TRY ME!
Fraudulent Financial Practices Motion
Summary
In cases involving fraudulent financial practices, its crucial to act swiftly and present compelling evidence. Highlight key findings from forensic reports, request judicial notice, and address ethical concerns. Ensure all communications are clear, especially regarding notice of hearings. Health issues and consistent attendance can support requests for extensions. Supplementary financial records should be scrutinized for credibility. Consider consulting a local attorney for personalized guidance.Full Conversation
---
PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL VERIFIED EMERGENCY MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL AND STRIKE DEFENDANT’S MOTION BASED ON NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE
Introduction
The plaintiff respectfully submits this Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate the Dismissal and Strike the Defendant’s Motion. This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. Additionally, the forensic accountant’s report, previously submitted to the court, highlights tax evasion and fraudulent financial records, underscoring the gravity of this case and the need for immediate judicial intervention.
Given the serious allegations of fraud and new evidence, it's crucial to act promptly.
Can you specify if you need help drafting the motion or understanding the process?
Can you specify if you need help drafting the motion or understanding the process?
Need help drafting. Here's more. ---
Grounds for Motion
*.* Forensic Accountant’s Report
- Summarize key findings from the forensic accountant’s report, such as instances of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices.
- Reference the exhibit (e.g., "See Exhibit C").
- Emphasize that these findings were previously submitted to the court and should not be dismissed.
Sure, here's a draft for the "Grounds for Motion" section based on the information you provided:
---
Grounds for Motion
*. Forensic Accountant’s Report
- The forensic accountant’s report outlines instances of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices. See Exhibit C.
- These findings were previously submitted to the court, underscoring the severity of the defendant’s misconduct, and should not be dismissed.
*. Judicial Notice
- We request that the court take judicial notice of the forensic accountant’s report as authoritative evidence that supports our claims of fraud and financial misconduct.
*. Ethical Concerns
- The opposing counsel’s actions suggest aiding and abetting criminal conduct, further demonstrating ongoing fraudulent activities that require immediate judicial intervention.
*. Lack of Notice
- Documentation will show that proper notice of the hearing was not received, impacting the plaintiff’s ability to fully participate in the proceedings.
*. Health Issues
- Due to severe health issues affecting the plaintiff’s ability to effectively engage in the legal process, we request an extension.
*. Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits
- The defendant’s exhibits are fraudulent and should be stricken from the record.
---
Would you like to proceed with another sectionor need further assistance with this one?
---
Grounds for Motion
*. Forensic Accountant’s Report
- The forensic accountant’s report outlines instances of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices. See Exhibit C.
- These findings were previously submitted to the court, underscoring the severity of the defendant’s misconduct, and should not be dismissed.
*. Judicial Notice
- We request that the court take judicial notice of the forensic accountant’s report as authoritative evidence that supports our claims of fraud and financial misconduct.
*. Ethical Concerns
- The opposing counsel’s actions suggest aiding and abetting criminal conduct, further demonstrating ongoing fraudulent activities that require immediate judicial intervention.
*. Lack of Notice
- Documentation will show that proper notice of the hearing was not received, impacting the plaintiff’s ability to fully participate in the proceedings.
*. Health Issues
- Due to severe health issues affecting the plaintiff’s ability to effectively engage in the legal process, we request an extension.
*. Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits
- The defendant’s exhibits are fraudulent and should be stricken from the record.
---
Would you like to proceed with another sectionor need further assistance with this one?
An over view of my case. I hired my finacial advisor to assist me in my bankruptcy cases and he now owns my business and commercial property damages about * million. During the proceeding of my bankr under his care the trustee filed a advisarial proceeding against me claiming that i stole from my company. Although this was not trus and it was the result of my advisor , a CPA, work in the bankr case I got a judgment against me for $*,*. Last week that was just bought by one of the defandants in this case which is very susupicious and appears like bad faith. Would you agree? So I need to sompell the judge not to dismiss my case because of my mis pretrial hearing, though Im sure that he would like to because the case has been in his court room for 5 years but this is only because I am pro se and lost my attorney to lack of funds.
It sounds like a very complex situation with significant legal implications. Drafting a strong motion to vacate the dismissal is crucial. Here are some steps you can take:
- Summarize Key Points: Clearly state the fraudulent actions of your financial advisor.
- Highlight New Evidence: Emphasize the recent purchase of the judgment and the forensic accountant’s findings.
- Request Judicial Notice: Ask the court to consider this new evidence as authoritative.
- Ethical Concerns: Point out any actions by the opposing counsel that suggest misconduct.
- Health Issues: Provide documentation of your health problems affecting your participation.
- Lack of Notice: Show evidence that you didn’t receive proper notice for hearings.
Would you like help with specific wording for any of these sections?
- Summarize Key Points: Clearly state the fraudulent actions of your financial advisor.
- Highlight New Evidence: Emphasize the recent purchase of the judgment and the forensic accountant’s findings.
- Request Judicial Notice: Ask the court to consider this new evidence as authoritative.
- Ethical Concerns: Point out any actions by the opposing counsel that suggest misconduct.
- Health Issues: Provide documentation of your health problems affecting your participation.
- Lack of Notice: Show evidence that you didn’t receive proper notice for hearings.
Would you like help with specific wording for any of these sections?
Can i give you the motion one section at atime with you making edits?
Of course! Please provide the next section of your motion, and I'll assist you with editing it.
Is this next section ok?*. Forensic Accountant’s Report:
- Attached as Exhibit C is the report from a credible forensic accountant, which establishes serious allegations of tax evasion and commingling of funds by the defendant. These findings are critical to the integrity of this case.
- The forensic accountant’s report also establishes that the financial records and exhibits provided by the defendant are fraudulent.
Your "Forensic Accountant’s Report" section looks solid with clear and concise points. Here is a slightly refined version to ensure clarity and impact:
---
*. Forensic Accountant’s Report:
- Attached as Exhibit C is the report from a credible forensic accountant, detailing serious allegations of tax evasion and commingling of funds by the defendant.
- The report also confirms that the financial records and exhibits provided by the defendant are fraudulent, which is critical to the integrity of this case.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Forensic Accountant’s Report:
- Attached as Exhibit C is the report from a credible forensic accountant, detailing serious allegations of tax evasion and commingling of funds by the defendant.
- The report also confirms that the financial records and exhibits provided by the defendant are fraudulent, which is critical to the integrity of this case.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
*. Judicial Notice:
- I respectfully request that the court take judicial notice of the forensic accountant’s findings. The evidence provided is so authoritative and indisputable that it cannot reasonably be doubted.
- Additionally,the defendant, who was my trusted financial advisor hired to assist in my bankruptcy case to save my business and commercial building, now holds the title to both. This situation exemplifies a clear breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud. Similar to "res ipsa loquitur" in medical malpractice cases, where the evidence speaks for itself, the defendant’s actions speak volumes about their misconduct.
Your "Judicial Notice" section is well-drafted. Here’s a refined version for clarity and impact:
---
*. Judicial Notice:
- I respectfully request that the court take judicial notice of the forensic accountant’s findings. This evidence is so authoritative and indisputable that it cannot reasonably be doubted.
- Additionally, the defendant, my trusted financial advisor hired to assist in my bankruptcy case, now holds the title to my business and commercial building. This exemplifies a clear breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud. Similar to "res ipsa loquitur" in medical malpractice cases, where the evidence speaks for itself, the defendant’s actions speak volumes about their misconduct.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Judicial Notice:
- I respectfully request that the court take judicial notice of the forensic accountant’s findings. This evidence is so authoritative and indisputable that it cannot reasonably be doubted.
- Additionally, the defendant, my trusted financial advisor hired to assist in my bankruptcy case, now holds the title to my business and commercial building. This exemplifies a clear breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud. Similar to "res ipsa loquitur" in medical malpractice cases, where the evidence speaks for itself, the defendant’s actions speak volumes about their misconduct.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
is this okay?
Case Rating: *.
Your section on "Judicial Notice" looks good overall, but here's a slightly refined version to ensure clarity and impact:
---
*. Judicial Notice:
- I respectfully request that the court take judicial notice of the forensic accountant’s findings, as the evidence provided is authoritative and indisputable.
- Additionally, the defendant, who was my trusted financial advisor hired to assist in my bankruptcy case to save my business and commercial building, now holds the title to both. This situation exemplifies a clear breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud. Similar to "res ipsa loquitur" in medical malpractice cases, where the evidence speaks for itself, the defendant’s actions speak volumes about their misconduct.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
Your section on "Judicial Notice" looks good overall, but here's a slightly refined version to ensure clarity and impact:
---
*. Judicial Notice:
- I respectfully request that the court take judicial notice of the forensic accountant’s findings, as the evidence provided is authoritative and indisputable.
- Additionally, the defendant, who was my trusted financial advisor hired to assist in my bankruptcy case to save my business and commercial building, now holds the title to both. This situation exemplifies a clear breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud. Similar to "res ipsa loquitur" in medical malpractice cases, where the evidence speaks for itself, the defendant’s actions speak volumes about their misconduct.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
see above.
Your section on "Judicial Notice" looks quite strong. Here is a slightly refined version to ensure clarity and impact:
---
*. Judicial Notice:
- I respectfully request that the court take judicial notice of the forensic accountant’s findings. The evidence provided is so authoritative and indisputable that it cannot reasonably be doubted.
- Additionally, the defendant, who was my trusted financial advisor hired to assist in my bankruptcy case to save my business and commercial building, now holds the title to both. This situation exemplifies a clear breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud. Similar to "res ipsa loquitur" in medical malpractice cases, where the evidence speaks for itself, the defendant’s actions speak volumes about their misconduct.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Judicial Notice:
- I respectfully request that the court take judicial notice of the forensic accountant’s findings. The evidence provided is so authoritative and indisputable that it cannot reasonably be doubted.
- Additionally, the defendant, who was my trusted financial advisor hired to assist in my bankruptcy case to save my business and commercial building, now holds the title to both. This situation exemplifies a clear breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud. Similar to "res ipsa loquitur" in medical malpractice cases, where the evidence speaks for itself, the defendant’s actions speak volumes about their misconduct.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
Is this pertinent? *. Ethical Concerns:
- It is imperative to highlight that the opposing counsel, aware of these findings from the deposition of the forensic accountant, appears to be aiding and abetting criminal conduct. Representing the defendant with the aim of releasing them from liability and not reporting their illegal activities constitutes an act of aiding and abetting.
It sounds like you have a strong case with significant evidence of misconduct. Here is a refined version of your "Ethical Concerns" section:
---
*. Ethical Concerns:
- It is imperative to highlight that the opposing counsel, aware of the forensic accountant’s findings, appears to be aiding and abetting criminal conduct.
- Representing the defendant with the aim of releasing them from liability and not reporting their illegal activities constitutes an act of aiding and abetting.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Ethical Concerns:
- It is imperative to highlight that the opposing counsel, aware of the forensic accountant’s findings, appears to be aiding and abetting criminal conduct.
- Representing the defendant with the aim of releasing them from liability and not reporting their illegal activities constitutes an act of aiding and abetting.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
see above
Case Rating: *
Your section on "Ethical Concerns" is important and well-articulated. Here is a refined version to ensure clarity and impact:
---
*. Ethical Concerns:
- It is imperative to highlight that the opposing counsel, aware of the findings from the forensic accountant’s deposition, appears to be aiding and abetting criminal conduct. Representing the defendant with the aim of releasing them from liability and not reporting their illegal activities constitutes an act of aiding and abetting.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
Your section on "Ethical Concerns" is important and well-articulated. Here is a refined version to ensure clarity and impact:
---
*. Ethical Concerns:
- It is imperative to highlight that the opposing counsel, aware of the findings from the forensic accountant’s deposition, appears to be aiding and abetting criminal conduct. Representing the defendant with the aim of releasing them from liability and not reporting their illegal activities constitutes an act of aiding and abetting.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
see above
Your section on "Ethical Concerns" is important and relevant. Here’s a refined version to ensure clarity and impact:
---
*. Ethical Concerns:
- It is imperative to highlight that the opposing counsel, aware of these findings from the deposition of the forensic accountant, appears to be aiding and abetting criminal conduct.
- Representing the defendant with the aim of releasing them from liability and not reporting their illegal activities constitutes an act of aiding and abetting.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Ethical Concerns:
- It is imperative to highlight that the opposing counsel, aware of these findings from the deposition of the forensic accountant, appears to be aiding and abetting criminal conduct.
- Representing the defendant with the aim of releasing them from liability and not reporting their illegal activities constitutes an act of aiding and abetting.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
Sorry for the capital lease excuse it and misspellings. i THINK ID LIKE TO CLARIFY. i UNDERSTAND THAT THE COURT PROVIDED ME WITH nOTICE BUT i DID NOT RECIEVE IT GIVEN THAT OUR LAST HEARIN i UNDERSTood THAT OUR JURY TRAIL DATE WAS FOR DECEMEBER. So I DI d NOT ANTICIAPTE A ny nOTICEs FROM THE COURT IN oCTOBER BUT i WAS WRONG NOT TO LOOK FOR it..*. Lack of Notice:
- I did not receive proper notice of the hearing scheduled for October *, *. I discovered the notice was sent via email only after receiving the dismissal notice and conducting a search. Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to honor this court's proceedings and my lack of notice.
Your section on "Lack of Notice" is crucial and relevant. Here's a refined version for clarity and impact:
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- I did not receive proper notice of the hearing scheduled for October *, *. I discovered the notice was sent via email only after receiving the dismissal notice and conducting a search.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to honor this court's proceedings and my lack of notice.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- I did not receive proper notice of the hearing scheduled for October *, *. I discovered the notice was sent via email only after receiving the dismissal notice and conducting a search.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to honor this court's proceedings and my lack of notice.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
see above
Your section on "Lack of Notice" is crucial for your case. Here's a refined version for clarity and impact:
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- I did not receive proper notice of the hearing scheduled for October *, *. I discovered the notice was sent via email only after receiving the dismissal notice and conducting a search.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to honor this court's proceedings and my lack of notice.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- I did not receive proper notice of the hearing scheduled for October *, *. I discovered the notice was sent via email only after receiving the dismissal notice and conducting a search.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to honor this court's proceedings and my lack of notice.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
Please make Lack of Notice more compelling.
Here’s a refined and more compelling version of your "Lack of Notice" section:
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- Despite the court providing notice, I did not receive it due to a misunderstanding from our last hearing where I was under the impression that our jury trial date was set for December. Consequently, I did not anticipate any notices from the court in October.
- I discovered the notice for the October *, * hearing in my email only after receiving the dismissal notice and conducting a search.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to participate fully in these proceedings.
- This lack of notice severely impacted my ability to prepare and present my case, thereby justifying the need to vacate the dismissal.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- Despite the court providing notice, I did not receive it due to a misunderstanding from our last hearing where I was under the impression that our jury trial date was set for December. Consequently, I did not anticipate any notices from the court in October.
- I discovered the notice for the October *, * hearing in my email only after receiving the dismissal notice and conducting a search.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to participate fully in these proceedings.
- This lack of notice severely impacted my ability to prepare and present my case, thereby justifying the need to vacate the dismissal.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
Please clarify the court never got a confirmation to the notice of a october * hearing from me. However they held the hearing which I did not attend. Then opposing counsel jumped on it and filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice.
Here's a refined and compelling version of your "Lack of Notice" section:
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- The court never received a confirmation from me regarding the notice for the October *, * hearing.
- Despite this, the hearing proceeded in my absence, significantly impacting my ability to participate effectively.
- Following the hearing, opposing counsel swiftly filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice.
- This lack of proper notice and my inability to attend the hearing justifies vacating the dismissal to ensure a fair trial.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to honor this court's proceedings.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- The court never received a confirmation from me regarding the notice for the October *, * hearing.
- Despite this, the hearing proceeded in my absence, significantly impacting my ability to participate effectively.
- Following the hearing, opposing counsel swiftly filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice.
- This lack of proper notice and my inability to attend the hearing justifies vacating the dismissal to ensure a fair trial.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to honor this court's proceedings.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
see above
Here’s a revised and more compelling version of your "Lack of Notice" section:
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- Despite the court providing notice, I did not receive it due to a misunderstanding from our last hearing where I believed our jury trial date was set for December. Consequently, I did not anticipate any notices from the court in October.
- I discovered the notice for the October *, * hearing in my email only after receiving the dismissal notice and conducting a search.
- The court never received a confirmation of notice from me for the October * hearing. However, the hearing proceeded in my absence.
- Subsequently, opposing counsel took advantage of this situation and filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to participate fully in these proceedings.
- This lack of notice severely impacted my ability to prepare and present my case, justifying the need to vacate the dismissal.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- Despite the court providing notice, I did not receive it due to a misunderstanding from our last hearing where I believed our jury trial date was set for December. Consequently, I did not anticipate any notices from the court in October.
- I discovered the notice for the October *, * hearing in my email only after receiving the dismissal notice and conducting a search.
- The court never received a confirmation of notice from me for the October * hearing. However, the hearing proceeded in my absence.
- Subsequently, opposing counsel took advantage of this situation and filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to participate fully in these proceedings.
- This lack of notice severely impacted my ability to prepare and present my case, justifying the need to vacate the dismissal.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
see above
Here’s a refined version of your "Lack of Notice" section, incorporating your additional details:
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- Despite the court providing notice, I did not receive it due to a misunderstanding from our last hearing where I was under the impression that our jury trial date was set for December. Consequently, I did not anticipate any notices from the court in October.
- I discovered the notice for the October *, * hearing in my email only after receiving the dismissal notice and conducting a search.
- Moreover, the court never received a confirmation from me regarding the notice of the October * hearing. However, they proceeded with the hearing in my absence.
- Following this, the opposing counsel took advantage of my absence and filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to participate fully in these proceedings.
- This lack of notice severely impacted my ability to prepare and present my case, thereby justifying the need to vacate the dismissal.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Lack of Notice:
- Despite the court providing notice, I did not receive it due to a misunderstanding from our last hearing where I was under the impression that our jury trial date was set for December. Consequently, I did not anticipate any notices from the court in October.
- I discovered the notice for the October *, * hearing in my email only after receiving the dismissal notice and conducting a search.
- Moreover, the court never received a confirmation from me regarding the notice of the October * hearing. However, they proceeded with the hearing in my absence.
- Following this, the opposing counsel took advantage of my absence and filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice.
- Attached as Exhibits A and B are letters I sent to counsel requesting updated financials, demonstrating my intent to participate fully in these proceedings.
- This lack of notice severely impacted my ability to prepare and present my case, thereby justifying the need to vacate the dismissal.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
I dont understand thsi statement : - This lack of notice severely impacted my ability to prepare and present my case, thereby justifying the need to vacate the dismissal.
The statement means that because you did not receive proper notice about the hearing, you were unable to prepare and present your case effectively. This significantly affected your ability to participate in the legal process. Therefore, you are arguing that the dismissal of your case should be reversed (vacated) because the lack of notice unjustly hindered your defense.
Would you like assistance with another section or further clarification on this statement?
Would you like assistance with another section or further clarification on this statement?
My concern is : that the court sent me an email notifying me. Should the court have waited for my confirmation?
The court generally sends notices and expects parties to check their emails regularly. While the court isn't required to wait for your confirmation, they should ensure you receive proper notice. This situation strengthens your argument for lack of notice affecting your participation.
Do you need help drafting any specific part of your motion based on this?
Do you need help drafting any specific part of your motion based on this?
Is this okay? *. Health Issues:
- I am currently dealing with severe health issues, including Stage * kidney disease, which has significantly impacted my ability to keep up with court communications and proceedings. I respectfully request an extension of 30 days to submit further medical documentation if required.
Your "Health Issues" section is clear and compelling. Here's a slightly refined version to ensure clarity and impact:
---
*. Health Issues:
- I am currently dealing with severe health issues, including Stage * kidney disease, which has significantly impacted my ability to keep up with court communications and proceedings.
- I respectfully request an extension of 30 days to submit further medical documentation if required.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Health Issues:
- I am currently dealing with severe health issues, including Stage * kidney disease, which has significantly impacted my ability to keep up with court communications and proceedings.
- I respectfully request an extension of 30 days to submit further medical documentation if required.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
*. New Email Address:
- To rectify any future communication issues, I have created a dedicated email address (jamescronan123@gmail.com) and have notified the clerk to use this for all court communications.*. Consistent Attendance:
- I have never missed a hearing before, indicating my dedication to this case and my compliance with court procedures.
Is this okay?
Your "New Email Address" and "Consistent Attendance" sections are clear and well-written. Here’s a refined version for clarity and impact:
---
*. New Email Address:
- To rectify any future communication issues, I have created a dedicated email address (jamescronan123@gmail.com) and have notified the clerk to use this for all court communications.
*. Consistent Attendance:
- I have never missed a hearing before, indicating my dedication to this case and my compliance with court procedures.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
---
*. New Email Address:
- To rectify any future communication issues, I have created a dedicated email address (jamescronan123@gmail.com) and have notified the clerk to use this for all court communications.
*. Consistent Attendance:
- I have never missed a hearing before, indicating my dedication to this case and my compliance with court procedures.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
*. Supplementary Financial Records:
- Although I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to abide by court proceedings, I must emphasize that given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant may lack credibility. This highlights the necessity for thorough scrutiny and verification of all financial documentation provided before proceeding further. We have to add this On October 23rd which was the same day as the haesring I sent a letter to opposing counsel Rreguesting Supllementary Finacials - this is further evidence of my ongoing commitment to court proceedings and that i honestly did not see the notice from the court. In addition the problem of even collecting the records as they lack complete authenticated evidence standard requirments as they are based on the already established fraudlent finacials already sent it to the court already. So why bother reiving them?
Your "Supplementary Financial Records" section is critical and well thought-out. Here’s a refined version to ensure clarity and impact:
---
*. Supplementary Financial Records:
- Although I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings, I must emphasize that the findings in the forensic accountant's report indicate serious issues of credibility. Therefore, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant require thorough scrutiny and verification.
- On October 23rd, the same day as the hearing, I sent a letter to opposing counsel requesting supplementary financials. This demonstrates my ongoing commitment to court proceedings and my assertion that I did not see the court notice.
- Additionally, the problem with collecting these records lies in their lack of complete authenticated evidence standards, given they are based on already established fraudulent financials previously submitted to the court. Hence, their credibility remains in question.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Supplementary Financial Records:
- Although I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings, I must emphasize that the findings in the forensic accountant's report indicate serious issues of credibility. Therefore, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant require thorough scrutiny and verification.
- On October 23rd, the same day as the hearing, I sent a letter to opposing counsel requesting supplementary financials. This demonstrates my ongoing commitment to court proceedings and my assertion that I did not see the court notice.
- Additionally, the problem with collecting these records lies in their lack of complete authenticated evidence standards, given they are based on already established fraudulent financials previously submitted to the court. Hence, their credibility remains in question.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
see above.
Your "Supplementary Financial Records" section is quite strong, but let's refine it for clarity and impact:
---
*. Supplementary Financial Records:
- Although I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings, I must emphasize that given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant may lack credibility.
- This highlights the necessity for thorough scrutiny and verification of all financial documentation provided before proceeding further.
- On October 23rd, the same day as the hearing, I sent a letter to opposing counsel requesting supplementary financials. This further demonstrates my ongoing commitment to court proceedings and my honest oversight in not seeing the court's notice.
- Additionally, the problem of collecting these records arises as they lack complete authenticated evidence standards, being based on already established fraudulent financials submitted to the court. Therefore, reviewing them may prove futile.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
---
*. Supplementary Financial Records:
- Although I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings, I must emphasize that given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant may lack credibility.
- This highlights the necessity for thorough scrutiny and verification of all financial documentation provided before proceeding further.
- On October 23rd, the same day as the hearing, I sent a letter to opposing counsel requesting supplementary financials. This further demonstrates my ongoing commitment to court proceedings and my honest oversight in not seeing the court's notice.
- Additionally, the problem of collecting these records arises as they lack complete authenticated evidence standards, being based on already established fraudulent financials submitted to the court. Therefore, reviewing them may prove futile.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
can we please change the word, may in this sentence to maybe something stronger given that I have a forensic accountant establishing fraud, Although I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings, I must emphasize that given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant may lack credibility.
Sure, here's the revised sentence with stronger wording:
---
*. Supplementary Financial Records:
- Although I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings, I must emphasize that given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant will likely lack credibility.
---
*. Supplementary Financial Records:
- Although I have requested supplementary accounting from the defendant to comply with court proceedings, I must emphasize that given the serious findings in the forensic accountant's report, any additional financial records submitted by the defendant will likely lack credibility.
i think this is wrong as I understand now that the defenadant filed evidence in limme ( I dont know the word)
*. Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits:
- Recently opposing counsel provided Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* to the court These exhibits include balance sheets from * to *, emails, and other communications, all based on already established fraudulent accounting.
- In an email to me I have disvovered this email from opposing counsel , "I will be requesting that Judge Stern take Judicial Notice of many of these exhibits which will eliminate the need to receive a stipulation from all parties."
- The forensic accountant’s report confirms that these financial records and related documents are fraudulent. Therefore, I respectfully move to strike these exhibits.
- Submitting fraudulent evidence to the court not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also constitutes fraud upon the court.
Your section on the "Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits" is crucial and well-structured. Here's a refined version to ensure clarity and impact:
---
*. Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits:
- Recently, opposing counsel provided Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* to the court. These exhibits include balance sheets from * to *, emails, and other communications, all based on already established fraudulent accounting.
- In an email, opposing counsel stated, "I will be requesting that Judge Stern take Judicial Notice of many of these exhibits which will eliminate the need to receive a stipulation from all parties."
- The forensic accountant’s report confirms that these financial records and related documents are fraudulent. Therefore, I respectfully move to strike these exhibits.
- Submitting fraudulent evidence to the court not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also constitutes fraud upon the court.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
---
*. Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits:
- Recently, opposing counsel provided Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* to the court. These exhibits include balance sheets from * to *, emails, and other communications, all based on already established fraudulent accounting.
- In an email, opposing counsel stated, "I will be requesting that Judge Stern take Judicial Notice of many of these exhibits which will eliminate the need to receive a stipulation from all parties."
- The forensic accountant’s report confirms that these financial records and related documents are fraudulent. Therefore, I respectfully move to strike these exhibits.
- Submitting fraudulent evidence to the court not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also constitutes fraud upon the court.
---
Would you like to proceed with another section or need further assistance with this one?
see above
Your "Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits" section is strong and detailed. Here’s a refined version to ensure clarity and impact:
---
*. Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits:
- Recently, opposing counsel provided Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* to the court. These exhibits include balance sheets from * to *, emails, and other communications, all based on already established fraudulent accounting.
- In an email to me, opposing counsel stated, "I will be requesting that Judge Stern take Judicial Notice of many of these exhibits which will eliminate the need to receive a stipulation from all parties."
- The forensic accountant’s report confirms that these financial records and related documents are fraudulent. Therefore, I respectfully move to strike these exhibits.
- Submitting fraudulent evidence to the court not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also constitutes fraud upon the court.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
---
*. Motion to Strike Defendant’s Exhibits:
- Recently, opposing counsel provided Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* to the court. These exhibits include balance sheets from * to *, emails, and other communications, all based on already established fraudulent accounting.
- In an email to me, opposing counsel stated, "I will be requesting that Judge Stern take Judicial Notice of many of these exhibits which will eliminate the need to receive a stipulation from all parties."
- The forensic accountant’s report confirms that these financial records and related documents are fraudulent. Therefore, I respectfully move to strike these exhibits.
- Submitting fraudulent evidence to the court not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also constitutes fraud upon the court.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
*. Challenges as a Pro Se Litigant:
- Although this court may find it more challenging to work with a pro se litigant, I come with great anxiety due to the grave financial crimes against me by my trusted financial advisor, whichhas left me insolvent and consequently enriched him. This is demonstrated by the fraudulent conversion of my shares in our partnered company, for which I received nothing (Exhibit D), and the fraudulent conversion of the commercial building at * Fountain St, R.I., leaving me with a Small Business Loan debt that I still pay monthly (Exhibit E). Therefore, I do not enjoy or relish being a pro se litigant in this honorable court, but I am forced to do so. This has left the defendant with an upper hand, having hired two attorneys to litigate this matter, paid for by his unjust enrichment.
Your "Challenges as a Pro Se Litigant" section is compelling and outlines your difficulties effectively. Here's a refined version:
---
*. Challenges as a Pro Se Litigant:
- Although this court may find it more challenging to work with a pro se litigant, I am compelled to represent myself due to the grave financial crimes committed against me by my trusted financial advisor. These crimes have left me insolvent while enriching him.
- This is demonstrated by the fraudulent conversion of my shares in our partnered company, for which I received nothing (Exhibit D), and the fraudulent conversion of the commercial building at * Fountain St, R.I., leaving me with a Small Business Loan debt that I still pay monthly (Exhibit E).
- Therefore, I do not enjoy or relish being a pro se litigant in this honorable court, but I am forced to do so. This has left the defendant with an upper hand, having hired two attorneys to litigate this matter, paid for by his unjust enrichment.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
---
*. Challenges as a Pro Se Litigant:
- Although this court may find it more challenging to work with a pro se litigant, I am compelled to represent myself due to the grave financial crimes committed against me by my trusted financial advisor. These crimes have left me insolvent while enriching him.
- This is demonstrated by the fraudulent conversion of my shares in our partnered company, for which I received nothing (Exhibit D), and the fraudulent conversion of the commercial building at * Fountain St, R.I., leaving me with a Small Business Loan debt that I still pay monthly (Exhibit E).
- Therefore, I do not enjoy or relish being a pro se litigant in this honorable court, but I am forced to do so. This has left the defendant with an upper hand, having hired two attorneys to litigate this matter, paid for by his unjust enrichment.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
Ok Now we must write this strong compelling section: This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith
Here's a strong and compelling section based on the information provided:
---
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This transaction not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and attempts to manipulate the outcome of this case. The plaintiff's forensic accountant has further uncovered substantial evidence of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices, which were previously submitted to the court. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or need further clarification on any part of your motion?
---
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This transaction not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and attempts to manipulate the outcome of this case. The plaintiff's forensic accountant has further uncovered substantial evidence of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices, which were previously submitted to the court. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or need further clarification on any part of your motion?
To clarify the Judgement came from the bankruptcy trsutee against me . I had hired my finacial advisor to repreent me in the bankruptcy court and this judgement was a result of his accounting respresenation. Now on XXX the dfenadant puchases the $*,* judgement for a $*,* . I can only assume it was to take more retalliation against me .
Here's a refined version incorporating your clarifications:
---
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
The transaction executed by the defendant not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me. The plaintiff's forensic accountant has further uncovered substantial evidence of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices, previously submitted to the court. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or need further clarification on any part of your motion?
---
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
The transaction executed by the defendant not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me. The plaintiff's forensic accountant has further uncovered substantial evidence of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices, previously submitted to the court. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or need further clarification on any part of your motion?
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court. i believe that he knowingly and willfully filled incorrect financials into the bankrupcty court becasue after the filing of the lawsuit it was used against me as why he could not keep his promsies to me about returning my name to the title of the commercial mill building. He said to me , " Mike I cant putyour name back on the Mill building because of D'Oreo's lawsuit against you." In deed the lawsuit that he created being my CPA and trusted advisor at the time.
Here's a refined and cohesive version of your compelling section:
---
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
I believe that he knowingly and willfully submitted incorrect financials to the bankruptcy court. After filing the lawsuit, he used it as justification for not fulfilling his promise to return my name to the title of the commercial mill building. He said to me, "Mike, I can't put your name back on the Mill building because of D'Oreo's lawsuit against you." This lawsuit was, in fact, created by him while he was my CPA and trusted advisor at the time.
The transaction executed by the defendant not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me. The forensic accountant's report has further uncovered substantial evidence of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices, previously submitted to the court. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse ofthe legal system.
---
Would you like assistance with any additional sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
---
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
I believe that he knowingly and willfully submitted incorrect financials to the bankruptcy court. After filing the lawsuit, he used it as justification for not fulfilling his promise to return my name to the title of the commercial mill building. He said to me, "Mike, I can't put your name back on the Mill building because of D'Oreo's lawsuit against you." This lawsuit was, in fact, created by him while he was my CPA and trusted advisor at the time.
The transaction executed by the defendant not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me. The forensic accountant's report has further uncovered substantial evidence of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices, previously submitted to the court. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse ofthe legal system.
---
Would you like assistance with any additional sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
The transaction now buying the judgement for pennies on the dollar not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me
Here’s a refined and cohesive version of your compelling section:
---
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
I believe that he knowingly and willfully submitted incorrect financials to the bankruptcy court. After filing the lawsuit, he used it as justification for not fulfilling his promise to return my name to the title of the commercial mill building. He said to me, "Mike, I can't put your name back on the Mill building because of D'Oreo's lawsuit against you." This lawsuit was, in fact, created by him while he was my CPA and trusted advisor at the time.
The transaction, now buying the judgment for pennies on the dollar, not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me. The forensic accountant's report has further uncovered substantial evidence of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices, previously submitted to the court. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessaryto ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
---
Would you like assistance with any additional sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
---
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
I believe that he knowingly and willfully submitted incorrect financials to the bankruptcy court. After filing the lawsuit, he used it as justification for not fulfilling his promise to return my name to the title of the commercial mill building. He said to me, "Mike, I can't put your name back on the Mill building because of D'Oreo's lawsuit against you." This lawsuit was, in fact, created by him while he was my CPA and trusted advisor at the time.
The transaction, now buying the judgment for pennies on the dollar, not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me. The forensic accountant's report has further uncovered substantial evidence of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices, previously submitted to the court. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessaryto ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
---
Would you like assistance with any additional sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
So this topic # * , what do we call it?
It seems like you're looking for an appropriate title for your section on the newly discovered evidence and the significant factual developments involving the judgment purchase and related fraudulent activities. A suitable title could be:
*. Newly Discovered Evidence and Significant Factual Developments
Would you like assistance with any other sections or need further clarification on any part of your motion?
*. Newly Discovered Evidence and Significant Factual Developments
Would you like assistance with any other sections or need further clarification on any part of your motion?
Therefore, I respectfully request that the court grant this supplemental motion to vacate the dismissal of my case and strike the opposing counsel's motion filed on October *, *. It wasent a motion. It was Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* to the court.
Here's a refined version of your conclusion, ensuring clarity and accuracy:
---
*. Newly Discovered Evidence and Significant Factual Developments:
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
I believe that he knowingly and willfully submitted incorrect financials to the bankruptcy court. After filing the lawsuit, he used it as justification for not fulfilling his promise to return my name to the title of the commercial mill building. He said to me, "Mike, I can't put your name back on the Mill building because of D'Oreo's lawsuit against you." This lawsuit was, in fact, created by him while he was my CPA and trusted advisor at the time.
The transaction, now buying the judgment for pennies on the dollar, not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me. The forensic accountant's report has further uncovered substantial evidence of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices,previously submitted to the court. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
---
Therefore, I respectfully request that the court grant this supplemental motion to vacate the dismissal of my case and strike the opposing counsel's submission of Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* to the court.
---
Would you like any further assistance or clarification on this section or any other part of your motion?
---
*. Newly Discovered Evidence and Significant Factual Developments:
This motion is grounded on newly discovered evidence and significant factual developments. Recently, one of the defendants purchased a $*,* judgment for $*,*, raising serious concerns about ongoing fraud and bad faith. This judgment originated from the bankruptcy trustee against me, which was a direct result of my financial advisor's accounting representation in the bankruptcy court.
I believe that he knowingly and willfully submitted incorrect financials to the bankruptcy court. After filing the lawsuit, he used it as justification for not fulfilling his promise to return my name to the title of the commercial mill building. He said to me, "Mike, I can't put your name back on the Mill building because of D'Oreo's lawsuit against you." This lawsuit was, in fact, created by him while he was my CPA and trusted advisor at the time.
The transaction, now buying the judgment for pennies on the dollar, not only undermines the integrity of the judicial process but also highlights the defendant's ongoing fraudulent activities and potential retaliation against me. The forensic accountant's report has further uncovered substantial evidence of tax evasion and fraudulent financial practices,previously submitted to the court. Given these findings, immediate judicial intervention is necessary to ensure justice and prevent further abuse of the legal system.
---
Therefore, I respectfully request that the court grant this supplemental motion to vacate the dismissal of my case and strike the opposing counsel's submission of Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* to the court.
---
Would you like any further assistance or clarification on this section or any other part of your motion?
see above . What will the court do ? what is your belief. Will he dimiss the case? It seems harsh to simiss the case with prejudice because I missed a hearing. Can I say this?
Here's how you could refine your request in light of the specifics:
---
Therefore, I respectfully request that the court grant this supplemental motion to vacate the dismissal of my case and strike the opposing counsel's Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* filed on October *, *.
---
As for your concern about whether the court will dismiss your case, it's difficult to predict the court's decision with certainty. However, you have presented strong arguments and new evidence that could justify vacating the dismissal. Courts generally prefer to decide cases on their merits rather than procedural technicalities, especially when there are significant issues like fraud and bad faith involved.
You can certainly argue that dismissing the case with prejudice due to a missed hearing is harsh given the circumstances, including your health issues and the lack of notice.
Would you like help with anything else or further clarification on any part of your motion?
---
Therefore, I respectfully request that the court grant this supplemental motion to vacate the dismissal of my case and strike the opposing counsel's Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* filed on October *, *.
---
As for your concern about whether the court will dismiss your case, it's difficult to predict the court's decision with certainty. However, you have presented strong arguments and new evidence that could justify vacating the dismissal. Courts generally prefer to decide cases on their merits rather than procedural technicalities, especially when there are significant issues like fraud and bad faith involved.
You can certainly argue that dismissing the case with prejudice due to a missed hearing is harsh given the circumstances, including your health issues and the lack of notice.
Would you like help with anything else or further clarification on any part of your motion?
I want to argue that dismissing the case with prejudice due to a missed hearing is harsh given the circumstances, including your health issues and the lack of notice and that I have taken measures to fis the problem so that it doesnt happen again. I seek another chance .
Here’s a refined argument to include in your motion:
---
Argument for Reconsideration:
I respectfully argue that dismissing the case with prejudice due to a missed hearing is unduly harsh given the circumstances. The missed hearing resulted from a lack of proper notice and my severe health issues, including Stage * kidney disease, which have significantly impacted my ability to stay abreast of court communications.
Additionally, I have taken proactive measures to rectify communication issues, including creating a dedicated email address for court notifications and promptly notifying the court clerk.
Given the new evidence of fraud, bad faith, and the serious nature of the financial crimes committed against me, it is imperative that the court allows this case to proceed on its merits rather than dismissing it on procedural grounds. I seek another chance to present my case fully and fairly.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
---
Argument for Reconsideration:
I respectfully argue that dismissing the case with prejudice due to a missed hearing is unduly harsh given the circumstances. The missed hearing resulted from a lack of proper notice and my severe health issues, including Stage * kidney disease, which have significantly impacted my ability to stay abreast of court communications.
Additionally, I have taken proactive measures to rectify communication issues, including creating a dedicated email address for court notifications and promptly notifying the court clerk.
Given the new evidence of fraud, bad faith, and the serious nature of the financial crimes committed against me, it is imperative that the court allows this case to proceed on its merits rather than dismissing it on procedural grounds. I seek another chance to present my case fully and fairly.
---
Would you like assistance with any other sections or further clarification on any part of your motion?
can you finsih it with a verfied signed under pains and penalty?
Certainly! Here’s the final version of your motion with the verification statement included:
---
Argument for Reconsideration:
I respectfully argue that dismissing the case with prejudice due to a missed hearing is unduly harsh given the circumstances. The missed hearing resulted from a lack of proper notice and my severe health issues, including Stage * kidney disease, which have significantly impacted my ability to stay abreast of court communications.
Additionally, I have taken proactive measures to rectify communication issues, including creating a dedicated email address for court notifications and promptly notifying the court clerk.
Given the new evidence of fraud, bad faith, and the serious nature of the financial crimes committed against me, it is imperative that the court allows this case to proceed on its merits rather than dismissing it on procedural grounds. I seek another chance to present my case fully and fairly.
Therefore, I respectfully request that the court grant this supplemental motion to vacate the dismissal of my case and strike the opposing counsel's Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* filed on October *, *.
---
VERIFICATION
I, [Your Name], hereby declare under the pains and penalties ofperjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signed: ___________________________
[Your Name]
Date: ___________________________
---
Would you like assistance with anything else or further clarification on any part of your motion?
---
Argument for Reconsideration:
I respectfully argue that dismissing the case with prejudice due to a missed hearing is unduly harsh given the circumstances. The missed hearing resulted from a lack of proper notice and my severe health issues, including Stage * kidney disease, which have significantly impacted my ability to stay abreast of court communications.
Additionally, I have taken proactive measures to rectify communication issues, including creating a dedicated email address for court notifications and promptly notifying the court clerk.
Given the new evidence of fraud, bad faith, and the serious nature of the financial crimes committed against me, it is imperative that the court allows this case to proceed on its merits rather than dismissing it on procedural grounds. I seek another chance to present my case fully and fairly.
Therefore, I respectfully request that the court grant this supplemental motion to vacate the dismissal of my case and strike the opposing counsel's Proposed Trial Exhibits #* - #* filed on October *, *.
---
VERIFICATION
I, [Your Name], hereby declare under the pains and penalties ofperjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signed: ___________________________
[Your Name]
Date: ___________________________
---
Would you like assistance with anything else or further clarification on any part of your motion?
Start a new chat