Civil Dispute Case Overview

Summary

A civil dispute involves a business partnership where one party, acting as CPA and CFO, allegedly misappropriated $74,000 and breached fiduciary duties. The case, overseen by Judge Joshua A. Allison, involved claims of underselling a medical clinic and unauthorized fund distribution. The defendant provided inconsistent accounts to authorities and was granted summary judgment without discovery rule enforcement. An appeal was made to the New Mexico Court of Appeals, but a writ of execution was granted without notification. An emergency stay motion was filed, citing concerns of judicial bias.

Full Conversation

help me paraphrase this paragraph!..I am involved in case number D-*-CV-*-*, presided over by JUDGE JOSHUA A. ALLISON. The case involves a civil dispute with my business ex-partner, who was my company's CPA and CFO. I sued her for taking $ money that didn’t belong to her, $*,*. In *, she undersold my medical Clinic, and she kept my seed money and some checks; as the CPA and CFO of my company, she violated her ''FIDUCIARY'' duty to remain loyal to me and to the company; she went into hiding to draft the sales contract, she distributed money without my permission.
Sure, Mauro! Here is the paraphrased version:
I am involved in case number D-*-CV-*-*, overseen by Judge Joshua A. Allison. This civil dispute is with my former business partner, who served as my company's CPA and CFO. I sued her for misappropriating $*,*. In *, she sold my medical clinic for less than its value, kept my seed money and checks, and breached her fiduciary duty by drafting the sales contract in secret and distributing funds without my consent.
Is there anything else you need assistance with?
This is a follow up, paraphrase for me!...On */*/*, when asked by a California investigator from the California Board of Accountancy, she gave a made-up version of how she repaid me my seed money; then, on */*/*, she gave the second judicial Court a completely different version of the events. THE HONORABLE JUDGE IN THIS CASE JOSHUA A. ALLISON, without enforcing the discovery rules, the judge mentioned above granted the defendant a summary judgment.
Sure, Mauro! Here is the paraphrased version:
On */*/*, she told a California investigator from the California Board of Accountancy a fabricated story about repaying my seed money. Then, on */*/*, she presented a different account to the Second Judicial Court. Judge Joshua A. Allison granted her summary judgment without enforcing discovery rules.
Is there anything else you need assistance with?
And lastly, paraphrase this please!...Moving forward, I appealed the case to The New Mexico Court of Appeals asking the Court to remand the case to the lower Court. Without the court, or the opposite attorney notifying me, Judge Joshua A. Allison held a hearing on */*/* granting the writ of execution to the defendant. I filed an emergency motion for a stay, but I feel that the Judge has proved unable to be impartiality in this case.
Sure, Mauro! Here is the paraphrased version:
I appealed the case to the New Mexico Court of Appeals, requesting it be sent back to the lower court. Unnotified, Judge Joshua A. Allison held a hearing on */*/* and granted the writ of execution to the defendant. I filed an emergency stay motion, but I believe the judge has shown bias.