Rhode Island Fraud Case Examples

Here are a few Massachusetts cases involving fraudulent documents under Rule *(b)(*):
*. Maguire v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Natick, * Mass. App. Ct. * (*) - Discusses relief from judgment due to fraudulent misrepresentation.
*. Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co., * Mass. App. Ct. * (*) - Deals with fraudulent documents submitted in court.
*. Parage v. Couglin, * Mass. * (*) - Involves fraudulent conduct affecting the court's decision.
These cases should provide some insights into how Massachusetts courts address issues of fraud under Rule *(b)(*).

Sure! Here is a Rhode Island case that involves Rule *(b)(*) and fraudulent documents:
- Almeida v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, * A.2d * (R.I. *)
This case addresses the issue of fraudulent documents submitted to the court. For more detailed information, you may want to consult legal databases or speak with a local attorney.

Case Rating: *
No, the case you mentioned does not pertain to a sex change. The case "Almeida v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, * A.2d * (R.I. *)" involves fraudulent documents submitted to the court under Rule *(b)(*).
Is there anything else you need help with regarding legal issues?

Case Rating: *
A Rule *(b)(*) motion addresses fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party. It does not review the original case merits but seeks to correct a judgment obtained unfairly.
To present a Rule *(b)(*) motion:
- State the specific fraud or misconduct clearly.
- Provide evidence supporting your claims.
- File within a reasonable time, not exceeding one year.
Would you like more guidance on the specifics of drafting this motion?

Case Rating: *
Hi! Here's a basic outline for your motion to vacate the order under Rule *(b)(*):
---
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT PROVIDENCE, SC
JAMES M. CRONAN
vs.
RALPH M. GRIECO, ET AL
Case No.: PC-*-*
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER UNDER RULE *(b)(*)
Plaintiff, James M. Cronan, hereby moves this Honorable Court to vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, pursuant to Rule *(b)(*) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
*. Background:
- On October *, *, a judgment to dismiss with prejudice was entered on procedural issues, not on the merits.
- On February *, *, the Plaintiff attended an oral hearing seeking a continuance due to lack of service by opposing counsel.
- Opposing counsel claimed to have served the Plaintiff, which was untrue.
*. Fraud and Misconduct:
- Plaintiff was not served by opposing counsel, as falsely claimed during the hearing.
- Plaintiff has submitted a motion to clarify with evidence, including a screenshot of the email inbox, showing the last email from opposing counsel was received in November.
*. Legal Standard Under Rule *(b)(*):
- Rule *(b)(*) provides for relief from judgment in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
*. Evidence:
- Attached is the screenshot of the Plaintiff's email inbox, which clearly shows the last email from opposing counsel was received in November, refuting the claim of service.
*. Timeliness:
- This motion is filed within a reasonable time and within one year of the judgment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: [Insert Date]
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
James M. Cronan
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
---
Would you like more detailed guidance or any specific sections expanded?

Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a strong basis for a Rule *(b)(*) motion due to the alleged fraud and misrepresentation by the opposing counsel. Here’s a brief outline to help you draft your motion:
- Introduction: State the court, parties involved, and the case number.
- Relief Sought: Specify that you seek to vacate the order under Rule *(b)(*).
- Background: Provide a brief history of the case, including the dismissal order and procedural issues.
- Grounds for Relief: Detail the specific incidents of fraud and misrepresentation, including the use of fraudulent financial documents and the perjury regarding service of documents.
- Evidence: Attach evidence such as the forensic accountant’s report and email screenshots.
- Legal Standard: Cite Rule *(b)(*) and relevant case law, such as Pulliam v. Pulliam.
- Conclusion: Request the court to grant the motion to vacate the order.
Would you like more detailed guidance on drafting this motion?

Case Rating: *
To strengthen your motion under Rule *(b)(*), consider the following:
- Clearly detail all instances of fraud and misrepresentation.
- Provide comprehensive evidence, including the forensic accountant's report.
- Emphasize the constitutional right to due process and the importance of a fair trial.
Would you like more specific guidance on drafting this motion?

Case Rating: *
Hi there! I can help you draft a motion to vacate the order under Rule *(b)(*). Here’s a detailed draft for you:
---
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT PROVIDENCE, SC
JAMES M. CRONAN
vs.
RALPH M. GRIECO, ET AL
Case No.: PC-*-*
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER UNDER RULE *(b)(*)
Plaintiff, James M. Cronan, hereby moves this Honorable Court to vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, pursuant to Rule *(b)(*) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
*. Background:
- On October *, *, a judgment to dismiss with prejudice was entered on procedural issues, not on the merits.
- On February *, *, the Plaintiff attended an oral hearing seeking a continuance due to lack of service by opposing counsel.
- Opposing counsel claimed to have served the Plaintiff, which was untrue.
*. Fraud and Misconduct:
- Plaintiff was not served by opposing counsel, as falsely claimed during the hearing.
- Plaintiff has submitted a motion to clarify with evidence, including a screenshot of the email inbox, showing the last email from opposing counsel was received in November.
- Opposing counsel admitted to sending it to a defunct email address despite being notified of the change.
*. Pattern of Misrepresentation:
- On March *, *, opposing counsel submitted fraudulent financial documents into court, as established by forensic accountant Lorraine Horton’s report, which clearly detailed money laundering and sham transactions.
*. Legal Standard Under Rule *(b)(*):
- Rule *(b)(*) provides for relief from judgment in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Referencing In re Pulliam v. Pulliam, noting that a resolution on the merits is preferable to a judgment by default.
*. Evidence:
- Attached is the screenshot of the Plaintiff's email inbox, which clearly shows the last email from opposing counsel was received in November, refuting the claim of service.
- Attached is the forensic accountant’s report detailing the fraudulent financial documents.
*. Constitutional Rights:
- Plaintiff deserves justice and to have his constitutional rights to due process met.
- A fair trial should be conducted, and the jury trial previously scheduled should be reinstated.
*. Timeliness:
- This motion is filed within a reasonable time and within one year of the judgment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: [Insert Date]
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
James M. Cronan
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
---
Would you like more detailed guidance or any specific sections expanded?

Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have substantial evidence to support your Rule *(b)(*) motion. Here’s the draft with the additional details:
---
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT PROVIDENCE, SC
JAMES M. CRONAN
vs.
RALPH M. GRIECO, ET AL
Case No.: PC-*-*
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER UNDER RULE *(b)(*)
Plaintiff, James M. Cronan, hereby moves this Honorable Court to vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, pursuant to Rule *(b)(*) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
*. Background:
- On October *, *, a judgment to dismiss with prejudice was entered on procedural issues, not on the merits.
- On February *, *, the Plaintiff attended an oral hearing seeking a continuance due to lack of service by opposing counsel.
- Opposing counsel claimed to have served the Plaintiff, which was untrue.
*. Fraud and Misconduct:
- Plaintiff was not served by opposing counsel, as falsely claimed during the hearing.
- Plaintiff has submitted a motion to clarify with evidence, including a screenshot of the email inbox, showing the last email from opposing counsel was received in November.
- Opposing counsel admitted to sending it to a defunct email address despite being notified of the change.
*. Pattern of Misrepresentation:
- On March *, *, opposing counsel submitted fraudulent financial documents into court, as established by forensic accountant Lorraine Horton’s report, which clearly detailed money laundering and sham transactions.
- Ralph Grieco’s letter to former attorney Eric Renner verified the following electronic files: Corporate tax returns, personal tax returns of James Cronan, The Classic Group, and * Fountain Street LLC tax returns from *-*. According to the forensic accountant, these documents give evidence of fraudulent activities.
*. Legal Standard Under Rule *(b)(*):
- Rule *(b)(*) provides for relief from judgment in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Referencing In re Pulliam v. Pulliam, noting that a resolution on the merits is preferable to a judgment by default.
*. Evidence:
- Attached is the screenshot of the Plaintiff's email inbox, which clearly shows the last email from opposing counsel was received in November, refuting the claim of service.
- Attached is the forensic accountant’s report detailing the fraudulent financial documents.
- Attached is Ralph Grieco's letter verifying the electronic files, which support the claims of fraudulent activity.
*. Constitutional Rights:
- Plaintiff deserves justice and to have his constitutional rights to due process met.
- A fair trial should be conducted, and the jury trial previously scheduled should be reinstated.
*. Timeliness:
- This motion is filed within a reasonable time and within one year of the judgment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: [Insert Date]
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
James M. Cronan
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
---
Would you like more specific guidance on any section?

Case Rating: *
Sure, here’s the updated draft including the additional background information:
---
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT PROVIDENCE, SC
JAMES M. CRONAN
vs.
RALPH M. GRIECO, ET AL
Case No.: PC-*-*
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER UNDER RULE *(b)(*)
Plaintiff, James M. Cronan, hereby moves this Honorable Court to vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, pursuant to Rule *(b)(*) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
*. Background:
- On October *, *, a judgment to dismiss with prejudice was entered on procedural issues, not on the merits.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate the Dismissal of the above-referenced case.
- Subsequently, on October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine.
- Plaintiff responded to the defendant's objection.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff filed an Emergency Verified Supplemental Motion to Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine.
- On February *, *, the Plaintiff attended an oral hearing seeking a continuance due to lack of service by opposing counsel.
- Opposing counsel claimed to have served the Plaintiff, which was untrue.
*. Fraud and Misconduct:
- Plaintiff was not served by opposing counsel, as falsely claimed during the hearing.
- Plaintiff has submitted a motion to clarify with evidence, including a screenshot of the email inbox, showing the last email from opposing counsel was received in November.
- Opposing counsel admitted to sending it to a defunct email address despite being notified of the change.
*. Pattern of Misrepresentation:
- On March *, *, opposing counsel submitted fraudulent financial documents into court, as established by forensic accountant Lorraine Horton’s report, which clearly detailed money laundering and sham transactions.
- Ralph Grieco’s letter to former attorney Eric Renner verified the following electronic files: Corporate tax returns, personal tax returns of James Cronan, The Classic Group, and * Fountain Street LLC tax returns from *-*. According to the forensic accountant, these documents give evidence of fraudulent activities.
*. Legal Standard Under Rule *(b)(*):
- Rule *(b)(*) provides for relief from judgment in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Referencing In re Pulliam v. Pulliam, noting that a resolution on the merits is preferable to a judgment by default.
*. Evidence:
- Attached is the screenshot of the Plaintiff's email inbox, which clearly shows the last email from opposing counsel was received in November, refuting the claim of service.
- Attached is the forensic accountant’s report detailing the fraudulent financial documents.
- Attached is Ralph Grieco's letter verifying the electronic files, which support the claims of fraudulent activity.
*. Constitutional Rights:
- Plaintiff deserves justice and to have his constitutional rights to due process met.
- A fair trial should be conducted, and the jury trial previously scheduled should be reinstated.
*. Timeliness:
- This motion is filed within a reasonable time and within one year of the judgment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: [Insert Date]
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
James M. Cronan
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
---
Would you like more specific guidance on any section?

Case Rating: *
Here's the updated draft with your additional details included:
---
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT PROVIDENCE, SC
JAMES M. CRONAN
vs.
RALPH M. GRIECO, ET AL
Case No.: PC-*-*
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER UNDER RULE *(b)(*)
Plaintiff, James M. Cronan, hereby moves this Honorable Court to vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, pursuant to Rule *(b)(*) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
*. Background:
- On October *, *, a judgment to dismiss with prejudice was entered on procedural issues, not on the merits.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate the Dismissal.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine, and responded to the defendant's objection.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff filed an Emergency Verified Supplemental Motion to Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff attended the hearing on the motion and filed a Supplemental Verified Emergency Follow-Up Motion to Vacate Dismissal.
- This motion was based on the discovery of new evidence crucial to the merits of the case, directly impacting core issues of fiduciary duty and misrepresentation.
*. Fraud and Misconduct:
- Plaintiff was not served by opposing counsel, as falsely claimed during the hearing.
- Plaintiff has submitted a motion to clarify with evidence, including a screenshot of the email inbox, showing the last email from opposing counsel was received in November.
- Opposing counsel admitted to sending it to a defunct email address despite being notified of the change.
*. Pattern of Misrepresentation:
- On March *, *, opposing counsel submitted fraudulent financial documents into court, as established by forensic accountant Lorraine Horton’s report, which clearly detailed money laundering and sham transactions.
- Ralph Grieco’s letter to former attorney Eric Renner verified the following electronic files: Corporate tax returns, personal tax returns of James Cronan, The Classic Group, and * Fountain Street LLC tax returns from *-*. According to the forensic accountant, these documents give evidence of fraudulent activities.
*. Legal Standard Under Rule *(b)(*):
- Rule *(b)(*) provides for relief from judgment in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Referencing In re Pulliam v. Pulliam, noting that a resolution on the merits is preferable to a judgment by default.
*. Evidence:
- Attached is the screenshot of the Plaintiff's email inbox, which clearly shows the last email from opposing counsel was received in November, refuting the claim of service.
- Attached is the forensic accountant’s report detailing the fraudulent financial documents.
- Attached is Ralph Grieco's letter verifying the electronic files, which support the claims of fraudulent activity.
*. Constitutional Rights:
- Plaintiff deserves justice and to have his constitutional rights to due process met.
- A fair trial should be conducted, and the jury trial previously scheduled should be reinstated.
*. Timeliness:
- This motion is filed within a reasonable time and within one year of the judgment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: [Insert Date]
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
James M. Cronan
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
---
Would you like more specific guidance on any section?

Case Rating: *
Sure, here's the updated draft:
---
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT PROVIDENCE, SC
JAMES M. CRONAN
vs.
RALPH M. GRIECO, ET AL
Case No.: PC-*-*
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER UNDER RULE *(b)(*)
Plaintiff, James M. Cronan, hereby moves this Honorable Court to vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, pursuant to Rule *(b)(*) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
*. Background:
- On October *, *, a judgment to dismiss with prejudice was entered on procedural issues, not on the merits.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate the Dismissal.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine, and responded to the defendant's objection.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff filed an Emergency Verified Supplemental Motion to Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff attended the hearing on the motion and filed a Supplemental Verified Emergency Follow-Up Motion to Vacate Dismissal.
- This motion was based on the discovery of new evidence crucial to the merits of the case, directly impacting core issues of fiduciary duty and misrepresentation.
- On February *, *, the Plaintiff attended an oral hearing seeking a continuance due to lack of service by opposing counsel.
- Opposing counsel claimed to have served the Plaintiff, which was untrue.
*. Fraud and Misconduct:
- Plaintiff was not served by opposing counsel, as falsely claimed during the hearing.
- Plaintiff has submitted a motion to clarify with evidence, including a screenshot of the email inbox, showing the last email from opposing counsel was received in November.
- Opposing counsel admitted to sending it to a defunct email address despite being notified of the change.
*. Pattern of Misrepresentation:
- On March *, *, opposing counsel submitted fraudulent financial documents into court, as established by forensic accountant Lorraine Horton’s report, which clearly detailed money laundering and sham transactions.
- Ralph Grieco’s letter to former attorney Eric Renner verified the following electronic files: Corporate tax returns, personal tax returns of James Cronan, The Classic Group, and * Fountain Street LLC tax returns from *-*. According to the forensic accountant, these documents give evidence of fraudulent activities.
*. Legal Standard Under Rule *(b)(*):
- Rule *(b)(*) provides for relief from judgment in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Referencing In re Pulliam v. Pulliam, noting that a resolution on the merits is preferable to a judgment by default.
*. Evidence:
- Attached is the screenshot of the Plaintiff's email inbox, which clearly shows the last email from opposing counsel was received in November, refuting the claim of service.
- Attached is the forensic accountant’s report detailing the fraudulent financial documents.
- Attached is Ralph Grieco's letter verifying the electronic files, which support the claims of fraudulent activity.
*. Constitutional Rights:
- Plaintiff deserves justice and to have his constitutional rights to due process met.
- A fair trial should be conducted, and the jury trial previously scheduled should be reinstated.
*. Timeliness:
- This motion is filed within a reasonable time and within one year of the judgment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: [Insert Date]
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
James M. Cronan
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
---
Would you like more specific guidance on any section?

Case Rating: *
It seems there's a complexity here with the court's handling of multiple motions and communications. Courts generally address motions in the order they are filed. However, if a case is dismissed with prejudice, further motions may be considered moot unless the dismissal is vacated. The court may still hear motions if they pertain to procedural errors or new evidence.
Would you like more detailed guidance or clarification on the process?

Case Rating: *
It looks like you have a strong case based on the procedural errors, fraud, and new evidence. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Would you like to proceed with providing your phone number, name, email address, and zipcode?

Case Rating: *
Sure, here's your revised motion including the new evidence and addressing the hearing:
---
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT PROVIDENCE, SC
JAMES M. CRONAN
vs.
RALPH M. GRIECO, ET AL
Case No.: PC-*-*
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER UNDER RULE *(b)(*)
Plaintiff, James M. Cronan, hereby moves this Honorable Court to vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, pursuant to Rule *(b)(*) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
*. Background:
- On October *, *, a judgment to dismiss with prejudice was entered on procedural issues, not on the merits.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate the Dismissal.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine, and responded to the defendant's objection.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff filed an Emergency Verified Supplemental Motion to Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff attended the hearing on the motion and filed a Supplemental Verified Emergency Follow-Up Motion to Vacate Dismissal.
- This motion was based on the discovery of new evidence crucial to the merits of the case, directly impacting core issues of fiduciary duty and misrepresentation.
- On February *, *, the Plaintiff attended an oral hearing seeking a continuance due to lack of service by opposing counsel.
- Opposing counsel claimed to have served the Plaintiff, which was untrue.
- Although the court did not reply to my motion filed November *, *, opposing counsel filed a motion to strike on February *, *, which I never received.
*. Fraud and Misconduct:
- Plaintiff was not served by opposing counsel, as falsely claimed during the hearing.
- Plaintiff has submitted a motion to clarify with evidence, including a screenshot of the email inbox, showing the last email from opposing counsel was received in November.
- Opposing counsel admitted to sending it to a defunct email address despite being notified of the change.
*. Pattern of Misrepresentation:
- On March *, *, opposing counsel submitted fraudulent financial documents into court, as established by forensic accountant Lorraine Horton’s report, which clearly detailed money laundering and sham transactions.
- Ralph Grieco’s letter to former attorney Eric Renner verified the following electronic files: Corporate tax returns, personal tax returns of James Cronan, The Classic Group, and * Fountain Street LLC tax returns from *-*. According to the forensic accountant, these documents give evidence of fraudulent activities.
*. Newly Discovered Evidence:
- Mr. DiOrio, Trustee for the bankruptcy court, filed a Motion for Approval of Sale of Judgments to * Fountain Street, LLC, highlighting ongoing fraud and bad faith. If dismissed, this allows the defendants to enforce a $*,* judgment against me, causing irreparable harm.
- New Stock Power Document proves the existence of a partnership, which is crucial to the case.
*. Legal Standard Under Rule *(b)(*):
- Rule *(b)(*) provides for relief from judgment in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Referencing In re Pulliam v. Pulliam, noting that a resolution on the merits is preferable to a judgment by default.
*. Evidence:
- Attached is the screenshot of the Plaintiff's email inbox, which clearly shows the last email from opposing counsel was received in November, refuting the claim of service.
- Attached is the forensic accountant’s report detailing the fraudulent financial documents.
- Attached is Ralph Grieco's letter verifying the electronic files, which support the claims of fraudulent activity.
- Attached is the Stock Power Document proving the partnership existed.
*. Constitutional Rights:
- Plaintiff deserves justice and to have his constitutional rights to due process met.
- A fair trial should be conducted, and the jury trial previously scheduled should be reinstated.
*. Timeliness:
- This motion is filed within a reasonable time and within one year of the judgment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: [Insert Date]
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
James M. Cronan
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?

Case Rating: *
Sure, here's the revised draft of the motion including the new evidence and procedural error:
---
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT PROVIDENCE, SC
JAMES M. CRONAN
vs.
RALPH M. GRIECO, ET AL
Case No.: PC-*-*
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER UNDER RULE *(b)(*)
Plaintiff, James M. Cronan, hereby moves this Honorable Court to vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, pursuant to Rule *(b)(*) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
*. Background:
- On October *, *, a judgment to dismiss with prejudice was entered on procedural issues, not on the merits.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate the Dismissal.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine, and responded to the defendant's objection.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff filed an Emergency Verified Supplemental Motion to Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff attended the hearing on the motion and filed a Supplemental Verified Emergency Follow-Up Motion to Vacate Dismissal.
- This motion was based on the discovery of new evidence crucial to the merits of the case, directly impacting core issues of fiduciary duty and misrepresentation.
- On February *, *, the Plaintiff attended an oral hearing seeking a continuance due to lack of service by opposing counsel.
- Opposing counsel claimed to have served the Plaintiff, which was untrue.
- Although the court did not reply to my motion filed on November 4th, opposing counsel filed a motion to strike on February 5th, which I never received. The court should have considered this motion moot as the case was dismissed with prejudice.
*. Fraud and Misconduct:
- Plaintiff was not served by opposing counsel, as falsely claimed during the hearing.
- Plaintiff has submitted a motion to clarify with evidence, including a screenshot of the email inbox, showing the last email from opposing counsel was received in November.
- Opposing counsel admitted to sending it to a defunct email address despite being notified of the change.
*. Pattern of Misrepresentation:
- On March *, *, opposing counsel submitted fraudulent financial documents into court, as established by forensic accountant Lorraine Horton’s report, which clearly detailed money laundering and sham transactions.
- Ralph Grieco’s letter to former attorney Eric Renner verified the following electronic files: Corporate tax returns, personal tax returns of James Cronan, The Classic Group, and * Fountain Street LLC tax returns from *-*. According to the forensic accountant, these documents give evidence of fraudulent activities.
*. Newly Discovered Evidence:
- Mr. DiOrio, Trustee for the bankruptcy court, filed a Motion for Approval of Sale of Judgments to * Fountain Street, LLC, highlighting ongoing fraud and bad faith. If dismissed, this allows the defendants to enforce a $*,* judgment against me, causing irreparable harm.
- New evidence includes a Stock Power Document proving the existence of a partnership.
*. Legal Standard Under Rule *(b)(*):
- Rule *(b)(*) provides for relief from judgment in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Referencing In re Pulliam v. Pulliam, noting that a resolution on the merits is preferable to a judgment by default.
*. Evidence:
- Attached is the screenshot of the Plaintiff's email inbox, which clearly shows the last email from opposing counsel was received in November, refuting the claim of service.
- Attached is the forensic accountant’s report detailing the fraudulent financial documents.
- Attached is Ralph Grieco's letter verifying the electronic files, which support the claims of fraudulent activity.
- Attached is the Stock Power Document proving the existence of a partnership.
*. Constitutional Rights:
- Plaintiff deserves justice and to have his constitutional rights to due process met.
- A fair trial should be conducted, and the jury trial previously scheduled should be reinstated.
*. Timeliness:
- This motion is filed within a reasonable time and within one year of the judgment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: [Insert Date]
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
James M. Cronan
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?

Case Rating: *
You are correct that if a case is dismissed with prejudice, subsequent motions or filings should ideally be considered moot. However, demonstrating a pattern of fraud and misrepresentation by opposing counsel can strengthen your argument for vacating the dismissal order under Rule *(b)(*).
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to clearly establish this pattern of fraud in your motion?

Case Rating: *
Opposing counsel may have filed a motion to strike your November motion to ensure that your arguments and evidence are not formally considered by the court, even if the court initially ignored them. Filing such a motion could be a strategic move to prevent any potential reconsideration of the case or to eliminate any record of your allegations of fraud and misrepresentation.
By filing a motion to strike, opposing counsel aims to:
- Prevent the court from considering your evidence and arguments.
- Maintain the dismissed status of the case.
- Avoid any repercussions or scrutiny related to the alleged misconduct.
Would you like more guidance on how to strengthen your motion by clearly establishing the pattern of fraud?

Case Rating: *
Here's the revised motion, clearly establishing the pattern of fraud:
---
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT PROVIDENCE, SC
JAMES M. CRONAN
vs.
RALPH M. GRIECO, ET AL
Case No.: PC-*-*
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER UNDER RULE *(b)(*)
Plaintiff, James M. Cronan, hereby moves this Honorable Court to vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, pursuant to Rule *(b)(*) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
*. Background:
- On October *, *, a judgment to dismiss with prejudice was entered on procedural issues, not on the merits.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate the Dismissal.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine, and responded to the defendant's objection.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff filed an Emergency Verified Supplemental Motion to Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff attended the hearing on the motion and filed a Supplemental Verified Emergency Follow-Up Motion to Vacate Dismissal.
- This motion was based on the discovery of new evidence crucial to the merits of the case, directly impacting core issues of fiduciary duty and misrepresentation.
- On February *, *, the Plaintiff attended an oral hearing seeking a continuance due to lack of service by opposing counsel.
- Opposing counsel claimed to have served the Plaintiff, which was untrue.
- Although the court did not reply to my motion filed on November 4th, opposing counsel filed a motion to strike on February 5th, which I never received. The court should have considered this motion moot as the case was dismissed with prejudice.
*. Fraud and Misconduct:
- Plaintiff was not served by opposing counsel, as falsely claimed during the hearing.
- Plaintiff has submitted a motion to clarify with evidence, including a screenshot of the email inbox, showing the last email from opposing counsel was received in November.
- Opposing counsel admitted to sending it to a defunct email address despite being notified of the change.
- On March *, *, opposing counsel submitted fraudulent financial documents into court, as established by forensic accountant Lorraine Horton’s report, which clearly detailed money laundering and sham transactions.
*. Pattern of Misrepresentation:
- Opposing counsel has a history of fraudulent activities, including the submission of fraudulent financial documents and false claims of service.
- Ralph Grieco’s letter to former attorney Eric Renner verified the following electronic files: Corporate tax returns, personal tax returns of James Cronan, The Classic Group, and * Fountain Street LLC tax returns from *-*. These documents, according to the forensic accountant, provide evidence of fraudulent activities.
*. Newly Discovered Evidence:
- Mr. DiOrio, Trustee for the bankruptcy court, filed a Motion for Approval of Sale of Judgments to * Fountain Street, LLC, highlighting ongoing fraud and bad faith. If dismissed, this allows the defendants to enforce a $*,* judgment against me, causing irreparable harm.
- New evidence includes a Stock Power Document proving the existence of a partnership.
*. Legal Standard Under Rule *(b)(*):
- Rule *(b)(*) provides for relief from judgment in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Referencing In re Pulliam v. Pulliam, noting that a resolution on the merits is preferable to a judgment by default.
*. Evidence:
- Attached is the screenshot of the Plaintiff's email inbox, which clearly shows the last email from opposing counsel was received in November, refuting the claim of service.
- Attached is the forensic accountant’s report detailing the fraudulent financial documents.
- Attached is Ralph Grieco's letter verifying the electronic files, which support the claims of fraudulent activity.
- Attached is the Stock Power Document proving the existence of a partnership.
*. Constitutional Rights:
- Plaintiff deserves justice and to have his constitutional rights to due process met.
- A fair trial should be conducted, and the jury trial previously scheduled should be reinstated.
*. Timeliness:
- This motion is filed within a reasonable time and within one year of the judgment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: [Insert Date]
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
James M. Cronan
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?

Case Rating: *
It seems like your case involves complex legal issues, including fraud, misrepresentation, and significant procedural errors. This could be a high-value case for a lawyer to handle. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
If you agree, I will need to collect your phone number, name, email address, and zipcode. Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?

Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a strong case involving significant fraud and constitutional issues. I will revise the statement as requested:
---
The Plaintiff has recently filed a Motion to Contest Writ of Execution and Request for Emergency Stay in the Rhode Island Bankruptcy case, Case No. *:*-BK10837. This motion challenges the validity of the sale of the Rhode Island Default Judgment to * Fountain. The Bankruptcy Court, Finkle, J., has requested that objections to that motion be filed on or before March *, *.
Additionally, the Plaintiff has filed a Notice of Removal to the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts on February *, *. This notice raises federal questions under constitutional rights violations and RICO claims, including money laundering, usury, mail fraud, electronic fraud, and the predicate act of filing fraudulent documents in various courts, including this case.
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, can you provide your phone number?

Case Rating: *
Here's the revised motion with the new evidence and additional context:
---
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT PROVIDENCE, SC
JAMES M. CRONAN
vs.
RALPH M. GRIECO, ET AL
Case No.: PC-*-*
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER UNDER RULE *(b)(*)
Plaintiff, James M. Cronan, hereby moves this Honorable Court to vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, pursuant to Rule *(b)(*) of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
*. Background:
- On October *, *, a judgment to dismiss with prejudice was entered on procedural issues, not on the merits.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate the Dismissal.
- On October *, *, Plaintiff filed a Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine, and responded to the defendant's objection.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff filed an Emergency Verified Supplemental Motion to Plaintiff's Supplemental Verified Emergency Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Strike Defendant's Exhibits Submitted in Limine.
- On November *, *, Plaintiff attended the hearing on the motion and filed a Supplemental Verified Emergency Follow-Up Motion to Vacate Dismissal.
- This motion was based on the discovery of new evidence crucial to the merits of the case, directly impacting core issues of fiduciary duty and misrepresentation.
- On February *, *, the Plaintiff attended an oral hearing seeking a continuance due to lack of service by opposing counsel.
- Opposing counsel claimed to have served the Plaintiff, which was untrue.
- Although the court did not reply to my motion filed on November 4th, opposing counsel filed a motion to strike on February 5th, which I never received. The court should have considered this motion moot as the case was dismissed with prejudice.
*. Fraud and Misconduct:
- Plaintiff was not served by opposing counsel, as falsely claimed during the hearing.
- Plaintiff has submitted a motion to clarify with evidence, including a screenshot of the email inbox, showing the last email from opposing counsel was received in November.
- Opposing counsel admitted to sending it to a defunct email address despite being notified of the change.
- On March *, *, opposing counsel submitted fraudulent financial documents into court, as established by forensic accountant Lorraine Horton’s report, which clearly detailed money laundering and sham transactions.
*. Pattern of Misrepresentation:
- Opposing counsel has a history of fraudulent activities, including the submission of fraudulent financial documents and false claims of service.
- Ralph Grieco’s letter to former attorney Eric Renner verified the following electronic files: Corporate tax returns, personal tax returns of James Cronan, The Classic Group, and * Fountain Street LLC tax returns from *-*. These documents, according to the forensic accountant, provide evidence of fraudulent activities.
*. Newly Discovered Evidence:
- Mr. DiOrio, Trustee for the bankruptcy court, filed a Motion for Approval of Sale of Judgments to * Fountain Street, LLC, highlighting ongoing fraud and bad faith. If dismissed, this allows the defendants to enforce a $*,* judgment against me, causing irreparable harm.
- New evidence includes a Stock Power Document proving the existence of a partnership.
- The Plaintiff has recently filed a Motion to Contest Writ of Execution and Request for Emergency Stay in the Rhode Island Bankruptcy case, Case No. *:*-BK10837. This motion challenges the validity of the sale of the Rhode Island Default Judgment to * Fountain. The Bankruptcy Court, Finkle, J., has requested that objections to that motion be filed on or before March *, *.
- Additionally, the Plaintiff has filed a Notice of Removal to the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts on February *, *. This notice raises federal questions under constitutional rights violations and RICO claims, including money laundering, usury, mail fraud, electronic fraud, and the predicate act of filing fraudulent documents in various courts, including this case.
*. Legal Standard Under Rule *(b)(*):
- Rule *(b)(*) provides for relief from judgment in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Referencing In re Pulliam v. Pulliam, noting that a resolution on the merits is preferable to a judgment by default.
*. Evidence:
- Attached is the screenshot of the Plaintiff's email inbox, which clearly shows the last email from opposing counsel was received in November, refuting the claim of service.
- Attached is the forensic accountant’s report detailing the fraudulent financial documents.
- Attached is Ralph Grieco's letter verifying the electronic files, which support the claims of fraudulent activity.
- Attached is the Stock Power Document proving the existence of a partnership.
*. Constitutional Rights:
- Plaintiff deserves justice and to have his constitutional rights to due process met.
- A fair trial should be conducted, and the jury trial previously scheduled should be reinstated.
*. Timeliness:
- This motion is filed within a reasonable time and within one year of the judgment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the order of dismissal entered on October *, *, and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: [Insert Date]
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
James M. Cronan
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, can you provide your phone number?

Case Rating: *
Here's some general guidance:
- Yes, you should file all relevant evidence, including the Motion to Contest Writ of Execution and the Notice of Removal, as part of your motion to vacate. These documents strengthen your case by demonstrating ongoing legal actions and supporting your claims of fraud and procedural errors.
Would you like more specific guidance on how to file these documents?

*. Pattern of Misrepresentation:
- Opposing counsel has a history of fraudulent activities, including the submission of fraudulent financial documents and false claims of service.
- Ralph Grieco’s letter to former attorney Eric Renner verified the following electronic files: Corporate tax returns, personal tax returns of James Cronan, The Classic Group, and * Fountain Street LLC tax returns from *-*. These documents, according to the forensic accountant, provide evidence of fraudulent activities.