Notarized Affidavit Testimony Rules
Summary
Before 1989 in New York, notarized affidavits could be used as direct testimony if properly notarized, relevant, and compliant with evidence rules. CPLR 2106 outlines affidavit requirements. For detailed case references, consult historical case law or legal databases.Full Conversation
yes, but in new york
Hey! Since you're looking for information about New York, the rules may differ slightly. Generally, before *, notarized affidavits could be used as direct testimony under certain circumstances.
- They needed to be properly notarized.
- They had to be relevant and material to the case.
- They were subject to the rules of evidence.
Would you like more specific details?
yes, with sources
Sure! In New York, before *, here are key points about the use of notarized affidavits as direct testimony:
-
Proper Notarization: The affidavit had to be properly notarized to ensure its authenticity.
-
Relevance and Materiality: The affidavit needed to be relevant and material to the case.
-
Rules of Evidence: The affidavit was subject to New York's rules of evidence, which means it had to comply with standards for admissibility.
Relevant Sources:
*. New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR): Specifically, CPLR * outlines the requirements for affidavits.
*. Historical Case Law: Reviewing case law from before * can provide context on how courts treated notarized affidavits.
Would you need any specific case references or further details on this topic?
can you give me the CPL supporting it
Case Rating: *
It looks like you need information regarding the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) that support the admissibility of notarized affidavits as direct testimony prior to *. Here’s a key point:
- CPLR *: This rule outlines the requirements for affidavits in New York.
For specific case references or further details, you might want to consult historical case law or legal databases. Would you need more specific information or have another question?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat