Discovery Tools And Procedures

Summary

In Washington, a request for admission is a discovery tool that, if not responded to in time, results in statements being deemed true. Failure to attend a deposition can lead to sanctions. Res judicata prevents relitigation of issues with a final judgment. A motion for a new trial can be filed if new evidence emerges. Summary judgment resolves cases without trial based on presented evidence. Collateral estoppel prevents re-litigation of fully litigated issues. Additur is allowed in Washington but not federally. The standard of proof in civil trials is by a preponderance of the evidence. A jury trial can be waived, and a plaintiff can voluntarily dismiss a case once without prejudice. A CR 12(e) motion addresses vague pleadings. Subpoenas are generally for non-party deponents, and depositions of nonresident non-parties must be within 100 miles of the subpoena service.

Full Conversation

Plaintiff Groucho sued Defendant Harpo for trespassing onto his property. The complaint was properly filed and served on July *, *. On July *, *, Groucho properly served upon Harpo a notice of deposition to occur on August *, * at the office of Groucho's attorney. Harpo did not attend this deposition. Upon Groucho’s motion, Harpo will likely be liable for payment of discovery sanctions because of his refusal to attend the August *, * deposition. True False
True.
In Washington, if a party fails to attend a properly noticed deposition, the court can impose discovery sanctions on the non-complying party. Groucho's motion for sanctions against Harpo for failing to attend the deposition is likely to be granted.
The process by which factual information is obtained through interviews and investigations, prior to commencing formal legal action is often referred to as “________.” A. an interrogatory B. an oral deposition C. informal discovery D. formal discovery
The correct answer is:
C. informal discovery
Relevant evidence is evidence that has any tendency to make a fact of consequence more or less probable. True False
Case Rating: *
True. Relevant evidence is evidence that has any tendency to make a fact of consequence more or less probable.
Is there a specific legal issue you are dealing with in Washington that you need assistance with?
Bert’s eye was injured when his baseball glove broke while he was fielding a vicious grounder. Bert sued Ernie's Leather Co. for negligent manufacture of the glove. The case was tried in Washington Superior Court, and final judgment was entered in favor of Ernie's. Later, Bert has decided to sue Ernie's again, only this time he is arguing that the judge in the first lawsuit erroneously excluded important testimonial evidence from Bert’s expert regarding baseball glove manufacturing standards. Bert asserts that he is entitled to a trial in which all of the admissible evidence is properly introduced to the jury. Ernie's disagrees and has pleaded res judicata in his answer. Will this affirmative defense prevent Bert's second action against Ernie's? C. Yes. Res judicata will bar Bert’s second action. final judgment need not be “right” to preclude further litigation; it need only be final and on the merits.
Case Rating: *
Res judicata is a legal doctrine that prevents a party from relitigating issues that have already been resolved by a final judgment on the merits. In Bert's case, since there has already been a final judgment in favor of Ernie's Leather Co., res judicata will likely bar Bert's second action.
Would you like more information on how res judicata applies in Washington courts?
Defendant Milli would like to dispose of Plaintiff Vanilli’s case before commencing the trial. Which of the following methods might accomplish this goal? Select the best answer. A. By filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings. B. By filing a motion for summary judgment. C. By filing a motion for judgment as a matter of law. D. A & B are both correct.
Case Rating: *
The best answer to dispose of Plaintiff Vanilli’s case before commencing the trial is:
D. A & B are both correct.
- A motion for judgment on the pleadings (A) and a motion for summary judgment (B) are both methods that can potentially resolve a case before trial.
Is there a specific legal issue you are dealing with in Washington that you need assistance with?
Our client, Itchy, just lost his personal injury lawsuit to the defendant, Scratchy. The day after the entry of judgment, Itchy discovered that Scratchy and Judge Stimpy were old fraternity brothers, and that they played golf together every weekend, including during the trial. Under these circumstances, Itchy should file a: Motion for a new trial Motion for relief from judgment Motion in limine Motion for judgment as a matter of law
Case Rating: *
Itchy may consider filing a Motion for a New Trial under these circumstances. Washington courts allow for a new trial if there is evidence of misconduct that affected the fairness of the trial.
Would you like more information on the process of filing a motion for a new trial in Washington?
A motion for new trial must be served and filed within ___ days after the entry of judgment? A. five B. * C. * D. *
Case Rating: *
In Washington, a motion for a new trial must be served and filed within 10 days after the entry of judgment.
Would you like more information on how to file a motion for a new trial in Washington?
According to Article IV of the United States Constitution, all states and territories must respect the final judgments rendered on the merits from other states and territories. True False
Case Rating: *
Yes, according to Article IV of the United States Constitution, all states and territories must respect the final judgments rendered on the merits from other states and territories. This principle is known as the Full Faith and Credit Clause.
Is there a specific legal issue you are dealing with in Washington that you need assistance with?
During trial Plaintiff Beavis’s attorney called Witness Wanda to the stand. On direct examination Witness Wanda testified to two things: (*) that she saw Defendant Butthead intentionally damage Beavis’s car with his key in August *, and (*) that he saw Defendant Butthead vandalize an entirely different vehicle in July *. Upon cross-examination, Defendant Butthead’s Attorney limited his questions of Witness Wanda to the incident involving only Beavis’s car. Upon redirect, Plaintiff Beavis’s attorney may ask Wanda: A. “Isn't it true that Defendant Butthead drives a very rare bright orange sports car?” B. “What color was the car that you believe Butthead vandalized in July *?” C. Both A & B are acceptable. D. Neither A nor B is acceptable.
Case Rating: *
In the scenario you've described, Plaintiff Beavis’s attorney can use the redirect examination to clarify or expand on any matters that were brought up during cross-examination.
- Option A is not directly related to the incidents at hand.
- Option B relates to the prior testimony about a different vehicle and is permissible to clarify earlier statements not touched upon directly during cross-examination.
So the correct choice would be:
D. Neither A nor B is acceptable.
Is there a specific legal issue you are dealing with in Washington that you need more information on?
So which one
Case Rating: *
It seems you're asking about the appropriate legal procedure in different scenarios. If you have a specific legal issue in Washington, I can provide more tailored information. Could you clarify the legal matter you need assistance with?
During trial Plaintiff Beavis’s attorney called Witness Wanda to the stand. On direct examination Witness Wanda testified to two things: (*) that she saw Defendant Butthead intentionally damage Beavis’s car with his key in August *, and (*) that he saw Defendant Butthead vandalize an entirely different vehicle in July *. Upon cross-examination, Defendant Butthead’s Attorney limited his questions of Witness Wanda to the incident involving only Beavis’s car. Upon redirect, Plaintiff Beavis’s attorney may ask Wanda: A. “Isn't it true that Defendant Butthead drives a very rare bright orange sports car?” B. “What color was the car that you believe Butthead vandalized in July *?” C. Both A & B are acceptable. D. Neither A nor B is acceptable.
Case Rating: *
Based on the scenario provided, Plaintiff Beavis’s attorney may ask Witness Wanda questions that clarify or expand on matters brought up during cross-examination.
- Option A is not directly related to the incident involving Beavis’s car.
- Option B relates to prior testimony about a different vehicle but wasn't directly covered in cross-examination.
Therefore, the correct choice is:
D. Neither A nor B is acceptable.
Do you have any more questions or need further assistance with another legal matter?
A motion to amend the pleadings is considered a nondispositive motion. True False
Case Rating: *
A motion to amend the pleadings is generally considered a nondispositive motion. This means it does not resolve the substantive issues of the case but addresses procedural aspects.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need assistance with?
So is it tru or false
Case Rating: *
True, a motion to amend the pleadings is generally considered a nondispositive motion.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need assistance with?
Petunia Plaintiff wins her breach of contract action in a Superior Court in Washington State against Dimwit Defendant; however, the jury only awards Petunia $*. The judge amends the judgment to award Petunia $*,*. This is an example of: A. Additur B. Remittitur C. Collateral Estoppel D. Judicial Misconduct
Case Rating: *
This scenario is an example of Additur.
- Additur: This is when a judge increases the amount of damages awarded by the jury if they find it inadequate.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington you need assistance with?
The right to a civil jury trial is absolute and can never be waived. True False
Case Rating: *
False. In Washington, as in most jurisdictions, the right to a civil jury trial can be waived under certain circumstances, such as by agreement of the parties or by failing to timely demand a jury trial.
Do you have any specific legal issues or questions you need assistance with in Washington?
If a party seeks a ________, then he or she seeks a remedy or ruling that does not involve any award of damages, but rather a proclamation of certain rights, duties, and obligations. A. resolution B. final judgment C. declaratory judgment D. summary judgment
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is: C. declaratory judgment.
If you have any specific legal issues or questions you need assistance with in Washington, feel free to ask!
The procedure used to assign trial dates for civil cases varies among the superior courts and local court rules must be consulted. True False
Case Rating: *
True. The procedure for assigning trial dates for civil cases can vary among different superior courts, and local court rules should be consulted for specific procedures.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need assistance with?
An order granting a motion for _________ is made by the judge to direct a verdict in favor of one side on the basis of statements and evidence that were presented for the record but without any trial. A. a new trial B. summary judgment C. judgment as a matter of law D. relief from judgment
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
B. Summary judgment
Summary judgment is a legal decision made by a judge based on statements and evidence presented without going to trial.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need assistance with?
Under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, an issue that has already been fully litigated by the parties in a previous action for which there has been a final judgment on the merits cannot be re-litigated in any future action involving the same parties. True False
Case Rating: *
True. The doctrine of collateral estoppel, also known as issue preclusion, prevents re-litigation of issues that have already been fully litigated and decided in a previous action with a final judgment on the merits.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need assistance with?
Perfect Plaintiff sued Dumb Defendant. By agreement of the parties and judge, * jurors were seated. At the conclusion of jury deliberations nine of the * jurors sided with Perfect, while the other three jurors sided with Dumb. Based on the information above, the prevailing party at this trial was: A. Perfect Plaintiff B. Dumb Defendant C. Nobody D. Everybody
Case Rating: *
The prevailing party in this trial is:
A. Perfect Plaintiff
In Washington, a civil verdict can be reached with a three-fourths majority of the jurors agreeing. Since * out of * jurors sided with Perfect Plaintiff, Perfect Plaintiff is the prevailing party.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need more information on?
Both remittitur and additur are allowed under the Washington State Superior Court and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. True False
Case Rating: *
False.
- Remittitur (reducing a jury's award) is permitted under Washington State Superior Court Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
- Additur (increasing a jury's award) is not generally allowed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but it is permitted in Washington State courts.
To preserve a disputed issue for appeal, generally the party must object to an asserted error in the trial court at the earliest possible time, otherwise the issue is waived. True False
Case Rating: *
Yes, it is true that to preserve a disputed issue for appeal, generally the party must object to an asserted error in the trial court at the earliest possible time; otherwise, the issue is waived.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need assistance with?
Patient Plaintiff lost her lawsuit against Dastardly Defendant. Three weeks after the entry of judgment, new evidence implicating the Dastardly surfaced. Had this new evidence been presented to the jury it would have almost certainly changed the outcome of the case in Patient’s favor. Patient’s best course of action is to now file a: A. motion for judgment as a matter of law. B. motion for a new trial. C. motion for relief from judgment. D. renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law.
Case Rating: *
Patient Plaintiff should file a motion for a new trial.
- In Washington, a new trial can be granted if new evidence surfaces that could significantly alter the trial's outcome.
Would you like more information on the process of filing a motion for a new trial in Washington?
When fraud by opposing party has discovered after the entry of judgment, there is no one year time limitation for bringing a motion for relief from judgment. True False
Case Rating: *
True. In Washington, there is no one-year time limitation for bringing a motion for relief from judgment if it is based on fraud by the opposing party.
Is there a specific legal issue related to this that you need assistance with in Washington?
In most cases, the standard of proof in a civil trial is: A. by clear and convincing evidence. B. by a preponderance of the evidence. C. beyond a reasonable doubt. D. None of the above.
Case Rating: *
In most civil trials, the standard of proof is:
- B. by a preponderance of the evidence.
This means that the plaintiff must prove that it's more likely than not that their claims are true.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need assistance with?
As a general rule, the plaintiff can dismiss his or her case one time voluntarily without prejudice. True False
Case Rating: *
True. As a general rule, in Washington, the plaintiff can dismiss their case one time voluntarily without prejudice. This means they can refile the case later if they choose to do so.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need more information on?
Any party may demand a jury trial of an issue triable by a jury by filing and serving written demand “not later than ____ after service of the last pleading directed to such an issue” A. * court days B. * calendar days C. * court days D. * calendar days
Case Rating: *
To demand a jury trial, the written demand must be served "not later than * calendar days after service of the last pleading directed to such an issue."
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need assistance with?
If a pleading contains statements that are so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, or if more particularity is needed, the adversely affected party should most likely file a ___ motion. A. CR *(c) B. CR *(e) C. CR *(f) D. CR *
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
B. CR *(e)
A CR *(e) motion is used when a pleading is so vague or ambiguous that the responding party cannot reasonably prepare a response. This motion requests the court to order the opposing party to provide a more definite statement.
Would you like more information on how to file a CR *(e) motion in Washington?
The doctrine of collateral estoppel may be used offensively by the plaintiff or as an affirmative defense by the defendant. True False
Case Rating: *
True. The doctrine of collateral estoppel, also known as issue preclusion, can be used by the plaintiff to prevent the defendant from relitigating an issue already decided in a previous case, or as an affirmative defense by the defendant for the same purpose.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need assistance with?
In Washington State, a party may not videotape a deposition within the first ____ days of commencement of the lawsuit (the later of the date of filing or service of lawsuit), except by leave of court. A. * B. * C. * D. *
Case Rating: *
In Washington State, a party may not videotape a deposition within the first 30 days of commencement of the lawsuit (the later of the date of filing or service of lawsuit), except by leave of court.
Is there any other specific legal issue you need assistance with in Washington?
As a general rule, it is necessary to serve a subpoena on both party deponents and non-party deponents when noticing a deposition. True False
Case Rating: *
False. Generally, subpoenas are required for non-party deponents but not for party deponents. Party deponents can be compelled to attend depositions through a notice of deposition.
Is there a specific legal issue in Washington that you need assistance with?
When deposing a nonresident non-party, the party requesting the deposition must conduct the deposition within ___ miles of where the subpoena was served, and typically in the state where the non-party resides. A. * B. * C. * D. None of the above
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is C. * miles.
Is there any specific legal issue in Washington that you need assistance with?