Fraudulent Discovery Document Consequences

Summary

Providing fraudulent documents during discovery can be considered fraud on the court, even if not filed directly. Rule 60(b)(3) allows for relief from judgments due to fraud. In Rhode Island, consulting an attorney for specific case law is advisable. Fraud on the court can undermine judicial processes and may lead to vacating judgments.

Full Conversation

and you file reconsideration and two more motions which the court does not respond too but the opposing counsel recently files a motion on feburary 5th to strike which he does not send to the proper email to you which I made so that you are ensured of getting all emails from the court, can I file a motion now under rule * for fruad on the court as poviding fruadulent money laundering accounting docments to answer discovery reguests would be considered fruad on the court. Right?
It sounds like you might have grounds to file a motion under Rule * for relief from a judgment or order based on fraud. Here are some key points:
- Rule *(b)(*): Allows for relief from a final judgment or order due to fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Fraud on the Court: If you believe the opposing party submitted fraudulent documents, this could be a basis for your motion.
Would you like more detailed information on filing a Rule * motion in Massachusetts?
It is not a belief rather as i have proof from a forensic accountant that they, a CPA., did. Is knowingly giving fraudulent documents answering discovery reguests as I have the CPA defendants letter stating her are my financial documents that you have asked for considered fraud to the court's proceedings?
Yes, knowingly providing fraudulent documents during discovery can be considered fraud on the court. You might want to file a motion under Rule *(b)(*) in Massachusetts to seek relief from the judgment based on this fraud.
Would you like more detailed information on how to file a Rule * motion in Massachusetts?
its is Rhode Island. Can you give me a rhode island court case stating fraudlent documents during discovery is considered fruad on the court *(b)(*)?
Case Rating: *
I cannot provide specific Rhode Island court cases, but generally, Rule *(b)(*) allows for relief from a judgment due to fraud, including submitting fraudulent documents. This is considered "fraud on the court." Consulting an attorney for specific case law would be beneficial.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
is giving fruadlent documents in discovery phase of litigation, fruad on the court when the defendant did not speciffically file them in to court rather gave them to counsel?
Case Rating: *
Yes, providing fraudulent documents to counsel during the discovery phase can still be considered fraud on the court. The intent to deceive and disrupt the judicial process is key, regardless of whether the documents were filed in court or given to counsel.
Would you like more detailed information on how to pursue this in Rhode Island?
For evidence I have the letter of the defendent and the report from the forensic accountant. Please send me the most notable or freuently used case law validating that fraud vitiates everything and can vacate an order or judgement .
Case Rating: *
In Massachusetts, providing fraudulent documents during the discovery phase can be considered fraud on the court. Here are some points you might find useful:
- Fraud on the court undermines the judicial process and can be grounds for vacating a judgment.
- Rule *(b)(*) allows relief from a judgment due to fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct.
For specific case law, consider searching Massachusetts case law databases or consulting an attorney for the most relevant rulings.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with a Rule * motion in Massachusetts?
you always give me case law. Please give me case law in Rhode island.
Case Rating: *
I understand you're looking for specific case law in Rhode Island related to fraud on the court. Here are some general guidelines:
- Rule *(b)(*): This rule allows for relief from a final judgment due to fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct.
- Fraud on the Court: If proven, it can be grounds for vacating a judgment.
Given that you are dealing with a complex legal issue, consulting an attorney who can provide specific case law and detailed guidance would be highly recommended. Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with a Rule * motion in Rhode Island?