescue scam since *. *. Response toopposing counsel's Claim Preclusion Argument: - Opposing counsel argues that claim preclusion makes a valid, final judgment conclusive on the parties and their privies, preventing the relitigation of all matters that were or could have been adjudicated in the action, citing the Kobrin and O'Neil decisions. However, what Mr.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're dealing with a complex legal matter involving allegations of fraud, significant legal issues, and claim preclusion arguments.
To better assist you, it would be helpful to know:
- Have you gathered all the necessary evidence to support your fraud claims?
- Are there any specific legal precedents you plan to cite in your motion?
It seems like you're dealing with a complex legal matter involving allegations of fraud, significant legal issues, and claim preclusion arguments.
To better assist you, it would be helpful to know:
- Have you gathered all the necessary evidence to support your fraud claims?
- Are there any specific legal precedents you plan to cite in your motion?
Godbout fails to present to this court is that he has been aiding and abetting his clients in mortgage fraud conspiracy, mail fraud conspiracy, and other significant crimes against the federal government and Ms. Merritt and her family. Therefore, the Kobrin and O'Neil decisionsare not applicable here, as they are based on a valid judgment being conclusive on the parties, not one obtained through substantial fraud on the court. - It appears that the opposing counsel is trying to downplay the significance of the case by labeling it as an "administrative action." However, given the fraudulent circumstances and complex legal issues involved, this label could be seen as an attempt to obscure the true natureof the case.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like a complex case involving fraud and significant legal issues. Here are some general steps to consider:
- Document Evidence: Ensure all evidence supporting the fraud claims is well-documented.
- Legal Precedents: Identify and cite relevant legal precedents.
- Health-Related Challenges: Mention any health-related challenges faced by the defendants as a reason for the extension.
Would you like detailed information on any specific legal aspects or precedents?
It sounds like a complex case involving fraud and significant legal issues. Here are some general steps to consider:
- Document Evidence: Ensure all evidence supporting the fraud claims is well-documented.
- Legal Precedents: Identify and cite relevant legal precedents.
- Health-Related Challenges: Mention any health-related challenges faced by the defendants as a reason for the extension.
Would you like detailed information on any specific legal aspects or precedents?
*. Significance of Mr. Grieco's Ownership: - It is important to note that Mr. Grieco, the Defandandant's long term CPA, is the other owner of * Fountain Street LLC, having acquired it on April *, * through a fraudulent conveyance and fraud on this Court. This omission is significant as it impacts the credibility and transparency of * Fountain Street LLC’s actions. Exhibit *: The transfer of the title of * Fountain Street to Mr. Grieco and Mr. Tiernan from Classic Display Inc, Mr. Cronan.*. Breach of Fiduciary Duty: - Mr. Grieco is also a debtor. Both Ms. Merritt and Mr. Cronan have a counterclaim in the Superior Court of Massachusetts seeking significant damages for his breach of fiduciary duty. The fraudulent conveyance and misrepresentation are part of a broader conspiracy involving mortgage fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and other related crimes. Exhibit *: Civil Cover Sheet filed by Mr. Grieco’s counsel in Superior Court MA
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a highly complex legal case involving allegations of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and other significant issues. Here are some key points to consider for your motion:
- Evidence Documentation: Gather and document all evidence supporting claims of fraud and misrepresentation.
- Legal Precedents: Cite relevant legal precedents to strengthen your arguments.
- Health-Related Challenges: Mention any health-related challenges as a reason for needing the extension.
Would you like more detailed information on any specific legal aspect or precedent?
It sounds like you're dealing with a highly complex legal case involving allegations of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and other significant issues. Here are some key points to consider for your motion:
- Evidence Documentation: Gather and document all evidence supporting claims of fraud and misrepresentation.
- Legal Precedents: Cite relevant legal precedents to strengthen your arguments.
- Health-Related Challenges: Mention any health-related challenges as a reason for needing the extension.
Would you like more detailed information on any specific legal aspect or precedent?
please draft the motion *. Malicious Civil Conspiracy: - The purchase of the default judgment is the latest overt act under the elements of malicious civil conspiracy. Mr. Cronan alleges that this purchase is part of a broader conspiracy to commit mortgage fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and other related crimes. All of the entities involved are conspiring to retain their ill-gotten gains by manipulating the courts. In this case, they are attempting to deceive the Court into believing that one of the entities is a "good faith" creditor.This is not true. As stated the assigness of * Founatin St LLc the plaintiff in this matter are trying merely to keep their funds that they recived through fruadlent means. Additionally Defandants are filing a Motion to United States Bankruptcy Court District of Rhode Island Classic Display, Inc. Case No: *:*-bk-* Motion to Contest Writ of Execution and Request for Emergency Stay tomorrow morning having just completed the motion.
Case Rating: *
Here's a draft for your motion:
---
Here's a draft for your motion:
---
MOTION TO RESPOND TO OPPOSING COUNSEL'S REQUEST TO DENY EXTENSION
Now come the Defendants, Mr. James Cronan and Karen Merritt, respectfully submitting this motion to respond to the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension regarding the case related to Classic Display, Inc. (Case No: *:*-bk-*) by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island. The opposing counsel's objections are based on incorrect assertions and a failure to consider the fraudulent circumstances and significant legal issues involved in this case.
In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows:
*. Significant Legal Issues:
- The case involves substantial legal questions that require thorough examination and preparation, which cannot be adequately addressed without the requested extension.
- Denying the extension would result in undue hardship and could compromise the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Fraudulent Circumstances:
- The judgment in question was entered under fraudulent circumstances. Rule *(b)(*) explicitly states that judgments obtained through fraud are void.
- The purchase of the alleged default judgment is
Now come the Defendants, Mr. James Cronan and Karen Merritt, respectfully submitting this motion to respond to the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension regarding the case related to Classic Display, Inc. (Case No: *:*-bk-*) by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island. The opposing counsel's objections are based on incorrect assertions and a failure to consider the fraudulent circumstances and significant legal issues involved in this case.
In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows:
*. Significant Legal Issues:
- The case involves substantial legal questions that require thorough examination and preparation, which cannot be adequately addressed without the requested extension.
- Denying the extension would result in undue hardship and could compromise the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Fraudulent Circumstances:
- The judgment in question was entered under fraudulent circumstances. Rule *(b)(*) explicitly states that judgments obtained through fraud are void.
- The purchase of the alleged default judgment is
please send it without the borderline
Case Rating: *
Sure, here is the draft without the borderlines:
MOTION TO RESPOND TO OPPOSING COUNSEL'S REQUEST TO DENY EXTENSION
Now come the Defendants, Mr. James Cronan and Karen Merritt, respectfully submitting this motion to respond to the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension regarding the case related to Classic Display, Inc. (Case No: *:*-bk-*) by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island. The opposing counsel's objections are based on incorrect assertions and a failure to consider the fraudulent circumstances and significant legal issues involved in this case.
In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows:
*. Significant Legal Issues:
- The case involves substantial legal questions that require thorough examination and preparation, which cannot be adequately addressed without the requested extension.
- Denying the extension would result in undue hardship and could compromise the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Fraudulent Circumstances:
- The judgment in question was entered under fraudulent circumstances. Rule *(b)(*) explicitly states that judgments obtained through fraud are void.
- The purchase of the alleged default judgment is the latest overt act stemming from
Sure, here is the draft without the borderlines:
MOTION TO RESPOND TO OPPOSING COUNSEL'S REQUEST TO DENY EXTENSION
Now come the Defendants, Mr. James Cronan and Karen Merritt, respectfully submitting this motion to respond to the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension regarding the case related to Classic Display, Inc. (Case No: *:*-bk-*) by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island. The opposing counsel's objections are based on incorrect assertions and a failure to consider the fraudulent circumstances and significant legal issues involved in this case.
In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows:
*. Significant Legal Issues:
- The case involves substantial legal questions that require thorough examination and preparation, which cannot be adequately addressed without the requested extension.
- Denying the extension would result in undue hardship and could compromise the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Fraudulent Circumstances:
- The judgment in question was entered under fraudulent circumstances. Rule *(b)(*) explicitly states that judgments obtained through fraud are void.
- The purchase of the alleged default judgment is the latest overt act stemming from
now from "- The purchase of the alleged default judgment is the latest overt act stemming from" onward keeping without the borderline.
Case Rating: *
Sure, here is the continuation from where you specified:
- The purchase of the alleged default judgment is the latest overt act stemming from a foreclosure rescue scam since *.
*. Response to Opposing Counsel's Claim Preclusion Argument:
- Opposing counsel argues that claim preclusion makes a valid, final judgment conclusive on the parties and their privies, preventing the relitigation of all matters that were or could have been adjudicated in the action, citing the Kobrin and O'Neil decisions. However, what Mr. Godbout fails to present to this court is that he has been aiding and abetting his clients in mortgage fraud conspiracy, mail fraud conspiracy, and other significant crimes against the federal government and Ms. Merritt and her family. Therefore, the Kobrin and O'Neil decisions are not applicable here, as they are based on a valid judgment being conclusive on the parties, not one obtained through substantial fraud on the court.
- It appears that the opposing counsel is trying to downplay the significance of the case by labeling it as an "administrative action." However, given the fraudulent circumstances and complex legal issues involved, this label could be seen as an attempt to obscure the true nature of the
Sure, here is the continuation from where you specified:
- The purchase of the alleged default judgment is the latest overt act stemming from a foreclosure rescue scam since *.
*. Response to Opposing Counsel's Claim Preclusion Argument:
- Opposing counsel argues that claim preclusion makes a valid, final judgment conclusive on the parties and their privies, preventing the relitigation of all matters that were or could have been adjudicated in the action, citing the Kobrin and O'Neil decisions. However, what Mr. Godbout fails to present to this court is that he has been aiding and abetting his clients in mortgage fraud conspiracy, mail fraud conspiracy, and other significant crimes against the federal government and Ms. Merritt and her family. Therefore, the Kobrin and O'Neil decisions are not applicable here, as they are based on a valid judgment being conclusive on the parties, not one obtained through substantial fraud on the court.
- It appears that the opposing counsel is trying to downplay the significance of the case by labeling it as an "administrative action." However, given the fraudulent circumstances and complex legal issues involved, this label could be seen as an attempt to obscure the true nature of the
Now from "- It appears that the opposing counsel is trying to downplay the significance of the case by labeling it as an "administrative action." However, given the fraudulent circumstances and complex legal issues involved, this label could be seen as an attempt to obscure the true nature of the" onward keeping without the borderline
Case Rating: *
Sure, here is the continuation from where you specified:
- It appears that the opposing counsel is trying to downplay the significance of the case by labeling it as an "administrative action." However, given the fraudulent circumstances and complex legal issues involved, this label could be seen as an attempt to obscure the true nature of the case.
Would you like any further assistance with this document or any other legal aspects?
Sure, here is the continuation from where you specified:
- It appears that the opposing counsel is trying to downplay the significance of the case by labeling it as an "administrative action." However, given the fraudulent circumstances and complex legal issues involved, this label could be seen as an attempt to obscure the true nature of the case.
Would you like any further assistance with this document or any other legal aspects?
it is important that is how that there are tweo court cases pending on this matter The default judgment was purchased by * Fountain Street LLC and Mr. Tiernan as its assignee for $*,*, significantly below its value of $*,*, to offset damages in a lawsuit that Defendant, Karen Merritt, has against Mr. Tiernan in the United States Court for the District of Rhode Island for claims including illegal foreclosure, usury violations, breach of contract, and violations under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A. Exhibit *: Evidence of ongoing federal court proceedings.-*. Significance of Mr. Grieco's Ownership: - It is important to note that Mr. Grieco, the Defandandant's long term CPA, is the other owner of * Fountain Street LLC, having
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a very complex case involving multiple legal issues, including fraudulent circumstances, significant legal questions, and breach of fiduciary duty. Here are some key points to consider:
- Gather and document all evidence supporting your claims of fraud and misrepresentation.
- Cite relevant legal precedents to strengthen your arguments.
- Highlight any health-related challenges as a reason for needing the extension.
Is there any specific legal aspect or precedent you need detailed information on?
It seems like you have a very complex case involving multiple legal issues, including fraudulent circumstances, significant legal questions, and breach of fiduciary duty. Here are some key points to consider:
- Gather and document all evidence supporting your claims of fraud and misrepresentation.
- Cite relevant legal precedents to strengthen your arguments.
- Highlight any health-related challenges as a reason for needing the extension.
Is there any specific legal aspect or precedent you need detailed information on?
acquired it on April *, * through a fraudulent conveyance and fraud on this Court. This omission is significant as it impacts the credibility and transparency of * Fountain Street LLC’s actions. Mr. Grieco is also a debtor. Both Ms. Merritt and Mr. Cronan have a counterclaim in the Superior Court of Massachusetts seeking significant damages for his breach of fiduciary duty. The fraudulent conveyance and misrepresentation are part of a broader conspiracy involving mortgage fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and other related crimes. Exhibit *: Civil Cover Sheet filed
Case Rating: *
Your case involves complex legal issues, including fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and potential conspiracy. Here are some key points to consider:
- Document Evidence: Ensure all evidence supporting your claims is well-documented.
- Legal Precedents: Cite relevant legal precedents to strengthen your arguments.
- Health-Related Challenges: Mention any health-related challenges as a reason for needing the extension.
Would you like more detailed information on any specific legal aspect or assistance with drafting any other parts of your motion?
Your case involves complex legal issues, including fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and potential conspiracy. Here are some key points to consider:
- Document Evidence: Ensure all evidence supporting your claims is well-documented.
- Legal Precedents: Cite relevant legal precedents to strengthen your arguments.
- Health-Related Challenges: Mention any health-related challenges as a reason for needing the extension.
Would you like more detailed information on any specific legal aspect or assistance with drafting any other parts of your motion?
by Mr. Grieco’s counsel in Superior Court MA . The default judgement purchase was ourchased as the latest overt act and not an isolated act as Mr. godbout wants you to believe that his client is just a creditor who purchase a valed dfault judgment. this is untrue. Its deceptive. Rather its the latest overt act of a long running scheme. In suppirt of my argment here are both of the court cases showing that Ms Mrritt and Mr Cronan are creditors.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you are dealing with a complex legal matter involving multiple aspects of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and significant legal issues. Would you like to connect with local lawyers who can provide more detailed assistance with your case?
If yes, could you please provide the following details?
*. Your phone number
*. Your name
*. Your email address (optional)
*. Your zipcode or city
Additionally, could you provide a brief summary of your legal issue?
It sounds like you are dealing with a complex legal matter involving multiple aspects of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and significant legal issues. Would you like to connect with local lawyers who can provide more detailed assistance with your case?
If yes, could you please provide the following details?
*. Your phone number
*. Your name
*. Your email address (optional)
*. Your zipcode or city
Additionally, could you provide a brief summary of your legal issue?
please write the motion the court is waiting for it now.
Case Rating: *
Sure, here's the full motion based on the points you provided:
---
MOTION TO RESPOND TO OPPOSING COUNSEL'S REQUEST TO DENY EXTENSION
Now come the Defendants, Mr. James Cronan and Karen Merritt, respectfully submitting this motion to respond to the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension regarding the case related to Classic Display, Inc. (Case No: *:*-bk-*) by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island. The opposing counsel's objections are based on incorrect assertions and a failure to consider the fraudulent circumstances and significant legal issues involved in this case.
In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows:
*. Significant Legal Issues:
- The case involves substantial legal questions that require thorough examination and preparation, which cannot be adequately addressed without the requested extension.
- Denying the extension would result in undue hardship and could compromise the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Fraudulent Circumstances:
- The judgment in question was entered under fraudulent circumstances. Rule *(b)(*) explicitly states that judgments obtained through fraud are void.
- The purchase
Sure, here's the full motion based on the points you provided:
---
MOTION TO RESPOND TO OPPOSING COUNSEL'S REQUEST TO DENY EXTENSION
Now come the Defendants, Mr. James Cronan and Karen Merritt, respectfully submitting this motion to respond to the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension regarding the case related to Classic Display, Inc. (Case No: *:*-bk-*) by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island. The opposing counsel's objections are based on incorrect assertions and a failure to consider the fraudulent circumstances and significant legal issues involved in this case.
In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows:
*. Significant Legal Issues:
- The case involves substantial legal questions that require thorough examination and preparation, which cannot be adequately addressed without the requested extension.
- Denying the extension would result in undue hardship and could compromise the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Fraudulent Circumstances:
- The judgment in question was entered under fraudulent circumstances. Rule *(b)(*) explicitly states that judgments obtained through fraud are void.
- The purchase
now from * onward keeping without the borderline
Case Rating: *
Sure, here is the motion from the specified point onward:
*. Fraudulent Circumstances:
- The judgment in question was entered under fraudulent circumstances. Rule *(b)(*) explicitly states that judgments obtained through fraud are void.
- The purchase of the alleged default judgment is the latest overt act stemming from a foreclosure rescue scam since *.
*. Response to Opposing Counsel's Claim Preclusion Argument:
- Opposing counsel argues that claim preclusion makes a valid, final judgment conclusive on the parties and their privies, preventing the relitigation of all matters that were or could have been adjudicated in the action, citing the Kobrin and O'Neil decisions. However, what Mr. Godbout fails to present to this court is that he has been aiding and abetting his clients in mortgage fraud conspiracy, mail fraud conspiracy, and other significant crimes against the federal government and Ms. Merritt and her family. Therefore, the Kobrin and O'Neil decisions are not applicable here, as they are based on a valid judgment being conclusive on the parties, not one obtained through substantial fraud on the court.
- It appears that the opposing counsel is trying to downplay the significance of
Sure, here is the motion from the specified point onward:
*. Fraudulent Circumstances:
- The judgment in question was entered under fraudulent circumstances. Rule *(b)(*) explicitly states that judgments obtained through fraud are void.
- The purchase of the alleged default judgment is the latest overt act stemming from a foreclosure rescue scam since *.
*. Response to Opposing Counsel's Claim Preclusion Argument:
- Opposing counsel argues that claim preclusion makes a valid, final judgment conclusive on the parties and their privies, preventing the relitigation of all matters that were or could have been adjudicated in the action, citing the Kobrin and O'Neil decisions. However, what Mr. Godbout fails to present to this court is that he has been aiding and abetting his clients in mortgage fraud conspiracy, mail fraud conspiracy, and other significant crimes against the federal government and Ms. Merritt and her family. Therefore, the Kobrin and O'Neil decisions are not applicable here, as they are based on a valid judgment being conclusive on the parties, not one obtained through substantial fraud on the court.
- It appears that the opposing counsel is trying to downplay the significance of
now from "it appears that the .." onward
Case Rating: *
Sure, here is the continuation:
- It appears that the opposing counsel is trying to downplay the significance of the case by labeling it as an "administrative action." However, given the fraudulent circumstances and complex legal issues involved, this label could be seen as an attempt to obscure the true nature of the case.
*. Pending Court Cases:
- The default judgment was purchased by * Fountain Street LLC and Mr. Tiernan as its assignee for $*,*, significantly below its value of $*,*, to offset damages in a lawsuit that Defendant, Karen Merritt, has against Mr. Tiernan in the United States Court for the District of Rhode Island for claims including illegal foreclosure, usury violations, breach of contract, and violations under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A. Exhibit *: Evidence of ongoing federal court proceedings.
- It is important to note that Mr. Grieco, the Defendant's long-term CPA, is the other owner of * Fountain Street LLC, having acquired it on April *, *, through a fraudulent conveyance and fraud on this Court. This omission is significant as it impacts the credibility and transparency of * Fountain Street LLC’s actions
Sure, here is the continuation:
- It appears that the opposing counsel is trying to downplay the significance of the case by labeling it as an "administrative action." However, given the fraudulent circumstances and complex legal issues involved, this label could be seen as an attempt to obscure the true nature of the case.
*. Pending Court Cases:
- The default judgment was purchased by * Fountain Street LLC and Mr. Tiernan as its assignee for $*,*, significantly below its value of $*,*, to offset damages in a lawsuit that Defendant, Karen Merritt, has against Mr. Tiernan in the United States Court for the District of Rhode Island for claims including illegal foreclosure, usury violations, breach of contract, and violations under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A. Exhibit *: Evidence of ongoing federal court proceedings.
- It is important to note that Mr. Grieco, the Defendant's long-term CPA, is the other owner of * Fountain Street LLC, having acquired it on April *, *, through a fraudulent conveyance and fraud on this Court. This omission is significant as it impacts the credibility and transparency of * Fountain Street LLC’s actions
Now from "and fraud on this Court. This omission is significant as it impacts the credibility and transparency of * Fountain Street LLC’s actions" onward keeping without the borderline.
Case Rating: *
Sure, here is the continuation:
and fraud on this Court. This omission is significant as it impacts the credibility and transparency of * Fountain Street LLC’s actions. Mr. Grieco is also a debtor. Both Ms. Merritt and Mr. Cronan have a counterclaim in the Superior Court of Massachusetts seeking significant damages for his breach of fiduciary duty. The fraudulent conveyance and misrepresentation are part of a broader conspiracy involving mortgage fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and other related crimes. Exhibit *: Civil Cover Sheet filed by Mr. Grieco’s counsel in Superior Court MA.
*. Breach of Fiduciary Duty:
- Mr. Grieco, as the Defendant's long-term CPA, has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of his clients. His involvement in the fraudulent conveyance and other related crimes constitutes a breach of this duty.
- The counterclaim in the Superior Court of Massachusetts seeks significant damages for this breach.
*. Malicious Civil Conspiracy:
- The purchase of the default judgment is the latest overt act under the elements of malicious civil conspiracy. The conspirators are attempting to deceive the Court into believing that one of the entities is a "good faith" creditor. This is
Sure, here is the continuation:
and fraud on this Court. This omission is significant as it impacts the credibility and transparency of * Fountain Street LLC’s actions. Mr. Grieco is also a debtor. Both Ms. Merritt and Mr. Cronan have a counterclaim in the Superior Court of Massachusetts seeking significant damages for his breach of fiduciary duty. The fraudulent conveyance and misrepresentation are part of a broader conspiracy involving mortgage fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and other related crimes. Exhibit *: Civil Cover Sheet filed by Mr. Grieco’s counsel in Superior Court MA.
*. Breach of Fiduciary Duty:
- Mr. Grieco, as the Defendant's long-term CPA, has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of his clients. His involvement in the fraudulent conveyance and other related crimes constitutes a breach of this duty.
- The counterclaim in the Superior Court of Massachusetts seeks significant damages for this breach.
*. Malicious Civil Conspiracy:
- The purchase of the default judgment is the latest overt act under the elements of malicious civil conspiracy. The conspirators are attempting to deceive the Court into believing that one of the entities is a "good faith" creditor. This is
now from "civil conspiracy. The conspirators are attempting to deceive the Court into believing that one of the entities is a "good faith" creditor. This is.." onwrad keeping without the borderline
Case Rating: *
Sure, here is the continuation:
- civil conspiracy. The conspirators are attempting to deceive the Court into believing that one of the entities is a "good faith" creditor. This is not true. The assignees of * Fountain Street LLC, the plaintiff in this matter, are trying merely to keep their funds that they received through fraudulent means. Additionally, Defendants are filing a Motion to Contest Writ of Execution and Request for Emergency Stay tomorrow morning, having just completed the motion.
Sure, here is the continuation:
- civil conspiracy. The conspirators are attempting to deceive the Court into believing that one of the entities is a "good faith" creditor. This is not true. The assignees of * Fountain Street LLC, the plaintiff in this matter, are trying merely to keep their funds that they received through fraudulent means. Additionally, Defendants are filing a Motion to Contest Writ of Execution and Request for Emergency Stay tomorrow morning, having just completed the motion.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, Defendants respectfully request that the court deny the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension and grant the necessary time to address the significant legal issues and fraudulent circumstances involved in this case.
Would you like any further assistance or information on specific legal aspects?
For the reasons stated above, Defendants respectfully request that the court deny the opposing counsel's request to deny Ms. Merritt's extension and grant the necessary time to address the significant legal issues and fraudulent circumstances involved in this case.
Would you like any further assistance or information on specific legal aspects?
can you help me to write a proper email to Eric renner, my attorney. i am sending him the two Motions to Contest Writ of executions which the parties to the lawsuit filed to medighate thru damades in the two lawsuits he is representing me on. I seek to understand why i am the one handeling this Writ which subsequently is a lawsuit for the exection of it is in Superior Court when I believe that maybe an injuctive motion or a protect order could have been filed to stop the exection of it. Am I right in thinking this?
Case Rating: *
Sure, here’s a draft of the email to your attorney:
---
Subject: Questions Regarding Handling of Writ of Executions
Dear Eric,
I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to seek clarification on a couple of matters related to the two Motions to Contest Writ of Executions. As you know, these motions have been filed to mitigate damages in the lawsuits you are representing me on.
Attached are the two motions for your review.
I have a few concerns and questions:
*. Why am I the one handling this Writ of Execution, which is essentially a lawsuit in Superior Court?
*. Would it have been more appropriate to file an injunctive motion or a protective order to stop the execution of this writ?
Your guidance on these issues would be greatly appreciated. Looking forward to your prompt response.
Best regards,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust any part as needed.
Sure, here’s a draft of the email to your attorney:
---
Subject: Questions Regarding Handling of Writ of Executions
Dear Eric,
I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to seek clarification on a couple of matters related to the two Motions to Contest Writ of Executions. As you know, these motions have been filed to mitigate damages in the lawsuits you are representing me on.
Attached are the two motions for your review.
I have a few concerns and questions:
*. Why am I the one handling this Writ of Execution, which is essentially a lawsuit in Superior Court?
*. Would it have been more appropriate to file an injunctive motion or a protective order to stop the execution of this writ?
Your guidance on these issues would be greatly appreciated. Looking forward to your prompt response.
Best regards,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust any part as needed.
Meanwhile i recived an email including a invoice from Ned Stevens Inc., which conincidenly magically appeared after i filed a motion in the superior court case seeking an extension of time claiming mortgae conspiriacy and other crimes. Thus do we need to file an injunctive to protect my home in Norton too?
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you might be dealing with some suspicious activities related to your legal case. Here are some steps you might consider:
- Document the Invoice: Keep a record of the invoice and any correspondence related to it.
- Consult Your Attorney: Discuss the suspicious timing of the invoice with your attorney.
- Injunction Consideration: Ask your attorney if filing for an injunction to protect your home would be advisable.
Would you like more detailed information on injunctions or any other specific legal advice?
It sounds like you might be dealing with some suspicious activities related to your legal case. Here are some steps you might consider:
- Document the Invoice: Keep a record of the invoice and any correspondence related to it.
- Consult Your Attorney: Discuss the suspicious timing of the invoice with your attorney.
- Injunction Consideration: Ask your attorney if filing for an injunction to protect your home would be advisable.
Would you like more detailed information on injunctions or any other specific legal advice?
include this
Case Rating: *
Sure, here's an updated draft of the email including the new information:
---
Subject: Questions Regarding Handling of Writ of Executions and Recent Invoice
Dear Eric,
I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to seek clarification on a couple of matters related to the two Motions to Contest Writ of Executions, which have been filed to mitigate damages in the lawsuits you are representing me on.
Attached are the two motions for your review.
I have a few concerns and questions:
*. Why am I the one handling this Writ of Execution, which is essentially a lawsuit in Superior Court?
*. Would it have been more appropriate to file an injunctive motion or a protective order to stop the execution of this writ?
*. Additionally, I received an invoice from Ned Stevens Inc., which coincidentally appeared after I filed a motion in the Superior Court case seeking an extension of time, claiming mortgage conspiracy and other crimes. Should we consider filing an injunction to protect my home in Norton as well?
Your guidance on these issues would be greatly appreciated. Looking forward to your prompt response.
Best regards,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust any part as needed.
Sure, here's an updated draft of the email including the new information:
---
Subject: Questions Regarding Handling of Writ of Executions and Recent Invoice
Dear Eric,
I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to seek clarification on a couple of matters related to the two Motions to Contest Writ of Executions, which have been filed to mitigate damages in the lawsuits you are representing me on.
Attached are the two motions for your review.
I have a few concerns and questions:
*. Why am I the one handling this Writ of Execution, which is essentially a lawsuit in Superior Court?
*. Would it have been more appropriate to file an injunctive motion or a protective order to stop the execution of this writ?
*. Additionally, I received an invoice from Ned Stevens Inc., which coincidentally appeared after I filed a motion in the Superior Court case seeking an extension of time, claiming mortgage conspiracy and other crimes. Should we consider filing an injunction to protect my home in Norton as well?
Your guidance on these issues would be greatly appreciated. Looking forward to your prompt response.
Best regards,
[Your Name]
---
Feel free to adjust any part as needed.
question - i could file an injunctive motion or a protective order to stop the execution of the writ/
Case Rating: *
In Massachusetts, you might be able to file an injunction or a protective order to stop the execution of a writ. Here are some key points to consider:
- Types of Injunctions: Preliminary, temporary restraining orders, and permanent injunctions.
- Requirements: Likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, and balance of hardships.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with filing an injunction or protective order?
In Massachusetts, you might be able to file an injunction or a protective order to stop the execution of a writ. Here are some key points to consider:
- Types of Injunctions: Preliminary, temporary restraining orders, and permanent injunctions.
- Requirements: Likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, and balance of hardships.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with filing an injunction or protective order?
should i keep the Ned Stevens inc invoice showing that I recived it * hours after i filed a motion to oppose the excition of the judgement in superior court as i blieve that theres a conspirarcy?
Case Rating: *
It’s essential to keep the invoice from Ned Stevens Inc. as it may be relevant to your case. It could support your claims of suspicious activities or conspiracy.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with your case or any specific legal aspects?
It’s essential to keep the invoice from Ned Stevens Inc. as it may be relevant to your case. It could support your claims of suspicious activities or conspiracy.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with your case or any specific legal aspects?
Yes. I want to now file the removal of the superior court case to federal court . firstly Im understanding that if i raise a federal question that federal laws will be used to ajudicate the case but if I just file based on diversty then state court laws are used to ajudicate the case. Is this right?
Case Rating: *
You're correct in your understanding. Here are some key points:
- Federal Question: If your case involves a federal question (issues arising under the U.S. Constitution, federal laws, or treaties), federal laws will be used to adjudicate the case.
- Diversity Jurisdiction: If your case is based on diversity jurisdiction (parties are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $*,*), state laws are generally applied.
Would you like more information on the process of removing a case to federal court or assistance with drafting the removal notice?
You're correct in your understanding. Here are some key points:
- Federal Question: If your case involves a federal question (issues arising under the U.S. Constitution, federal laws, or treaties), federal laws will be used to adjudicate the case.
- Diversity Jurisdiction: If your case is based on diversity jurisdiction (parties are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $*,*), state laws are generally applied.
Would you like more information on the process of removing a case to federal court or assistance with drafting the removal notice?
and if both diversity and federal question are involved but I most defintely want federal laws to be used how would i file the case?
Case Rating: *
If both diversity and federal question jurisdiction are involved, you would generally file the case based on the federal question to ensure federal laws are applied. Here’s how you can proceed:
- File under Federal Question Jurisdiction: Clearly state in your notice of removal that your case involves substantial questions of federal law.
- Include All Relevant Facts: Outline both the diversity of parties and the federal question involved, but emphasize the federal question to ensure federal laws are applied.
Would you like assistance with drafting the notice of removal?
If both diversity and federal question jurisdiction are involved, you would generally file the case based on the federal question to ensure federal laws are applied. Here’s how you can proceed:
- File under Federal Question Jurisdiction: Clearly state in your notice of removal that your case involves substantial questions of federal law.
- Include All Relevant Facts: Outline both the diversity of parties and the federal question involved, but emphasize the federal question to ensure federal laws are applied.
Would you like assistance with drafting the notice of removal?
Ok. what party do i name in this scenero- my primary property was seized by the government ( state court by a judge who executed the removal of my physical self and personal possessions by a sheriff) based on fraud an illegaly foeclsoure would i sue the state of MA , would I sue the Southeast housing Court. My 14th due process and 4th ammendments seizure were violated.
Case Rating: *
In your scenario, you might consider the following steps:
- State of Massachusetts: If you believe your constitutional rights (14th Amendment - due process and 4th Amendment - unlawful seizure) were violated by the state officials, you might sue the State of Massachusetts.
- Southeast Housing Court: If the court’s actions specifically led to the alleged violations, including the judge’s decision, you might include them as part of your claim.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with filing these claims?
In your scenario, you might consider the following steps:
- State of Massachusetts: If you believe your constitutional rights (14th Amendment - due process and 4th Amendment - unlawful seizure) were violated by the state officials, you might sue the State of Massachusetts.
- Southeast Housing Court: If the court’s actions specifically led to the alleged violations, including the judge’s decision, you might include them as part of your claim.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with filing these claims?
do i include the sherriff too?
Case Rating: *
You may consider including the sheriff in your lawsuit if you believe their actions directly contributed to the violation of your rights. Here are some points to consider:
- State of Massachusetts: For overall constitutional rights violations.
- Southeast Housing Court: If the court's actions led to the alleged violations.
- Sheriff: If their actions in executing the removal contributed to the violation.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with these claims?
You may consider including the sheriff in your lawsuit if you believe their actions directly contributed to the violation of your rights. Here are some points to consider:
- State of Massachusetts: For overall constitutional rights violations.
- Southeast Housing Court: If the court's actions led to the alleged violations.
- Sheriff: If their actions in executing the removal contributed to the violation.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with these claims?
yes. when filing the removal do I supply prima fascia evidence including the notice of the exection by the judge in houisng court Oct * and the sherriff * hour notice, the testimony from the private lender confessing to hi execution in the illegal foreclsoure, the defalt notice showing the usuarious *% interest rate in violation of state usury laws?
Case Rating: *
When filing for the removal of a case to federal court, it’s important to include key evidence that supports your claims. For your situation, consider including the following:
- Notice of Execution by the Judge: This document will help establish the timeline and actions taken by the court.
- Sheriff's *-hour Notice: This supports your claim of removal and the immediacy of the action.
- Testimony from the Private Lender: This can provide evidence of alleged illegal foreclosure.
- Default Notice: Showing the usurious interest rate will support your claim of state usury law violations.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.
When filing for the removal of a case to federal court, it’s important to include key evidence that supports your claims. For your situation, consider including the following:
- Notice of Execution by the Judge: This document will help establish the timeline and actions taken by the court.
- Sheriff's *-hour Notice: This supports your claim of removal and the immediacy of the action.
- Testimony from the Private Lender: This can provide evidence of alleged illegal foreclosure.
- Default Notice: Showing the usurious interest rate will support your claim of state usury law violations.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.
so in the above scenerio i wouldnt be trying to establish state usury violations or really an illegal foreclsoure as i am trying to establish that despite these crimes the state of MA ruled that i was a criminal or a trespaser and order the illegal seizure. Is this right?
Case Rating: *
It seems your main focus is on the Constitutional violations (due process and unlawful seizure) rather than the state usury violations or illegal foreclosure itself. You are highlighting that despite these underlying crimes, the state of MA ruled against you, leading to your wrongful eviction and seizure of property.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.
If yes, could you please provide the following details:
*. What is your phone number?
*. What is your name?
*. What is your email address (optional)?
*. What is your zipcode or city?
Additionally, could you provide a brief summary of your legal issue?
It seems your main focus is on the Constitutional violations (due process and unlawful seizure) rather than the state usury violations or illegal foreclosure itself. You are highlighting that despite these underlying crimes, the state of MA ruled against you, leading to your wrongful eviction and seizure of property.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.
If yes, could you please provide the following details:
*. What is your phone number?
*. What is your name?
*. What is your email address (optional)?
*. What is your zipcode or city?
Additionally, could you provide a brief summary of your legal issue?
Phone number *-*-*, Name: Karen Merritt Email: karen.hgm@aol.com Zipcode; *. My legal issue: mortgage fraud conspiracy, mail fraud, abuse of process, fraud on the court leading to constuitional rights violations by Southeast Housing Court Massachusetts, starting in * based on a breach of fiduciary duty by my long term fiancial advisor (*-*). He embezzled my family's estate including roughly * million in properies as he now or his coconspirator has title or alleged ownership of my estate. Additionally the long running scheme has been an extreme emotional hardship or irreparable as I am now penniless with a severe health issue. Please polish this before sending it.
Case Rating: *
Sure, here’s a polished version of your summary:
---
Phone number: *-*-*
Name: Karen Merritt
Email: karen.hgm@aol.com
Zipcode: *
Legal Issue Summary:
I am dealing with mortgage fraud conspiracy, mail fraud, abuse of process, and fraud on the court that has led to constitutional rights violations by the Southeast Housing Court in Massachusetts, starting in *. This is based on a breach of fiduciary duty by my long-term financial advisor (*-*), who embezzled my family's estate, including roughly $* million in properties. He or his co-conspirator now allegedly holds title or ownership of my estate. This long-running scheme has caused extreme emotional hardship and irreparable damage, leaving me penniless and with severe health issues.
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails, and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.
If you want to
Sure, here’s a polished version of your summary:
---
Phone number: *-*-*
Name: Karen Merritt
Email: karen.hgm@aol.com
Zipcode: *
Legal Issue Summary:
I am dealing with mortgage fraud conspiracy, mail fraud, abuse of process, and fraud on the court that has led to constitutional rights violations by the Southeast Housing Court in Massachusetts, starting in *. This is based on a breach of fiduciary duty by my long-term financial advisor (*-*), who embezzled my family's estate, including roughly $* million in properties. He or his co-conspirator now allegedly holds title or ownership of my estate. This long-running scheme has caused extreme emotional hardship and irreparable damage, leaving me penniless and with severe health issues.
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails, and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.
If you want to
Yes. when i file my case in R.I. District court do i ask right away for ADA accomodations?
Case Rating: *
It's important to request ADA accommodations as soon as possible to ensure your needs are met throughout the legal process. You can include the request in your initial filing or notify the court’s ADA coordinator directly.
Would you like more detailed information on the process for requesting ADA accommodations in Rhode Island District Court?
It's important to request ADA accommodations as soon as possible to ensure your needs are met throughout the legal process. You can include the request in your initial filing or notify the court’s ADA coordinator directly.
Would you like more detailed information on the process for requesting ADA accommodations in Rhode Island District Court?
Not yest. My next question. Since my claim is mortgage fraud for profit especially foreclsoure rescue scam I believe that I will need an expert witness given its complexity. I need to establish that the mortgae process transcation was in violation of TILA, RESPA and the Dodd Frank Act. Is this right?
Case Rating: *
Yes, given the complexity of your claim involving mortgage fraud, particularly a foreclosure rescue scam, it would be beneficial to have an expert witness. Here’s why:
- TILA (Truth in Lending Act): An expert can help demonstrate how the mortgage transaction violated disclosure requirements.
- RESPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act): An expert can identify any illegal kickbacks or unearned fees.
- Dodd-Frank Act: An expert can explain how the transaction violated consumer protection provisions.
Would you like more detailed information on finding and working with an expert witness for your case?
Yes, given the complexity of your claim involving mortgage fraud, particularly a foreclosure rescue scam, it would be beneficial to have an expert witness. Here’s why:
- TILA (Truth in Lending Act): An expert can help demonstrate how the mortgage transaction violated disclosure requirements.
- RESPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act): An expert can identify any illegal kickbacks or unearned fees.
- Dodd-Frank Act: An expert can explain how the transaction violated consumer protection provisions.
Would you like more detailed information on finding and working with an expert witness for your case?
I am concerned becuase i am indigent becuase of the mortgae fruad as all of my wealth was in my two propertiws which my advisor now has title to. So do I inform the federal court in my complaint that i will need assisiatnce to support the federal crimes?
Case Rating: *
Yes, you should inform the federal court in your complaint that you will need assistance due to your indigent status. Here are some steps you can take:
- File an In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application: This allows you to proceed without paying court fees due to financial hardship.
- Request Court-Appointed Counsel: Mention your indigence and complex legal issues to request court-appointed legal counsel.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails, and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.
Yes, you should inform the federal court in your complaint that you will need assistance due to your indigent status. Here are some steps you can take:
- File an In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application: This allows you to proceed without paying court fees due to financial hardship.
- Request Court-Appointed Counsel: Mention your indigence and complex legal issues to request court-appointed legal counsel.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails, and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.
is there a federal law for foreclosure rescue scam crime?
Case Rating: *
Yes, there are federal laws that address foreclosure rescue scams. Here are some relevant points:
- Mortgage Assistance Relief Services (MARS) Rule: Prohibits mortgage assistance relief service providers from making false or misleading claims.
- Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act): Prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: Includes provisions to protect homeowners from foreclosure rescue scams.
Would you like more detailed information on any specific federal law or assistance with another legal matter?
Yes, there are federal laws that address foreclosure rescue scams. Here are some relevant points:
- Mortgage Assistance Relief Services (MARS) Rule: Prohibits mortgage assistance relief service providers from making false or misleading claims.
- Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act): Prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: Includes provisions to protect homeowners from foreclosure rescue scams.
Would you like more detailed information on any specific federal law or assistance with another legal matter?
can a private person sue a private lender and her advior based on those federal violations?
Case Rating: *
Yes, a private person can sue a private lender and their advisor based on federal violations such as those mentioned under the MARS Rule, FTC Act, and Dodd-Frank Act. Here are some key points to consider:
- MARS Rule: Prohibits deceptive practices by mortgage assistance relief service providers.
- FTC Act: Allows lawsuits for unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
- Dodd-Frank Act: Provides protections against fraudulent mortgage practices.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with filing such a lawsuit?
Yes, a private person can sue a private lender and their advisor based on federal violations such as those mentioned under the MARS Rule, FTC Act, and Dodd-Frank Act. Here are some key points to consider:
- MARS Rule: Prohibits deceptive practices by mortgage assistance relief service providers.
- FTC Act: Allows lawsuits for unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
- Dodd-Frank Act: Provides protections against fraudulent mortgage practices.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with filing such a lawsuit?
Ok. next are there federal laws for Abuse of process - in my case an attorney knowingly filed a fabrictaed foreclosure deed to perpetuate the mortgae fraud or is there a federal crime for fraud on the court?
Case Rating: *
There are federal laws that indirectly address abuse of process and fraud on the court, primarily through laws governing fraudulent activities, mail fraud, and wire fraud. Here are some key points:
- Mail and Wire Fraud: These statutes can apply if the fraudulent foreclosure deed involved the use of mail or electronic communications.
- Fraud on the Court: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure *(b)(*) allows a court to set aside a judgment for "fraud on the court."
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails, and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.
There are federal laws that indirectly address abuse of process and fraud on the court, primarily through laws governing fraudulent activities, mail fraud, and wire fraud. Here are some key points:
- Mail and Wire Fraud: These statutes can apply if the fraudulent foreclosure deed involved the use of mail or electronic communications.
- Fraud on the Court: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure *(b)(*) allows a court to set aside a judgment for "fraud on the court."
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails, and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.
can aprivate person sue for criminal conspirarcy or no just civil conspiarcy?
Case Rating: *
Generally, a private person cannot sue for criminal conspiracy, as criminal charges are typically brought by government prosecutors. However, a private person can sue for civil conspiracy, which involves an agreement between two or more parties to commit an unlawful act that causes harm.
Key Points:
- Criminal Conspiracy: Prosecuted by the state or federal government.
- Civil Conspiracy: Can be pursued by a private individual in civil court.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with a civil conspiracy claim or any other legal matter?
Generally, a private person cannot sue for criminal conspiracy, as criminal charges are typically brought by government prosecutors. However, a private person can sue for civil conspiracy, which involves an agreement between two or more parties to commit an unlawful act that causes harm.
Key Points:
- Criminal Conspiracy: Prosecuted by the state or federal government.
- Civil Conspiracy: Can be pursued by a private individual in civil court.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with a civil conspiracy claim or any other legal matter?
Start a new chat