TRY ME!
Fraudulent Foreclosure Deed Allegations
Summary
Fraud upon the court involves actions that corrupt the judicial process, such as filing fraudulent documents. In Massachusetts, Rule 60(b) allows for vacating judgments under specific circumstances, including fraud. Clear evidence is required to prove such fraud, which must have prevented a fair case presentation. If a party is found to have committed fraud upon the court, they may lose standing to bring claims, as their actions undermine judicial integrity. In cases of perceived judicial bias, options include filing a motion for recusal or appealing decisions. Legal advice should be sought to navigate these complex issues effectively.Full Conversation
We will go section by section of what he is argument . *. Sept. *, * the court allowed plaintiff's motion for summary judgement which dealth with the allegations in Merritt's present motion. *. Becuase the allegations within Merritt's present motion are the same or similiar to the defent's counterclaims , the court need not revist these issues in rule *(B)*. ....My comment this is the first time that I have sought to vacate under rule 60B) for fruad uon the court. He's correct that my previous counterclaims and defenses included the violation of criminal usuary chapter * section *. But again this is the first time that I have asked the court to take judicial notice that he filed frudulent documents into this court.
It sounds like you're dealing with a Rule *(b) motion to vacate a judgment for fraud upon the court. Here are some key points about Rule *(b) in Massachusetts:
- Rule *(b) allows a party to seek relief from a final judgment under specific circumstances, including fraud.
- You need to provide clear and convincing evidence of the fraud.
- The fraud must have prevented you from fully and fairly presenting your case.
What specific evidence do you have that the documents filed were fraudulent?
- Rule *(b) allows a party to seek relief from a final judgment under specific circumstances, including fraud.
- You need to provide clear and convincing evidence of the fraud.
- The fraud must have prevented you from fully and fairly presenting your case.
What specific evidence do you have that the documents filed were fraudulent?
I would like the court to ask him if he filed a deed into this court knowing that it violated usuary chapter * section *. Can I do this?
Yes, you can request the court to address the potential violation of usury laws in your motion. Here's a draft reply incorporating your points:
Yes, you can request the court to address the potential violation of usury laws in your motion. Here's a draft reply incorporating your points:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
I write in reply to the opposition filed by the opposing counsel to my Rule *(b) motion for fraud upon the court. I respectfully request the court to consider the following points:
*. First Motion Under Rule *(b): This is the first time I have sought to vacate the judgment under Rule *(b) for fraud upon the court, specifically addressing the fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel.
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), an unlicensed private lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conflict of interest and violates MassachusettsGeneral Laws Chapter *, Section *.
*. Violation of Usury Laws: The interest rate charged by the unlicensed lender exceeds *% without notification to the Attorney General, making it unenforceable under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. This is corroborated by the default notice I possess, which validates the *% interest rate.
*. Fraudulent Documents: The documents, such as the foreclosure deed, submitted by the opposing parties are fraudulent and have significantly affected my defense. This fraudulent activity is further supported by depositions and testimony from the lender admitting to the invalid foreclosure.
*. Undisclosed Misrepresentations: The lender and my financial advisor made substantial misrepresentations that were never disclosed to me. I was coerced into signing an illegal mortgage, believing that my family and I would lose our home if I did not sign. Despite my unemployment and inability to pay, the lender secretly charged compound interest over several years.
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
I write in reply to the opposition filed by the opposing counsel to my Rule *(b) motion for fraud upon the court. I respectfully request the court to consider the following points:
*. First Motion Under Rule *(b): This is the first time I have sought to vacate the judgment under Rule *(b) for fraud upon the court, specifically addressing the fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel.
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), an unlicensed private lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conflict of interest and violates MassachusettsGeneral Laws Chapter *, Section *.
*. Violation of Usury Laws: The interest rate charged by the unlicensed lender exceeds *% without notification to the Attorney General, making it unenforceable under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. This is corroborated by the default notice I possess, which validates the *% interest rate.
*. Fraudulent Documents: The documents, such as the foreclosure deed, submitted by the opposing parties are fraudulent and have significantly affected my defense. This fraudulent activity is further supported by depositions and testimony from the lender admitting to the invalid foreclosure.
*. Undisclosed Misrepresentations: The lender and my financial advisor made substantial misrepresentations that were never disclosed to me. I was coerced into signing an illegal mortgage, believing that my family and I would lose our home if I did not sign. Despite my unemployment and inability to pay, the lender secretly charged compound interest over several years.
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an
Next point he states;*. Had Merritt wished to address any of the item alleged in her present motion, she could have done so under proper appelate procedure. My answer please help to write. This is not true becuase despite what his previous state was that the court dealth wihthe issue of usuary he s wrong. The court completely ignored this counterclaim.
Here's a concise draft to address the opposing counsel's point:
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that I could have addressed the items in my present motion through proper appellate procedure, this is incorrect. The court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like help with any additional points or sections?
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that I could have addressed the items in my present motion through proper appellate procedure, this is incorrect. The court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like help with any additional points or sections?
he has * statements can we continue?
Sure, let's continue with the next statements. What is the next point from the opposing counsel's argument that you need help addressing?
Here's a draft reply to the opposing counsel's statement:
Next *. However on July *, * the court allowed Plaintiffs motion to strike Defendant's Appeal due to her failure to pay use and occupancy. He may be correct but its moot. On August *, * two attorney, filed a case gainst me knowing willfully with an desire to do me harm filed fruadulent documents into this court and as a result of these actions the documents filed by them pertained to a debt that is uraurious and unenforeceble as a matter of law. Hes trying to get me lost in procedural issues and I must keep focussed on fruad up the court.
Case Rating: *.
It seems you have a strong case for addressing fraud and usury violations. Here's a concise draft to address the opposing counsel's point:
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that the court allowed the Plaintiff’s motion to strike Defendant's Appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *, this point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions, and I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like help with the next point?
It seems you have a strong case for addressing fraud and usury violations. Here's a concise draft to address the opposing counsel's point:
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that the court allowed the Plaintiff’s motion to strike Defendant's Appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *, this point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions, and I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like help with the next point?
Here are * more. This new appeal seeks review of substantive issues alleged in Merritt's present motion , which are the same as those of her previous appeal stricken by this court on July * , *. My answer : the appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usuary charges and illegal forclsoure. rather it addressed precudural issues which i won.
Next. The Plaintiff request that this court issue an order that Merritt 's appeal in this matter have been stricken and sanction her for friviolous filings in the amount of $*. Answer i am very excited that i will come before the appeal court because for the first time in 4 years my substantive claims will be heard. There is noting frivilous about the injunstice I have incureed including being wrongly evicted from my home with stage4 cancer at the hands of an aggressive abusive litagators using misleading information such as this to get an unfair advatnage.
Here's a draft reply addressing the first point:
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *, this is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
And here's a draft reply addressing the second point:
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the Plaintiff's request for sanctions and striking my appeal for frivolous filings, I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to proceed with the next points?
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *, this is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
And here's a draft reply addressing the second point:
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the Plaintiff's request for sanctions and striking my appeal for frivolous filings, I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to proceed with the next points?
could you please send me section by section of my reply
Sure, let's go section by section of your reply. Here's the first part:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
I write in reply to the opposition filed by the opposing counsel to my Rule *(b) motion for fraud upon the court. I respectfully request the court to consider the following points:
*. First Motion Under Rule *(b): This is the first time I have sought to vacate the judgment under Rule *(b) for fraud upon the court, specifically addressing the fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel.
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), an unlicensed private lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conflict of interest and violates Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
*. Violation of Usury Laws: The interest rate charged by the unlicensed lender exceeds *% without notification to the Attorney General, making it unenforceable under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. This is corroborated by the default notice I possess, which validates the *% interest rate.
*. Fraudulent Documents: The documents, such as the foreclosure deed, submitted by the opposing parties are fraudulent and have significantly affected my defense. This fraudulent activity is further supported by depositions and testimony from the lender admitting to the invalid foreclosure.
*. Undisclosed Misrepresentations: The lender and my financial advisor made substantial misrepresentations that were never disclosed to me. I was coerced into signing an illegal mortgage, believing that my family and I would lose our home if I did not sign. Despite my unemployment and inability to pay, the lender secretly charged compound interest over several years.
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
---
Would you like to proceed with the next section
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
I write in reply to the opposition filed by the opposing counsel to my Rule *(b) motion for fraud upon the court. I respectfully request the court to consider the following points:
*. First Motion Under Rule *(b): This is the first time I have sought to vacate the judgment under Rule *(b) for fraud upon the court, specifically addressing the fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel.
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), an unlicensed private lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conflict of interest and violates Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
*. Violation of Usury Laws: The interest rate charged by the unlicensed lender exceeds *% without notification to the Attorney General, making it unenforceable under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. This is corroborated by the default notice I possess, which validates the *% interest rate.
*. Fraudulent Documents: The documents, such as the foreclosure deed, submitted by the opposing parties are fraudulent and have significantly affected my defense. This fraudulent activity is further supported by depositions and testimony from the lender admitting to the invalid foreclosure.
*. Undisclosed Misrepresentations: The lender and my financial advisor made substantial misrepresentations that were never disclosed to me. I was coerced into signing an illegal mortgage, believing that my family and I would lose our home if I did not sign. Despite my unemployment and inability to pay, the lender secretly charged compound interest over several years.
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
---
Would you like to proceed with the next section
please continue from "The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.' onward
Sure, here's the continuation from where we left off:
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal: The opposing counsel mentions that the court allowed the Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions, and I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel asserts this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegalforeclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to proceed with any additional points or sections?
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal: The opposing counsel mentions that the court allowed the Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions, and I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel asserts this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegalforeclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to proceed with any additional points or sections?
question can you explain to me Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. i dont really understand what he means when he says that I could have adrressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. Am i raight to say no i couldnt becuase i never adressed fraud upon the court before?
The opposing counsel suggests that you should have used the appellate procedure to address the issues in your motion. This typically means they believe you should have appealed the court's previous decisions instead of filing a Rule *(b) motion.
In your case, you can argue that:
- The court previously failed to address your counterclaim regarding usury (Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *).
- This is the first time you are bringing up the issue of fraud upon the court.
Would you like assistance drafting a specific response for this point?
In your case, you can argue that:
- The court previously failed to address your counterclaim regarding usury (Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *).
- This is the first time you are bringing up the issue of fraud upon the court.
Would you like assistance drafting a specific response for this point?
yes we said: Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
Sure, here's a response to address the point about procedural issues:
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure, this is incorrect. The court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like help with any additional points or sections?
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure, this is incorrect. The court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like help with any additional points or sections?
Question; to meet the elements of fraud upn the court does it include an attorney filing fraudlent documents into the court?
Yes, an attorney filing fraudulent documents into the court can meet the elements of fraud upon the court. Here are some key points regarding fraud upon the court in Massachusetts:
- Fraud upon the court involves conduct that corrupts the judicial process itself.
- It includes acts such as falsifying documents, bribery, and other misconduct by officers of the court.
- The fraud must have a direct impact on the judicial decision and prevent the opposing party from fully presenting their case.
Is there specific evidence you have that demonstrates the attorney knowingly filed fraudulent documents?
- Fraud upon the court involves conduct that corrupts the judicial process itself.
- It includes acts such as falsifying documents, bribery, and other misconduct by officers of the court.
- The fraud must have a direct impact on the judicial decision and prevent the opposing party from fully presenting their case.
Is there specific evidence you have that demonstrates the attorney knowingly filed fraudulent documents?
Can you review my information above to answer that question becuase i would like you to know my case? The attorney represents the broker (my financial advisor), the unlicensed provate lender and the buyer in my case. I have the last (one of three) default notice sent to me by the lender claiming a wildly inflated amount wherby he finally attached the accounting. He had compounded the interest rate to where it reached a *% interest rate to established the debt. This illegal interest t rate is in violation to MA usuary law chapter * section *. .
It sounds like you have a strong case for fraud upon the court, given the evidence of fraudulent documents and usury law violations. Here are key points to include in your argument:
- Fraudulent Conduct: The lender's testimony and the compounded interest rate of *% violate Massachusetts usury laws (Chapter *, Section *).
- Attorney's Misconduct: The opposing counsel (Godbout Law) was involved in sending the fraudulent payoff figures and filing the fraudulent foreclosure deed.
- Impact on Defense: The fraudulent foreclosure deed significantly affected your ability to defend yourself and created an unjust burden.
Would you like assistance in drafting a specific section or further points for your case?
- Fraudulent Conduct: The lender's testimony and the compounded interest rate of *% violate Massachusetts usury laws (Chapter *, Section *).
- Attorney's Misconduct: The opposing counsel (Godbout Law) was involved in sending the fraudulent payoff figures and filing the fraudulent foreclosure deed.
- Impact on Defense: The fraudulent foreclosure deed significantly affected your ability to defend yourself and created an unjust burden.
Would you like assistance in drafting a specific section or further points for your case?
The lender has testified in federal court that he knowingly charged me the compounded rate, that he deliberatly did not send me any inmvoices or statements. In adition he testified that it was Godbout law (this attorney) who sent the payoff figures to the forclsoing attorney to send the defulat letter to me and forclsoe on my home. This opposing counsel filed the fruadlent forclosure deed into this court which significantly affected my ability to defend myself. it has created an unjust burden on me me to be forced to contest false evidence in court
It seems you have substantial evidence of fraud and misconduct. Here's a draft section to include in your reply:
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Fraudulent Conduct and Attorney's Misconduct:
The lender has testified in federal court that he knowingly charged me a compounded interest rate of *%, which is in violation of Massachusetts usury laws (Chapter *, Section *). He also admitted that he deliberately did not send me any invoices or statements. Furthermore, it was the opposing counsel, Godbout Law, who sent the fraudulent payoff figures to the foreclosing attorney to send the default letter and foreclose on my home. This same opposing counsel filed the fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, significantly affecting my ability to defend myself. This has created an unjust burden on me, forcing me to contest false evidence in court.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything in this section or need help with any other points?
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Fraudulent Conduct and Attorney's Misconduct:
The lender has testified in federal court that he knowingly charged me a compounded interest rate of *%, which is in violation of Massachusetts usury laws (Chapter *, Section *). He also admitted that he deliberately did not send me any invoices or statements. Furthermore, it was the opposing counsel, Godbout Law, who sent the fraudulent payoff figures to the foreclosing attorney to send the default letter and foreclose on my home. This same opposing counsel filed the fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, significantly affecting my ability to defend myself. This has created an unjust burden on me, forcing me to contest false evidence in court.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything in this section or need help with any other points?
Thank you but i have filed a Motion to vacate under rule * b fruad upon the court , and one of the attornies from godbout law has file an objection which I must write a reply.
Hi there! It sounds like you're dealing with a complex case involving a Rule *(b) motion for fraud upon the court. Here's a concise draft to address the key points you've mentioned so far:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
I write in reply to the opposition filed by the opposing counsel to my Rule *(b) motion for fraud upon the court. I respectfully request the court to consider the following points:
*. First Motion Under Rule *(b): This is the first time I have sought to vacate the judgment under Rule *(b) for fraud upon the court, specifically addressing the fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel.
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), an unlicensed private lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conflict of interest and violates Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
*. Violation of Usury Laws: The interest rate charged by the unlicensed lender exceeds *% without notification to the Attorney General, making it unenforceable under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. This is corroborated by the default notice I possess, which validates the *% interest rate.
*. Fraudulent Documents: The documents, such as the foreclosure deed, submitted by the opposing parties are fraudulent and have significantly affected my defense. This fraudulent activity is further supported by depositions and testimony from the lender admitting to the invalid foreclosure.
*. Undisclosed Misrepresentations: The lender and my financial advisor made substantial misrepresentations that were never disclosed to me. I was coerced into signing an illegal mortgage, believing that my family and I would lose our home if I did not sign. Despite my unemployment and inability to pay, the lender secretly charged compound interest over several years.
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
I write in reply to the opposition filed by the opposing counsel to my Rule *(b) motion for fraud upon the court. I respectfully request the court to consider the following points:
*. First Motion Under Rule *(b): This is the first time I have sought to vacate the judgment under Rule *(b) for fraud upon the court, specifically addressing the fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel.
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), an unlicensed private lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conflict of interest and violates Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
*. Violation of Usury Laws: The interest rate charged by the unlicensed lender exceeds *% without notification to the Attorney General, making it unenforceable under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. This is corroborated by the default notice I possess, which validates the *% interest rate.
*. Fraudulent Documents: The documents, such as the foreclosure deed, submitted by the opposing parties are fraudulent and have significantly affected my defense. This fraudulent activity is further supported by depositions and testimony from the lender admitting to the invalid foreclosure.
*. Undisclosed Misrepresentations: The lender and my financial advisor made substantial misrepresentations that were never disclosed to me. I was coerced into signing an illegal mortgage, believing that my family and I would lose our home if I did not sign. Despite my unemployment and inability to pay, the lender secretly charged compound interest over several years.
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel
please send from *. procedural Misconduct onward
Sure, continuing from "Procedural Misconduct" onward:
---
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal: The opposing counsel mentions that the court allowed the Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulentactions, and I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel asserts this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything in this section or need help with any other points?
---
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal: The opposing counsel mentions that the court allowed the Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulentactions, and I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel asserts this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything in this section or need help with any other points?
Can you please edit where necessary. When a party is found to have committed fraud upon the court fraud upon the court generally they do not have standing to bring a claim in this court, as their fraudulent actions undermine the integrity of the judical process and prevent them from benefitting from the very system they attempted to decieve. they are barred from seeking felief due to their own wrongdoing. They come with unclean hands. . In addition the frudulant conduct has directly affected the court's ability to fairly decide the case. Since the fraud upon the court was established when Godbout law knowingly set out to defraud the integrity of the judicial process and filed this case dated august *, * all order and judgement are grounded in fraud and subsequently void ab initio as a matter of law.
Here is the edited version:
---
When a party is found to have committed fraud upon the court, they generally do not have standing to bring a claim in this court, as their fraudulent actions undermine the integrity of the judicial process and prevent them from benefiting from the very system they attempted to deceive. They are barred from seeking relief due to their own wrongdoing. They come with unclean hands.
In addition, the fraudulent conduct has directly affected the court's ability to fairly decide the case. Since the fraud upon the court was established when Godbout Law knowingly set out to defraud the integrity of the judicial process and filed this case dated August *, *, all orders and judgments are grounded in fraud and subsequently void ab initio as a matter of law.
---
Would you like to proceed with any additional edits or need help with other points?
---
When a party is found to have committed fraud upon the court, they generally do not have standing to bring a claim in this court, as their fraudulent actions undermine the integrity of the judicial process and prevent them from benefiting from the very system they attempted to deceive. They are barred from seeking relief due to their own wrongdoing. They come with unclean hands.
In addition, the fraudulent conduct has directly affected the court's ability to fairly decide the case. Since the fraud upon the court was established when Godbout Law knowingly set out to defraud the integrity of the judicial process and filed this case dated August *, *, all orders and judgments are grounded in fraud and subsequently void ab initio as a matter of law.
---
Would you like to proceed with any additional edits or need help with other points?
Give the above information can you answer this objection point made by the attorney? On Sept. *, * the court allowed Plaintiff's Motion for summary Judgement which dealt with the allegations in Merritt's present motion. This is false. Becuase the attorney knowingly filed a fruadulent forclsoure deed into this court it establishes the intent to deciev the court relied on this material document as true as autheticated evidece. Consequently the Septemeber *, * that the attorney highlites wherby the court "allowed Plaintiff's Motion for summary Judgement " is a testiment to fruad upon the court as the order was grounded in fraud and therby void.
Case Rating: *
Here's a concise response to the opposition's point:
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that on September *, *, the court allowed the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, this assertion is based on fraudulent grounds. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, establishing an intent to deceive. The court relied on this document as true, authentic evidence. Consequently, the order from September *, *, is a testament to fraud upon the court, rendering it void.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything in this section or need help with any other points?
Here's a concise response to the opposition's point:
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that on September *, *, the court allowed the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, this assertion is based on fraudulent grounds. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, establishing an intent to deceive. The court relied on this document as true, authentic evidence. Consequently, the order from September *, *, is a testament to fraud upon the court, rendering it void.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything in this section or need help with any other points?
In addition all following orders including interim use and occupancy, bomd orders and finally the execution for possession to evict me from my home stripping me of my entire life savings and my constitution rights to due process our as a matter of law void as well.
Here's an updated response incorporating your additional point:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that on September *, *, the court allowed the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, this assertion is based on fraudulent grounds. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, establishing an intent to deceive. The court relied on this document as true, authentic evidence. Consequently, the order from September *, *, is a testament to fraud upon the court, rendering it void.
In addition, all following orders, including interim use and occupancy, bond orders, and finally the execution for possession to evict me from my home, have stripped me of my entire life savings and my constitutional rights to due process. These orders are, as a matter of law, void as well.
Thankyou for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything in this section or need help with any other points?
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
Regarding the opposing counsel's statement that on September *, *, the court allowed the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, this assertion is based on fraudulent grounds. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, establishing an intent to deceive. The court relied on this document as true, authentic evidence. Consequently, the order from September *, *, is a testament to fraud upon the court, rendering it void.
In addition, all following orders, including interim use and occupancy, bond orders, and finally the execution for possession to evict me from my home, have stripped me of my entire life savings and my constitutional rights to due process. These orders are, as a matter of law, void as well.
Thankyou for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything in this section or need help with any other points?
Can i seek to have the court to take judicial notice to ask Godbout Law this question; why did you file a frudulent forclsoure deed into this court when you knew it was in violation of fraud and criminal usuary law chapter * section *, trying to collect on a debt through the act of froclsoing on the property by a *% interest rate?
Yes, you can request that the court take judicial notice and inquire about the conduct of Godbout Law in filing the fraudulent foreclosure deed. Here's a draft of how to incorporate this request into your reply:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
I write in reply to the opposition filed by the opposing counsel to my Rule *(b) motion for fraud upon the court. I respectfully request the court to consider the following points:
*. First Motion Under Rule *(b): This is the first time I have sought to vacate the judgment under Rule *(b) for fraud upon the court, specifically addressing the fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel.
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), an unlicensed private lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conflict of interest and violates Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
*. Violation of Usury Laws: The interest rate charged by the unlicensed lender exceeds *% without notification to the Attorney General, making it unenforceable under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. This is corroborated by the default notice I possess, which validates the *% interest rate.
*. Fraudulent Documents: The documents, such as the foreclosure deed, submitted by the opposing parties are fraudulent and have significantly affected my defense. This fraudulent activity is further supported by depositions and testimony from the lender admitting to the invalid foreclosure.
*. Undisclosed Misrepresentations: The lender and my financial advisor made substantial misrepresentations that were never disclosed to me. I was coerced into signing an illegal mortgage, believing that my family and I would lose our home if I did not sign. Despite my unemployment and inability to pay, the lender secretly charged compound interest over several years.
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
I write in reply to the opposition filed by the opposing counsel to my Rule *(b) motion for fraud upon the court. I respectfully request the court to consider the following points:
*. First Motion Under Rule *(b): This is the first time I have sought to vacate the judgment under Rule *(b) for fraud upon the court, specifically addressing the fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel.
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), an unlicensed private lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conflict of interest and violates Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
*. Violation of Usury Laws: The interest rate charged by the unlicensed lender exceeds *% without notification to the Attorney General, making it unenforceable under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. This is corroborated by the default notice I possess, which validates the *% interest rate.
*. Fraudulent Documents: The documents, such as the foreclosure deed, submitted by the opposing parties are fraudulent and have significantly affected my defense. This fraudulent activity is further supported by depositions and testimony from the lender admitting to the invalid foreclosure.
*. Undisclosed Misrepresentations: The lender and my financial advisor made substantial misrepresentations that were never disclosed to me. I was coerced into signing an illegal mortgage, believing that my family and I would lose our home if I did not sign. Despite my unemployment and inability to pay, the lender secretly charged compound interest over several years.
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel
Please edit: *. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), the unlicensed private lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conspirarcy or an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime or to commit a lawful act in an unlawful way.
Here's the edited version:
---
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), the unlicensed private lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conspiracy or an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime or to commit a lawful act in an unlawful way.
---
Would you like to add or modify anything in this section or need help with any other points?
---
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), the unlicensed private lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conspiracy or an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime or to commit a lawful act in an unlawful way.
---
Would you like to add or modify anything in this section or need help with any other points?
Please now send from *. The opposing counsel on ward
Sure, here's the continuation from point * onward:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal: The opposing counsel mentions that the court allowedPlaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions, and I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel asserts this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been taken into account. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal: The opposing counsel mentions that the court allowedPlaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions, and I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel asserts this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction
Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been immieidietly addressed.
Dear [Judge's Name],
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been immediately addressed. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal: The opposing counsel mentions that the court allowed Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions, and I must remain focused on addressingthe fraud upon the court.
*. Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel asserts this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been immediately addressed. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal: The opposing counsel mentions that the court allowed Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions, and I must remain focused on addressingthe fraud upon the court.
*. Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel asserts this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
*. On Sept. *, * the court allowed Plaintiff's Motion for summary Judgement which dealt with the allegations in Merritt's present motion. This is false. Becuase the attorney knowingly filed a fruadulent forclsoure deed into this court it establishes the intent to deciev the court relied on this material document as true as autheticated evidece. Consequently the Septemeber *, * that the attorney highlites wherby the court "allowed Plaintiff's Motion for summary Judgement " is a testiment to fruad upon the court as the order was grounded in fraud and therby void
Certainly, here's how you can incorporate this point into your reply:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
*. On September *, *, the court allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, which the opposing counsel claims dealt with the allegations in my present motion. This is false. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, establishing an intent to deceive. The court relied on this material document as true, authenticated evidence. Consequently, the September *, *, order that the attorney highlights, whereby the court "allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment," is a testament to fraud upon the court, rendering the order grounded in fraud and therefore void.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
*. On September *, *, the court allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, which the opposing counsel claims dealt with the allegations in my present motion. This is false. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, establishing an intent to deceive. The court relied on this material document as true, authenticated evidence. Consequently, the September *, *, order that the attorney highlights, whereby the court "allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment," is a testament to fraud upon the court, rendering the order grounded in fraud and therefore void.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
im confused . Do you think we should include this in the motion?On September *, *, the court allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, which the opposing counsel claims dealt with the allegations in my present motion. This is false. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, establishing an intent to deceive. The court relied on this material document as true, authenticated evidence. Consequently, the September *, *, order that the attorney highlights, whereby the court "allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment," is a testament to fraud upon the court, rendering the order grounded in fraud and therefore void.
Yes, you should include the information regarding the summary judgment and the fraudulent foreclosure deed in your motion. This helps demonstrate the basis of your argument for fraud upon the court and how it has impacted your case. Here's a concise draft to include:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
I write in reply to the opposition filed by the opposing counsel to my Rule *(b) motion for fraud upon the court. I respectfully request the court to consider the following points:
*. First Motion Under Rule *(b): This is the first time I have sought to vacate the judgment under Rule *(b) for fraud upon the court, specifically addressing the fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel.
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), the unlicensedprivate lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conspiracy or an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime or to commit a lawful act in an unlawful way.
*. Violation of Usury Laws: The interest rate charged by the unlicensed lender exceeds *% without notification to the Attorney General, making it unenforceable under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. This is corroborated by the default notice I possess, which validates the *% interest rate.
*. Fraudulent Documents: The documents, such as the foreclosure deed, submitted by the opposing parties are fraudulent and have significantly affected my defense. This fraudulent activity is further supported by depositions and testimony from the lender admitting to the invalid foreclosure.
*. Undisclosed Misrepresentations: The lender and my financial advisor made substantial misrepresentations that were never disclosed to me. I was coerced into signing an illegal mortgage, believing that my family and I would lose our home if I did not sign. Despite my unemployment and inability to pay, the lender secretly charged compound interest over several years.
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
I write in reply to the opposition filed by the opposing counsel to my Rule *(b) motion for fraud upon the court. I respectfully request the court to consider the following points:
*. First Motion Under Rule *(b): This is the first time I have sought to vacate the judgment under Rule *(b) for fraud upon the court, specifically addressing the fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel.
*. Client-Attorney Relationship: The opposing counsel has a client-attorney relationship with the broker (my financial advisor), the unlicensedprivate lender, and the third-party buyer. This relationship creates a conspiracy or an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime or to commit a lawful act in an unlawful way.
*. Violation of Usury Laws: The interest rate charged by the unlicensed lender exceeds *% without notification to the Attorney General, making it unenforceable under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. This is corroborated by the default notice I possess, which validates the *% interest rate.
*. Fraudulent Documents: The documents, such as the foreclosure deed, submitted by the opposing parties are fraudulent and have significantly affected my defense. This fraudulent activity is further supported by depositions and testimony from the lender admitting to the invalid foreclosure.
*. Undisclosed Misrepresentations: The lender and my financial advisor made substantial misrepresentations that were never disclosed to me. I was coerced into signing an illegal mortgage, believing that my family and I would lose our home if I did not sign. Despite my unemployment and inability to pay, the lender secretly charged compound interest over several years.
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a
please sen me from * onward.
Sure, here's the continuation from point * onward:
---
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been immediately addressed. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal: The opposing counsel mentions that the court allowed Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions, andI must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel asserts this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
*. Fraudulent Summary Judgment: On September *, *, the court allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, which the opposing counsel claims dealt with the allegations in my present motion. This is false. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court,
---
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been immediately addressed. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal: The opposing counsel mentions that the court allowed Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions, andI must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel asserts this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This is incorrect. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
*. Fraudulent Summary Judgment: On September *, *, the court allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, which the opposing counsel claims dealt with the allegations in my present motion. This is false. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court,
I think there needs to be an edit . Please review section * and * combinde and polish into one section. then send from section * onward.
Certainly! Here is the combined and polished section * and *, followed by the continuation of your reply:
---
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal and Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel claims the court allowed Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *, and asserts that this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won. Therefore, I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings inthe amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
*. Fraudulent Summary Judgment: On September *, *, the court allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, which the opposing counsel claims dealt with the allegations in my present motion. This is false. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, establishing an intent to deceive. The court relied on this material document as true, authenticated evidence. Consequently, the September *, *, order that the attorney highlights, whereby the court "allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment," is a testament to fraud upon the court, rendering the order grounded in fraud and therefore void.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
---
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal and Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counsel claims the court allowed Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *, and asserts that this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won. Therefore, I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings inthe amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
*. Fraudulent Summary Judgment: On September *, *, the court allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, which the opposing counsel claims dealt with the allegations in my present motion. This is false. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, establishing an intent to deceive. The court relied on this material document as true, authenticated evidence. Consequently, the September *, *, order that the attorney highlights, whereby the court "allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment," is a testament to fraud upon the court, rendering the order grounded in fraud and therefore void.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
question: how can i say that all the court has to do is ask the counsel if they knew that the foeclsoure was grounded in fraud and usuarious? You will note that they do not deny commiting fraud upon the court. How do i estblish this fact?
You can request that the court directly ask the opposing counsel about their knowledge of the fraudulent and usurious nature of the foreclosure. Here's a concise way to include this in your motion:
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
I respectfully request the court to ask the opposing counsel whether they knew that the foreclosure was grounded in fraud and usury. The opposing counsel has not denied committing fraud upon the court. This fact can be established by their silence and the documented evidence, including the fraudulent foreclosure deed and the violation of Massachusetts usury laws.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like assistance with any additional points or sections?
---
Dear [Judge's Name],
I respectfully request the court to ask the opposing counsel whether they knew that the foreclosure was grounded in fraud and usury. The opposing counsel has not denied committing fraud upon the court. This fact can be established by their silence and the documented evidence, including the fraudulent foreclosure deed and the violation of Massachusetts usury laws.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like assistance with any additional points or sections?
Could you please include this in my motion sending me that section?
Sure, here's the section included in your motion:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been immediately addressed. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal and Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counselclaims the court allowed Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *, and asserts that this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won. Therefore, I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Address of the Court]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: [Your Case Name/Number]
Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Dear [Judge's Name],
*. Procedural Misconduct: The lower court ignored crucial evidence, including the last default notice and loan history showing a *% interest rate, which should have been immediately addressed. The opposing counsel’s actions and the court’s oversight have led to an unjust outcome.
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
*. Striking Defendant's Appeal and Review of Substantive Issues: The opposing counselclaims the court allowed Plaintiff’s motion to strike my appeal due to failure to pay use and occupancy on July *, *, and asserts that this new appeal seeks review of the same substantive issues as my previous appeal stricken on July *, *. This point is moot. On August *, *, two attorneys filed a case against me with willful intent to cause harm, submitting fraudulent documents to the court. These documents pertain to a usurious and unenforceable debt as a matter of law. The core issue is their fraudulent actions. The appeal court has never reviewed the errors of the lower court based on the criminal usury charges and illegal foreclosure. Instead, it addressed procedural issues, which I won. Therefore, I must remain focused on addressing the fraud upon the court.
*. Request for Sanctions: The Plaintiff requests that this court issue an order that my appeals have been stricken and sanction me for frivolous filings in the amount of $*. I am eager to present my case to the appeal court. For the first time in four years, my substantive claims will be heard. The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous
Please send me from The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous onward.
Certainly, here's the continuation from the specified point:
---
The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
*. Fraudulent Summary Judgment: On September *, *, the court allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, which the opposing counsel claims dealt with the allegations in my present motion. This is false. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, establishing an intent to deceive. The court relied on this material document as true, authenticated evidence. Consequently, the September *, *, order that the attorney highlights, whereby the court "allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment," is a testament to fraud upon the court, rendering the order grounded in fraud and therefore void.
*. Judicial Notice Request: I respectfully request the court to ask the opposing counsel whether they knew that the foreclosure was grounded in fraud and usury. The opposing counsel has not denied committing fraud upon the court. This fact can be established by their silence and the documented evidence, including the fraudulent foreclosure deed and the violation of Massachusetts usury laws.
Thankyou for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
---
The injustice I have endured, including wrongful eviction while battling stage * cancer, is substantial and not frivolous. The misleading information used against me by aggressive litigators aimed to gain an unfair advantage.
*. Fraudulent Summary Judgment: On September *, *, the court allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, which the opposing counsel claims dealt with the allegations in my present motion. This is false. The attorney knowingly filed a fraudulent foreclosure deed into this court, establishing an intent to deceive. The court relied on this material document as true, authenticated evidence. Consequently, the September *, *, order that the attorney highlights, whereby the court "allowed Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment," is a testament to fraud upon the court, rendering the order grounded in fraud and therefore void.
*. Judicial Notice Request: I respectfully request the court to ask the opposing counsel whether they knew that the foreclosure was grounded in fraud and usury. The opposing counsel has not denied committing fraud upon the court. This fact can be established by their silence and the documented evidence, including the fraudulent foreclosure deed and the violation of Massachusetts usury laws.
Thankyou for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
I respectfully request the court to ask the opposing counsel s whether they knew that the foreclosure was grounded in fraud and usury. Suppose they lie, I didnt know? Is ther a better guestion to ask?
Instead of asking if they "knew" about the fraud and usury, you could ask whether they had reason to believe or suspect that the foreclosure was grounded in fraud and usury based on the evidence presented. This makes it more difficult for them to deny without addressing the specifics.
Here's how you can frame it:
---
*. Judicial Notice Request: I respectfully request the court to ask the opposing counsel whether they had any reason to believe or suspect that the foreclosure was grounded in fraud and usury, given the evidence presented. The opposing counsel has not denied committing fraud upon the court. This can be established through their silence and the documented evidence, including the fraudulent foreclosure deed and the violation of Massachusetts usury laws.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
Here's how you can frame it:
---
*. Judicial Notice Request: I respectfully request the court to ask the opposing counsel whether they had any reason to believe or suspect that the foreclosure was grounded in fraud and usury, given the evidence presented. The opposing counsel has not denied committing fraud upon the court. This can be established through their silence and the documented evidence, including the fraudulent foreclosure deed and the violation of Massachusetts usury laws.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
Please polish this making it sound better. Then please just send me this polished section.*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section * relying instaed on the misrepretations and frudulent documents filed by oppeosing counsel which further supports fraud upon the court. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
---
*. Addressing Procedural Issues:
The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Instead, the court relied on the misrepresentations and fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel, further supporting fraud upon the court. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
---
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Instead, the court relied on the misrepresentations and fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel, further supporting fraud upon the court. Additionally, this is the first time I am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
---
Would you like to add or modify anything further?
Lastely is there anyway i can protect myself from the abusive of discretion as I strongly believe that my Motion to vacate judgement will be denied as this judge has infairly prosecute me in this case. So i anticiapte that he wont ask them the question. is there again anything I can do ?
If you believe the judge has demonstrated bias or abused their discretion, you have a few options:
*. Motion for Recusal: File a motion to have the judge recuse themselves from the case due to potential bias.
*. Appeal: If your motion is denied, you can appeal the decision to a higher court.
*. Judicial Conduct Complaint: File a complaint with the Judicial Conduct Commission if you believe the judge has acted unethically.
Would you like assistance drafting a motion for recusal or exploring other options?
*. Motion for Recusal: File a motion to have the judge recuse themselves from the case due to potential bias.
*. Appeal: If your motion is denied, you can appeal the decision to a higher court.
*. Judicial Conduct Complaint: File a complaint with the Judicial Conduct Commission if you believe the judge has acted unethically.
Would you like assistance drafting a motion for recusal or exploring other options?
If i am asking him to ask them a question should i wait to file a motio for Recusal?
You may consider filing the motion for recusal first, as it addresses your concern about potential bias. If the recusal motion is granted, a different judge will handle your case, which may lead to a more impartial consideration of your motion.
Would you like assistance drafting a motion for recusal?
Would you like assistance drafting a motion for recusal?
Do i file this motion replying to counsel and the motion for Recusal?
Yes, you can file both the reply to the opposing counsel and the motion for recusal. Here’s a suggested approach:
*. File the Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court: This should address all the points you’ve raised, including the request for the court to take judicial notice and ask the opposing counsel about their knowledge of the fraudulent foreclosure deed and usury.
*. File the Motion for Recusal: This motion should detail your concerns about the judge's potential bias and why you believe a fair and impartial trial is not possible with the current judge.
By filing both, you address the substantive issues in your case while also seeking to ensure that your case is heard by an impartial judge. Here’s the polished section you requested:
---
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Instead, the court relied on the misrepresentations and fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel, further supporting fraud upon the court. Additionally, this is the first timeI am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
---
Would you like assistance drafting a motion for recusal or any further points?
*. File the Reply to Opposition to Rule *(b) Motion for Fraud Upon the Court: This should address all the points you’ve raised, including the request for the court to take judicial notice and ask the opposing counsel about their knowledge of the fraudulent foreclosure deed and usury.
*. File the Motion for Recusal: This motion should detail your concerns about the judge's potential bias and why you believe a fair and impartial trial is not possible with the current judge.
By filing both, you address the substantive issues in your case while also seeking to ensure that your case is heard by an impartial judge. Here’s the polished section you requested:
---
*. Addressing Procedural Issues: The opposing counsel claims I could have addressed the items in my motion through proper appellate procedure. This is incorrect because the court previously failed to address my counterclaim regarding usury, specifically under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *. Instead, the court relied on the misrepresentations and fraudulent documents filed by opposing counsel, further supporting fraud upon the court. Additionally, this is the first timeI am raising the issue of fraud upon the court.
---
Would you like assistance drafting a motion for recusal or any further points?
Can uou polish this please?I do not feel safe having Judge Michaud ajudicate my case as I believe that he has shown me bias and prejudice and given that he was was “publicly reprimanded” by the state’s Supreme Judicial Court due to posts he made about political figures and events from his now-deleted Facebook account this establishes my lack of faith in his ajudication of my case . Wherby The Supreme Judicial Court stated “Public confidence in the judiciary is undermined when a judge’s social media activity casts reasonable doubt on the judge’s capacity to act impartially even if the judge is in fact impartial. The Judge has acknowledged that he erred by sharing these types of posts that undermine public confidence in the judiciary.”
Sure, here's a polished version of your statement:
---
I do not feel safe having Judge Michaud adjudicate my case due to demonstrated bias and prejudice. Judge Michaud was publicly reprimanded by the state’s Supreme Judicial Court for posts he made about political figures and events on his now-deleted Facebook account. This establishes my lack of faith in his impartiality in adjudicating my case. The Supreme Judicial Court stated, “Public confidence in the judiciary is undermined when a judge’s social media activity casts reasonable doubt on the judge’s capacity to act impartially, even if the judge is in fact impartial.” The Judge has acknowledged his error in sharing posts that undermine public confidence in the judiciary.
---
Would you like help with any other points or sections?
---
I do not feel safe having Judge Michaud adjudicate my case due to demonstrated bias and prejudice. Judge Michaud was publicly reprimanded by the state’s Supreme Judicial Court for posts he made about political figures and events on his now-deleted Facebook account. This establishes my lack of faith in his impartiality in adjudicating my case. The Supreme Judicial Court stated, “Public confidence in the judiciary is undermined when a judge’s social media activity casts reasonable doubt on the judge’s capacity to act impartially, even if the judge is in fact impartial.” The Judge has acknowledged his error in sharing posts that undermine public confidence in the judiciary.
---
Would you like help with any other points or sections?
Start a new chat