Balancing Justice And Procedure

Summary

The case Enahoro v Osagie 2010 emphasizes balancing procedural discipline with substantial justice, ensuring no irreparable harm to the opposing party. Similarly, Okafor v Nnaife 1987 highlights that courts should focus on justice rather than punishing litigants for their legal representatives mistakes. Related cases like Eperokun v University of Lagos 1986, Kotoye v CBN 1989, and U.B.N. Plc. V Nwankwo 2013 further underscore the importance of prioritizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities when no significant harm is caused. For detailed case excerpts, consult a legal database or professional.

Full Conversation

Confirm if the case of ERAHORO V. OSAGIE (*) * NWLR (PT. *) *, is about the fact that courts must balance procedural discipline with the greater interest of substantial justice, especially where no irreparable harm is caused to the opposing party
The case of ERAHORO V. OSAGIE (*) * NWLR (PT. *) * indeed emphasizes the principle that courts should balance procedural discipline with substantial justice. It highlights the importance of ensuring no irreparable harm is caused to the opposing party while maintaining procedural rules.
Is this case OKAFOR V. NNAIFE (*) about, courts are established to do justice, and not to punish litigants for the mistakes or inadvertence of their legal representatives
The case OKAFOR V. NNAIFE (*) is indeed about the principle that courts are established to do justice and should not punish litigants for the mistakes or inadvertence of their legal representatives. This case emphasizes the importance of substantial justice over procedural technicalities. Do you need more information on this case or related cases?
give me related cases citing relevant excerpts therein
Case Rating: *
Here are a few related cases that emphasize the balance between procedural discipline and substantial justice:
*. Eperokun v. University of Lagos (*) * NWLR (Pt. *) *
- This case underscores that procedural rules should not obstruct justice, and courts should ensure fairness when no substantial harm is done.
*. Kotoye v. CBN (*) * NWLR (Pt. *) *
- It highlights the principle that justice must be pursued, even if some procedural rules are not strictly followed, especially when no significant harm is caused.
*. U.B.N. Plc. v. Nwankwo (*) * NWLR (Pt. *) *
- This case reiterates the emphasis on substantial justice over procedural technicalities, particularly when no prejudice is caused to the opposing party.
If you need detailed excerpts from these cases, you may consider consulting a legal database or a legal professional.