Service Of Process Dispute

Summary

The respondent claims she wasnt served with the petition or summons. The petitioner provided proof showing an unknown person, labeled as agent, received the mail instead, as per the January 19th service notice. The notice of service filed January 19th supports the respondents position that no valid service of process was made upon her on January 13th, 2022. The attached delivery receipt shows that the mail was delivered to an unknown person, who was not the respondent, identified only as agent.

Full Conversation

They respondent asserts she was not served with a petition or summons, a fact for which petitioner provided proof, shown on the delivery receipt he attached to the January 19th notice of service which evidence that an unknown person who was not the respondent identified only as agent was allowed to receive the mail
Sure! Here's a more concise and easier-to-understand version of the sentence:
"The respondent claims she wasn't served with the petition or summons. The petitioner provided proof showing an unknown person, labeled as 'agent,' received the mail instead, as per the January 19th service notice."
****
"The respondent says she didn't get the petition or summons. The petitioner showed proof that an unknown person, called 'agent,' received the mail on January 19th."
The notice of service filed January 19th supports the respondents position that no valid service of process was made upon her January 13th, *. The attached delivery receipt shows that the mail was delivered to an unknown person, who was not the respondent, identified only as "agent."
Case Rating: *
Here's a more concise and easier-to-understand version of the sentence:
"The respondent claims she wasn't served on January 13th, *. The delivery receipt attached to the January 19th notice shows the mail was received by an unknown person called 'agent.'"