Texas Discovery Objection Guide

Summary

In Texas, common boilerplate objections against written discovery include relevance, overbroad, unduly burdensome, vague and ambiguous, privileged information, confidential information, not proportional, premature, duplicative, speculative, public information, and lack of knowledge. Each objection has specific wording, such as Objection. This request is not relevant to the subject matter of the litigation and is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence for relevance. These objections help protect parties from providing unnecessary or protected information during the discovery process.

Full Conversation

What other kinds, and I need specific wording for texas
Sure, here are some additional boilerplate objections you can use against written discovery in Texas:
- Confidential Information: The request seeks confidential information which is protected by confidentiality agreements.
- Not Proportional: The request is not proportional to the needs of the case.
- Premature: The request is premature as it seeks information prior to the appropriate discovery phase.
- Duplicative: The request is duplicative of other discovery requests already answered.
Would you like to know more about any of these objections?
are those it or are there more?
In addition to the objections listed, you can also use:
- Speculative: The request requires speculation or conjecture.
- Public Information: The information requested is publicly available.
- Lack of Knowledge: The responding party lacks knowledge or information sufficient to respond.
Do you need specific wording for any of these objections?
Yeah I need specific wording for all of those
Case Rating: *
Sure, here's specific wording for each of the objections:
- Relevance: "Objection. This request is not relevant to the subject matter of the litigation and is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence."
- Overbroad: "Objection. This request is overly broad and not reasonably tailored to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence."
- Unduly Burdensome: "Objection. Complying with this request would be unduly burdensome and oppressive."
- Vague and Ambiguous: "Objection. This request is vague and ambiguous as to the information sought."
- Privileged Information: "Objection. This request seeks information protected by attorney-client privilege and/or work-product doctrine."
- Confidential Information: "Objection. This request seeks confidential information protected by confidentiality agreements."
- Not Proportional: "Objection. This request is not proportional to the needs of the case."
- Premature: "Objection. This request is premature as it seeks information prior to the appropriate discovery phase."
- Duplicative: "Objection. This request is duplicative of other discovery requests already answered."
- Speculative: "Objection. This request calls for speculation or conjecture."
- Public Information: "Objection. The information requested is publicly available."
- Lack of Knowledge: "Objection. The responding party lacks knowledge or information sufficient to respond."
Would you like to know more about how to apply these objections?