Mistrial Motion Options Connecticut

Summary

In Connecticut, if a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, parties can file a motion to reargue if there are grounds like legal errors or overlooked evidence. The Connecticut General Statutes and local court rules may provide guidance, though specific statutes on mistrials might not be detailed. Consulting a local attorney or legal resources can offer further insights, especially for pro se litigants.

Full Conversation

Where can I find the statutory language regarding filing a motion for reargue? The is nothing in the CT practice book that addresses mistrials in a civil case
For Connecticut civil cases, the statutory language for filing a motion to reargue or reconsider is often found in the Connecticut General Statutes and local court rules. You may want to review:
- Connecticut General Statutes, particularly sections related to civil procedure.
- Local court rules or standing orders of the specific court handling the case.
If you have specific details or need further guidance, feel free to share.
Would this scenario justify a motion to reargue a judge's mistrial decision
In Connecticut, filing a motion to reargue a judge's mistrial decision in a civil case can be justified if there are grounds such as legal errors or overlooked evidence. It's important to consult the Connecticut General Statutes and local court rules. Would you like assistance finding specific statute sections or court rules?
IN a civil bench trial where the judge, midway through the proceedings, abruptly declares a mistrial because a key witness (for your side) unexpectedly becomes unable to continue testifying. If there were other ways to address this, such as rescheduling the testimony or allowing for the admission of the witness' prior statements, and the judge failed to consider these alternatives
Case Rating: *
In Virginia, if a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, you can file a motion to reconsider or reargue the decision. This can be justified if there were alternative solutions, like rescheduling testimony or admitting prior statements, that the judge failed to consider. Do you need guidance on filing such a motion?
Would this scenario justify a motion to reargue a judge's mistrial decision - -in a civil bench trial where the judge, midway through the proceedings, abruptly declares a mistrial because a key witness (for your side) unexpectedly becomes unable to continue testifying. If there were other ways to address this, such as rescheduling the testimony or allowing for the admission of the witness' prior statements, and the judge failed to consider these alternatives
Case Rating: *
In Virginia, it may be justified to file a motion to reargue a judge's mistrial decision in a civil bench trial if alternative solutions, like rescheduling testimony or admitting prior statements, were not considered. Consulting the Virginia Civil Procedure Code and relevant local court rules is advisable.
Why are you saying Virginia? The case is in CT - - Would this scenario justify a motion to reargue a judge's mistrial decision - -in a civil bench trial where the judge, midway through the proceedings, abruptly declares a mistrial because a key witness (for your side) unexpectedly becomes unable to continue testifying. If there were other ways to address this, such as rescheduling the testimony or allowing for the admission of the witness' prior statements, and the judge failed to consider these alternatives
Case Rating: *
Apologies for the confusion. In Connecticut, if a judge declares a mistrial due to a key witness's unavailability, and alternatives weren't considered, filing a motion to reargue could be justified. It's important to consult the Connecticut General Statutes and local court rules for specific guidance. Need help finding specific statutes?
There is nothing specific on this in the CT Gen Statutes and nothing in the local court rules
Case Rating: *
In Connecticut, while specific statutes may not address mistrials in detail, a motion to reargue can be filed if legal errors or overlooked alternatives exist. Consulting a local attorney familiar with Connecticut civil procedures might offer more precise guidance. Would you like help finding a lawyer?
No. The case is pro se
Case Rating: *
In Connecticut, if there are no specific statutes or local court rules regarding a motion to reargue a mistrial, consulting a legal professional familiar with civil procedures might provide more clarity. However, since you're proceeding pro se, exploring Connecticut legal forums or resources may also offer insights.