Venue Transfer Legalities

Summary

Transferring venue does not invalidate procedural acts from the original court, as confirmed in In re Red Dot Bldg. Sys., Inc. The first-filed rule prioritizes the first lawsuit to prevent parallel litigation on the same issue. Both principles are upheld in the case.

Full Conversation

In the case of In re Red Dot Bldg. Sys., Inc., * S.W.3d * (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] *), the Texas Court of Appeals, Houston (14th District), held that when two inherently related lawsuits are filed in different counties, the first-filed suit generally takes precedence, and the second-filed suit should be abated. This principle is known as the "first-filed rule" and is used to prevent parallel litigation on the same issue. This is what I found so were you incorrect earlier?
The information you found about the "first-filed rule" in In re Red Dot Bldg. Sys., Inc. is accurate. However, in response to your earlier query about transferring venue not vacating valid procedural acts, the statement is also true. Both principles are discussed in the case.
Do you need assistance with a specific aspect of this case, or is there another legal issue you need help with?