Summary
In New Jersey, after a money judgment, parties can negotiate a payment plan independently or through court assistance. Options include contacting the judgment creditor, submitting a written agreement to the court, or requesting a court hearing. In Colorado, if a defendants mitigating evidence was not heard, they may file a Motion for New Trial or Motion to Set Aside Judgment due to procedural errors. These motions should be filed within specific timeframes and can address issues like expedited trials without considering evidence.Full Conversation
What motions and objections are available to th3 defendant who the judgment was against
In Colorado, a defendant can consider the following motions and objections after a judgment:
- Motion for New Trial: Requesting a new trial due to errors during the initial trial.
- Motion to Set Aside Judgment: If there's a valid reason like mistake, inadvertence, or fraud.
- Appeal: Challenging the judgment in a higher court.
Is there a specific scenario or detail you are concerned about?
Non3 of the defendant
It seems like you're looking for guidance on what motions and objections are available to a defendant in Colorado after a judgment is made. To help further, can you clarify what you mean by "Non3 of the defendant"? Are you inquiring about specific defenses or situations in which the defendant can object or file motions?
None of the defendant's mitigating evidence was heard bby
Case Rating: *
It seems like there might be an issue with the defendant's mitigating evidence not being heard. In Colorado, if evidence was not considered, the defendant might file a "Motion for New Trial" or "Motion to Set Aside Judgment."
Could you provide more details about the situation or any specific concerns?
None of the defendant's mitigating evidence was heard by the presiding judge,
Case Rating: *
It seems like the defendant may have grounds to file a "Motion for New Trial" or a "Motion to Set Aside Judgment" if mitigating evidence was not considered. Could you provide more information about why the evidence was not heard? This might help in understanding the situation better.
No reason as to why the mitigating evidence wasnt heard other than the court wanted to expedite the none jury trial
Case Rating: *
It seems like the defendant has potential grounds to file a "Motion for New Trial" or "Motion to Set Aside Judgment" if the court expedited the trial without considering mitigating evidence. These motions can address procedural errors or omissions in the trial. Would you like more information on how to proceed with these motions?
Yes
Case Rating: *
In Colorado, here's how you can proceed with these motions:
- Motion for New Trial: File this motion within 14 days after the judgment. Explain the procedural errors, such as not considering mitigating evidence.
- Motion to Set Aside Judgment: If you believe there was an error, file this motion citing reasons like mistake or omission.
Would you like any more details on filing these motions?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat