Court Jurisdiction Transfer Rules

Summary

In Quebec, Article 3137 of the Civil Code allows case transfers to the appropriate court with party consent. In Ontario, Rule 13.1.02 of the Rules of Civil Procedure permits jurisdiction transfers with consent, while Rule 61.05(7) applies to appeals. Appellate review for evidence misapprehension is termed palpable and overriding error in Canada. SLAPP lawsuits in Quebec can be dismissed under Article 54.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, with public interest considerations under Article 54.2. In Ontario, the *1704604 Ontario Ltd. V. Pointes Protection Association* case discusses SLAPP lawsuit criteria, specifically in paragraphs 54-58.

Full Conversation

**** in Ontario
In Ontario, you can refer to Rule *.*.* of the Rules of Civil Procedure, which allows for the transfer of a case to another court with proper jurisdiction upon consent of the parties involved.
Is there anything else you need help with?
I should have filed my appeal in Divisional Court but have the consent of the respondent to transfer. What rule do I cite in Ontario
In Ontario, you can refer to Rule *.*(*) of the Rules of Civil Procedure for transferring an appeal to the appropriate court with the consent of the respondent.
Do you need any further assistance?
What is Appellate review on misapprehension of the evidence called
Case Rating: *
In Canada, including Quebec, appellate review on the grounds of misapprehension of the evidence is often referred to as "palpable and overriding error."
Is there anything else you need help with?
When the indicia of a slapp lawsuit outweighs the merits, the claim should be dismissed
Case Rating: *
In Quebec, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP) can be addressed under Article *.* of the Code of Civil Procedure, which allows for the dismissal of claims that are intended to limit freedom of expression and participation in public matters.
Is there anything else you need help with?
Where do I find the term that the indicia of a slapp lawsuit should be considered in the public interest
Case Rating: *
In Quebec, you can refer to Article *.* of the Code of Civil Procedure, which states that the court must consider if the lawsuit is in the public interest when determining whether it is a SLAPP.
Is there anything else you need help with?
What section in Pointes protection speaks of the indicia of a slapp lawsuit
Case Rating: *
In Ontario, the concept of SLAPP lawsuits and the indicia for determining them are discussed in the case of ** Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Association*. Specifically, look at the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in this case, which elaborates on the criteria for identifying SLAPP lawsuits.
Is there anything else you need assistance with?
What paragraph in Pointes protection refers to the indicia of the slapp lawsuit
Case Rating: *
To find the specific paragraph in the ** Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Association* case that refers to the indicia of a SLAPP lawsuit, you should refer to paragraphs *-* of the Supreme Court of Canada's decision. These paragraphs discuss the criteria for identifying SLAPP lawsuits.
Is there anything else you need help with?