Federal Default Judgment Procedures

Summary

Federal default judgment procedures can be complex, and judges have discretion in handling defaults, sometimes requiring additional evidence or clarification. If objections are not recorded, consider filing a formal complaint or motion regarding the judges handling of your objections. Consulting with a legal professional may provide further guidance on navigating this process.

Full Conversation

I filed for a federal judge in California to adopt a sister state judgement from a state judge in Ohio that granted an investigation in Ohio into California government workers terrorizing me. The defense never responded. When I asked the court for a default the court denied, reserved the defendant and asked for me to show cause. I answered the order to show cause and also requested a default and summary judgement, the default judgement response from the defense was supposed to come today but yesterday the judge made his recommendation and report. Why is he not following procedures for default
It sounds like a complex situation involving federal and state court procedures. Judges sometimes have discretion in handling defaults and may require further evidence or clarification before granting a default judgment.
Could you provide the exact recommendation and report made by the judge?
Not yet I have not received it
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex procedural issue. Judges have considerable discretion and may sometimes deviate from expected procedures for various reasons.
Do you have any specific questions or concerns about how to proceed while waiting for the judge's recommendation and report?
I objected to bias in not finding the defendant in default but the objections was not placed on the record
It seems you've encountered a procedural issue in your case. Judges have discretion, but objections should be recorded.
Are you planning to file a formal complaint or motion regarding the judge's handling of your objections?