Nevada Civil Procedure Rules

Summary

The Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure (NRCP) include NRCP 12(b)(4) for motions to dismiss due to insufficient process, NRCP 12(b)(5) for failure to state a claim, and NRCP 4.2(a) for service of process. Proper service is crucial for legal proceedings to continue. If service is improper, motions to dismiss may be filed. Once proper service is achieved, the case can proceed, and any preserved motions, such as those under NRCP 12(b)(5), can be addressed.

Full Conversation

nrcp *(b(* ) nrcp4.* (a) nrcp2.* *(b)nrcp *(b)(*)
It seems like there's some confusion with the rules you're referencing. If you could provide a bit more context on your situation or legal issue, I could offer more specific guidance related to these Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure. Are you facing any particular legal challenge or need help with a specific legal process?
the nrcp in it
It looks like you're focusing on specific Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure (NRCP). Here's a brief summary:
- NRCP *(b)(*): Motion to dismiss for insufficient process.
- NRCP *(b)(*): Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
- NRCP *.*(a): Service of process to individuals.
How can I assist further with these rules?
can you break down the order for me and explain throughly
Case Rating: *
The order in the document pertains to a legal proceeding where Defendant Kristin Laforges filed a Motion to Strike Service due to improper service by the Plaintiff, Stephanie Abernathy. Here's a breakdown of the key points:
*. Improper Service: Plaintiff's service of process was deemed improper because it did not comply with NRCP *.*(a), which specifies how individuals should be served.
*. Motion to Strike: The Court granted Defendant Kristin Laforges's Motion to Strike Service due to the lack of proper personal service.
*. Preservation of Motion to Dismiss: The Motion to Dismiss under NRCP *(b)(*) for failure to state a claim was preserved, meaning it can be revisited once proper service is effectuated.
*. Plaintiff's Absence: Plaintiff, representing herself, did not appear at the hearing, which led the Court to issue an Order to Show Cause why the matter should not be dismissed for her failure to appear.
*. Rescheduled Hearings: Further hearings were rescheduled for May *, *, for the Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider and Motion for Leave to Amend.
Would you like any specific section explained further?
so when she is reserved then what
Case Rating: *
Once Plaintiff Stephanie Abernathy properly serves Defendant Kristin Laforges according to NRCP *.*(a), the court proceedings can continue. The Plaintiff will need to address the Motion to Dismiss under NRCP *(b)(*) for failure to state a claim. Proper service allows the case to proceed without dismissal for improper service.