Bankruptcy Court Hearing Differences

Summary

An evidentiary hearing in bankruptcy court involves presenting evidence and witnesses to support a case, while a discovery request is a pre-trial procedure for exchanging information and documents. In an evidentiary hearing, the judge reviews the evidence to make a decision, and you typically do not need to request a judgment. A declaratory hearing, on the other hand, seeks a legal determination on specific issues without necessarily presenting evidence. If a case is dismissed with prejudice, it may prevent future actions on the same claim. A motion for reconsideration can be filed to argue against such a dismissal, especially if new evidence or errors in the courts decision are present. In Massachusetts, dismissals with prejudice require a higher standard, and missing a pretrial hearing alone might not justify such a dismissal.

Full Conversation

In an Evidentiary hearing do I ask the court for indeed a judment from that hearing?

During an evidentiary hearing, the judge reviews the evidence and testimony presented. Typically, you do not need to ask for a judgment; the judge will make a determination based on the evidence presented.
Is there a specific aspect of your case you're unsure about?

question what is the difference between an evidentairy hearing and a declaratory hearing?

An evidentiary hearing and a declaratory hearing differ in purpose and procedure:
- Evidentiary Hearing: Parties present evidence and witnesses to support their case. The judge makes a decision based on the evidence.

- Declaratory Hearing: Parties seek a legal determination on specific issues or rights without necessarily presenting evidence. It clarifies legal relationships or statutes.
Is there a specific legal issue you're dealing with that involves either of these hearings?

Yes. Pardon my spelling errors. I type fast. I will first give you a background. Please pause. I have a case in superior court R.I. which was initially filed in * with respresentation and now becuase although I signed a contingence contract with him he changed it to hourly which I signed in fear of losing his represenation that I was doomed to fail being insolvent due to the breach of a fiduciary 's action in a partnership, shareholder, officer corporation that I partnered with him and one other that the case reprecentation withdrew from the case and now

It sounds like you have a complex case involving breach of fiduciary duty and partnership issues. Given the change in your legal representation and the substantial evidence you have, it might be worthwhile to consult with another attorney.
Is there a specific aspect of your case you need help with at this moment?

Im prose. Im suing for damages. Although I do not have a partnership agreement as one of my partners was my CPA for 8 years so I trusted him. But he now has title to a commercial building and all of my shares in the buisnes formed in the partnership. I have critical evidence including the actual share certificate from the State validating that I was on third owner of the business , tax documents labeling me as a one of the director of the business, promissory notes orignated by the CPA making me a quarator of loans wherby I am listed as a sharholder.

It sounds like you have a strong case with substantial evidence. In Massachusetts, proving a breach of fiduciary duty involves showing that your partner owed you a duty, breached that duty, and caused you damages.
Would you like information on how to proceed with your lawsuit or tips on representing yourself in court?

This case is in R.I. Currently my problem is that the case was dismissed with prejudice because I missed a pretrail hearing. I made an excusable mistake and cited new evidence to vacate the dismissal with prejudice and with you file * motions . I had the oral hearing yesterday and than sent a follow-up motion. After more research i am learning that arguably the judge cannot dismiss the dissolution of my partnership with prejucice because that is telling me that i can never break from the partnership. Right?

It sounds like you have a strong argument. Generally, dismissing a dissolution case with prejudice may be inappropriate because it precludes you from ever seeking dissolution again. You may want to focus on arguing this point in your motion to vacate the dismissal.
Do you need information on appealing the judge's decision if the motion to vacate is denied?

First I did focus this point under rule *(b) * or * as New Evience . I think my next motion is reconsideration . At least arguing that if you want to keep the judgement to dismiss my case to drop the prejudice becuase its unlawful to order to keep me in a pratnership that I dont want to be in. Would a reconsideration be right to file?

Yes, a motion for reconsideration could be appropriate. Highlight that dismissing with prejudice effectively forces you to remain in a partnership against your will, which might be unlawful. Ensure you demonstrate new evidence or an error in the court's previous ruling.
Is there anything specific you need help with in drafting your motion for reconsideration?

if I clearly show an error are judges required to reiew their order ? can they give another reason other than the one that initiated the motion for dismissal of the case . Meaning can they bring up other issues in the case that they might have reason to dismiss the case but didnt and now theis last issue is like the last straw and they are "emotionally" fed up. I am being biased because I am pro se. the case sat for years without prosecution as a result of all parties in the case and not just mine as the parties were in differrent law suits in the different but related matters.

Judges are generally required to review their orders if a clear error is shown, especially under Rule *(b). However, they can consider other reasons for dismissal if they are legally relevant. Emotional bias should not influence their decisions.
Is there a specific part of your motion you need help crafting?

Do you have to show a differrent standard of cause to dismiss a case with prejudice? Meaning wouldnt I have to do something more than mistakenly missing a pretrial hearing, especially if you compare my actions to the defendenrts who have knowingly filed fruadulent financial documents into the court? I have a forensic accountant's report establsihing commingling of funds, using commercial funds for personal use (embezzlement), tax evasion and sham transactions. It seems to me that if the judge were going to dismiss me for missing a trail jury surely he must address the fraud up on the court by opposing counsel. If he does this this is an act of bias. Would you agree? And given this do i have other arguments?

Dismissals with prejudice require a higher standard due to their finality. Missing a pretrial hearing alone might not justify such a dismissal. Highlight the opposing party's fraudulent actions and emphasize the new evidence. Bias claims can be tough, so focus on legal arguments.
Would you like help drafting specific sections of your motion for reconsideration?

I did I focussed on mistakenly missing the hearing as I didnt anticpate any communication from the court in October because at our last hearing he said that he'd schedule the jury trail for Decemeber. Plus I have a recent diagnosis with stage * kidney disease. Also I focussed on New evidence the defendants just bought a $*,* judgment against me for $*,* ( which was procurred by their misconduct in the partnership and at the time I didnt understand the harm it has caused me) and if he dismisse the case they will pursue collection on the judgement causing me more harm. I cited this in motions and presented it in an oral argument. What do you think the judge will do?

It's hard to predict exactly what a judge will do, but you have presented strong arguments such as:
- Your medical condition
- New evidence of defendants' misconduct
- The potential harm from the judgment against you
These factors could persuade the judge to reconsider the dismissal with prejudice. Would you like information on what steps to take if the judge denies your motion?

I know that i am going to have to appeal it because its unlawful to keep me from dissoving my partnership. He might change the dismissal of my case deleting the prejudice. Can ajudge change certain espects of a judgement while maintaing the core judgement or is he bound to dismiss the entire judgment?

Yes, a judge can change certain aspects of a judgment while maintaining the core judgment. They are not necessarily bound to dismiss the entire judgment; they can modify it based on new evidence or legal arguments presented.
Do you need information on the appeals process in case the judge denies your motion?

I will once we know. . he said he'd give his judgement in * hours. Is this a good sign?

It's hard to predict the outcome, but the fact that the judge is taking time to review everything could be positive. Judges often take time to ensure they have considered all arguments and evidence before making a decision.
Would you like information on the appeals process in case the decision doesn't go in your favor?

The only argement that oposssong counsel made to dismiss my case with prejudice was that I missed a hearing. And of course he wants the case dismissed he's representing criminals.

It sounds like you have strong grounds to contest the dismissal with prejudice, especially given the circumstances and substantial evidence you have. The judge's decision to take * hours to deliberate suggests they are taking your arguments seriously.
Would you like information on preparing for an appeal in Massachusetts if the judge's decision is not in your favor?

Now can we move on to the current appeal that I have to write a brief to file in the first week of decemeber? Its not a ble brief but the brief for pro se litigants. Are you familiar with it?

Yes, I can provide guidance on writing an appeal brief for pro se litigants.
Key elements to include in your brief:
- Introduction: Briefly explain the case history and the decision you're appealing.
- Statement of Facts: Present a clear and concise account of the important facts.
- Argument: Outline the legal reasons why the lower court's decision was incorrect. Cite relevant laws and precedents.
- Conclusion: Summarize your arguments and state the relief you are seeking.
Would you like help with drafting a specific section of your brief?

To make sure that we have the same brief in mind please tell me the name of the brief that I am eguired to file for the full panel in Massachusetts.

It sounds like you need to file an "Appellant's Brief" for your appeal in Massachusetts. This brief will present your arguments and evidence to the appellate court, explaining why the lower court's decision should be overturned.
Would you like more detailed guidance on drafting any specific sections of your Appellant's Brief?

But its not just a Blue Brief its less stringent . I can look it up on their website.

It sounds like you need to file the "Appellant’s Informal Brief" for pro se litigants, which is less stringent than the formal blue brief. This brief still needs to clearly present your case and arguments.
Would you like help with any specific section of your informal brief?

Yes. Do i need to file an appendix?

In Massachusetts, when you file an Appellant’s Informal Brief, you typically are required to file an appendix that includes the relevant documents and exhibits from the lower court proceedings. This helps the appellate court review the evidence and context of your case.
Would you like assistance with understanding what documents to include in your appendix?

How about I give you an overview or a background first of the case?

Sure, you can provide an overview or background of your case. This will help me understand your situation better and provide more accurate guidance. What specific details would you like to share?

the history as to how i sined an promissory not which lead me to catastrophic damages including an illegal foreclsoure and susquent eviction of my home and threatened forclsoure of a second property . Theses tow properties are my entire wealth and as a senoir with terminal cancer being destitude. I think its important that I starty with the orgination of the debt. Or do you think I start with the orginantion of the lawsuit inh the lowere court? Where do i start, please?

It sounds like you have a complex and serious case. Starting with the origination of the debt is crucial because it sets the context for all subsequent events, including the lawsuit in the lower court. Documenting the history will provide clarity on how the promissory note led to your current situation.
Would you like guidance on organizing your overview or help with a specific section of your brief?

I will write my overview now and you will edit and change and make it more polished . Ok?

Sure, go ahead and write your overview, and I'll help you polish it up!

Here we go will you please condense keeping what you surmize as key ponts?From * when I first received a telephone call from my then financial advisor Ralph Grieco , president/partner of a leading accounting company in Rhode Island who had been mine and my about to be divorced husband, James Cronan’s (Mike) personal and corporate (we had two family business and four pieces of property with considerable equity ) CPA since *. From that initial call by Mr. Grieco and up until today have been damaged beyond my anticipated belief as he had been so sweet and warm asking me what properties I wanted from my divorce and ensuring me with buttery words like,

Ralph Grieco, a financial advisor and CPA since * for me and my soon-to-be ex-husband, initiated a call in *. He assured me he would handle my property division during my divorce. Since then, his actions have caused significant financial damage beyond my expectations.
Would you like help with the next section of your overview?

“ if I needed anything to call him.” Little did I know though that that call was the seed to my destruction. Subsequently today either his brother in-law, Mr. Fagan or his business colleague, Mr. Tiernan either jointly or in some configuration now has title to those two family businesses, our high end commercial building, my primary residence, * Brayton Woods Rehoboth, Massachusetts, and my childhood home, * Oak Street,

Ralph Grieco assured me during my divorce that he would handle the property division. However, his actions, along with those of his brother-in-law Mr. Fagan and colleague Mr. Tiernan, have led to them acquiring titles to our family businesses, commercial building, and residences, totaling over $* million.
Currently, I am the plaintiff in a federal case for illegal foreclosure, usury under Massachusetts Chapter * Section *, consumer protection violations under Massachusetts 93A, and breach of contract against Mr. Tiernan. Additionally, there is a Superior Court case in Massachusetts involving accounting malpractice and predatory lending practices against Mr. Grieco.
Would you like assistance with drafting the next part of your overview or any specific sections of your brief?

Norton Massachusetts totaling an average value of well over * million dollars.In other words our. Mr. grieco has embezzled entire life savings. The good new: presently I am the plaintiff in a federal case pending for illegal foreclosure, Massachachusett chapter * section * : Usuay , Massachusetts 93A consumer protection and breach of contract against Mr. tiernan the so-called private lender , a Superior Court case in Massachusetts where both Mike and I are defendants with counterclaims accounting malpractice,Massachachusett chapter * section * and violations in Massachusetts predatory Home Loan Practices Act against Mr Grieco.

It sounds like you have several strong legal arguments and substantial evidence to support your claims. Here is a condensed version of your overview for your brief:
---
In *, Ralph Grieco, my financial advisor and CPA since *, assured me of his support during my divorce, promising to handle the property division. However, his actions, along with those of his brother-in-law Mr. Fagan and colleague Mr. Tiernan, led to them acquiring titles to our family businesses, a high-end commercial building, my primary residence at * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and my childhood home at * Oak Street, Norton, MA, totaling over $* million in value.
Currently, I am the plaintiff in a federal case for illegal foreclosure, usury under Massachusetts Chapter * Section *, consumer protection violations under Massachusetts 93A, and breach of contract against Mr. Tiernan. Additionally, there is an ongoing Superior Court case in Massachusetts involving accounting malpractice and predatory lending practices against Mr. Grieco.
---
Would you like assistance with drafting the next part of your overview or any specific sections of your brief?

In addition there is an ongoing court case in Rhode island against Mr. Grieco and Mr. Tiernan for breach of partnership and unjust enrchment et al.

You have a strong and complex case with substantial evidence and multiple legal proceedings. Here's an updated and condensed version of your overview:
---
In *, Ralph Grieco, my financial advisor and CPA since *, assured me of his support during my divorce, promising to handle the property division. However, his actions, along with those of his brother-in-law Mr. Fagan and colleague Mr. Tiernan, led to them acquiring titles to our family businesses, a high-end commercial building, my primary residence at * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and my childhood home at * Oak Street, Norton, MA, totaling over $* million in value.
Currently, I am the plaintiff in a federal case for illegal foreclosure, usury under Massachusetts Chapter * Section *, consumer protection violations under Massachusetts 93A, and breach of contract against Mr. Tiernan. Additionally, there is an ongoing Superior Court case in Massachusetts involving accounting malpractice and predatory lending practices against Mr. Grieco. Furthermore, there is an ongoing court case in Rhode Island against Mr. Grieco and Mr. Tiernan for breach of partnership and unjust enrichment.
---
Would you like assistance with drafting the next part of youroverview or any specific sections of your brief?

see above

It sounds like you have a strong case with substantial evidence and multiple legal actions in progress. Here is a condensed and polished version of your overview:
---
In *, Ralph Grieco, my financial advisor and CPA since *, assured me of his support during my divorce, promising to handle the property division. However, his actions, along with those of his brother-in-law Mr. Fagan and colleague Mr. Tiernan, led to them acquiring titles to our family businesses, a high-end commercial building, my primary residence at * Brayton Woods, Rehoboth, MA, and my childhood home at * Oak Street, Norton, MA, totaling over $* million in value.
Currently, I am the plaintiff in a federal case for illegal foreclosure, usury under Massachusetts Chapter * Section *, consumer protection violations under Massachusetts 93A, and breach of contract against Mr. Tiernan. Additionally, there is an ongoing Superior Court case in Massachusetts involving accounting malpractice and predatory lending practices against Mr. Grieco. Furthermore, there is an ongoing court case in Rhode Island against Mr. Grieco and Mr. Tiernan for breach of partnership and unjust enrichment, among other claims.
---
Would you like assistancewith drafting the next part of your overview or any specific sections of your brief?

Now do I provide a timeline?

Yes, providing a timeline can be very helpful in clarifying the sequence of events for the court. Here’s a basic structure for your timeline:
- *: Ralph Grieco becomes my financial advisor and CPA.
- *: Initial call from Ralph Grieco during my divorce, promising to handle property division.
- *-*: Actions by Grieco, Fagan, and Tiernan lead to the transfer of titles for family businesses, commercial building, and residences.
- *: Superior Court case filed in Rhode Island for breach of partnership and unjust enrichment.
- *: Federal case filed for illegal foreclosure and related claims.
Would you like help drafting the detailed timeline with specific events and dates?

yes. In *, Merritt and Cronan purchased Merritt’s childhood home located at * Oak Street, Norton, Massachusetts * (the “Norton property”). Merritt’s father, Bruce Merritt, did owner financing so that he could take early retirement at Texas Instruments. *. In *, Merritt and Cronan custom built a colonial home on almost * acres located at * Brayton Woods Drive, Rehoboth, Massachusetts * (the “Rehoboth property"). *. In *, Cronan and Merritt painstakingly received the Judgment Of Divorce Nisi Under M.G.l. Ch. *, Sec.1A. Counsel for Merritt was Atty. John Zacchilli, Milford MA. Commonwealth of Massachusetts The Trial Court Probate and Family Court Department Docket No. 06D1295DV1. “The husband agrees to pay the Rehoboth mortgage in addition to the monthly child support for four years from the date of this agreement.” within the Strict Performance clause.

Here's a structured timeline based on the information provided:
- *: Merritt and Cronan purchased Merritt’s childhood home at * Oak Street, Norton, MA (Norton property) through owner financing from Merritt’s father, Bruce Merritt.

- *: Merritt and Cronan custom-built a colonial home on nearly * acres at * Brayton Woods Drive, Rehoboth, MA (Rehoboth property).

- *:
- Merritt and Cronan received the Judgment of Divorce Nisi under M.G.L. Ch. *, Sec. 1A.
- Counsel for Merritt was Atty. John Zacchilli, Milford, MA.
- The agreement stipulated that the husband would pay the Rehoboth mortgage and monthly child support for four years.
- Initial call from Ralph Grieco, financial advisor and CPA, promising to handle property division.

- *-*:
- Actions by Ralph Grieco, his brother-in-law Mr. Fagan, and colleague Mr. Tiernan resulted in the transfer of titles of family businesses, commercial building, and primary residences.
- *: Superior Court case filed in Rhode Island for breach of partnership and unjust enrichment against Mr. Grieco and Mr. Tiernan.
- *: Federal case filed for illegal foreclosure, usury under Massachusetts Chapter * Section *, consumer protection violations under Massachusetts 93A, and breach of contract against Mr. Tiernan.
Would you like further assistance with drafting any specific sections of your brief or additional details to include in your timeline?

would you Please edit and polsih the time line points that I may not need?

Sure, here's a polished and condensed version of your timeline with key points:

Timeline:
- *: Merritt and Cronan purchased the Norton property at * Oak Street, Norton, MA, with owner financing from Merritt’s father, Bruce Merritt.

- *: Merritt and Cronan custom built a colonial home on nearly * acres at * Brayton Woods Drive, Rehoboth, MA.
- *:
- Merritt and Cronan received the Judgment of Divorce Nisi. Merritt’s counsel was Atty. John Zacchilli.
- Cronan quitclaimed the Rehoboth and Norton properties to Merritt individually.
- Ralph Grieco, who had been their personal and business accountant since *, assured Merritt of his support during the divorce.
- *-*:
- Grieco served as personal and business accountant for Merritt and Cronan, managing their businesses Classic Display, Inc. and Cronan Realty, LLC.
- Grieco handled employee payroll tax services, managed the Prudential Life Insurance policy, and refinanced loans for investment properties held by Merritt and Cronan.
-- Grieco executed transactions directly from Classic Display Inc.’s QuickBooks account, with authorization from Cronan.
- *-*: Actions by Grieco, his brother-in-law Mr. Fagan, and colleague Mr. Tiernan led to the transfer of titles for family businesses, commercial building, and residences, totaling over $* million in value.
- *: Superior Court case filed in Rhode Island for breach of partnership and unjust enrichment against Grieco and Tiernan.
- *: Federal case filed for illegal foreclosure, usury under Massachusetts Chapter * Section *, consumer protection violations under Massachusetts 93A, and breach of contract against Mr. Tiernan.
Would you like help drafting the next part of your overview or any specific sections of your brief?

.*. In *, Cronan quitclaimed the Rehoboth property and the Norton property to Merritt individually. *. Since * Ralph Grieco served as Plaintiffs' personal and business accountant and trusted advisor serving as personal accountant for Plaintiffs and as accountant for Cronan's businesses, Classic Display, Inc. and Cronan Realty, LLC. *. Since * Mr. Grieco handled and maintained the Employee Payroll Tax service for the Classic Display Inc. *. Since * Mr. Grieco was James Cronan’s insurance agent managing the Prudential Life Insurance policy for Cronan and Financial Advisor including managing the refinancing of a loan for an investment property held by Merritt and Cronan.

Here is a polished and condensed version of your timeline:
- *: Merritt and Cronan purchased Merritt’s childhood home at * Oak Street, Norton, MA. Financing was provided by Merritt’s father, Bruce Merritt.
- *: Ralph Grieco began serving as Merritt and Cronan’s personal and business accountant, handling Classic Display, Inc. and Cronan Realty, LLC.
- *: Merritt and Cronan custom-built a colonial home at * Brayton Woods Drive, Rehoboth, MA.
- *:
- Divorce finalized; Cronan quitclaimed Rehoboth and Norton properties to Merritt.
- Grieco continued as their financial advisor and insurance agent, managing various financial aspects including employee payroll tax service and life insurance.
- *: Superior Court case filed in Rhode Island against Grieco and Tiernan for breach of partnership and unjust enrichment.
- *: Federal case filed for illegal foreclosure, usury under Massachusetts Chapter * Section *, consumer protection violations under Massachusetts 93A, and breach of contract against Mr. Tiernan. Additionally, there is an ongoing Superior Court case in Massachusetts involving accounting malpractice and predatory lending practices against Mr. Grieco.
Would you like to continue with drafting specific sections of your brief or need guidance on any other part of your case?

*. Since *, Mr. Grieco was held in such high esteem and devoted loyalty by Cronan, that Cronan gave Mr. Grieco his authorization to execute transactions directly from the Classic Display Inc.’s QuickBooks account, on behalf of Mr. Cronan. Mr. Grieco could freely write his own checks to himself from Cronan’s QuickBooks. Over the decade of years, Merritt and Cronan confided in Grieco on personal and professional issues. B. Cronan’s Operation of Classic Display, Inc. and Cronan Realty, LLC *. Cronan has been in business since *. He owned and operated his successful display and real estate businesses for decades in Rhode Island. *. Over the years, Cronan’s display business, Classic Display, Inc., averaged gross sales of approximately $*,*,* per year. Cronan’s real estate business, Cronan Realty, LLC, averaged rental income of approximately $*,* per year in Rhode Island.

It sounds like you have a detailed and compelling case with substantial evidence. Here is a condensed and polished version of your additional points:
---

Timeline:
- *: Merritt and Cronan purchased Merritt’s childhood home at * Oak Street, Norton, MA, with owner financing from Merritt’s father.
- *: Ralph Grieco began serving as Merritt and Cronan’s personal and business accountant, handling Classic Display, Inc. and Cronan Realty, LLC.
- *: Merritt and Cronan custom-built a colonial home at * Brayton Woods Drive, Rehoboth, MA.
- *:
- Divorce finalized; Cronan quitclaimed Rehoboth and Norton properties to Merritt.
- Grieco continued as their financial advisor and insurance agent, managing various financial aspects including employee payroll tax service and life insurance.
- Cronan authorized Grieco to execute transactions from Classic Display Inc.'s QuickBooks, allowing Grieco to write checks to himself.
- *: Superior Court case filed in Rhode Island against Grieco and Tiernan for breach of partnership and unjust enrichment.
- *: Federal case filed for illegal foreclosure, usury under Massachusetts Chapter * Section *, consumer protection violations under Massachusetts 93A, and breach of contract against Mr. Tiernan. Additionally, there is an ongoing Superior Court case in Massachusetts involving accounting malpractice and predatory lending practices against Mr. Grieco.
---

Company Operations:
- *: Cronan's display and real estate businesses began operations in Rhode Island.
- *: Articles of Organization for Classic Display, Inc. filed in MA.
- *: Articles of Organization for Classic Display, Inc. filed in RI.
- Sales and Income: Classic Display, Inc. averaged approx. $*.5M/year in sales. Cronan Realty, LLC averaged approx. $160k/year in rental income.
---
Would you like help drafting the next part of your brief or need guidance on any other part of your case?

*. On June *, *, Cronan filed Articles of Organization with the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth for Classic Display, Inc. with the stated purpose of manufacturing displays, silk screening, and signage and all activities incidental thereto. Cronan was the sole shareholder and officer of Classic Display, Inc. *. On December *, *, Cronan filed Articles of Organization with the Rhode Island Secretary of State for Classic Display, Inc. with the stated purpose of manufacturing point of purchase displays, toys, furniture, and specialty consumer items and importing and exporting specialty items of various types. Cronan remained the sole shareholder and officer of Classic Display, Inc.

Your case appears to have substantial evidence and multiple legal actions in progress. Here is a polished and condensed version of your timeline and company operations:

Timeline:
- *: Merritt and Cronan purchased Merritt’s childhood home at * Oak Street, Norton, MA, with owner financing from Merritt’s father.
- *: Ralph Grieco began serving as Merritt and Cronan’s personal and business accountant, handling Classic Display, Inc. and Cronan Realty, LLC.
- *: Merritt and Cronan custom-built a colonial home at * Brayton Woods Drive, Rehoboth, MA.
- *:
- Divorce finalized; Cronan quitclaimed Rehoboth and Norton properties to Merritt.
- Grieco continued as their financial advisor and insurance agent, managing various financial aspects including employee payroll tax service and life insurance.
- Cronan authorized Grieco to execute transactions from Classic Display Inc.'s QuickBooks, allowing Grieco to write checks to himself.
- *: Superior Court case filed in Rhode Island against Grieco and Tiernan for breach of partnership and unjust enrichment.
- *: Federal case filed for illegalforeclosure, usury under Massachusetts Chapter * Section *, consumer protection violations under Massachusetts 93A, and breach of contract against Mr. Tiernan. Additionally, there is an ongoing Superior Court case in Massachusetts involving accounting malpractice and predatory lending practices against Mr. Grieco.

Company Operations:
- *: Cronan's display and real estate businesses began operations in Rhode Island.
- *: Articles of Organization for Classic Display, Inc. filed in MA.
- *: Articles of Organization for Classic Display, Inc. filed in RI.
- Sales and Income: Classic Display, Inc. averaged approx. $*.5M/year in sales. Cronan Realty, LLC averaged approx. $160k/year in rental income.
Would you like help drafting the next part of your brief or need guidance on any other part of your case?

*. On September *, *, Cronan filed Articles of Organization with the Rhode Island Secretary of State for Cronan Realty, LLC with the stated purpose to own and lease real estate. Cronan was the sole member and manager of Cronan Realty, LLC. Cronan listed the location of Cronan Realty, LLC’s principal office as the commercial property located at * Fountain Street, Pawtucket, Rhode Island * (“the Mill building”, “* Fountain Street property”). *. On or about September *, *, Cronan Realty, LLC purchased the * Fountain Street property, where Classic Display, Inc. operated and continued to operate. C. Cronan Suffered During the Financial Crisis - The Great Recession. *. During the great financial crisis in and around * and *, Classic Display, Inc. lost two major accounts—Dunkin Donuts and T. Marzetti Company—and its sales were cut in half.

Here is a polished and condensed version of your timeline and additional points:

Timeline:
- *: Merritt and Cronan purchased Merritt’s childhood home at * Oak Street, Norton, MA, with owner financing from Merritt’s father.
- *: Ralph Grieco began serving as Merritt and Cronan’s personal and business accountant, handling Classic Display, Inc. and Cronan Realty, LLC.
- *: Merritt and Cronan custom-built a colonial home at * Brayton Woods Drive, Rehoboth, MA.
- *:
- Divorce finalized; Cronan quitclaimed Rehoboth and Norton properties to Merritt.
- Grieco continued as their financial advisor and insurance agent, managing various financial aspects including employee payroll tax service and life insurance.
- Cronan authorized Grieco to execute transactions from Classic Display Inc.'s QuickBooks, allowing Grieco to write checks to himself.
- *:
- Cronan filed Articles of Organization with the Rhode Island Secretary of State for Cronan Realty, LLC.
- Cronan Realty, LLC purchased the * Fountain Street property, where Classic Display, Inc. operated.
- *-*: Financial crisis led to Classic Display, Inc. losing major accounts (Dunkin Donuts and T. Marzetti Company), cutting sales in half.
- *: Superior Court case filed in Rhode Island against Grieco and Tiernan for breach of partnership and unjust enrichment.
- *: Federal case filed for illegal foreclosure, usury under Massachusetts Chapter * Section *, consumer protection violations under Massachusetts 93A, and breach of contract against Mr. Tiernan. Additionally, there is an ongoing Superior Court case in Massachusetts involving accounting malpractice and predatory lending practices against Mr. Grieco.

Company Operations:
- *: Cronan's display and real estate businesses began operations in Rhode Island.
- *: Articles of Organization for Classic Display, Inc. filed in MA.
- *: Articles of Organization for Classic Display, Inc. filed in RI.
- Sales and Income: Classic Display, Inc. averaged approx. $*.5M/year in sales. Cronan Realty, LLC averaged approx. $160k/year in rental income.
- *: Cronan Realty, LLC established and purchased the * Fountain

I dont know if I need Mike's buisness histor in this case. Please decide.*. All of Cronan’s financial dealings were through the small regional bank, Bristol County Savings bank (B.C.S.B). Their main office, Taunton, Massachusetts. *. Cronan’s business Classic Display Inc. had a credit line with B.C.S.B that had been converted to a loan. With his real estate holdings and the business loan Cronan had monthly payments totaling approximately $*,* per month with B.C.S.B which included a SBA business loan and in addition held * Brayton Woods, the “Rehoboth Property. Cronan’s family home in Massachusetts.

It sounds like Mike's business history is quite relevant to your case as it provides context for the financial situation and dealings that led to the current legal issues. Here's a condensed version of the additional points you provided, including Mike's business history:
---

Timeline:
- *: Merritt and Cronan purchased Merritt’s childhood home at * Oak Street, Norton, MA, with owner financing from Merritt’s father.
- *: Ralph Grieco began serving as Merritt and Cronan’s personal and business accountant, handling Classic Display, Inc. and Cronan Realty, LLC.
- *: Merritt and Cronan custom-built a colonial home at * Brayton Woods Drive, Rehoboth, MA.
- *:
- Divorce finalized; Cronan quitclaimed Rehoboth and Norton properties to Merritt.
- Grieco continued as their financial advisor and insurance agent, managing various financial aspects including employee payroll tax service and life insurance.
- Cronan authorized Grieco to execute transactions from Classic Display Inc.'s QuickBooks, allowing Grieco to write checks to himself.
- *: Superior Court case filed in Rhode Island against Grieco andTiernan for breach of partnership and unjust enrichment.
- *: Federal case filed for illegal foreclosure, usury under Massachusetts Chapter * Section *, consumer protection violations under Massachusetts 93A, and breach of contract against Mr. Tiernan. Additionally, there is an ongoing Superior Court case in Massachusetts involving accounting malpractice and predatory lending practices against Mr. Grieco.

Company Operations:
- *: Cronan's display and real estate businesses began operations in Rhode Island.
- *: Articles of Organization for Classic Display, Inc. filed in MA.
- *: Articles of Organization for Classic Display, Inc. filed in RI.
- Sales and Income: Classic Display, Inc. averaged approx. $*.5M/year in sales. Cronan Realty, LLC averaged approx. $160k/year in rental income.
- *: Articles of Organization for Cronan Realty, LLC filed in RI, with the principal office at * Fountain Street, Pawtucket, RI.
- *-*: Financial crisis hit; Classic Display, Inc. lost major accounts, leading to halved sales.

Financial Dealings:
- All of Cronan’s financial

Bankruptcy Court Hearing Differences

Summary

Full Conversation

Related Chats