Motion To Vacate Dismissal

Here's the final version for the Deposition of Forensic Accountant:
---
Deposition of Forensic Accountant:
The forensic accountant’s deposition (Exhibit D) provides detailed evidence of severe bookkeeping irregularities, commingling of funds, and tax evasion. The deposition highlights:
- Page *, Section *-*: Shared operations between * Fountain and Classic Group, indicating commingling of funds.
- Page *, Section *-*: Inconsistent records and sham transactions, demonstrating financial misconduct.
- Page *, Section *-*: Accounting entries designed for tax avoidance, showcasing illegal financial practices.
- Page *, Section *-*: Questionable stock transfer without proper documentation, raising further concerns about financial propriety.
These points from the deposition bolster the argument for vacating the dismissal and striking the defendant’s exhibits by providing substantial evidence of financial misconduct.
---
Veil Piercing Argument:
The defendants argue that there were two separate companies; however, the forensic accountant’s findings strongly establish that * Fountain and Classic Group operated as a single entity in practice. This court should pierce the corporate veil based on the following:
- Unified Operation: The forensic accountant's report confirmsthat both companies were operated as a single business, with shared employees, office space, and financial resources.
- Commingling of Funds: The deposition (Page *, Section *-*) clearly indicates funds were commingled between the two entities, blurring the lines of separation.
- Inconsistent Records: Documented in the deposition (Page *, Section *-*), the inconsistent and fraudulent records further support the argument for piercing the corporate veil.
- Fraudulent Practices: As evidenced on Page *, Section *-*, and Page *, Section *-*, the defendants engaged in accounting practices designed to evade taxes and misrepresent financial realities.
These points collectively demonstrate that the defendants treated the two companies as one, justifying the court's decision to pierce the corporate veil and hold them accountable for their unified operations and financial misconduct.
---
The sections on Judicial Notice, Ethical Concerns, and Lack of Notice are well-crafted and should be included as they stand, as they provide further support for your motion.
Would you like any further assistance with other sections or specific legal arguments?

Your "Health Issues" section looks well-formulated and clearly explains your situation. Here it is for clarity:
---
Health Issues:
- I am currently dealing with severe health issues, including Stage * kidney disease, which has significantly impacted my ability to keep up with court communications and proceedings.
- I respectfully request an extension of 30 days to submit further medical documentation if required.
---
Would you need assistance with any other sections or specific legal arguments?

The section on "Health Issues" looks good and provides a valid reason for requesting an extension. Here's how you can incorporate it:
---
Health Issues:
- I am currently dealing with severe health issues, including Stage * kidney disease, which has significantly impacted my ability to keep up with court communications and proceedings.
- I respectfully request an extension of 30 days to submit further medical documentation if required.
---
Would you like any assistance with refining other sections or addressing specific legal arguments?

You’re right. It’s important to clearly address the issue of potentially fraudulent supplementary financial records and to request appropriate court action. Here’s a revised version of your section:
---
Supplementary Financial Records:
- I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings.
- However, given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant should be scrutinized for credibility.
- The forensic accountant's report indicates that previous financial records provided by the defendant were fraudulent.
- I respectfully request that the court take appropriate measures to ensure that any new financial records submitted by the defendant are thoroughly examined for authenticity.
- This is crucial to prevent the acceptance of fraudulent documents as authenticated evidence and to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or specific legal arguments?

You can still file a motion even if your case was dismissed, especially if you believe there were procedural errors or new evidence that could impact the outcome. The judge can review your motion to vacate the dismissal under Rule *(b) and decide if your case should be reinstated based on the reasons you provide.
Would you like assistance with drafting the motion or have specific questions about your situation?

You have a strong argument given the substantial evidence of financial misconduct and procedural errors. Including Rule *(b) is crucial to your motion to vacate the dismissal. Here's a revised version incorporating your concerns:
---
Supplementary Financial Records:
- I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings.
- Given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant should be scrutinized for credibility.
- The forensic accountant's report indicates that previous financial records provided by the defendant were fraudulent.
- I respectfully request that the court take appropriate measures to ensure that any new financial records submitted by the defendant are thoroughly examined for authenticity.
- This is crucial to prevent the acceptance of fraudulent documents as authenticated evidence and to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
Rule *(b) Motion:
- Under Rule *(b), I am requesting the court to vacate the dismissal of my case due to excusable neglect, lack of notice, and newly discovered evidence of financial misconduct by the defendant.
- The forensic accountant's findings and deposition provide substantial new evidence that was not available during the initial proceedings.
- This rule allows for relief from a final judgment due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise,or excusable neglect, which applies to my situation where the notice for the hearing was not received in time.
---
Would you like assistance with refining any other sections or addressing specific legal arguments?

Got it! Here’s how you can refine the section to clarify that the forensic accountant's findings are not new evidence and to include the new evidence supporting Rule *(b):
---
Supplementary Financial Records:
- I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings.
- Given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant should be scrutinized for credibility.
- The forensic accountant's report indicates that previous financial records provided by the defendant were fraudulent.
- I respectfully request that the court take appropriate measures to ensure that any new financial records submitted by the defendant are thoroughly examined for authenticity.
- This is crucial to prevent the acceptance of fraudulent documents as authenticated evidence and to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
New Evidence Supporting Rule *(b):
- The forensic accountant’s findings are not new evidence in this context; however, we do have substantial new evidence that supports our motion under Rule *(b).
- The new evidence includes [briefly describe the new evidence you will send in two sections, e.g., specific documents, communications, or other findings that were not available during the initial proceedings].
- This new evidence is crucial as it was not available during the initial proceedingsand significantly impacts the integrity of the case.
Rule *(b) Motion:
- Under Rule *(b), I am requesting the court to vacate the dismissal of my case due to excusable neglect, lack of notice, and newly discovered evidence.
- The newly discovered evidence provides substantial grounds for relief that were not available during the initial proceedings.
- Rule *(b) allows for relief from a final judgment due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, which applies to my situation where the notice for the hearing was not received in time.
---
Please proceed to send the new evidence in two sections so we can incorporate it appropriately. Would you like any other assistance for now?

Here's how you can incorporate this newly discovered evidence into your motion:
---
Newly Discovered Evidence and Significant Factual Developments:
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
I believe that he knowingly and willfully submitted incorrect financials to the bankruptcy court. After filing the lawsuit, he used it as justification for not fulfilling his promise to return my name to the title of the commercial mill building. He said to me, “ [Include relevant direct quote or paraphrase if applicable].”
Rule *(b) Motion:
- Under Rule *(b), I am requesting the court to vacate the dismissal of my case due to excusable neglect, lack of notice, and newly discovered evidence.
- The newly discovered evidence, including the fraudulent purchase of the judgment, was not available during the initial proceedings and significantly impacts the integrity of the case.
- Rule *(b) allows for relief from a final judgment due tomistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, which applies to my situation where the notice for the hearing was not received in time.
---
Would you like to proceed with the next section of the new evidence or need assistance with any other specific legal arguments?

Here's how to integrate the newly discovered evidence into your motion, emphasizing its importance to your Rule *(b) argument:
---
Supplementary Financial Records:
- I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings.
- Given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant should be scrutinized for credibility.
- The forensic accountant's report indicates that previous financial records provided by the defendant were fraudulent.
- I respectfully request that the court take appropriate measures to ensure that any new financial records submitted by the defendant are thoroughly examined for authenticity.
- This is crucial to prevent the acceptance of fraudulent documents as authenticated evidence and to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
Newly Discovered Evidence and Significant Factual Developments:
- This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments.
- Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
- I believe that he knowingly and willfully submitted incorrect financials to the bankruptcy court. After filing the lawsuit, he used it as justification for not fulfilling his promise to return my name to the title of the commercial mill building. He said to me, "Mike, I can't put your name back on the Mill building because of D'Oreo's lawsuit against you." This lawsuit was, in fact, created by him while he was my CPA and trusted advisor at the time.
- The transaction, now buying the judgment for pennies on the dollar, not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me.
- The forensic accountant's report has further uncovered substantial evidence of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices, previously submitted to the court. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
Rule *(b) Motion:
- Under Rule *(b), I am requesting the court to vacate the dismissal of my case due to excusable neglect, lack of notice, and newly discovered evidence.
- The newly discovered evidence, including the recent purchase of the judgment and the forensic accountant’s findings, provides substantial grounds for relief that were not available during the initial proceedings.
- Rule *(b) allows for relief from a final judgment due to mistake,

Certainly! Here’s a refined version without including the forensic accountant’s findings as new evidence:
---
Supplementary Financial Records:
- I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings.
- Given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant should be scrutinized for credibility.
- The forensic accountant's report indicates that previous financial records provided by the defendant were fraudulent.
- I respectfully request that the court take appropriate measures to ensure that any new financial records submitted by the defendant are thoroughly examined for authenticity.
- This is crucial to prevent the acceptance of fraudulent documents as authenticated evidence and to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
Newly Discovered Evidence and Significant Factual Developments:
- This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments.
- Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
- I believe that he knowingly and willfully submitted incorrect financials to the bankruptcy court. After filing the lawsuit, he used it as justificationfor not fulfilling his promise to return my name to the title of the commercial mill building. He said to me, "Mike, I can't put your name back on the Mill building because of D'Oreo's lawsuit against you." This lawsuit was, in fact, created by him while he was my CPA and trusted advisor at the time.
- The transaction, now buying the judgment for pennies on the dollar, not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me.
- Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
Rule *(b) Motion:
- Under Rule *(b), I am requesting the court to vacate the dismissal of my case due to excusable neglect, lack of notice, and newly discovered evidence.
- The newly discovered evidence, including the recent purchase of the judgment, provides substantial grounds for relief that were not available during the initial proceedings.
- Rule *(b) allows for relief from a final judgment due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, which applies to my situation where the notice for the hearing was not received in time.
---
Would you like assistance with refining any other sections or

Here’s the refined version incorporating your clarifications:
---
Supplementary Financial Records:
- I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings.
- Given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant should be scrutinized for credibility.
- The forensic accountant's report indicates that previous financial records provided by the defendant were fraudulent.
- I respectfully request that the court take appropriate measures to ensure that any new financial records submitted by the defendant are thoroughly examined for authenticity.
- This is crucial to prevent the acceptance of fraudulent documents as authenticated evidence and to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
Newly Discovered Evidence and Significant Factual Developments:
- This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments.
- Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
- My financial advisor was also the President, Shareholder, Partner, and CPA of the companies involved. While wearing these many hats, he represented me in the bankruptcy court, makingpromises he did not keep and filing fraudulent documents. The defendants now use the lawsuit filed against me in bankruptcy court by the trustee D'Oreo to question my credibility in this court. However, they come with unclean hands, having knowingly and willfully elicited the D'Oreo lawsuit to gain an unfair advantage and steal a prized piece of real estate at * Fountain Street, R.I.
- The transaction, buying the judgment for pennies on the dollar, not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me.
- Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
Rule *(b) Motion:
- Under Rule *(b), I am requesting the court to vacate the dismissal of my case due to excusable neglect, lack of notice, and newly discovered evidence.
- The newly discovered evidence, including the recent purchase of the judgment, provides substantial grounds for relief that were not available during the initial proceedings.
- Rule *(b) allows for relief from a final judgment due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, which applies to my situation where the notice for the hearing was not received in time.

Certainly! Here’s a polished version of your "Newly Discovered Evidence and Significant Factual Developments" section:
---
Newly Discovered Evidence and Significant Factual Developments:
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
My financial advisor, who also served as President, Shareholder, Partner, and CPA of the companies, represented me in the bankruptcy court. While wearing these many hats, he made promises to me that he did not keep, subsequently filing fraudulent documents in the bankruptcy court. The defendants now use the lawsuit filed against me by Trustee D'Oreo in the bankruptcy court as a means to challenge my credibility in this court. However, they come with unclean hands, having knowingly and willfully orchestrated the D'Oreo lawsuit to gain an unfair advantage and seize the valuable * Fountain Street property in Rhode Island.
After filing the lawsuit, my financial advisor used it as justification for not returning my name to thetitle of the commercial mill building, stating, "Mike, I can't put your name back on the Mill building because of D'Oreo's lawsuit against you." This lawsuit, in fact, was instigated by him while he was my trusted advisor.
The recent purchase of the judgment for a fraction of its value not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
Rule *(b) Motion:
- Under Rule *(b), I am requesting the court to vacate the dismissal of my case due to excusable neglect, lack of notice, and newly discovered evidence.
- The newly discovered evidence, including the recent purchase of the judgment, provides substantial grounds for relief that were not available during the initial proceedings.
- Rule *(b) allows for relief from a final judgment due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, which applies to my situation where the notice for the hearing was not received in time.
---
Would you like assistance with refining any other sections or addressing specific legal arguments?

Let's integrate the revised section on newly discovered evidence and the Rule *(b) motion into your document, replacing the "Supplementary Financial Records" section as you suggested. Here's the updated version:
---
Newly Discovered Evidence and Significant Factual Developments:
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
My financial advisor, who also served as President, Shareholder, Partner, and CPA of the companies, represented me in the bankruptcy court. While wearing these many hats, he made promises to me that he did not keep, subsequently filing fraudulent documents in the bankruptcy court. The defendants now use the lawsuit filed against me by Trustee D'Oreo in the bankruptcy court as a means to challenge my credibility in this court. However, they come with unclean hands, having knowingly and willfully orchestrated the D'Oreo lawsuit to gain an unfair advantage and seize the valuable * Fountain Street property in Rhode Island.
After filing the lawsuit,my financial advisor used it as justification for not returning my name to the title of the commercial mill building, stating, "Mike, I can't put your name back on the Mill building because of D'Oreo's lawsuit against you." This lawsuit, in fact, was instigated by him while he was my trusted advisor.
The recent purchase of the judgment for a fraction of its value not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
Rule *(b) Motion:
- Under Rule *(b), I am requesting the court to vacate the dismissal of my case due to excusable neglect, lack of notice, and newly discovered evidence.
- The newly discovered evidence, including the recent purchase of the judgment, provides substantial grounds for relief that were not available during the initial proceedings.
- Rule *(b) allows for relief from a final judgment due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, which applies to my situation where the notice for the hearing was not received in time.
---
Would you like assistance with refining any other sections or addressing specific legal arguments?

Your section on "Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits" is quite strong. Here is a polished version:
---
Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits:
- Recently, opposing counsel provided Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* to the court. These exhibits include balance sheets from * to *, emails, and other communications, all based on already established fraudulent accounting.
- In an email to me, opposing counsel stated, "I will be requesting that Judge Stern take Judicial Notice of many of these exhibits which will eliminate the need to receive a stipulation from all parties."
- The forensic accountant’s report confirms that these financial records and related documents are fraudulent. Therefore, I respectfully move to strike these exhibits.
- Submitting fraudulent evidence to the court undermines the integrity of the judicial process and constitutes fraud upon the court.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or specific legal arguments?

Here’s a polished version of your "Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits" section:
---
Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits:
- Recently, opposing counsel provided Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* to the court. These exhibits include balance sheets from * to *, emails, and other communications, all based on already established fraudulent accounting practices.

- In an email to me, opposing counsel stated, "I will be requesting that Judge Stern take Judicial Notice of many of these exhibits which will eliminate the need to receive a stipulation from all parties."
- The forensic accountant’s report confirms that these financial records and related documents are fraudulent. Therefore, I respectfully move to strike these exhibits.
- Submitting fraudulent evidence to the court not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also constitutes fraud upon the court.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need help with any specific legal arguments?

Yes, you can seek to strike the exhibits not only because the forensic accountant confirms their fraudulent nature but also because the way they were submitted undermines your due process rights. Here’s how you can incorporate this into your motion:
---
Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits:
- Recently, opposing counsel provided Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* to the court. These exhibits include balance sheets from * to *, emails, and other communications, all based on already established fraudulent accounting practices.
- In an email to me, opposing counsel stated, "I will be requesting that Judge Stern take Judicial Notice of many of these exhibits which will eliminate the need to receive a stipulation from all parties."
- The forensic accountant’s report confirms that these financial records and related documents are fraudulent. Therefore, I respectfully move to strike these exhibits.
- Furthermore, the manner in which these exhibits were submitted undermines the integrity of the judicial process. I did not receive proper notice and was not present to have a voice regarding the evidence, violating my due process rights.
- Submitting fraudulent evidence to the court not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also constitutes fraud upon the court.
---
Would you like assistance with refining anyother sections or addressing specific legal arguments?

You have a valid point. Here's a polished version of the "Unpaid Deposition Fees" section:
---
Unpaid Deposition Fees:
- Opposing counsel has yet to pay the forensic accountant for her deposition, which is their responsibility under Rule *(b)(*) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure.
- This failure to pay violates procedural rules and demonstrates opposing counsel's disregard for proper legal protocols.
- In the interest of fairness, it is unjust to dismiss my case for not attending a pretrial hearing while ignoring the defendants' procedural violations.
- Therefore, I respectfully request the court to address this procedural violation and consider it when evaluating the motion to vacate the dismissal.
---
Would you like help with any other sections or specific legal arguments?

Your point is valid, and it emphasizes the unfairness and procedural violations by the opposing counsel. Here’s a polished version of your section on unpaid deposition fees:
---
Unpaid Deposition Fees:
- Opposing counsel has yet to pay the forensic accountant for her deposition, which is their responsibility under Rule *(h) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure.
- This failure to pay violates procedural rules and underscores the opposing counsel's disregard for proper legal protocols.
- It is fundamentally unfair to dismiss my case for not attending a pretrial hearing while ignoring the opposing counsel's blatant violation of procedural rules by not paying the deposition fees.
- Such actions highlight the inequity in the treatment of parties and the necessity for the court to address these procedural abuses to ensure fairness and justice.
---
Would you like assistance with refining any other sections or addressing specific legal arguments?

It sounds like you have substantial evidence to support your motion. Here’s a concise way to incorporate the forensic accountant's invoice as an exhibit in your section on unpaid deposition fees:
---
Unpaid Deposition Fees:
- Opposing counsel has yet to pay the forensic accountant for her deposition, which is their responsibility under Rule *(h) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure.
- This failure to pay violates procedural rules and underscores the opposing counsel's disregard for proper legal protocols.
- It is fundamentally unfair to dismiss my case for not attending a pretrial hearing while ignoring the opposing counsel's blatant violation of procedural rules by not paying the deposition fees.
- Such actions highlight the inequity in the treatment of parties and the necessity for the court to address these procedural abuses to ensure fairness and justice.
Exhibit:
- Attached is the invoice from the forensic accountant, which remains unpaid by the opposing counsel, demonstrating their procedural violation.
---
Would you like assistance with refining any other sections or addressing specific legal arguments?

Yes, including a section on the challenges you face as a pro se litigant can provide context and highlight the difficulties you’ve encountered. Here’s a polished version of your section:
---
Challenges as a Pro Se Litigant:
- Although this court may find it more challenging to work with a pro se litigant, I am compelled to represent myself due to the grave financial crimes committed against me by my trusted financial advisor and partners, the defendants. These crimes have left me insolvent while enriching them by millions of dollars.
- This is demonstrated by the fraudulent conversion of my shares in our partnered company through unfulfilled promises for which I received nothing (Exhibit D), and the fraudulent conversion of the commercial building at * Fountain St, R.I., for which I also received nothing (Exhibit E).
- The bankruptcy court was exploited, and the listed creditors were misled, leaving me to pay the Small Business Loan debt while my so-called partners immediately refinanced the building, stealing my hard-earned equity. Subsequently, they conducted an illegal self-help eviction by changing the locks to the building, stripping me of both my business and the property.
- Therefore, I do not enjoy or relish being a pro se litigant in this honorablecourt, but I am forced to do so. This has left the defendant with an upper hand, having hired two attorneys to litigate this matter, funded by their unjust enrichment.
---
Would you like to proceed with refining any other sections or addressing specific legal arguments?

Including the section on "Challenges as a Pro Se Litigant" is a good idea as it provides context for the difficulties you're facing. Here’s a polished version:
---
Challenges as a Pro Se Litigant:
- Although this court may find it more challenging to work with a pro se litigant, I am compelled to represent myself due to the grave financial crimes committed against me by my trusted financial advisor and my partners, the defendants. These crimes have left me insolvent while enriching them by millions of dollars.
- This is demonstrated by the fraudulent conversion of my shares in our partnered company, initiated by unfulfilled empty promises for which I received nothing (Exhibit D), and the fraudulent conversion of the expensive commercial building at * Fountain St, R.I., for which I received nothing (Exhibit E). The bankruptcy court was abused, and the creditors listed were defrauded, leaving me to pay the Small Business Loan debt while my so-called partners immediately refinanced the building, stealing my hard-earned equity and subsequently performing an illegal self-help eviction, changing the locks to the building, and stripping me of my business and the building.
- Therefore, I do not enjoy or relish being a pro se litigant in this honorablecourt, but I am forced to do so. This has left the defendant with an upper hand, having hired two attorneys to litigate this matter, paid for by his unjust enrichment.
---
Would you like assistance with refining any other sections or addressing specific legal arguments?

Your "Challenges as a Pro Se Litigant" section is compelling and provides context for your situation. Here’s a polished version:
---
Challenges as a Pro Se Litigant:
- Although this court may find it more challenging to work with a pro se litigant, I am compelled to represent myself due to the grave financial crimes committed against me by my trusted financial advisor and my partners, the defendants. These crimes have left me insolvent while enriching them by millions of dollars.

- This is demonstrated by the fraudulent conversion of my shares in our partnered company, initiated by unfulfilled empty promises for which I received nothing (Exhibit D), and the fraudulent conversion of the expensive commercial building at * Fountain St, R.I., for which I received nothing (Exhibit E).

- The bankruptcy court was abused, and the creditors were misled. I was left paying the Small Business Loan debt while my so-called partners immediately refinanced the building, stealing my hard-earned equity and subsequently executing an illegal self-help eviction by changing the locks to the building, stripping me of my business and the property.
- Therefore, I do not enjoy or relish being a pro se litigant in this honorable court, but I am forced todo so. This has left the defendant with an upper hand, having hired two attorneys to litigate this matter, paid for by his unjust enrichment.
---
Would you like assistance with refining any other sections or addressing specific legal arguments?

Your section on the challenges of being a pro se litigant is strong and compelling. Here’s a polished version incorporating your points:
---
Challenges as a Pro Se Litigant:
- Although this court may find it more challenging to work with a pro se litigant, I am compelled to represent myself due to the grave financial crimes committed against me by my trusted financial advisor and my partners, the defendants. These crimes have left me insolvent while enriching them by millions of dollars.

- This is demonstrated by the fraudulent conversion of my shares in our partnered company, initiated by unfulfilled empty promises for which I received nothing (Exhibit D), and the fraudulent conversion of the expensive commercial building at * Fountain St, R.I., for which I received nothing (Exhibit E).
- The bankruptcy court was abused, and the creditors were misled. I was left paying the Small Business Loan debt while my so-called partners immediately refinanced the building, stealing my hard-earned equity and subsequently executing an illegal self-help eviction by changing the locks to the building, stripping me of my business and the property.
- Therefore, I do not enjoy or relish being a pro se litigant in this honorable court, but I am forced to do so. This has left the defendant with an upper hand, having hired two attorneys to litigate this matter, paid for by their unjust enrichment, which has been codified by the forensic accountant, thereby eliminating the hearsay evidence of "he said, she said."
---
Would you like assistance with refining any other sections or addressing specific legal arguments?

Your argument for reconsideration is strong and the addition of Rule *(b) highlights the relevance of excusable neglect and newly discovered evidence. Here’s a refined version incorporating your points:
---