Child Custody Legal Judgments
Summary
In India, child custody decisions prioritize the childs welfare. Key judgments include Gaurav Nagpal vs. Sumedha Nagpal (2008), emphasizing the childs best interest. Roxann Sharma vs. Arun Sharma (2015) suggests custody of children under 5 should generally be with the mother unless proven unfit. Nil Ratan Kundu vs. Abhijit Kundu (2008) highlights considering the childs preference if mature enough. Vivek Singh vs. Romani Singh (2017) reiterates the childs welfare over parental rights.Full Conversation
Needs judgment for custody of child who is of 3 years to father
To provide more specific information, could you please tell me if there are any existing court orders or agreements regarding the child's custody?
Any judgement you have to search
You can refer to the below landmark judgment related to child custody in India:
Gaurav Nagpal vs. Sumedha Nagpal (*)
- The Supreme Court held that the welfare of the child is paramount.
- The court emphasized that the child’s best interest should be the primary consideration in custody decisions.
Would you like more details or any specific aspects of the judgment? More law point if you have
Case Rating: *
Sure, here are some additional landmark judgments and legal points related to child custody in India:
- Roxann Sharma vs. Arun Sharma (*)
- The Supreme Court ruled that the custody of a child under 5 years should ordinarily be with the mother unless the father can prove that the mother is unfit.
- Nil Ratan Kundu vs. Abhijit Kundu (*)
- The Supreme Court stated that the child's welfare is the paramount consideration, and the child's preference may be considered if they are of sufficient age and maturity.
- Vivek Singh vs. Romani Singh (*)
- The Supreme Court emphasized that the child's welfare must be the primary consideration over the rights of parents.
Would you like more details on any specific aspect or case?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat