Responding To Attorney Fees Application
Summary
Julie should emphasize her good faith basis for filing the claims, provide legal grounds for implied contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit, and present detailed evidence of her contributions and retained property. She should also address the timeliness of her response under Rule 6(a) and explain any delivery delays.Full Conversation
I need help with a response to the defendants lawyers Application for attorney fees. He alleges that my civil claims are ewrroneous and brought in bad faith. The defendant kept all my oersonal property and gifts, implied contract, unjust enrichment and quantum merit.
****, to help you with responding to the defendant's application for attorney fees, you should consider addressing the following points in your response:
- **Good Faith Basis**: Explain the legitimate reasons why you believed your claims were valid when you filed them.
- **Legal Grounds**: Detail the legal basis for your claims of implied contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit.
- **Evidence**: Provide any evidence that supports your claims and counters the defendant's allegations.
- **Personal Property**: Describe the personal property and gifts in question, and how the defendant retained them.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these points, or do you have specific questions about the process?
- **Good Faith Basis**: Explain the legitimate reasons why you believed your claims were valid when you filed them.
- **Legal Grounds**: Detail the legal basis for your claims of implied contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit.
- **Evidence**: Provide any evidence that supports your claims and counters the defendant's allegations.
- **Personal Property**: Describe the personal property and gifts in question, and how the defendant retained them.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these points, or do you have specific questions about the process?
real estate signs and real estate riders, $*,*
office equipment: desk, chair, and glass mat $*,*
HP color laser printer and a spare set of toner cartridges, $*,*
office supplies, $*
personal files $____
Three bedroom dressers, a nightstand, bed, *-lamps, $*,*
half the master bedroom closet of clothes - suits/professional and purses, and shoes/boots up to the ceiling. The dresser in the master bedroom is filled with socks, pajamas, and underclothes, $Bank Statements
Two guest bedroom closets filled with clothes, and three other dressers filled with clothes, i.e., sweaters, jeans, exercise clothes, sweatshirts, sweat pants, yoga pants & tops, and a nightstand filled with wool Sox, North Face Capilene under shirts and long johns, large walking closet near the guest bathroom filled with three cashmere coats and various jackets, half of the front door closet filled with down jackets & coats - Patagonia and North Face. $Bank Statements
iron $*
Nine pieces of pottery with iron stand $*,*
Three pieces of Polish pottery $*
Three colorful art animals $*
down comforter $*
*-* wool blankets $*.*
Two containers/baskets of winter scarfs, hats, and gloves $*,*
Three hats: * white, one grey, and one tan $*
lots of boots and shoes in the guest bedroom $*
lots of summer shoes in the other guest bedroom closet $*
Five gaming cameras with * cases to lock them plus numerous locks for the cameras and gates, $*,*
books $*
art supplies $*,*
Christmas decorations - tree and ornaments $*,*
extra set of laser toners for the printer valued at $*
exercise equipment: mat, weights, Bosu, two core balls, and gravity machine to hang upside down/massager to stretch my spinal cord $*
Pink Dog cage and grooming tools - clippers, brushes, toys, etc. $*
four paintings, $*,*
music box - jewelry box, $*
down pillows & bedspread to match, $*,*
* King-size Pendleton Wool Blankets $*
King-size wool blanket $*
a set of sheets, $*
Towels, hand towels, & wash clothes $*
bathroom items: white waste basket, a Kleenex holder that matches the waste basket, $*
A drawer full of channel make-up, $*,*
Channel Make-up Brushes $*,*
two containers of jewelry cleaner with * John Hardy necklaces $*,* Diamond Cross Necklace
* Purses $*
toiletries, $*
various kitchen things: cooking and serving utensils, casserole containers $*
* Waterford crystal pieces - (* vases and a serving bowl), $*
various baking pans, mixing bowls, and serving bowls, $*
Cuisinart mixer. $*
white platter, $*
kitchen knives $*,*
* paintings (Currie Estate Sale)
* wooden painted figures (Currie Estate Sale) $*
* wood inlaid music/jewelry box (Currie Estate Sale)
Maltese $*,*
Total: $*,* plus clothing items from Bank Statements & Credit Cards
$*,* removed from Bank Statement
* Great Pyrenees (Mother Bella and * of her puppies) $*,*
New * F-Pace Jaguar $*,*
* XKR Jaguar convertible $*,*
Total: $*,*
Approximately, $*,* plus whatever the court deems appropriate as damages
****, you seem to be detailing a comprehensive list of personal property and assets involved in your case. To help you better respond to the defendant's application for attorney fees, you can consider these points:
- **Good Faith Basis**: Explain why your claims were made in good faith.
- **Legal Grounds**: Clarify the legal basis for implied contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit.
- **Evidence**: Present evidence supporting your claims.
- **Personal Property**: Elaborate on the personal property and gifts retained by the defendant.
Would you like assistance in drafting a specific section or need more detailed information on a particular point?
- **Good Faith Basis**: Explain why your claims were made in good faith.
- **Legal Grounds**: Clarify the legal basis for implied contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit.
- **Evidence**: Present evidence supporting your claims.
- **Personal Property**: Elaborate on the personal property and gifts retained by the defendant.
Would you like assistance in drafting a specific section or need more detailed information on a particular point?
Plaintiff’s Brief in Civil Litigation for Implied Contract
Statement of Facts
The Plaintiff and Defendant cohabitated for *.5 years. During this time, Plaintiff significantly contributed to Defendant’s business and provided extensive personal care, mainly through Defendant's hip replacement and *.5 years of cancer treatments, often prioritizing his health over her own. As a result, the Plaintiff’s health deteriorated, requiring numerous surgeries for which she could not afford the insurance co-payments.
During their relationship, the Defendant provided the Plaintiff with four Jaguars. Upon the relationship's dissolution, Defendant retained all of Plaintiff's personal property and wrongfully accused her of car theft, leading to her arrest.
Legal Arguments
Existence of an Implied Contract
The long-term cohabitation and mutual contributions between Plaintiff and Defendant created an implied contract. Under Arizona law, an implied contract is established through conduct implying a mutual intent to contract. The Plaintiff’s extensive contributions to the Defendant’s business and personal health care demonstrate an implied agreement that she would be supported and share in the benefits accrued during their cohabitation.
Relevant Case Law:
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital, * Ariz. *, * P.2d * (*), established that implied contracts could be formed through the conduct and relationship of the parties.
Pyeatte v. Pyeatte, * Ariz. *, * P.2d * (*)—This case recognizes claims based on implied contracts arising from long-term cohabitation and mutual support.
Unjust Enrichment
Plaintiff’s contributions to his business and personal care have unjustly enriched Defendant. Under the doctrine of unjust enrichment, a party who benefits at another’s expense without a legal contract must provide restitution. Plaintiff's sacrifices and efforts directly benefited Defendant, warranting compensation.
Relevant Case Law:
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson, * Ariz. *, * P.2d * (*)—This case defines unjust enrichment and the requirement for restitution when one party benefits unjustly at another’s expense.
Quantum Merit
The Plaintiff is entitled to recover under the principle of quantum merit for the reasonable value of the services rendered. Even without a formal agreement, equity demands that the Plaintiff be compensated for her labor and care.
Relevant Statutes:
A.R.S. § *-*.* allows the recovery of reasonable attorney’s fees in actions arising out of contract, express or implied.
Conversion of Personal Property
The Defendant’s retention of Plaintiff’s personal property constitutes conversion. Conversion occurs when one party wrongfully controls another’s property, denying them their rightful ownership.
Relevant Statutes:
A.R.S. § *-* – Establishes the statute of limitations for actions to recover personal property.
Relevant Case Law:
Case Corp. v. Gehrke, * Ariz. *, * P.3d * (App. *) – Defines the elements of conversion and the remedies available.
Defamation and Malicious Prosecution
The Defendant’s actions in having the Plaintiff arrested for car theft constitute defamation and malicious prosecution. These actions were taken without probable cause, and harmed the Plaintiff’s reputation and personal distress.
Relevant Statutes:
A.R.S. § *-* – Defines defamation and the legal recourse for false accusations.
Relevant Case Law:
Slade v. City of Phoenix, * Ariz. *, * P.2d * (*), details the elements required to establish malicious prosecution and recoverable damages.
Conclusion
The Plaintiff respectfully requests that the court recognize the implied contract formed through the parties' long-term cohabitation and mutual contributions, award damages for unjust enrichment, quantum merit, conversion of personal property, and defamation/malicious prosecution. These remedies are necessary to restore the Plaintiff’s rightful property, compensate for her significant sacrifices, and address the Defendant's wrongdoings.
Respectfully submitted,
**** ****
****ann.lafaye@gmail.com
*-*-*
May *, *
****, to respond effectively to the defendant's application for attorney fees, you should focus on the following points:
- **Good Faith Basis**: Explain why your claims were made in good faith, emphasizing the extensive personal and business contributions you made.
- **Legal Grounds**: Clarify the legal basis for implied contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit, using the relevant case law and statutes you've mentioned.
- **Evidence**: Present detailed evidence supporting your claims, such as documentation of your contributions and the retained property.
- **Personal Property**: Elaborate on the list of personal property and gifts retained by the defendant.
Would you like assistance in drafting a specific section of your response, or do you need more detailed information on a particular point?
- **Good Faith Basis**: Explain why your claims were made in good faith, emphasizing the extensive personal and business contributions you made.
- **Legal Grounds**: Clarify the legal basis for implied contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit, using the relevant case law and statutes you've mentioned.
- **Evidence**: Present detailed evidence supporting your claims, such as documentation of your contributions and the retained property.
- **Personal Property**: Elaborate on the list of personal property and gifts retained by the defendant.
Would you like assistance in drafting a specific section of your response, or do you need more detailed information on a particular point?
I would like help
****, let's break down your response to the defendant's application for attorney fees. Here are some key points to focus on:
*. **Good Faith Basis**:
- Emphasize your significant contributions to the defendant's business and personal care.
- Highlight your sacrifices and the deterioration of your own health due to your care for the defendant.
*. **Legal Grounds**:
- Implied Contract: Mention the long-term cohabitation and mutual contributions. Cite *Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital* and *Pyeatte v. Pyeatte*.
- Unjust Enrichment: Argue that the defendant was unjustly enriched by your contributions. Refer to *Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson*.
- Quantum Meruit: State that equity demands compensation for your services. Mention A.R.S. § *-*.*.
*. **Evidence**:
- Provide documentation of your contributions, such as receipts, emails, and any written agreements.
- Include detailed descriptions and valuations of the personal property and gifts listed.
*. **Personal Property**:
- Describe the property and how the defendant retained it.
- Mention specific items and their values as detailed
*. **Good Faith Basis**:
- Emphasize your significant contributions to the defendant's business and personal care.
- Highlight your sacrifices and the deterioration of your own health due to your care for the defendant.
*. **Legal Grounds**:
- Implied Contract: Mention the long-term cohabitation and mutual contributions. Cite *Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital* and *Pyeatte v. Pyeatte*.
- Unjust Enrichment: Argue that the defendant was unjustly enriched by your contributions. Refer to *Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson*.
- Quantum Meruit: State that equity demands compensation for your services. Mention A.R.S. § *-*.*.
*. **Evidence**:
- Provide documentation of your contributions, such as receipts, emails, and any written agreements.
- Include detailed descriptions and valuations of the personal property and gifts listed.
*. **Personal Property**:
- Describe the property and how the defendant retained it.
- Mention specific items and their values as detailed
I would like help
I can help you with drafting a response to the defendant's application for attorney fees. Let's break it down step-by-step.
Drafting Points for Response:
*. **Good Faith Basis**:
- Emphasize your significant contributions to the defendant's business and personal care.
- Highlight the sacrifices you made, such as prioritizing the defendant's health over your own, leading to deterioration of your health.
*. **Legal Grounds**:
- **Implied Contract**:
- Mention the long-term cohabitation and mutual contributions.
- Cite *Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital* and *Pyeatte v. Pyeatte*.
- **Unjust Enrichment**:
- Argue that the defendant was unjustly enriched by your contributions.
- Refer to *Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson*.
- **Quantum Meruit**:
- State that equity demands compensation for your services.
- Mention A.R.S. § *-*.*.
*. **Evidence**:
- Provide documentation of your contributions, such as receipts, emails, and any written agreements.
- Include detailed descriptions and valuations of the personal property and gifts listed
*. **Good Faith Basis**:
- Emphasize your significant contributions to the defendant's business and personal care.
- Highlight the sacrifices you made, such as prioritizing the defendant's health over your own, leading to deterioration of your health.
*. **Legal Grounds**:
- **Implied Contract**:
- Mention the long-term cohabitation and mutual contributions.
- Cite *Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital* and *Pyeatte v. Pyeatte*.
- **Unjust Enrichment**:
- Argue that the defendant was unjustly enriched by your contributions.
- Refer to *Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson*.
- **Quantum Meruit**:
- State that equity demands compensation for your services.
- Mention A.R.S. § *-*.*.
*. **Evidence**:
- Provide documentation of your contributions, such as receipts, emails, and any written agreements.
- Include detailed descriptions and valuations of the personal property and gifts listed
Fourteenth Amendment
Section *
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Rules of Civil Procedure *(a). Computation
* March *
In computing any period of time specified or allowed by these rules, by any local rules, by order of court, or by any applicable statute, the day of the act, event or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. When the period of time specified or allowed, exclusive of any additional time allowed under subdivision (e) of this rule, is less than 11 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays shall not be included in the computation. When the period of time is 11 days or more, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays shall be included in the computation. The last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday or a legal holiday, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, a Sunday or a legal holiday.Carroll v. Lee
* Ariz. * (*)
* P.2d *
Judith (Lee) CARROLL, Appellee, v. Paul T. LEE, Appellant.
No. *-PR.
Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.
January *, *.
Reconsideration Denied February *, *.
** Leighton Rockafellow, Tucson, for appellee.
Aboud & Aboud, P.C., Tucson, by Michael Aboud, for appellant.
GORDON, Vice Chief Justice.
Judith Carroll (Judy) has petitioned this Court for review of a decision of the court of appeals reversing the trial court's judgment granting her request of partition of certain real and personal property. We ** have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. *, § *(*) and Rule *, Ariz.R.Civ. App.P.
A.R.S. § *-*.
Cook v. Cook, * Ariz. *, * P.2d * (*). See Carroll v. Lee, * Ariz. *, * P.2d
"The sine qua non of any contract is the exchange of promises. Restatement (Second) of Contracts § * (*). From this exchange flows the obligation of one party to another. * Williston on Contracts § * at * (*). Although it is most apparent that two parties have exchanged promises when their words express ** a spoken or written statement of promissory intention, mutual promises need not be express in order to create an enforceable contract. Restatement (Second) of Contracts § *. Indeed, a promise `may be inferred wholly or partly from conduct,' id., and `there is no distinction in the effect of the promise whether it is expressed in writing, or orally, or in acts, or partly in one of these ways and partly in others.' Id. § *, comment a. See also Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona York Refrigeration Co., * Ariz. *, *, * P.2d *, * (*). Thus, two parties may by their course of conduct express their agreement, though no words are ever spoken. From their conduct alone the finder of fact can determine the existence of an agreement. Restatement (Second) of Contracts § *; * A. Corbin, Contracts, § * at *-* (*). See also Malcoff v. Coyier, * Ariz. App. *, * P.2d * (*)."
* Ariz. at *, * P.2d at *.Del. R. Ch. Ct. *
(a)Time to Serve a Responsive Pleading.
(*)In General. Unless another time is specified by this rule or statute, the time for serving a responsive pleading is as follows:
(A) A defendant must serve an answer within 20 days after being served with the summons and complaint;
(B) A party must serve an answer to a counterclaim or crossclaim within 20 days after being served with the pleading that states the counterclaim or crossclaim.
(*)Effect of a Motion. Unless the Court sets a different time, serving a motion under this rule directed at a pleading in whole or part alters these periods as follows:
(A) If the Court denies the motion or postpones its disposition until trial, the responsive pleading must be served within 10 days after notice of the Court's action; or
(B) If the Court grants a motion for a more definite statement, the responsive pleading must be served within 10 days after the more definite statement is served.
(b)How to Present Defenses. Every defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading if one is required. But a party may assert the following defenses by motion:
(*) lack of subject-matter jurisdiction;
(*) lack of personal jurisdiction;
(*) insufficient process;
(*) insufficient service of process;
(*) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and(*) failure to join a party under Rule *.
(c)Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. After the pleadings are closed-but early enough not to delay trial-a party may move for judgment on the pleadings.
(d)Result of Presenting Matters Outside the Pleadings. If a party moves under Rule *(b)(*) or *(c) and presents matters outside the pleadings that are not excluded by the Court, then
(*) the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule *; and
(*) all parties must be given a reasonable opportunity to present pertinent material under Rule *.
(e)Motion for a More Definite Statement. A party may move for a more definite statement of a pleading to which a responsive pleading is allowed but that is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably prepare a response. The party must move before filing a responsive pleading, and the motion must identify the defects and the details required to reasonably prepare a response. If the Court orders a more definite statement and the order is not obeyed within 10 days after notice of the order or within the time the Court sets, the Court may strike the pleading or issue any other appropriate order.
(f)Motion to Strike. A party may move to strike from a pleading any insufficient defense or any material that is redundant, scandalous, immaterial, or not pertinent. The party must move either before responding to the pleading or, if a response is not allowed, within 20 days after being served with the pleading. The Court may also act on its own initiative.
(*)When No Responsive Pleading Is Allowed. If a pleading sets out a claim for relief that does not require a responsive pleading, an opposing party may assert at trial any defense to that claim.
preserved initially-as to the new matter.
In *, Rule * was revised to align its language with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure * so that authorities interpreting the federal rule could be cited more easily as persuasive authority for the interpretation of Rule *.
No substantive change in the interpretation of the rule was intended, and prior Delaware authorities interpreting the rule remain applicable.(*)Amended and Supplemental Pleadings. If a pleading raises new matter that is subject to a defense listed in Rule *(b)(*)-(*), then an opposing party may assert that defense-even if not asserted or preserved initially-as to the new matter.
(i)Deferral Until Trial. The Court may defer until trial ruling on any defense listed in Rule *(b) -whether made in a pleading or by motion-or any motion under Rule *(c).
Amended May *, *, effective */*/*.
Comment
In *, Rule * was revised to align its language with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure * so that authorities interpreting the federal rule could be cited more easily as persuasive authority for the interpretation of Rule *.
No substantive change in the interpretation of the rule was intended, and prior Delaware authorities interpreting the rule remain applicable.
****, I can help you draft a structured response to the defendant's application for attorney fees. Here's a concise and organized template you can use:
---
---
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Application for Attorney Fees
**Good Faith Basis:**
- **Significant Contributions:** I provided substantial support to the defendant’s business and personal care, including managing his business affairs and providing extensive personal care during his hip replacement and cancer treatments.
- **Sacrifices Made:** My health deteriorated due to prioritizing the defendant's health, leading to multiple surgeries for which I couldn't afford the co-payments.
**Legal Grounds:**
- **Implied Contract:**
- **Cohabitation and Contributions:** Our *.5 years of cohabitation and mutual contributions constitute an implied contract.
- **Relevant Case Law:** Cite *Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital* and *Pyeatte v. Pyeatte*.
- **Unjust Enrichment:**
- **Benefit to Defendant:** The defendant was unjustly enriched by my contributions.
- **Relevant Case Law:** Refer to *Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson*.
- **Quantum Meruit:**
- **Equitable Compensation:** Equity demands
**Good Faith Basis:**
- **Significant Contributions:** I provided substantial support to the defendant’s business and personal care, including managing his business affairs and providing extensive personal care during his hip replacement and cancer treatments.
- **Sacrifices Made:** My health deteriorated due to prioritizing the defendant's health, leading to multiple surgeries for which I couldn't afford the co-payments.
**Legal Grounds:**
- **Implied Contract:**
- **Cohabitation and Contributions:** Our *.5 years of cohabitation and mutual contributions constitute an implied contract.
- **Relevant Case Law:** Cite *Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital* and *Pyeatte v. Pyeatte*.
- **Unjust Enrichment:**
- **Benefit to Defendant:** The defendant was unjustly enriched by my contributions.
- **Relevant Case Law:** Refer to *Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson*.
- **Quantum Meruit:**
- **Equitable Compensation:** Equity demands
Then there is * A.R.S. Rules of civil procedure, Rule *
****, let's focus on addressing Rule * of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure in your response to the defendant's application for attorney fees. Here’s a concise template you could use:
---
**Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Application for Attorney Fees:**
**Good Faith Basis:**
- **Significant Contributions:** I provided substantial support to the defendant’s business and personal care, managing his business affairs and offering extensive personal assistance during his hip replacement and cancer treatments.
- **Sacrifices Made:** My health deteriorated due to prioritizing the defendant's health, leading to multiple surgeries for which I couldn't afford the co-payments.
**Legal Grounds:**
- **Implied Contract:**
- **Cohabitation and Contributions:** Our *.5 years of cohabitation and mutual contributions constitute an implied contract.
- **Relevant Case Law:** Cite *Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital* and *Pyeatte v. Pyeatte*.
- **Unjust Enrichment:**
- **Benefit to Defendant:** The defendant was unjustly enriched by my contributions.
- **Relevant Case Law:** Refer to *Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson*.
- **Quantum Meruit:
---
**Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Application for Attorney Fees:**
**Good Faith Basis:**
- **Significant Contributions:** I provided substantial support to the defendant’s business and personal care, managing his business affairs and offering extensive personal assistance during his hip replacement and cancer treatments.
- **Sacrifices Made:** My health deteriorated due to prioritizing the defendant's health, leading to multiple surgeries for which I couldn't afford the co-payments.
**Legal Grounds:**
- **Implied Contract:**
- **Cohabitation and Contributions:** Our *.5 years of cohabitation and mutual contributions constitute an implied contract.
- **Relevant Case Law:** Cite *Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital* and *Pyeatte v. Pyeatte*.
- **Unjust Enrichment:**
- **Benefit to Defendant:** The defendant was unjustly enriched by my contributions.
- **Relevant Case Law:** Refer to *Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson*.
- **Quantum Meruit:
and Rules of civil procedure *(a) I was accused of requesting an extension outside the allotted time. I believe that I made the request on the 9th day of the *-days. Further, I was accused of not delivering the defendants attorney until * weeks later. I put my response in his court house mail box and am unable to explain the delay of * weeks.
It sounds like you have a complex situation involving both the timeliness of your response and the delivery of your documents. Here are some points to consider addressing:
Key Points for Your Response:
*. **Timeliness of Request:**
- **Rule *(a) Compliance:** Explain that according to Rule *(a) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the day of the act is excluded from the computation of time. Clarify that you submitted your request on the 9th day, well within the *-day period.
*. **Delivery Delay:**
- **Explanation of Delivery Method:** Mention that you placed your response in the court house mailbox as a method of delivery.
- **Possible Explanations:** While you may not know the exact reason for the delay, suggest possibilities such as administrative errors or delays within the courthouse system.
*. **Timeliness of Request:**
- **Rule *(a) Compliance:** Explain that according to Rule *(a) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the day of the act is excluded from the computation of time. Clarify that you submitted your request on the 9th day, well within the *-day period.
*. **Delivery Delay:**
- **Explanation of Delivery Method:** Mention that you placed your response in the court house mailbox as a method of delivery.
- **Possible Explanations:** While you may not know the exact reason for the delay, suggest possibilities such as administrative errors or delays within the courthouse system.
Example Response Template:
---
**Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Allegations on Timeliness and Delivery:**
**Timeliness of Request:**
- **Rule *(a) Compliance:**
- According to Rule *(a) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the day of the act or event is excluded from the computation of time. Therefore, my request made on the *
---
**Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Allegations on Timeliness and Delivery:**
**Timeliness of Request:**
- **Rule *(a) Compliance:**
- According to Rule *(a) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the day of the act or event is excluded from the computation of time. Therefore, my request made on the *