Washington State Court Procedures
Summary
The Washington State Court of Appeals must hear all cases appealed from lower courts, except in limited situations. District and Municipal Courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. Small Claims Court cases are filed in State District Court and limited to $10,000. Personal jurisdiction requires sufficient minimum contacts. Venue is governed by statutory rules, and improper venue must be raised timely. Washington does not allow punitive damages except in specific cases. Amendments to pleadings are allowed under certain conditions. Class action certification depends on common questions of law or fact. Appeals and discretionary reviews are collectively referred to as reviews. King County requires alternative dispute resolution before trial.Full Conversation
The Washington State District Courts and Municipal Courts are considered courts of limited jurisdiction.
True
False
True. The Washington State District Courts and Municipal Courts are indeed considered courts of limited jurisdiction. They handle specific types of cases, such as misdemeanors, traffic violations, and small claims.
In Washington State, cases filed in Small Claims Court are:
A. filed and heard in the State District Court.
B. limited to money claims of up to $*,*.
C. Both A & B are correct
D. Neither A nor B is correct
The correct answer is:
C. Both A & B are correct
In Washington State, cases filed in Small Claims Court are filed and heard in the State District Court and are limited to money claims of up to $*,*.
C. Both A & B are correct
In Washington State, cases filed in Small Claims Court are filed and heard in the State District Court and are limited to money claims of up to $*,*.
The most important legal issue decided in the landmark case of International Shoe v. Washington relates to the requirement for sufficient minimum contacts requirements in order for the court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant..
True
False
Case Rating: *
True, the most important legal issue decided in the landmark case of International Shoe v. Washington relates to the requirement for sufficient minimum contacts for the court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant.
True, the most important legal issue decided in the landmark case of International Shoe v. Washington relates to the requirement for sufficient minimum contacts for the court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant.
Ginger and Fred entered into an oral contract on January *, * in Seattle, Washington. Pursuant to the contract, Ginger agreed to pay Fred $*,* if Fred agreed to give Ginger dance lessons. Ginger made the payment, but Fred never came through with the dances lessons. In March *, Ginger moved to Spokane, Washington. On December *, *, she filed her complaint in Spokane County Superior Court against Fred for breach of oral contract. Breach of oral contract has a three year statute of limitation in Washington State. Fred was served the summons and complaint on December *, *. On January *, *, he filed a motion to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. Ginger responded by immediately refilling her lawsuit in the proper superior court (i.e., King County). Despite the inconvenience and delay, Ginger’s case will mostly likely not be dismissed; instead it will probably be transferred to King County Superior Court where it will proceed against Fred.
True
False
Case Rating: *
Given the details, the case is likely to be transferred rather than dismissed because Ginger refiled in the appropriate court. However, it's always good to consult with a local attorney for confirmation and further assistance.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Given the details, the case is likely to be transferred rather than dismissed because Ginger refiled in the appropriate court. However, it's always good to consult with a local attorney for confirmation and further assistance.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
So is it true or false
Case Rating: *
It appears that the answer provided is True. However, it's important to note that in practice, the specific details of the case and procedural rules followed by the courts can affect the outcome. Consulting with a local attorney would provide the most accurate guidance.
Would you like more information on any specific part of this topic?
It appears that the answer provided is True. However, it's important to note that in practice, the specific details of the case and procedural rules followed by the courts can affect the outcome. Consulting with a local attorney would provide the most accurate guidance.
Would you like more information on any specific part of this topic?
*) Having proper ____ jurisdiction refers to whether the court has the power to require the parties to appear before it and bind them with its decisions.
A. Personal
B. Subject Matter
C. Concurrent
D. Diversity
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
A. Personal
Personal jurisdiction refers to the court's power to require the parties to appear before it and bind them with its decisions.
Would you like more information on this topic or any additional question?
The correct answer is:
A. Personal
Personal jurisdiction refers to the court's power to require the parties to appear before it and bind them with its decisions.
Would you like more information on this topic or any additional question?
Dear Paralegal, We have two new cases this week, both from the same client Mr. Carl, a resident of Seattle. In the first case, Carl is suing Arthur, also a resident of Seattle, to quiet title on a piece of property located in Pierce County. The second case is a wrongful termination lawsuit. Carl’s former employer, Jack (the owner of Monster Builders), fired him based on his perceived sexual orientation. In truth, Carl is happy that he will not have to commute all the way to Thurston County where Jack lives and where Monster Builders is located, but he is still very angry over his discriminatory termination. Where should we file these two cases?
A. Case *: King County Superior Court; Case *: Thurston County Superior Court.
B. Case *: King County Superior Court; Case *: King County Superior Court.
C. Case *: Pierce County Superior Court; Case *: Thurston County Superior Court.
D. Case *: Pierce County Superior Court; Case *: King County Superior Court.
Case Rating: *
For Mr. Carl's two cases:
*. Case * (Quiet Title Action): Since the property is located in Pierce County, it should be filed in Pierce County Superior Court.
*. Case * (Wrongful Termination): Since the employer and company are located in Thurston County, it should be filed in Thurston County Superior Court.
Therefore, the correct choice is:
C. Case *: Pierce County Superior Court; Case *: Thurston County Superior Court.
For Mr. Carl's two cases:
*. Case * (Quiet Title Action): Since the property is located in Pierce County, it should be filed in Pierce County Superior Court.
*. Case * (Wrongful Termination): Since the employer and company are located in Thurston County, it should be filed in Thurston County Superior Court.
Therefore, the correct choice is:
C. Case *: Pierce County Superior Court; Case *: Thurston County Superior Court.
Unlike personal jurisdiction, there is no constitutional requirement for proper venue in order to have a valid judgment.
True
False
Case Rating: *
False. While venue is generally governed by statutory rules rather than constitutional ones, improper venue can still be a basis for challenging a court's judgment, especially if it causes significant inconvenience to the parties involved.
Would you like more information on any specific part of this topic?
False. While venue is generally governed by statutory rules rather than constitutional ones, improper venue can still be a basis for challenging a court's judgment, especially if it causes significant inconvenience to the parties involved.
Would you like more information on any specific part of this topic?
Jason got into an automobile accident in King County. The other driver was Cindy who was injured and is suing Jason in Superior Court. Cindy is a resident of Snohomish County and works in Skagit County. Jason is a resident of Kitsap County and works in Pierce County. Which one of the following statements is false?
A. This type of case is considered a "transitory action."
B. The correct venue for this case is Snohomish County.
C. The correct venue for this case is Kitsap County.
D. The correct venue for this case is King County.
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
B. The correct venue for this case is Snohomish County.
The correct answer is:
B. The correct venue for this case is Snohomish County.
Which one is false.
Case Rating: *
The false statement would be B. The correct venue for the case against Jason would be King County, where the accident occurred, making it the proper venue for the lawsuit.
The false statement would be B. The correct venue for the case against Jason would be King County, where the accident occurred, making it the proper venue for the lawsuit.
If the defendant determines that a case was incorrectly filed in the wrong venue he or she may raise this defense at any time during trial as long as it is done prior to the final entry of judgment.
True
False
Case Rating: *
False. In Washington, a defendant must raise the issue of improper venue in a timely manner, usually through a pre-trial motion. Raising it for the first time during trial is typically not allowed.
Do you need more information on this topic or have another question?
False. In Washington, a defendant must raise the issue of improper venue in a timely manner, usually through a pre-trial motion. Raising it for the first time during trial is typically not allowed.
Do you need more information on this topic or have another question?
All pleadings are filed with the court, but not all documents filed with the court are pleadings.
True
False
Case Rating: *
True. All pleadings are filed with the court, but not all documents filed with the court are pleadings.
Do you have any other legal questions or need more details on any specific topic?
True. All pleadings are filed with the court, but not all documents filed with the court are pleadings.
Do you have any other legal questions or need more details on any specific topic?
Bert is at a party at Ernie's house and Bert slips and falls on some ice on the floor. Bert sues Ernie in a civil personal injury suit trying to recover for injury to his leg. Luckily Ernie has home owner's insurance and asks the court to bring his insurance company in to the action. Ernie is arguing that he is:
A. indispensable party.
B. entitled to intervention as of right.
C. entitled to a cross-claim.
D. entitled to impleader.
Case Rating: *
It looks like Ernie is arguing that he is entitled to impleader. Impleader allows a defendant to bring a third party into a lawsuit, claiming that the third party is liable for all or part of the plaintiff's claim.
Would you like more details on this topic or have another question?
It looks like Ernie is arguing that he is entitled to impleader. Impleader allows a defendant to bring a third party into a lawsuit, claiming that the third party is liable for all or part of the plaintiff's claim.
Would you like more details on this topic or have another question?
Just choose a b c. Or d
The correct answer is:
D. entitled to impleader.
D. entitled to impleader.
A corporation is a "person" for legal purposes and has the same legal capacity to own property, enter into contracts, and sue or be sued as real people.
True
False
Case Rating: *
True. A corporation is considered a "person" for legal purposes and has the same legal capacity to own property, enter into contracts, and sue or be sued as real people.
Do you have any other legal questions or need more details on any specific topic?
True. A corporation is considered a "person" for legal purposes and has the same legal capacity to own property, enter into contracts, and sue or be sued as real people.
Do you have any other legal questions or need more details on any specific topic?
Lacee Landlord sued Tahir Tenant for unpaid rent. In his answer, Tahir sued Lacee for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment. Tahir’s cause of action against Lacee is referred to as a:
A. cross-claim.
B. third party claim.
C. counterclaim.
D. third party complaint.
Case Rating: *
Tahir's cause of action against Lacee is referred to as a:
C. counterclaim.
Tahir's cause of action against Lacee is referred to as a:
C. counterclaim.
Paula Plaintiff has had difficulty personally serving Danny Defendant the summons and complaint to his Bellevue, Washington home. Therefore, Paula filed an affidavit with the court stating that Danny could not be located despite her best efforts and due diligence, and that she believed Danny to be in hiding. The court granted Paula’s request to serve Danny by publication. Paula ran a notice in the Eastside Journal, a newspaper of general circulation in King County, for four weeks from February 1st to March 1st. When her attorney friend advised her that the notice was supposed to run for six weeks, she reinserted it in the Eastside Journal and ran the same notice for an additional two weeks between March 15th and March 30th. On April 1st, Danny made a CR *(b)(*) motion to dismiss the case. The court will probably find that Danny’s motion is without merit since Paula’s constructive service was done properly.
True
False
Case Rating: *
False. In Washington State, service by publication must be done consistently for six consecutive weeks. Paula’s initial four-week publication plus an additional two-week run does not fulfill this requirement. Danny's motion to dismiss may be found to have merit because the service was not properly completed for the required duration.
Do you need more information on service by publication or have another legal question?
False. In Washington State, service by publication must be done consistently for six consecutive weeks. Paula’s initial four-week publication plus an additional two-week run does not fulfill this requirement. Danny's motion to dismiss may be found to have merit because the service was not properly completed for the required duration.
Do you need more information on service by publication or have another legal question?
An order for the defendant to appear in court in person, and typically served along with the formal legal document that sets forth the basic facts and legal reasons that the plaintiff believes are sufficient to support his or her claim against the defendant, is called the:
A. complaint.
B. order.
C. subpoena.
D. summons.
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
D. summons.
The correct answer is:
D. summons.
Washington is a "code pleading" state, meaning that the pleading must contain sufficient facts to alert the defendant as to why he or she is being sued.
True
False
Case Rating: *
The answer to your question is True. In Washington, the pleading must contain enough detail to inform the defendant of the nature of the claim and the grounds on which it rests.
Do you have any other legal questions or need further assistance on this topic?
The answer to your question is True. In Washington, the pleading must contain enough detail to inform the defendant of the nature of the claim and the grounds on which it rests.
Do you have any other legal questions or need further assistance on this topic?
Washington State is very liberal about awarding punitive damages compared to other states; it is common for a jury to award punitive damages in Washington.
True
False
Case Rating: *
False. Washington does not allow punitive damages except in cases of wrongful death or where expressly authorized by statute. This makes the awarding of punitive damages quite rare in Washington.
Do you have any other legal questions or need further assistance on this topic?
False. Washington does not allow punitive damages except in cases of wrongful death or where expressly authorized by statute. This makes the awarding of punitive damages quite rare in Washington.
Do you have any other legal questions or need further assistance on this topic?
___ damages must be referred to in a complaint; otherwise such damages are waived.
A. General
B. Punitive
C. Special
D. Incidental
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
C. Special
Special damages must be specifically pleaded in a complaint; otherwise, they are waived.
Do you have any other legal questions or need further assistance on this topic?
The correct answer is:
C. Special
Special damages must be specifically pleaded in a complaint; otherwise, they are waived.
Do you have any other legal questions or need further assistance on this topic?
Pablo Plaintiff served Dakota Defendant his summons and complaint on January 15th. On February 1st, Dakota served Pablo her answer. On February 22nd, Dakota found an error in her pleading, amended it, refiled it with the court, and served it upon Pablo. The court will automatically allow this change by Dakota, without leave of court, because she was entitled to amend her pleading once time as ‘a matter of right.’
True
False
Case Rating: *
The answer is True. Dakota is entitled to amend her pleading once as a matter of right within 20 days of serving her answer. In this scenario, she amended her pleading within this time frame.
The answer is True. Dakota is entitled to amend her pleading once as a matter of right within 20 days of serving her answer. In this scenario, she amended her pleading within this time frame.
The _____ doctrine comes into effect when a pleading is amended to add a new claim or a new party, after the statute of limitations has expired.
A. work product
B. *-day rule
C. relation back
D. collateral estoppel
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
C. relation back
The correct answer is:
C. relation back
Washington State courts readily allow the plaintiff to add a new cause of action to his or her existing complaint, even if the statute of limitations has since expired, just as long as the new claim arose out of the same events that were stated in the original pleading.
True
False
Case Rating: *
True, Washington State courts allow plaintiffs to add new causes of action to an existing complaint if the new claim arises out of the same events stated in the original pleading, even if the statute of limitations has expired.
Do you have any other questions or need further clarification on this topic?
True, Washington State courts allow plaintiffs to add new causes of action to an existing complaint if the new claim arises out of the same events stated in the original pleading, even if the statute of limitations has expired.
Do you have any other questions or need further clarification on this topic?
Once served upon the plaintiff, the defendant has 30 days to amend his or her answer as a matter of right.
True
False
Case Rating: *
False. In Washington, a defendant has 20 days to amend their answer as a matter of right after serving the answer, not 30 days.
Do you have any other questions or need more information on a different legal topic?
False. In Washington, a defendant has 20 days to amend their answer as a matter of right after serving the answer, not 30 days.
Do you have any other questions or need more information on a different legal topic?
The courts in Washington rarely allow the addition of a new party to an existing pleading after the statute of limitations has expired.
True
False
Case Rating: *
The statement is True. Washington courts rarely allow the addition of a new party to an existing pleading after the statute of limitations has expired.
Do you have any other questions or need further details on this topic?
The statement is True. Washington courts rarely allow the addition of a new party to an existing pleading after the statute of limitations has expired.
Do you have any other questions or need further details on this topic?
An amended complaint requiring leave of court must be submitted to the court denominated as "proposed" and be unsigned.
True
False
Case Rating: *
True, in Washington, an amended complaint that requires leave of court must be submitted to the court as a "proposed" document and it should be unsigned. This allows the court to review the proposed changes before granting permission to amend the complaint.
Would you like more information on any specific part of this topic or have another legal question?
True, in Washington, an amended complaint that requires leave of court must be submitted to the court as a "proposed" document and it should be unsigned. This allows the court to review the proposed changes before granting permission to amend the complaint.
Would you like more information on any specific part of this topic or have another legal question?
Owners of a subdivision with * houses located in Bellevue pooled their resources and hired Solar Inc. to install solar roof panels on all of the houses for a discount. One year after installation the solar panels stopped working on all of the houses, and Solar Inc. refused to replace work. The homeowners would like to bring their suit as a class action. Which of the following statements is most correct?
A. The certification will likely succeed because there are common questions of law or fact among the class.
B. The certification will likely succeed because balancing all interests a class action is the best way to adjudicate their claims.
C. The certification will likely fail because the class is not large enough.
D. The certification will likely fail because the claims of representatives are not typical of the entire class.
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
A. The certification will likely succeed because there are common questions of law or fact among the class.
Would you like more information on class action lawsuits or have any other legal questions?
The correct answer is:
A. The certification will likely succeed because there are common questions of law or fact among the class.
Would you like more information on class action lawsuits or have any other legal questions?
Because of its policy with regard to punitive damages, Washington State is a favorable place for a class action lawsuit to be filed as compared to other states.
True
False
Case Rating: *
False. Washington State is not considered a favorable place for class action lawsuits with regard to punitive damages because the state does not allow punitive damages except in cases of wrongful death or where expressly authorized by statute. This makes the awarding of punitive damages quite rare.
Do you have any other legal questions or need further details on a different topic?
False. Washington State is not considered a favorable place for class action lawsuits with regard to punitive damages because the state does not allow punitive damages except in cases of wrongful death or where expressly authorized by statute. This makes the awarding of punitive damages quite rare.
Do you have any other legal questions or need further details on a different topic?
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Hickman v. Taylor, stated the following: “Were such materials open to opposing counsel on mere demand, much of what is now put down in writing would remain unwritten. An attorney’s thoughts, heretofore inviolate, would not be his own. Inefficiency, unfairness and sharp practices would inevitably develop in the giving of legal advice and in the preparation of cases for trial. The effect on the legal profession would be demoralizing. And the interests of the clients and the cause of justice would be poorly served.” Based on the content of this statement alone, the Supreme Court was clearly referring to and advocating for:
A. the informal discovery process.
B. the attorney work product doctrine.
C. the attorney-client privilege.
D. the subpoena duces tecum process.
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
B. the attorney work product doctrine.
Would you like more information on this topic or have any other legal questions?
The correct answer is:
B. the attorney work product doctrine.
Would you like more information on this topic or have any other legal questions?
Westlaw and LexisNexis offer fee-based online legal research databases that provide an abundance of reference material to conduct informal discovery right from the paralegal’s work computer.
True
False
Case Rating: *
True.
Would you like any other legal information or have another question?
True.
Would you like any other legal information or have another question?
The Participation Agreement is used in ________, and assures that the attorneys will never represent the parties in litigation, among other things.
A. mediations
B. arbitrations
C. the collaborative law process
D. All of the above
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
C. the collaborative law process
The correct answer is:
C. the collaborative law process
Which of the following statements is false regarding binding arbitration?
A. In Washington State, all civil cases are required to take part in mandatory arbitration.
B. The arbitrators’ decisions are final, and successful appeals from their decisions are rare.
C. The majority of arbitrations arise from an arbitration clause contained in a contract.
D. Most arbitrations are more formal than mediation but less formal than a trial.
Case Rating: *
The false statement is:
A. In Washington State, all civil cases are required to take part in mandatory arbitration.
Not all civil cases in Washington State are required to undergo mandatory arbitration; it typically depends on the county and the specific rules governing arbitration in that area.
The false statement is:
A. In Washington State, all civil cases are required to take part in mandatory arbitration.
Not all civil cases in Washington State are required to undergo mandatory arbitration; it typically depends on the county and the specific rules governing arbitration in that area.
In Washington State, an "appeal" and a "discretionary review" are not synonymous, but are collectively, referred to as "reviews."
True
False
Case Rating: *
True. In Washington State, an "appeal" and a "discretionary review" are distinct processes but are collectively referred to as "reviews."
Would you like more information on any specific part of this topic or have another legal question?
True. In Washington State, an "appeal" and a "discretionary review" are distinct processes but are collectively referred to as "reviews."
Would you like more information on any specific part of this topic or have another legal question?
Which of the following is false with regard to "appeals" in Washington?
A. A party seeking review of a trial court decision reviewable as “a matter of right” must file a Notice of Appeal within 30 days of the entry of judgment.
B. In Washington, an appeal is officially referred to as a discretionary review when it is filed as of right.
C. Parties have a right to appeal final judgments issued by the Superior Court.
D. To preserve a disputed issue for appeal, generally the party must object to an asserted error in the trial court at the earliest possible time, otherwise the objection is waived.
Case Rating: *
The false statement is:
B. In Washington, an appeal is officially referred to as a discretionary review when it is filed as of right.
An appeal filed as of right is not considered a discretionary review; discretionary reviews are for cases that require the court's permission to be heard.
Do you need more information on appeals or have another legal question?
The false statement is:
B. In Washington, an appeal is officially referred to as a discretionary review when it is filed as of right.
An appeal filed as of right is not considered a discretionary review; discretionary reviews are for cases that require the court's permission to be heard.
Do you need more information on appeals or have another legal question?
In King County, the Superior Court requires that at some point prior to the start of trial all cases have a settlement conference, or engage in mediation, or participate in some other form alternative dispute resolution in which a third party is involved.
True
False
Case Rating: *
True. In King County, the Superior Court requires that all cases undergo a settlement conference, mediation, or another form of alternative dispute resolution involving a third party before trial begins.
Would you like more information on the specific requirements for alternative dispute resolution in King County?
True. In King County, the Superior Court requires that all cases undergo a settlement conference, mediation, or another form of alternative dispute resolution involving a third party before trial begins.
Would you like more information on the specific requirements for alternative dispute resolution in King County?
In King County, attorneys must file a "Mandatory Joint Confirmation of Trial Readiness Report" with the court for all civil cases and certain family law cases.
True
False
Case Rating: *
True. In King County, attorneys must file a "Mandatory Joint Confirmation of Trial Readiness Report" with the court for all civil cases and certain family law cases.
Would you like more information on this topic or have another legal question?
True. In King County, attorneys must file a "Mandatory Joint Confirmation of Trial Readiness Report" with the court for all civil cases and certain family law cases.
Would you like more information on this topic or have another legal question?
Which of the following is not mandatory in King County Superior Court?
A. Using the eFiling application to file new cases.
B. Using the eWorking Copies application to submit working copies to the judge.
C. Using the eService application to serve opposing counsel documents.
D. Both B & C are correct answers
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
The correct answer is:
~D. Both B & C are correct answers
In King County Superior Court, using the eWorking Copies application to submit working copies to the judge and using the eService application to serve opposing counsel documents are not mandatory.
Would you like to know more about any specific aspect of this topic or have another legal question?
In King County Superior Court, using the eWorking Copies application to submit working copies to the judge and using the eService application to serve opposing counsel documents are not mandatory.
Would you like to know more about any specific aspect of this topic or have another legal question?