Motion To Vacate Orders

Summary

In Massachusetts, you can file a motion to vacate void orders if there is a lack of jurisdiction or fraud involved. This involves using Massachusetts Rule 60(b)(3) and 60(b)(6). If your appeal to the full panel of the Appeals Court is unsuccessful, you can petition for further review by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, although acceptance is at their discretion. Ensure your motion is clear and concise, focusing on key legal points, and consider seeking legal advice for drafting and filing.

Full Conversation

so you would not include in the title the following, WHO ARE NOT SECURE CREDITORS, AND WHO WERE NOT REAL PARTY IN INTEREST TO KING’S PROMISSORY NOTE AND MORTGAGE CONTRACT, AND A MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE * AND TO ADDRESS NEW EVIDENCE OF FRAUD ON THE COURT AND EVIDENCE OF FILING A FRAUDRULENT CLAIM
I understand your concern about making sure the title accurately reflects all aspects of your motion. However, to keep it concise while still covering the critical points, consider including the essential elements:
Polished Title:
OMNIBUS MOTION UNDER MASSACHUSETTS RULE *(b)(*) AND *(b)(*) FOR RECONSIDERATION TO VACATE VOID ORDERS DUE TO LACK OF JURISDICTION, PARTIES NOT SECURE CREDITORS, AND FRAUD ON THE COURT
Would you like further assistance with any other part of your motion?
Do I need to add AND A MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE * AND TO ADDRESS NEW EVIDENCE OF FRAUD ON THE COURT AND EVIDENCE OF FILING A FRAUDRULENT CLAIM
It's important to make your title both comprehensive and concise. Including too many details might make it cumbersome. You can mention the motion to take judicial notice and addressing new evidence within the body of your motion instead of the title.
Would you like assistance with drafting the body of your motion?
Can you polish this if a and b are the issues :ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT TO VACATE THE VOID ORDERS ON */*/ *, AND */*/*. a. This Motion Must Be Vacated Immediately Because It Lacked Any Judicial Or Legal Basis Pursuant Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure Rule * (b)(*): Lack of the Jurisdiction b. And “Fraud upon the Court”
Certainly! Here's a polished version:
ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT TO VACATE VOID ORDERS DATED */*/* AND */*/*
a. The motion must be vacated immediately due to lack of judicial or legal basis pursuant to Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure Rule *(b)(*): Lack of Jurisdiction.
b. Fraud upon the Court.
Is there anything else you need help with?
I, Alton King Jr., humbly request that the court take Judicial Notice pursuant to *(c)(*), which states, that the court “must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information” of all facts in this section that cannot be disputed. * This Housing Court lacked jurisdiction to grant execution for possession to debt collectors, impersonating as creditors, of SERIES *-J7 because claims were time-barred pursuant to UCC *-*(a) and (b) and pursuant to the Fair Debt Collections Practice Act, FDCPA, Regulation F. Debt collector alleged their clients had purchased mortgage debts that was secured by the promissory notes. This was untrue. Both debt collectors of SERIES *-J7 and it&#*;s agents clearly lacked Article III standing.
It's crucial to ensure that your motion is clear and well-structured. Here is a polished version of your statement:
---
I, Alton King Jr., humbly request that the court take Judicial Notice pursuant to Rule *(c)(*), which mandates the court to take judicial notice if a party requests it and provides the necessary information, of all indisputable facts in this section.
This Housing Court lacked jurisdiction to grant execution for possession to debt collectors impersonating as creditors of SERIES *-J7 because claims were time-barred pursuant to UCC *-*(a) and (b) and the Fair Debt Collections Practice Act (FDCPA), Regulation F. The debt collector falsely alleged their clients had purchased mortgage debts secured by promissory notes. Both the debt collectors of SERIES *-J7 and their agents lacked Article III standing.
---
Would you like assistance with any specific section of your motion or additional legal information?
Can you polish this please:I, Alton King Jr., humbly request that the court take Judicial Notice pursuant to *(c)(*), which states, that the court “must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court issupplied with the necessary information” of all facts in this section that cannot be disputed. This Housing Court lacked jurisdiction to grant execution for possession to debt collectors, impersonating as creditors, of SERIES *-J7 because claims were time-barred pursuant to UCC *-*(a) and (b) and pursuant to the Fair Debt Collections Practice Act, FDCPA, Regulation F.
---
I, Alton King Jr., respectfully request that the court take Judicial Notice pursuant to Rule *(c)(*), which mandates that the court “must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information” of all indisputable facts in this section.
This Housing Court lacked jurisdiction to grant execution for possession to debt collectors impersonating creditors of SERIES *-J7 because claims were time-barred pursuant to UCC *-*(a) and (b), and the Fair Debt Collections Practice Act (FDCPA), Regulation F. The debt collectors falsely alleged their clients had purchased mortgage debts secured by promissory notes. Both the debt collectors of SERIES *-J7 and their agents lacked Article III standing.
---
Would you like assistance with any other part of your motion or additional legal information?
Debt collector alleged their clients had purchased mortgage debts that was secured by the promissory notes. This was untrue. Both debt collectors of SERIES *-J7 and it&#*;s agents clearly lacked Article III standing. The order to grant possession to debt collector On July *, * was based on irrefutable fraudulent acts of fabricated documents attempting to verify possession of the promissory note along with misrepresentation submitted by attorney Fumarola’s affidavit presented in the Summary Judgment for the Western housing Court and later to the Supreme Judicial court.
Sure, here's a polished version:
---
I, Alton King Jr., humbly request that the court take Judicial Notice pursuant to Rule *(c)(*), which states that the court "must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information" of all facts in this section that cannot be disputed.
This Housing Court lacked jurisdiction to grant execution for possession to debt collectors impersonating as creditors of SERIES *-J7 because claims were time-barred pursuant to UCC *-*(a) and (b) and the Fair Debt Collections Practice Act (FDCPA), Regulation F. The debt collector falsely alleged their clients had purchased mortgage debts secured by promissory notes. Both the debt collectors of SERIES *-J7 and their agents clearly lacked Article III standing.
The order to grant possession to the debt collector on July *, *, was based on irrefutable fraudulent acts of fabricated documents attempting to verify possession of the promissory note, along with misrepresentation submitted by attorney Fumarola’s affidavit presented in the Summary Judgment for the Western Housing Court and later to the Supreme Judicial Court.
---
Would you like assistance with another part of your motion or any additional legalinformation regarding your situation?
If I lose my appeal to the full panel appeals court can i appeal that?
If you lose your appeal to the full panel of the Appeals Court in Massachusetts, you can petition for further review by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC). However, the SJC has discretion to accept or deny your petition.
Would you like more information on the petition process or help with drafting your petition?