Responding To Discovery Requests
Summary
In Oklahoma, when responding to a certificate of service of discovery, you should draft a formal response acknowledging receipt, specify any objections, and ensure compliance with Oklahoma Civil Procedure rules. Key defenses include lack of comprehension as a co-signer, statute of limitations (5 years for written contracts), lack of notification, and involvement in bankruptcy. If you were not properly served, you can argue insufficient service under Oklahoma law 12 O.S. 2004. Deny claims based on relevance and ensure all responses are well-documented with supporting evidence. Consider challenging jurisdiction if the case involves Missouri rules in Oklahoma County.Full Conversation
Dave
Hi Dave! How can I assist you with your legal issue today?
I need help with responding to a certificate of service of discovery in Oklahoma county.
Hey Dave! For responding to a certificate of service of discovery in Oklahoma County, you'll generally need to:
- Draft a formal response acknowledging receipt.
- Specify any objections or issues with the discovery request.
- Ensure your response complies with Oklahoma Civil Procedure rules.
Do you have specific concerns about the discovery request?
- Draft a formal response acknowledging receipt.
- Specify any objections or issues with the discovery request.
- Ensure your response complies with Oklahoma Civil Procedure rules.
Do you have specific concerns about the discovery request?
I want to deny all their claims because I didn't comprehend the obligation as I was a co signer on a vehicle, this is over the statute of limitations, I never received anything in the mail, and the car has been in a bankruptcy by the primary owner.
Got it, Dave. To strengthen your response, you might want to focus on these points:
- Lack of Comprehension: Mention that you did not fully understand the obligations as a co-signer.
- Statute of Limitations: In Oklahoma, the statute of limitations for written contracts is 5 years. Specify if this time frame has lapsed.
- Lack of Notification: State clearly that you never received any notices or mail related to the claims.
- Bankruptcy of Primary Owner: Highlight that the vehicle was part of a bankruptcy case involving the primary owner.
Do you have any documents or evidence to support these claims?
- Lack of Comprehension: Mention that you did not fully understand the obligations as a co-signer.
- Statute of Limitations: In Oklahoma, the statute of limitations for written contracts is 5 years. Specify if this time frame has lapsed.
- Lack of Notification: State clearly that you never received any notices or mail related to the claims.
- Bankruptcy of Primary Owner: Highlight that the vehicle was part of a bankruptcy case involving the primary owner.
Do you have any documents or evidence to support these claims?
Yes.
Dave, make sure to include all supporting documents when you draft your response. Here are your key points to include:
- Lack of Comprehension: Mention your limited understanding as a co-signer.
- Statute of Limitations: Highlight if the *-year period for written contracts has passed.
- Lack of Notification: Emphasize the absence of mailed notices.
- Bankruptcy: Note the vehicle's involvement in the primary owner's bankruptcy.
Do you have any other questions or concerns about your response?
- Lack of Comprehension: Mention your limited understanding as a co-signer.
- Statute of Limitations: Highlight if the *-year period for written contracts has passed.
- Lack of Notification: Emphasize the absence of mailed notices.
- Bankruptcy: Note the vehicle's involvement in the primary owner's bankruptcy.
Do you have any other questions or concerns about your response?
Can you help me deny each question with the law?
Hey Dave! It sounds like you have several strong points to argue. Here’s a concise way to deny each claim based on the points you mentioned:
*. Lack of Comprehension:
- Oklahoma law recognizes that co-signers are equally liable. However, if you can prove you were misled or not adequately informed, this might be a defense.
*. Statute of Limitations:
- Under Oklahoma law, the statute of limitations for written contracts is 5 years. If this period has expired, the claim may be invalid.
*. Lack of Notification:
- If you never received any notices or mail, you may argue insufficient service of process, which is required under Oklahoma Civil Procedure.
*. Bankruptcy of Primary Owner:
- If the primary owner’s bankruptcy included the vehicle, you may be released from liability depending on the bankruptcy discharge and the type of bankruptcy filed (Chapter * or Chapter *).
Would you like more detailed information on any of these points?
*. Lack of Comprehension:
- Oklahoma law recognizes that co-signers are equally liable. However, if you can prove you were misled or not adequately informed, this might be a defense.
*. Statute of Limitations:
- Under Oklahoma law, the statute of limitations for written contracts is 5 years. If this period has expired, the claim may be invalid.
*. Lack of Notification:
- If you never received any notices or mail, you may argue insufficient service of process, which is required under Oklahoma Civil Procedure.
*. Bankruptcy of Primary Owner:
- If the primary owner’s bankruptcy included the vehicle, you may be released from liability depending on the bankruptcy discharge and the type of bankruptcy filed (Chapter * or Chapter *).
Would you like more detailed information on any of these points?
Yes please
Sure, Dave! Here’s a bit more detail on each of your defense points:
*. Lack of Comprehension:
- If you can demonstrate that you were misled or inadequately informed, this can be a defense. Oklahoma law generally expects co-signers to be aware of their obligations, but exceptions exist for proven misinformation.
*. Statute of Limitations:
- Oklahoma law sets a *-year statute of limitations for written contracts. If this time frame has expired, you can assert that the claim is time-barred.
*. Lack of Notification:
- Oklahoma Civil Procedure requires proper service of process. If you did not receive any notices, you can argue that there was insufficient service, which could invalidate the claim.
*. Bankruptcy of Primary Owner:
- If the primary owner's bankruptcy included the vehicle, the discharge may relieve you of liability. The type of bankruptcy (Chapter * or Chapter *) and the specifics of the discharge will determine the outcome.
Would you like assistance in drafting your formal response or any other legal concerns?
*. Lack of Comprehension:
- If you can demonstrate that you were misled or inadequately informed, this can be a defense. Oklahoma law generally expects co-signers to be aware of their obligations, but exceptions exist for proven misinformation.
*. Statute of Limitations:
- Oklahoma law sets a *-year statute of limitations for written contracts. If this time frame has expired, you can assert that the claim is time-barred.
*. Lack of Notification:
- Oklahoma Civil Procedure requires proper service of process. If you did not receive any notices, you can argue that there was insufficient service, which could invalidate the claim.
*. Bankruptcy of Primary Owner:
- If the primary owner's bankruptcy included the vehicle, the discharge may relieve you of liability. The type of bankruptcy (Chapter * or Chapter *) and the specifics of the discharge will determine the outcome.
Would you like assistance in drafting your formal response or any other legal concerns?
Yes
Dave, here’s a structured way to draft your formal response:
*. Lack of Comprehension:
- State that you were not adequately informed about your obligations as a co-signer and provide any evidence of this misunderstanding.
*. Statute of Limitations:
- Assert that the *-year statute of limitations for written contracts has expired, making the claim invalid.
*. Lack of Notification:
- Indicate that you never received any official notices or mail, citing insufficient service of process as per Oklahoma Civil Procedure.
*. Bankruptcy of Primary Owner:
- Highlight that the vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy. Specify the type of bankruptcy (Chapter * or Chapter *) and detail how the discharge affects your liability.
Include any supporting documents with your response. Is there anything specific you need help drafting in your response?
*. Lack of Comprehension:
- State that you were not adequately informed about your obligations as a co-signer and provide any evidence of this misunderstanding.
*. Statute of Limitations:
- Assert that the *-year statute of limitations for written contracts has expired, making the claim invalid.
*. Lack of Notification:
- Indicate that you never received any official notices or mail, citing insufficient service of process as per Oklahoma Civil Procedure.
*. Bankruptcy of Primary Owner:
- Highlight that the vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy. Specify the type of bankruptcy (Chapter * or Chapter *) and detail how the discharge affects your liability.
Include any supporting documents with your response. Is there anything specific you need help drafting in your response?
how should my format appear?
Hey Dave! Here's a simple format for your formal response:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Recipient's Name]
[Recipient's Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear [Recipient's Name],
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. Below are my points of contention:
*. Lack of Comprehension:
I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer. Attached is [evidence/document] supporting this misunderstanding.
*. Statute of Limitations:
The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired. The timeline for this claim is invalid as the contract dates back to [date].
*. Lack of Notification:
I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, which constitutes insufficient service of process under Oklahoma Civil Procedure.
*. Bankruptcy of Primary Owner:
The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The type of bankruptcy was [Chapter */Chapter *], and the discharge relieves me of liability as per the attached documents.
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]**
---
Would you like any additional information or help with any specific section?
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Recipient's Name]
[Recipient's Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear [Recipient's Name],
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. Below are my points of contention:
*. Lack of Comprehension:
I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer. Attached is [evidence/document] supporting this misunderstanding.
*. Statute of Limitations:
The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired. The timeline for this claim is invalid as the contract dates back to [date].
*. Lack of Notification:
I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, which constitutes insufficient service of process under Oklahoma Civil Procedure.
*. Bankruptcy of Primary Owner:
The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The type of bankruptcy was [Chapter */Chapter *], and the discharge relieves me of liability as per the attached documents.
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]**
---
Would you like any additional information or help with any specific section?
regarding comprehension can I state emotional distress?
In Oklahoma, you can potentially include emotional distress as part of your claim under certain conditions, though it can be challenging to prove. Emotional distress usually requires:
- Evidence of severe emotional suffering.
- Proof that the distress was a direct result of the other party's actions.
Would you like advice on how to document emotional distress?
- Evidence of severe emotional suffering.
- Proof that the distress was a direct result of the other party's actions.
Would you like advice on how to document emotional distress?
yes
Hey Dave! Documenting emotional distress can strengthen your case. Here’s how you can approach it:
- Medical Records: Include any documentation from healthcare providers about your emotional state.
- Witness Statements: Gather statements from people who can attest to your distress.
- Personal Journal: Maintain a journal detailing your emotional experiences and how they link to the issue.
Would you like help drafting this part of your response?
- Medical Records: Include any documentation from healthcare providers about your emotional state.
- Witness Statements: Gather statements from people who can attest to your distress.
- Personal Journal: Maintain a journal detailing your emotional experiences and how they link to the issue.
Would you like help drafting this part of your response?
yes
Hey Dave! Here’s how you can draft the emotional distress part of your response:
---
*. Lack of Comprehension:
I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: [Attach statements from individuals who can attest to your emotional suffering].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
---
Would you like help with any other sections or further details?
---
*. Lack of Comprehension:
I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: [Attach statements from individuals who can attest to your emotional suffering].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
---
Would you like help with any other sections or further details?
I was pressured by the car dealership salesman as I was only there to provide transportation to the primary car owner.
Hey Dave! It's essential to mention the pressure you experienced at the dealership. Here’s how you can incorporate it into your response:
---
*. Lack of Comprehension:
I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. I was only there to provide transportation to the primary car owner. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: [Attach statements from individuals who can attest to your emotional suffering].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
---
Do you need additional help with any other sections or specific details?
---
*. Lack of Comprehension:
I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. I was only there to provide transportation to the primary car owner. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: [Attach statements from individuals who can attest to your emotional suffering].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
---
Do you need additional help with any other sections or specific details?
can my spouse be a witness to my anxiety and lack of sleep
Yes, your spouse can be a witness to your anxiety and lack of sleep. Here's how you can include it:
---
*. Lack of Comprehension:
I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse's Name], can attest to my anxiety and lack of sleep. [Attach their statement].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
---
Need help with anything else?
---
*. Lack of Comprehension:
I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse's Name], can attest to my anxiety and lack of sleep. [Attach their statement].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
---
Need help with anything else?
Should I state that I am self representing
Hey Dave! Yes, you should state that you are representing yourself. Here’s how you can include it:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Recipient's Name]
[Recipient's Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
Dear [Recipient's Name],
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my points of contention:
*. Lack of Comprehension:
I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse's Name], can attest to my anxiety and lack of sleep. [Attach their statement].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
*. Statute of Limitations:
The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired. The timeline for this claim is invalid as the contract dates back to [date].
*. Lack of Notification:
I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, which constitutes insufficient service of process under Oklahoma Civil Procedure.
*. Bankruptcy of Primary Owner:
The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The type of bankruptcy was [Chapter */Chapter *], and the discharge relieves me of liability as per the attached documents.
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like help with any other aspects?
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Recipient's Name]
[Recipient's Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
Dear [Recipient's Name],
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my points of contention:
*. Lack of Comprehension:
I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse's Name], can attest to my anxiety and lack of sleep. [Attach their statement].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
*. Statute of Limitations:
The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired. The timeline for this claim is invalid as the contract dates back to [date].
*. Lack of Notification:
I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, which constitutes insufficient service of process under Oklahoma Civil Procedure.
*. Bankruptcy of Primary Owner:
The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The type of bankruptcy was [Chapter */Chapter *], and the discharge relieves me of liability as per the attached documents.
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like help with any other aspects?
Should I start my response with denying the requested admissions?
Hey Dave! Generally, it's a good idea to address each admission request individually, either denying or admitting based on the facts and supporting evidence you have. Here’s a structured approach:
*. Start with a General Denial:
- "I deny each and every allegation set forth in the requested admissions."
*. Address Specific Admissions:
- For each admission, state whether you admit or deny, and provide reasons if denying.
Would you like a template to help format these specific responses?
*. Start with a General Denial:
- "I deny each and every allegation set forth in the requested admissions."
*. Address Specific Admissions:
- For each admission, state whether you admit or deny, and provide reasons if denying.
Would you like a template to help format these specific responses?
yes
Case Rating: *
Hey Dave! Here’s a template to help you format your responses to the requested admissions:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Recipient's Name]
[Recipient's Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear [Recipient's Name],
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions:
*. General Denial:
- I deny each and every allegation set forth in the requested admissions.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation - Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, which constitutes insufficient service of process under Oklahoma Civil Procedure."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The type of bankruptcy was [Chapter */Chapter *], and the discharge relieves me of liability as per the attached documents."]
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My
Hey Dave! Here’s a template to help you format your responses to the requested admissions:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Recipient's Name]
[Recipient's Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear [Recipient's Name],
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions:
*. General Denial:
- I deny each and every allegation set forth in the requested admissions.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation - Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, which constitutes insufficient service of process under Oklahoma Civil Procedure."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The type of bankruptcy was [Chapter */Chapter *], and the discharge relieves me of liability as per the attached documents."]
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My
what is the proper format for typing a response
Hey Dave! Here's a simple and structured format for typing your response:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Recipient's Name]
[Recipient's Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear [Recipient's Name],
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. General Denial:
- I deny each and every allegation set forth in the requested admissions.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, which constitutes insufficient service of process under Oklahoma Civil Procedure."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The type of bankruptcy was [Chapter */Chapter *], and the discharge relieves me of liability as per the attached documents."]
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse,
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Recipient's Name]
[Recipient's Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear [Recipient's Name],
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. General Denial:
- I deny each and every allegation set forth in the requested admissions.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, which constitutes insufficient service of process under Oklahoma Civil Procedure."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The type of bankruptcy was [Chapter */Chapter *], and the discharge relieves me of liability as per the attached documents."]
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse,
the correct font?
Hey Dave! When it comes to legal documents, a professional and readable font is crucial. Here are a few commonly accepted fonts:
- Times New Roman: *-point size, widely used in legal documents.
- Arial: *-point size, another clean and professional option.
- Calibri: *-point size, modern and readable.
Would you like help with any other aspect of your response?
- Times New Roman: *-point size, widely used in legal documents.
- Arial: *-point size, another clean and professional option.
- Calibri: *-point size, modern and readable.
Would you like help with any other aspect of your response?
Should I address the plaintiff or counsel representing the plaintiff?
Hey Dave! Generally, you should address the counsel representing the plaintiff if they have legal representation. This ensures that your response is appropriately directed to the party handling the legal matter.
Would you like a sample opening line to address the counsel?
Would you like a sample opening line to address the counsel?
Yes their name is FABER AND BRAND LLC,
Hey Dave! Here’s a sample opening line to address the counsel representing the plaintiff:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. General Denial:
- I deny each and every allegation set forth in the requested admissions.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit ordeny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, which constitutes insufficient service of process under Oklahoma Civil Procedure."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The type of bankruptcy was [Chapter */Chapter *], and the discharge relieves me of liability as per the attached documents."]
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- **Witness Statements
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. General Denial:
- I deny each and every allegation set forth in the requested admissions.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit ordeny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, which constitutes insufficient service of process under Oklahoma Civil Procedure."]
- Admission *: [State whether you admit or deny the allegation].
- Reason for Denial (if applicable): [Provide your reason, e.g., "The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The type of bankruptcy was [Chapter */Chapter *], and the discharge relieves me of liability as per the attached documents."]
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- **Witness Statements
Instead of general denial can we deny under relevance
Hey Dave! Yes, instead of a general denial, you can deny under relevance. Here’s how you can structure it:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Relevance Denial:
- "I deny each and every allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance."
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse's Name], can attest to my anxiety and lack of sleep. [Attach their statement].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any further assistance
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Relevance Denial:
- "I deny each and every allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance."
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse's Name], can attest to my anxiety and lack of sleep. [Attach their statement].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
Please find attached all supporting documents for your reference.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any further assistance
Admit that the defendant is Dave, and that defendant was properly served with process in the matter
Hey Dave! Here's how you can address the admission that you are the defendant and were properly served:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave, and that the defendant was properly served with process in the matter.
*. Relevance Denial:
- "I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance."
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me,and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse's Name], can attest to my anxiety and lack of sleep. [Attach their statement].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave, and that the defendant was properly served with process in the matter.
*. Relevance Denial:
- "I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance."
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me,and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse's Name], can attest to my anxiety and lack of sleep. [Attach their statement].
- Personal Journal: [Include excerpts from your journal detailing your emotional experiences related to this matter].
I wasn't properly serve the officer came to house on multiple ocassions and looked through my home window.
Hey Dave! Here’s how you can address the improper service allegation:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma Civil Procedure.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse's Name], can attest to my
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma Civil Procedure.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse's Name], can attest to my
Oklahoma law * o.s. *
Hey Dave! Here’s a structured response to include Oklahoma law * O.S. * and your points regarding improper service:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every otherallegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every otherallegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from
I'd like to deny this under law it states admit that plaintiff is proper party and has properly brought this action.
Hey Dave! Here's how you can deny the claim that the plaintiff is the proper party and has properly brought this action:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forthin the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
-
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forthin the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
-
can you help with a denial template for the previous question
Sure, Dave! Here's a denial template based on your previous question:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Additional Points:
- Lack of Comprehension:
- I was not adequately informed about my obligations as a co-signer and was pressured by the car dealership salesman. This has caused me severe emotional distress, as documented by the following:
- Medical Records: [Attach relevant documents from healthcare providers].
- Witness Statements: My spouse, [Spouse
admit that plaintiff is proper party and has properly brought this action.
Hey Dave! Here’s a template to deny the requested admission that the plaintiff is the proper party and has properly brought this action:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegationset forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- Admission: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I deny that the plaintiff is the proper party and that the action has been properly brought. The claim lacks sufficient legal basis and proper notification as per Oklahoma law.
*. Additional Points:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegationset forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- Admission: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I deny that the plaintiff is the proper party and that the action has been properly brought. The claim lacks sufficient legal basis and proper notification as per Oklahoma law.
*. Additional Points:
admit that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and venue is proper
Hey Dave! Here’s how you can address admitting the court's jurisdiction and venue:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and venue is proper.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forthin the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- Admission: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I deny that the plaintiff is the proper party and that the action has been properly brought. The claim lacks sufficient legal basis and proper notification as per Oklahoma law.
*. Additional Points:
-
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and venue is proper.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forthin the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- Admission: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I deny that the plaintiff is the proper party and that the action has been properly brought. The claim lacks sufficient legal basis and proper notification as per Oklahoma law.
*. Additional Points:
-
I believe that claim is to broad
Hey Dave! I can help you narrow it down. Here’s a more concise template for your response:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and venue is proper.
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Den3. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- Admission: Denied.
- Reason for Denial:** I deny that the plaintiff is the proper party and that the action has been properly brought. The claim lacks
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Admit:
- I admit that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and venue is proper.
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Den3. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- Admission: Denied.
- Reason for Denial:** I deny that the plaintiff is the proper party and that the action has been properly brought. The claim lacks
I'd like to deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and venue is proper
Hey Dave! Here’s a revised template for denying the court's jurisdiction and venue:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*.Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- Admission: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I deny that the plaintiff is the proper party and that the action has been properly brought. The claim lacks sufficient legal
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*.Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- Admission: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I deny that the plaintiff is the proper party and that the action has been properly brought. The claim lacks sufficient legal
what could happen if I admit that this court has jurisdiction
Hey Dave! If you admit that the court has jurisdiction, here's what could happen:
- Proceedings Will Continue: The case will move forward in that court without challenges to its authority.
- Waiving Jurisdictional Defenses: You lose the opportunity to argue that the court lacks jurisdiction later.
- Focus on Merits: The court will focus on the substantive issues rather than jurisdictional ones.
Do you have any other specific concerns or questions about your case?
- Proceedings Will Continue: The case will move forward in that court without challenges to its authority.
- Waiving Jurisdictional Defenses: You lose the opportunity to argue that the court lacks jurisdiction later.
- Focus on Merits: The court will focus on the substantive issues rather than jurisdictional ones.
Do you have any other specific concerns or questions about your case?
should I deny it
Hey Dave! If you believe there's a valid reason to challenge the court's jurisdiction—like improper service or venue issues—you should deny it. However, if the jurisdiction and venue are correct, admitting it can help streamline the process. Do you have any specific evidence or doubts about the court's jurisdiction or venue?
yes this took place in Oklahoma county and the pursuant is to the Missouri rules of civil procedure *.*
Hey Dave! Given that the issue revolves around jurisdiction and the application of Missouri rules in Oklahoma County, you have a strong point to challenge jurisdiction and venue. Here’s a template to deny the court's jurisdiction and venue:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper, as the case pertains to Missouri rules of civil procedure *.* and not Oklahoma.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that Iwas properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. **Proper Party and Properly B
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my responses to the requested admissions and my points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper, as the case pertains to Missouri rules of civil procedure *.* and not Oklahoma.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that Iwas properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. **Proper Party and Properly B
can you help me deny all the request of discovery
Hey Dave! Here's a concise template to help you deny all the requests of discovery based on the points you've provided:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my denials and points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper, as the case pertains to Missouri rules of civil procedure *.* and not Oklahoma.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, whichdoes not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- Admission: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I deny that
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my denials and points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper, as the case pertains to Missouri rules of civil procedure *.* and not Oklahoma.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, whichdoes not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- Admission: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I deny that
I deny that carman on September * * which has heretofore been assigned and sold to various parties including and ultimately to plaintiff
Hey Dave! Here's a revised template to help you deny all the requests of discovery, including your specific denial about the assignment and sale of the vehicle on September *, *:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my denials and points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper, as the case pertains to Missouri rules of civil procedure *.* and not Oklahoma.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. Theofficer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- **
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my denials and points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper, as the case pertains to Missouri rules of civil procedure *.* and not Oklahoma.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. Theofficer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
*. Proper Party and Properly Brought Action Denial:
- **
I deny that I failed to cure said defualt as I never received anything in the mail or any notice
Hey Dave! Here’s an updated template that includes your specific denial about failing to cure the default due to lack of notification:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my denials and points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper, as the case pertains to Missouri rules of civil procedure *.* and not Oklahoma.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked throughmy home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my denials and points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper, as the case pertains to Missouri rules of civil procedure *.* and not Oklahoma.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve me and looked throughmy home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial
I want to dent that carman advised me of their plan to sell the vehicle as required by law.
Hey Dave! Here's a template to specifically address your denial that Carman advised you of their plan to sell the vehicle as required by law:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my denials and points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper, as the case pertains to Missouri rules of civil procedure *.* and not Oklahoma.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve meand looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Faber and Brand LLC
[Address of Faber and Brand LLC]
[City, State, Zip Code]
Subject: Response to Certificate of Service of Discovery
---
Dear Counsel,
I am writing to formally respond to the Certificate of Service of Discovery received on [date]. I am representing myself in this matter. Below are my denials and points of contention:
*. Deny:
- I deny that this court has jurisdiction in this matter and that venue is proper, as the case pertains to Missouri rules of civil procedure *.* and not Oklahoma.
*. Admit:
- I admit that the defendant is Dave.
*. Improper Service Denial:
- I deny that I was properly served with process in this matter. The officer made multiple attempts to serve meand looked through my home window, which does not constitute proper service according to Oklahoma law * O.S. *.
*. Relevance Denial:
- I deny each and every other allegation set forth in the requested admissions on the grounds of relevance.
*. Specific Admissions:
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The obligations as a co-signer were not adequately explained to me, and I was pressured by the salesman. This detail is irrelevant to the claim.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The *-year statute of limitations for written contracts in Oklahoma has expired, rendering the claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: I did not receive any official notices or mail regarding this matter, making the service of process insufficient and irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
- Reason for Denial: The vehicle was included in the primary owner’s bankruptcy case. The discharge affects my liability, making this claim irrelevant.
- Admission *: Denied.
can you explain for me * o.s * b *
Hey Dave! Sure, here’s an explanation of Oklahoma Statute * O.S. § *(B)(*):
Key Points of * O.S. § *(B)(*)
- Scope of Discovery: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the action.
- Relevance: Information need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable if it appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
- Privilege: Privileged information is protected and not required to be disclosed.
Do you need any further clarification on this statute?
- Scope of Discovery: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the action.
- Relevance: Information need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable if it appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
- Privilege: Privileged information is protected and not required to be disclosed.
Do you need any further clarification on this statute?
can you explain rele
Hey Dave! Here's a brief explanation of "relevance" in the context of legal discovery:
Key Points of Relevance in Legal Discovery:
- Relevance: Information is considered relevant if it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
- Discovery Scope: The scope of discovery includes any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense.
- Admissibility: Information sought doesn't need to be admissible in court if it appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
Does this help, or do you need more details on applying it to your case?
- Relevance: Information is considered relevant if it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
- Discovery Scope: The scope of discovery includes any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense.
- Admissibility: Information sought doesn't need to be admissible in court if it appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
Does this help, or do you need more details on applying it to your case?
can you explain admissibility
Hey Dave! Here's a quick explanation of "admissibility" in a legal context:
Key Points of Admissibility:
- Relevance: Evidence must be relevant to be admissible.
- Reliability: Evidence must be reliable and credible.
- Rules of Evidence: Must comply with specific rules, such as those in Oklahoma’s Rules of Evidence.
- No Privilege: Privileged information (e.g., attorney-client communications) is generally inadmissible.
Do you have any specific questions about how admissibility might apply to your case?
- Relevance: Evidence must be relevant to be admissible.
- Reliability: Evidence must be reliable and credible.
- Rules of Evidence: Must comply with specific rules, such as those in Oklahoma’s Rules of Evidence.
- No Privilege: Privileged information (e.g., attorney-client communications) is generally inadmissible.
Do you have any specific questions about how admissibility might apply to your case?