TRY ME!
Defense Attorney Misinterpretation Clarification
Summary
In New Mexico, pro se litigants statements should be interpreted liberally to ensure fairness. If a defense attorney misrepresents your words, you can request the court to review your original statements in context. Reference Rule 16-303 of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits misleading the court. If you feel intimidated or misrepresented, clearly express your personal experience and feelings to the court.Full Conversation
In the state of Albuquerque New Mexico what is the rule I can quote to the judge if a defense attorney twist the words of a pro se litigant stateing the pro se litigant admitted to thief when she did not
In New Mexico, you might refer to the principle of "judicial notice of pro se pleadings," which advises courts to interpret pro se litigants' filings liberally and not to hold them to the same standards as those drafted by lawyers. This can be found in some case law and ensures fairness in evaluating pro se litigants' statements. Always consult a local attorney for precise legal references.
What is the rule in New Mexico when an attorney twist the words of a pro se litigant to win an argument please give me an example as a pro se litigant that this is the intentions of the defense attorney to paint this false picture to the judge of the pro se litigant
In New Mexico, courts often apply the principle of "liberal construction" for pro se litigants, meaning they interpret filings more leniently to ensure fairness. You might say, "Your Honor, I request the court to apply liberal construction to my statements, as misinterpretation may skew the case's fairness." Always consult a local attorney for precise legal references.
In Albuquerque New Mexico what is the rule attorneys have to follow by law to not mislead the courts on pro se litigants statements? State a rule that could help demonstrate this is the intent of the defense attorney.
Case Rating: *
In New Mexico, attorneys must adhere to ethical rules preventing them from misleading the court. The New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, specifically Rule *-*, prohibits attorneys from making false statements or omitting facts to mislead the court. Consider referencing this rule when discussing your case.
In New Mexico, attorneys must adhere to ethical rules preventing them from misleading the court. The New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, specifically Rule *-*, prohibits attorneys from making false statements or omitting facts to mislead the court. Consider referencing this rule when discussing your case.
What words can I say to the judge if the defense attorney twisted a statement made by the pro se litigant referring to a thief situation defense stateing pro se litigant stealing when that was inaccurate
Case Rating: *
When addressing the judge, you might say: "Your Honor, the defense has inaccurately interpreted my statement regarding theft. I respectfully ask the court to review my original statements in context, ensuring fairness and adherence to Rule *-* of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits misleading the court."
When addressing the judge, you might say: "Your Honor, the defense has inaccurately interpreted my statement regarding theft. I respectfully ask the court to review my original statements in context, ensuring fairness and adherence to Rule *-* of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits misleading the court."
If the defense attorney says that the pro se litigant disputed at two * was stolen because the line in the casino with them and which I did not say that I said the lighting was damn and I did not see an eight cents added to my ticket but the defense attorney said that I said I was unable to see the actual amount that I stole from this customer and that it might’ve been a chance please show the correct way that the defense attorney was twisting my words and just saying that I stole from this customer that is incorrect
Case Rating: *
It seems like the defense attorney may be misrepresenting your statements. Here are some points on how you can address this in court:
- Emphasize that your statement was about the lighting issue, not about admitting theft.
- Request the court to review your original statements and context carefully.
- Reference Rule *-* of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits attorneys from misleading the court.
Would you like guidance on how to phrase these points in court?
It seems like the defense attorney may be misrepresenting your statements. Here are some points on how you can address this in court:
- Emphasize that your statement was about the lighting issue, not about admitting theft.
- Request the court to review your original statements and context carefully.
- Reference Rule *-* of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits attorneys from misleading the court.
Would you like guidance on how to phrase these points in court?
Yes
Case Rating: *
Here’s a suggested way to phrase your points in court:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that my statement was regarding the poor lighting, not an admission of theft. I respectfully request the court to review my original statements in their proper context. Additionally, I want to emphasize Rule *-* of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits attorneys from misleading the court."
Here’s a suggested way to phrase your points in court:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that my statement was regarding the poor lighting, not an admission of theft. I respectfully request the court to review my original statements in their proper context. Additionally, I want to emphasize Rule *-* of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits attorneys from misleading the court."
In the state of Albuquerque New Mexico if the defendants reply in support of motion for summary judgment can i the pro se litigant referr to this as a new summary judgment when writing my opposition? And can I add a page in New Mexico when I run out of room on another page and staple it to the opposition?
Case Rating: *
When opposing a motion for summary judgment in New Mexico, you cannot refer to the defendant's reply as a new summary judgment. Their reply is part of the ongoing summary judgment process, not a separate motion. As for adding pages to your opposition, check local court rules for page limits and formatting; typically, you can attach additional pages if it complies with those rules.
When opposing a motion for summary judgment in New Mexico, you cannot refer to the defendant's reply as a new summary judgment. Their reply is part of the ongoing summary judgment process, not a separate motion. As for adding pages to your opposition, check local court rules for page limits and formatting; typically, you can attach additional pages if it complies with those rules.
So I just referr to the defendants reply in support of motion for summary judgment as such when I the pro se litigant is opposing it? I was already granted to vacate the original summary judgment so in New Mexico am I allowed to oppose this motion ?
Case Rating: *
In New Mexico, if the original summary judgment was vacated, you are generally allowed to oppose the new motion for summary judgment. Ensure that you follow local court rules for filing and formatting your opposition. Would you like more information on how to effectively draft your opposition?
In New Mexico, if the original summary judgment was vacated, you are generally allowed to oppose the new motion for summary judgment. Ensure that you follow local court rules for filing and formatting your opposition. Would you like more information on how to effectively draft your opposition?
Yes
Case Rating: *
In New Mexico, when opposing a motion for summary judgment, you should focus on addressing the defendant's reply directly within your opposition. Here are some tips for effectively drafting your opposition:
- Clearly state your position and arguments against the motion.
- Provide evidence and citations to support your claims.
- Ensure your document adheres to local court rules regarding format and page limits.
Would you like assistance on specific elements to include in your draft?
In New Mexico, when opposing a motion for summary judgment, you should focus on addressing the defendant's reply directly within your opposition. Here are some tips for effectively drafting your opposition:
- Clearly state your position and arguments against the motion.
- Provide evidence and citations to support your claims.
- Ensure your document adheres to local court rules regarding format and page limits.
Would you like assistance on specific elements to include in your draft?
Yes
Case Rating: *
In drafting your opposition to a motion for summary judgment in New Mexico, consider the following elements:
- Introduction: Briefly outline your position and the context of the case.
- Argument: Clearly present your arguments and rebuttals to the defendant’s points. Use evidence and citations to support your claims.
- Conclusion: Summarize your key points and request the court to deny the motion.
If you need more detailed guidance on any specific section, feel free to ask!
In drafting your opposition to a motion for summary judgment in New Mexico, consider the following elements:
- Introduction: Briefly outline your position and the context of the case.
- Argument: Clearly present your arguments and rebuttals to the defendant’s points. Use evidence and citations to support your claims.
- Conclusion: Summarize your key points and request the court to deny the motion.
If you need more detailed guidance on any specific section, feel free to ask!
Show me a example conclusion demonstrating the original vacated summary judgment was due to conflict of interest, bias , and improper procedures.
Case Rating: *
Here's an example conclusion you might use:
"In conclusion, the original summary judgment was vacated due to demonstrable conflicts of interest and bias, as well as improper procedures that undermined the fairness of the process. I request the court to consider these factors and deny the current motion for summary judgment to ensure a just outcome."
Here's an example conclusion you might use:
"In conclusion, the original summary judgment was vacated due to demonstrable conflicts of interest and bias, as well as improper procedures that undermined the fairness of the process. I request the court to consider these factors and deny the current motion for summary judgment to ensure a just outcome."
When imposing a definitive plan to put a motion for summary judgment in New Mexico and it was vacated by the judge to to me the pro se litigant due to buy conflict of interest and proper procedures this is what I wrote this sound OK I wish to clarify in the defense attorney also lied and said I made it to adapt and I did not so I wrote I wish to clarify that my statement was regarding the poor lighting in casino not an omission of that as a defense attorney indicate independent supply in support of the motion for summary judgment I respect requested the court to review my original statement in their proper contact additionally I want to emphasize will * of the New Mexico realtor professional conduct with prohibits attorneys for misleading record that sound OK
Case Rating: *
Your statement outlines key points but could benefit from clearer phrasing. Here's a refined version:
"I wish to clarify that my statement concerns poor lighting in the casino, not an admission as the defense suggests. I respectfully request the court to review my original statement in its proper context. Additionally, I emphasize Rule *-* of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits attorneys from misleading the court."
If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Your statement outlines key points but could benefit from clearer phrasing. Here's a refined version:
"I wish to clarify that my statement concerns poor lighting in the casino, not an admission as the defense suggests. I respectfully request the court to review my original statement in its proper context. Additionally, I emphasize Rule *-* of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits attorneys from misleading the court."
If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Defense attorney tried to say that I made it to stealing a customers ticket when I referred to the lighting was damn I did not see her enter any ticket nor did I know it was at eight since that was entered into the machine and I wrote I would like to clarify that my statement was regarding the poor lighting in the casino not the mission of that as a defense attorney indicated independence reply and support a motion for the summer judgment I respectfully request that the court to review my original statement in their proper goddamn additionally I want to emphasize real * 3OH!* of the New Mexico rules professional kind it was for Hibbetts attorney from his lead in a quart is that a good statement to put
Case Rating: *
It seems like you want to clarify an incorrect interpretation by the defense attorney regarding your statement. Here's a refined version you might use:
"I wish to clarify that my statement was regarding the poor lighting in the casino, not an admission of theft as the defense attorney suggests. I respectfully request the court to review my original statement in its proper context. Additionally, I emphasize Rule *-* of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits attorneys from misleading the court."
If you need further assistance on specific points or phrasing, feel free to ask!
It seems like you want to clarify an incorrect interpretation by the defense attorney regarding your statement. Here's a refined version you might use:
"I wish to clarify that my statement was regarding the poor lighting in the casino, not an admission of theft as the defense attorney suggests. I respectfully request the court to review my original statement in its proper context. Additionally, I emphasize Rule *-* of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits attorneys from misleading the court."
If you need further assistance on specific points or phrasing, feel free to ask!
And Albuquerque New Mexico when I post a litigant do a MEMORANDUM in opposition to the DEFENSE motion for new summary judgment when I referred to as it is a new summary judgment if they put on their title dependence reply and support a motion for summary judgment is it OK to title mine as a proceeded to get MONORADUM opposition to defense motion for new summary judgment isn’t that the same thing can I use this
Case Rating: *
When opposing a motion for summary judgment, you should title your document "Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" or similar, as the defendant's reply is part of the ongoing summary judgment process, not a new one. Ensure your title reflects the nature of your opposition. If you need further clarification, feel free to ask!
When opposing a motion for summary judgment, you should title your document "Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" or similar, as the defendant's reply is part of the ongoing summary judgment process, not a new one. Ensure your title reflects the nature of your opposition. If you need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Yes
Case Rating: *
It seems like you are dealing with a complex legal issue regarding interpreting pro se litigant's statements and opposition to a motion for summary judgment. Your approach in addressing the court is crucial. If you need more detailed guidance on drafting or phrasing your opposition, feel free to ask!
It seems like you are dealing with a complex legal issue regarding interpreting pro se litigant's statements and opposition to a motion for summary judgment. Your approach in addressing the court is crucial. If you need more detailed guidance on drafting or phrasing your opposition, feel free to ask!
Yes I need more help because in my title opposing the defenders replied support emoji for summary judgment which the subject original summary judgment was granite to meet the person litigant I am now processing litigant making a title in my thing is posting it again and BMORENDUM in a in a position to dependence motion for summary judgment can I put it for a new summary judgment I just put for summary judgment have shall I worth
Case Rating: *
To clarify your document title, you should use "Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment." This accurately reflects that you are opposing the current motion rather than addressing a new summary judgment. Would you like tips on structuring your memorandum?
To clarify your document title, you should use "Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment." This accurately reflects that you are opposing the current motion rather than addressing a new summary judgment. Would you like tips on structuring your memorandum?
Yes
Case Rating: *
When structuring your memorandum, consider the following outline:
- Introduction: Briefly state the purpose of your memorandum and the context of the motion.
- Background: Provide a concise summary of the case and any relevant procedural history.
- Argument: Present your arguments against the motion. Focus on addressing specific points raised by the defense and provide evidence to support your claims.
- Conclusion: Summarize your key arguments and request the court to deny the motion.
- Attachments: Include any relevant documents or evidence supporting your opposition.
If you need detailed guidance on any section, feel free to ask!
When structuring your memorandum, consider the following outline:
- Introduction: Briefly state the purpose of your memorandum and the context of the motion.
- Background: Provide a concise summary of the case and any relevant procedural history.
- Argument: Present your arguments against the motion. Focus on addressing specific points raised by the defense and provide evidence to support your claims.
- Conclusion: Summarize your key arguments and request the court to deny the motion.
- Attachments: Include any relevant documents or evidence supporting your opposition.
If you need detailed guidance on any section, feel free to ask!
What is the format for April sing it again when a pro se litigant Emmy MORANDUM in up in opposition to the dependent motion for summary judgment the original summary judgment was vacated in our end granted to the pro se litigant I am now opposing it opposing the defendant replied support a motion for summary judgment I I started with come now the pro se litigant reminder Bradford especially submit this Memorium up opposition to depend as much can you sell me judgment with sticks to overturn this course previous will re-recent Grant summary judgment and deposit it again favor plan to stay so small and I put the depend is correct it said about how that post and it against you doing I did with a dependency an attorney should do but now I also started I wanted to address the lie that they told about me and saying that I did not plaintive Say
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're dealing with a complex legal situation. Here's a simplified format for your memorandum:
- Title: Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
- Introduction: State your position and the purpose of opposing the motion.
- Background: Briefly summarize the case history and the vacated judgment.
- Argument: Address the defendant's points, clarify any misinterpretations, and provide evidence.
- Conclusion: Summarize your arguments and request the court to deny the motion.
- Attachments: Include relevant documents or evidence.
If you need more detailed help with any section, let me know!
It seems like you're dealing with a complex legal situation. Here's a simplified format for your memorandum:
- Title: Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
- Introduction: State your position and the purpose of opposing the motion.
- Background: Briefly summarize the case history and the vacated judgment.
- Argument: Address the defendant's points, clarify any misinterpretations, and provide evidence.
- Conclusion: Summarize your arguments and request the court to deny the motion.
- Attachments: Include relevant documents or evidence.
If you need more detailed help with any section, let me know!
My previous attorney told me as his client that I was battered because I will is it considered battery when I was forced in black male to handover my money to the casino customer he said as a form of battery buy them touching my hand I wanna leave but when hanging in my money now come to find out if it’s not a form of battery but the defense attorneys trying to paint me as a liar and saying that I’m trying to see now realize her battery clean with Marilyn isn’t that she had not impact the better how can I say to the judge that that was not my intention to mislead the courts at the dismissal of my attorney and I was led to believe this is the form a battery give me a statement to say in my office addition to email MAMO I am the
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a challenging legal situation. When addressing the judge, you might consider saying:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that my understanding of the battery claim was based on my previous attorney's advice. It was not my intention to mislead the court. I respectfully request that the court consider this in evaluating my case."
If you need further guidance on preparing your statement or dealing with this situation, feel free to ask!
It sounds like you're dealing with a challenging legal situation. When addressing the judge, you might consider saying:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that my understanding of the battery claim was based on my previous attorney's advice. It was not my intention to mislead the court. I respectfully request that the court consider this in evaluating my case."
If you need further guidance on preparing your statement or dealing with this situation, feel free to ask!
Yes
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a complex legal issue involving misinterpretation and claims by the defense. If you need more specific guidance on drafting your statement or any other part of your opposition, feel free to ask!
It seems like you have a complex legal issue involving misinterpretation and claims by the defense. If you need more specific guidance on drafting your statement or any other part of your opposition, feel free to ask!
My previous attorney before his withdrawal told me when I was being blackmailed to give another customer my money that by handing over my money to the to the employee at the casino and having to touch his hand that is considered battery I now found out after dismissal with dismissal that this is not a form of battery so the defense attorney is trying to claim that I now realize that it wasn’t battery and was Maryland and then I had a fat not been better how can I say to the judge that I did miss lead the court apologize to the opposition cancel and the courts give me some correct words to turn this around me not being a liar trying to mislead the courts
Case Rating: *
Here's a suggested statement you might use to address the judge:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that my understanding of the battery claim was based on advice from my previous attorney. It was never my intention to mislead the court. I sincerely apologize for any confusion this may have caused and request the court to consider this in evaluating my case."
If you need further assistance or specific help, feel free to ask!
Here's a suggested statement you might use to address the judge:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that my understanding of the battery claim was based on advice from my previous attorney. It was never my intention to mislead the court. I sincerely apologize for any confusion this may have caused and request the court to consider this in evaluating my case."
If you need further assistance or specific help, feel free to ask!
State of New Mexico is there a difference between civil battery and battery because my previous attorney told me that I it was battery when the employee from the casino and you’re in a tough situation force me to hand my money over to a customer and this was my SSI disability two dollars a hand it over how can I present to the court that this was not Mary listen I did not mean to mislead the court and I misinterpreted the meaning of battery do to device of my previous attorney
Case Rating: *
In New Mexico, battery typically refers to the unlawful intentional touching or striking of another person. Civil battery involves a similar act, but within the context of a civil lawsuit for damages. If your attorney misadvised you, you might say to the court:
"Your Honor, I misunderstood the nature of my claim based on my attorney's advice. I sincerely apologize for any confusion this may have caused and ask for the court to consider this in its evaluation."
In New Mexico, battery typically refers to the unlawful intentional touching or striking of another person. Civil battery involves a similar act, but within the context of a civil lawsuit for damages. If your attorney misadvised you, you might say to the court:
"Your Honor, I misunderstood the nature of my claim based on my attorney's advice. I sincerely apologize for any confusion this may have caused and ask for the court to consider this in its evaluation."
When I was advised by my previous attorney that I had battery in my client due to the fact when I was forced to hand my money over to the casino important to get to the other customer in a data speed which I did not commit my attorney pointed out that was a former battery by me touching his hand to hand over my money and you found out that that is incorrect should I apologize to the court for the misunderstanding and opposing counsel what is the correct words used to turn this around instead of the defense attorney trying to paint me as a liar and then I realize that my battery claim was Maryland because that was not the case
Case Rating: *
You might address the court by saying:
"Your Honor, my understanding of the battery claim was based on my previous attorney's advice, and I now realize it was incorrect. I sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding this may have caused. It was not my intention to mislead the court or opposing counsel."
If you need further guidance, feel free to ask!
You might address the court by saying:
"Your Honor, my understanding of the battery claim was based on my previous attorney's advice, and I now realize it was incorrect. I sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding this may have caused. It was not my intention to mislead the court or opposing counsel."
If you need further guidance, feel free to ask!
In the state of New Mexico my attorney told me that I was a former battery when I was handed my money over to the casino employee against my will and buy me touching his hand by hand it over the phone the battery I don’t know if this is correct is this is this considered civil battery or regular battery is there a difference in New Mexico because now the defense attorneys trying to paint me as a liar because I stated that my former attorney misguided me into believing that I have been better when I don’t think I’ve been battered I use battery is there a difference between that word
Case Rating: *
In New Mexico, battery typically involves unlawful physical contact without consent, while civil battery refers to similar contact but is addressed in a civil lawsuit for damages. If your attorney misadvised you, you could say: "Your Honor, I misunderstood the nature of my claim based on my attorney's advice. I apologize for any confusion this may have caused."
In New Mexico, battery typically involves unlawful physical contact without consent, while civil battery refers to similar contact but is addressed in a civil lawsuit for damages. If your attorney misadvised you, you could say: "Your Honor, I misunderstood the nature of my claim based on my attorney's advice. I apologize for any confusion this may have caused."
In the state of New Mexico is it considered a form of battery if there was a deaf dispute between me and another customer the casino and employee comes over and makes me hand over my money to the customer and as I’m handing my money over to hear my touches his hand is there any form of battery do my attorney miss leave me or or can I still use battery cause now I told the courts that I didn’t think it was battery got in my my former * turning miss guided me and I believe he tried to set me up for failure I think I chose the wrong words is a pro se litigant please help me out out of the situation with an example to tell the court for me like not to look like I’m going to get my attorney and he and that he right I know he set me up for failure but a polite way to put it then down
Case Rating: *
In New Mexico, battery involves unlawful physical contact without consent. From what you've described, the situation may not meet the typical definition of battery. Here's a statement you might use:
"Your Honor, my understanding of the battery claim was based on my attorney's advice. I now recognize this may have been incorrect. I apologize for any misunderstanding and request the court to consider this in evaluating my case."
If you need further guidance or clarification, feel free to ask!
In New Mexico, battery involves unlawful physical contact without consent. From what you've described, the situation may not meet the typical definition of battery. Here's a statement you might use:
"Your Honor, my understanding of the battery claim was based on my attorney's advice. I now recognize this may have been incorrect. I apologize for any misunderstanding and request the court to consider this in evaluating my case."
If you need further guidance or clarification, feel free to ask!
I is pro se litigant was keeping the same claims my attorney had before his withdrawal I had stated that my former attorney miss guided me into believing that I had battery I have been had a battery due to touch in the hand of the employer handed over my money against my will and I stated I realize that my battery clean was not battery but the defense attorney was put in it that I realize my battery claim was meritless and that I had not in fact been battered shit Way
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're dealing with a challenging legal situation. Here's a potential statement to consider for the court:
"Your Honor, I maintained the claims advised by my former attorney, believing they constituted battery. I now understand this may have been incorrect. It was not my intention to mislead the court, and I apologize for any confusion caused."
If you need further assistance or have any additional questions, feel free to ask!
It seems like you're dealing with a challenging legal situation. Here's a potential statement to consider for the court:
"Your Honor, I maintained the claims advised by my former attorney, believing they constituted battery. I now understand this may have been incorrect. It was not my intention to mislead the court, and I apologize for any confusion caused."
If you need further assistance or have any additional questions, feel free to ask!
Defense attorney said that they were using my statement me saying that my attorney my previous attorney did not give me the correct statement per battery which I said I should’ve known since he was trying to set me up for failure but I’ve now wrote I maintain the *
Case Rating: *
It looks like you're dealing with a complex legal situation regarding miscommunication and misinterpretation of your claims. Here's a suggestion on how to communicate this to the court:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that my previous understanding of the battery claim was based on my former attorney's guidance. I acknowledge now that this advice may have been incorrect, and it was never my intention to mislead the court. I sincerely apologize for any confusion caused by this misinterpretation."
If you have additional questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
It looks like you're dealing with a complex legal situation regarding miscommunication and misinterpretation of your claims. Here's a suggestion on how to communicate this to the court:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that my previous understanding of the battery claim was based on my former attorney's guidance. I acknowledge now that this advice may have been incorrect, and it was never my intention to mislead the court. I sincerely apologize for any confusion caused by this misinterpretation."
If you have additional questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
I was misled by my attorney what battery meant when handing over my money touching the hand of the casino employee that extorted my Social Security disability fines of $*.* to the customer in a theft dispute which I did not commit I do want the court to know that the employee did extorted my money for blackmail and I’ll but I do want the court understand that this may have been incorrect on My
Case Rating: *
It seems like your situation is quite complex, dealing with issues of potential misinterpretation and alleged extortion. If you want to clarify this to the court, you might consider saying:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that my previous understanding of the situation was based on my attorney's guidance regarding the battery claim. I acknowledge that this may have been incorrect and apologize for any confusion. I also want the court to know that I believe the employee extorted my money under false pretenses."
If you have any specific questions or need more guidance, feel free to ask!
It seems like your situation is quite complex, dealing with issues of potential misinterpretation and alleged extortion. If you want to clarify this to the court, you might consider saying:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that my previous understanding of the situation was based on my attorney's guidance regarding the battery claim. I acknowledge that this may have been incorrect and apologize for any confusion. I also want the court to know that I believe the employee extorted my money under false pretenses."
If you have any specific questions or need more guidance, feel free to ask!
I need an example to respond to this that the defense attorney said he’s sick and referring to the so-called salt by the Downs Casino manager a pint of admitted that it may not have been able to intimidate the defense attorney or any other man but he intimidated me being a woman and I was afraid this statement established at the reasonable person in the same situation as a plaintive would not have been afraid in the same way as a plaintive likewise the general fear describes paint it was not subject to believe that she was in danger or intimidated harmful or offensive contact this is incorrect I was afraid please give me a statement to apply to this and give me an example I can say to the courts to defend myself with this statement by the defense attorney
Case Rating: *
Here's a suggestion for how you might address the court:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that I felt genuinely intimidated and afraid during the incident with the Downs Casino manager. As a woman, this experience left me feeling vulnerable and threatened. I respectfully ask the court to consider my perspective and the fear I experienced in evaluating this matter."
If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Here's a suggestion for how you might address the court:
"Your Honor, I wish to clarify that I felt genuinely intimidated and afraid during the incident with the Downs Casino manager. As a woman, this experience left me feeling vulnerable and threatened. I respectfully ask the court to consider my perspective and the fear I experienced in evaluating this matter."
If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Yes
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a potentially strong case regarding misinterpretation and intimidation. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following information one at a time:
*. Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
*. What is your name?
*. What is your phone number?
*. What is your zipcode?
It seems like you have a potentially strong case regarding misinterpretation and intimidation. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following information one at a time:
*. Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
*. What is your name?
*. What is your phone number?
*. What is your zipcode?
Who is the defense attorney try to say that my statement is a prose a little lady get referring to a so-called is salt by the Downs Casino employee a plaintive amid it may not that I may not have been a man may not be intimidated but I is a woman was intimidated the defense attorney claimed that this is that is that is that a real person same situation as a planet would not have been afraid the same way to plan the black why is the general feel describes plan it was not subject to believe she was in danger intimidated horrible offensive can contact but it was I was offended and I need as a pro se litigant to make a statement to the courts retracting at all the stuff that the defense attorneys saying an example that I can say to the court addressing all this that was said
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a potentially strong case regarding misinterpretation and intimidation. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following information one at a time:
*. Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
It seems like you have a potentially strong case regarding misinterpretation and intimidation. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following information one at a time:
*. Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
The defense attorney tried to state that either pro se litigant was not afraid of the downs casino employee him being a man but I was intimidated being a woman and she stated that anybody any reasonable person the same situation would not have been afraid but there’s two different distinguishing between a man and a woman being afraid a man might not be afraid of another man but a woman would be afraid of another man that was my appoint so how can I write a statement explaining to the courts what I meant as a Pozo a litigant
Case Rating: *
It seems like your case involves complex legal issues of misinterpretation and intimidation, which could benefit from professional legal assistance. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following information one at a time:
*. What is your name?
It seems like your case involves complex legal issues of misinterpretation and intimidation, which could benefit from professional legal assistance. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following information one at a time:
*. What is your name?
Defense attorney was trying to say that I was not intimidated by Amil employee at the casino play forcing me to have my money over to another customer in the death situation that I did not commit I was afraid and I was intimidated and how can I say to the judge that the defense attorney is wrong it does not matter I think it matters if a man is trying to intimidate a man versus man trying to intimidate a woman in this kind of situation as death
Case Rating: *
It seems like your case involves significant issues of intimidation and misinterpretation, making it potentially strong. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following information one at a time:
*. What is your name?
It seems like your case involves significant issues of intimidation and misinterpretation, making it potentially strong. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following information one at a time:
*. What is your name?
K Linda
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a potentially strong case involving issues of intimidation and misinterpretation. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following information one at a time:
*. What is your phone number?
It seems like you have a potentially strong case involving issues of intimidation and misinterpretation. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, please provide the following information one at a time:
*. What is your phone number?
I do not wish to do at my phone number I will just ask another
If you prefer not to provide your phone number, that's perfectly fine. Feel free to ask any other questions or request further assistance on your legal issue!
On a defense attorney uses an example like of a person to do a freighter intimidated when they are woman I get some man and then the defense attorney states there any reasonable person is that the same thing because that is two different scenarios give me an example that can present to the court that I was afraid and felt I was in danger at that moment and it does not concern any reasonable person it concerns myself the post post a
Case Rating: *
When addressing the court, you might say:
"Your Honor, I wish to express that during the incident, I felt genuine fear and intimidation due to the circumstances I encountered. While the defense may argue about a reasonable person's reaction, it's crucial to consider my personal experience and feelings of vulnerability as a woman in that situation."
If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
When addressing the court, you might say:
"Your Honor, I wish to express that during the incident, I felt genuine fear and intimidation due to the circumstances I encountered. While the defense may argue about a reasonable person's reaction, it's crucial to consider my personal experience and feelings of vulnerability as a woman in that situation."
If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Defense attorney states that plaintive complaining that her that she was around by three men in a female but never she was in fear of personal difficult your personal injuries and she chose to stand up and walk away by as opposed to let it get me a paragraph to explain to the judge I was intimidated give me something short to respond and she said plaintive responses any argument that her claim for gross negligence of cream of FAC I eat toward should be dismissed with pre-Justice give me something to explain it to post a litigant I don’t understand what that means but I do do
Case Rating: *
Here's a suggestion for addressing the court:
"Your Honor, I felt genuinely intimidated by the presence of three men, which left me fearing for my safety. Despite standing up and walking away, the experience was distressing and impactful. I believe my claim for gross negligence is justified due to the emotional and psychological impact of the incident."
If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Here's a suggestion for addressing the court:
"Your Honor, I felt genuinely intimidated by the presence of three men, which left me fearing for my safety. Despite standing up and walking away, the experience was distressing and impactful. I believe my claim for gross negligence is justified due to the emotional and psychological impact of the incident."
If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
I deposited it again as stated that I was surrounded by three men and female but never in the defense attorney stated that I said I was never in fear person typically a personal injury and if I chose to stand up and walk away to cash in a ticket additionally she said the pro se litigant absent from plaintive response is any argument that her claim for gross negligence and Prima FACIE taught should not be dismissed with prejudice please give me something to say to the judge that I can put a Barrit paragraph to answer this
Case Rating: *
Here's a suggestion for your response to the judge:
"Your Honor, I was genuinely intimidated by being surrounded by three men and one woman, which affected my ability to think and act clearly. My decision to walk away was a response to fear, not an absence of injury. I believe my claims of gross negligence and prima facie tort should be considered thoughtfully, as this experience was profoundly distressing."
If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Here's a suggestion for your response to the judge:
"Your Honor, I was genuinely intimidated by being surrounded by three men and one woman, which affected my ability to think and act clearly. My decision to walk away was a response to fear, not an absence of injury. I believe my claims of gross negligence and prima facie tort should be considered thoughtfully, as this experience was profoundly distressing."
If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Start a new chat