TRY ME!
Motion To Re Enjoin Parties
Summary
The term re-enjoin is used to enforce or extend an existing injunction against a party. To add new parties to a case, use join or enjoin. You can reference violations by other parties without joining them, provided they support your main arguments. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act applies when a debt collector purchases a defaulted debt not secured by a promissory note. A third party to a promissory note has no rights to enforce the contract under the Massachusetts Uniform Commercial Code.Full Conversation
AI, Can you polish this is a motion that I'm about to file to re-enjoin parties in my case, Suggestions of rules and statutes would be greatly appreciated.
Sure thing, ****! Here’s a polished version of your motion to re-enjoin parties in your case:
---
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
Case No.: [Your Case Number]
Plaintiff: [Your Name]
Defendant: [Defendant’s Name]
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Plaintiff, [Your Name], respectfully moves this Honorable Court to re-enjoin the following parties in the above-captioned case:
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Additional Parties’ Names]
Background:
*. On [Date], Plaintiff filed a complaint against [Defendant’s Name] for [Brief Description of the Original Complaint].
*. On [Date], the Court issued an order [Brief Description of the Order Related to Enjoining Parties].
Argument:
Pursuant to [Relevant Rule or Statute], the Plaintiff seeks to re-enjoin the aforementioned parties for the following reasons:
*. Necessary for Complete Relief: Under Rule *(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, these parties are necessaryfor providing complete relief in this case.
*. Substantial Legal Interest: These parties have a substantial legal interest in the matters at issue, as defined under Connecticut General Statutes § *-*.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court re-enjoin the specified parties to ensure a just and complete resolution of this case.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
[Date]
---
Does this meet your needs, ****? Is there any additional information you'd like to add or clarify?
---
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
Case No.: [Your Case Number]
Plaintiff: [Your Name]
Defendant: [Defendant’s Name]
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Plaintiff, [Your Name], respectfully moves this Honorable Court to re-enjoin the following parties in the above-captioned case:
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Additional Parties’ Names]
Background:
*. On [Date], Plaintiff filed a complaint against [Defendant’s Name] for [Brief Description of the Original Complaint].
*. On [Date], the Court issued an order [Brief Description of the Order Related to Enjoining Parties].
Argument:
Pursuant to [Relevant Rule or Statute], the Plaintiff seeks to re-enjoin the aforementioned parties for the following reasons:
*. Necessary for Complete Relief: Under Rule *(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, these parties are necessaryfor providing complete relief in this case.
*. Substantial Legal Interest: These parties have a substantial legal interest in the matters at issue, as defined under Connecticut General Statutes § *-*.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court re-enjoin the specified parties to ensure a just and complete resolution of this case.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
[Date]
---
Does this meet your needs, ****? Is there any additional information you'd like to add or clarify?
This is for MA housing court and I will start submitting pieces but that was a great start
Since this involves MA housing court and not the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, here are some Massachusetts-specific adjustments:
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Housing Court Department, Trial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Case No.: [Your Case Number]
Plaintiff: [Your Name]
Defendant: [Defendant’s Name]
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Plaintiff, [Your Name], respectfully moves this Honorable Court to re-enjoin the following parties in the above-captioned case:
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Additional Parties’ Names]
Background:
*. On [Date], Plaintiff filed a complaint against [Defendant’s Name] for [Brief Description of the Original Complaint].
*. On [Date], the Court issued an order [Brief Description of the Order Related to Enjoining Parties].
Argument:
Pursuant to [Relevant Rule or Statute], the Plaintiff seeks to re-enjoin the aforementioned parties for the following reasons:
*. Necessary for Complete Relief: Under Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure *(a),these parties are necessary for providing complete relief in this case.
*. Substantial Legal Interest: These parties have a substantial legal interest in the matters at issue, as defined under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court re-enjoin the specified parties to ensure a just and complete resolution of this case.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
[Date]
Does this revised version work for your needs?
Housing Court Department, Trial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Case No.: [Your Case Number]
Plaintiff: [Your Name]
Defendant: [Defendant’s Name]
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Plaintiff, [Your Name], respectfully moves this Honorable Court to re-enjoin the following parties in the above-captioned case:
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Additional Parties’ Names]
Background:
*. On [Date], Plaintiff filed a complaint against [Defendant’s Name] for [Brief Description of the Original Complaint].
*. On [Date], the Court issued an order [Brief Description of the Order Related to Enjoining Parties].
Argument:
Pursuant to [Relevant Rule or Statute], the Plaintiff seeks to re-enjoin the aforementioned parties for the following reasons:
*. Necessary for Complete Relief: Under Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure *(a),these parties are necessary for providing complete relief in this case.
*. Substantial Legal Interest: These parties have a substantial legal interest in the matters at issue, as defined under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court re-enjoin the specified parties to ensure a just and complete resolution of this case.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
[Date]
Does this revised version work for your needs?
AI please revise the following
Sure thing, ****! Here's a revised version based on the Massachusetts Housing Court:
---
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Housing Court Department, Trial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Case No.: [Your Case Number]
Plaintiff: [Your Name]
Defendant: [Defendant’s Name]
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Plaintiff, [Your Name], respectfully moves this Honorable Court to re-enjoin the following parties in the above-captioned case:
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Additional Parties’ Names]
Background:
*. On [Date], Plaintiff filed a complaint against [Defendant’s Name] for [Brief Description of the Original Complaint].
*. On [Date], the Court issued an order [Brief Description of the Order Related to Enjoining Parties].
Argument:
Pursuant to [Relevant Rule or Statute], the Plaintiff seeks to re-enjoin the aforementioned parties for the following reasons:
*. Necessary for Complete Relief: Under Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure *(a), these parties are necessary for providing complete relief in this case.
*. Substantial Legal Interest: These parties have a substantial legal interest in the matters at issue, as defined under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court re-enjoin the specified parties to ensure a just and complete resolution of this case.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
[Date]
---
Does this revised version work for your needs? Let me know if you need any further adjustments.
---
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Housing Court Department, Trial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Case No.: [Your Case Number]
Plaintiff: [Your Name]
Defendant: [Defendant’s Name]
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Plaintiff, [Your Name], respectfully moves this Honorable Court to re-enjoin the following parties in the above-captioned case:
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Party *’s Name]
*. [Additional Parties’ Names]
Background:
*. On [Date], Plaintiff filed a complaint against [Defendant’s Name] for [Brief Description of the Original Complaint].
*. On [Date], the Court issued an order [Brief Description of the Order Related to Enjoining Parties].
Argument:
Pursuant to [Relevant Rule or Statute], the Plaintiff seeks to re-enjoin the aforementioned parties for the following reasons:
*. Necessary for Complete Relief: Under Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure *(a), these parties are necessary for providing complete relief in this case.
*. Substantial Legal Interest: These parties have a substantial legal interest in the matters at issue, as defined under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court re-enjoin the specified parties to ensure a just and complete resolution of this case.
Respectfully submitted,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address]
[Date]
---
Does this revised version work for your needs? Let me know if you need any further adjustments.
Now comes ****ton **** Jr. to ask leave of the court and re-enjoin Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee,(BNYMT) to also enjoin debt collector loan servicer, Select Portfolio Servicing, and also to enjoin debt collecting law firm, Nelson, Mullins, Scarborough, and Riley due to the multiple violations and newly discovered evidence of fraud upon the court because the plaintiff does not state that they ever owned or controlled the promissory note and due to the fact that the assignments in questioned were executed nine years after the original refinance lender, ComUnity Lending Inc., CLI, filed liquidating bankruptcy January *, * and because they failed to attach any power of attorney granting the signatories the authority to create assignments by MERS on behalf of CLI.
Sure thing, ****! Here's a revised version of your motion:
---
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Housing Court Department, Trial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Case No.: [Your Case Number]
Plaintiff: ****ton **** Jr.
Defendant: Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee, Select Portfolio Servicing, Nelson, Mullins, Scarborough, and Riley
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Plaintiff, ****ton **** Jr., respectfully moves this Honorable Court to re-enjoin the following parties in the above-captioned case:
*. Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee (BNYMT)
*. Select Portfolio Servicing
*. Nelson, Mullins, Scarborough, and Riley
Background:
*. Plaintiff has discovered multiple violations and new evidence of fraud upon the court.
*. The plaintiff contends that the defendants never owned or controlled the promissory note.
*. The assignments in question were executed nine years after the original refinance lender, ComUnity Lending Inc. (CLI), filed for bankruptcy on January *, *.
*. No power of attorney was attached granting signatories the authority to create assignmentsby MERS on behalf of CLI.
*. MERS admitted it does not loan money and is not a lender, thus could not have acted on behalf of CLI.
*. Newly discovered evidence reveals that during CLI’s bankruptcy proceedings from January *, *, through November *, *, the debt collector failed to provide evidence that the bankruptcy court granted them authority to implement any transactions on behalf of CLI.
*. No power of attorney was found in the Hampden County Registry of Deeds acknowledging this authority.
Argument:
Pursuant to Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure *(a), the Plaintiff seeks to re-enjoin the aforementioned parties for the following reasons:
*. Necessary for Complete Relief: These parties are essential for providing complete relief in this case.
*. Substantial Legal Interest: These parties have a substantial legal interest in the matters at issue, as defined under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court re-enjoin the specified parties to ensure a just and complete resolution of this case.
Respectfully submitted,
****ton **** Jr.
[Your Address]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address
---
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Housing Court Department, Trial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Case No.: [Your Case Number]
Plaintiff: ****ton **** Jr.
Defendant: Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee, Select Portfolio Servicing, Nelson, Mullins, Scarborough, and Riley
Motion to Re-Enjoin Parties
Plaintiff, ****ton **** Jr., respectfully moves this Honorable Court to re-enjoin the following parties in the above-captioned case:
*. Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee (BNYMT)
*. Select Portfolio Servicing
*. Nelson, Mullins, Scarborough, and Riley
Background:
*. Plaintiff has discovered multiple violations and new evidence of fraud upon the court.
*. The plaintiff contends that the defendants never owned or controlled the promissory note.
*. The assignments in question were executed nine years after the original refinance lender, ComUnity Lending Inc. (CLI), filed for bankruptcy on January *, *.
*. No power of attorney was attached granting signatories the authority to create assignmentsby MERS on behalf of CLI.
*. MERS admitted it does not loan money and is not a lender, thus could not have acted on behalf of CLI.
*. Newly discovered evidence reveals that during CLI’s bankruptcy proceedings from January *, *, through November *, *, the debt collector failed to provide evidence that the bankruptcy court granted them authority to implement any transactions on behalf of CLI.
*. No power of attorney was found in the Hampden County Registry of Deeds acknowledging this authority.
Argument:
Pursuant to Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure *(a), the Plaintiff seeks to re-enjoin the aforementioned parties for the following reasons:
*. Necessary for Complete Relief: These parties are essential for providing complete relief in this case.
*. Substantial Legal Interest: These parties have a substantial legal interest in the matters at issue, as defined under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section *.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court re-enjoin the specified parties to ensure a just and complete resolution of this case.
Respectfully submitted,
****ton **** Jr.
[Your Address]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Email Address
yes. To enjoin a party that was not a part of the original case, does the term re-enjoin apply?
To answer your question, the term "re-enjoin" typically applies to situations where you are seeking to enforce or extend an existing injunction against a party. If you are looking to add new parties to an ongoing case, you might use the term "join" or "enjoin" these new parties.
Is there a specific context or additional detail you need help with regarding this motion?
Is there a specific context or additional detail you need help with regarding this motion?
Can I reference violations by parties of this case without joining them to the case.
Yes, you can reference violations by other parties without joining them to the case. This can be done in your arguments or background to provide context and evidence for your claims. However, it's crucial to ensure that these references are relevant and support your main arguments.
Do you need more information on how to structure these references in your motion?
Do you need more information on how to structure these references in your motion?
AI please revise: Moving forward, the plaintiff does not state that they owned or controlled the promissory note, the assignments in questioned were executed nine years after the original refinance lender, CLI, filed liquidating bankruptcy */*/*, and because they failed to attach any power of attorney granting the signatories the authority to create assignments by MERS on behalf of CLI. MERS also admitted that they do not loan money, it is not a lender so therefore, they could not have acted on behalf of the defunct refinance lender, CLI. Newly discovered evidence reveals that during CLI’s bankruptcy proceedings from */*/*, through */*/*, the illegal transfer submitted by the debt collector failed to provide any evidence that the bankruptcy court granted the debt collector the authority to implement any transactions on behalf of CLI. There was not any power of attorney found in the HCRD acknowledging this authority.
Moving forward, the plaintiff does not state that they owned or controlled the promissory note. The assignments in question were executed nine years after the original refinance lender, ComUnity Lending Inc. (CLI), filed for bankruptcy on January *, *. The plaintiff failed to attach any power of attorney granting the signatories the authority to create assignments by MERS on behalf of CLI. MERS admitted that they do not loan money and are not a lender, so they could not have acted on behalf of CLI. Newly discovered evidence reveals that during CLI’s bankruptcy proceedings from January *, *, through November *, *, the debt collector failed to provide any evidence that the bankruptcy court granted them the authority to implement any transactions on behalf of CLI. No power of attorney was found in the Hampden County Registry of Deeds acknowledging this authority.
AI, Please revise: The controlling case law in this case is the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act because the debt collector purchased a defaulted, charged off debt account that was not secured by the promissory note and mortgage at issue. In this case a third party to ****’s promissory note passes no rights to enforce the contract pursuant to Massachusetts Uniform Commercial Code.
Here's the revised version:
The controlling case law in this case is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, as the debt collector purchased a defaulted, charged-off debt account that was not secured by the promissory note and mortgage at issue. A third party to ****’s promissory note has no rights to enforce the contract pursuant to the Massachusetts Uniform Commercial Code.
Do you need further assistance or additional details?
The controlling case law in this case is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, as the debt collector purchased a defaulted, charged-off debt account that was not secured by the promissory note and mortgage at issue. A third party to ****’s promissory note has no rights to enforce the contract pursuant to the Massachusetts Uniform Commercial Code.
Do you need further assistance or additional details?
AI, a third party to ****’s promissory note has no rights to enforce the contract pursuant to which Massachusetts Uniform Commercial Code.
Sure thing! Here's the revised version:
---
The controlling case law in this case is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because the debt collector purchased a defaulted, charged-off debt account that was not secured by the promissory note and mortgage at issue. A third party to ****’s promissory note has no rights to enforce the contract pursuant to the Massachusetts Uniform Commercial Code.
---
Is there anything else you'd like to add or adjust?
---
The controlling case law in this case is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because the debt collector purchased a defaulted, charged-off debt account that was not secured by the promissory note and mortgage at issue. A third party to ****’s promissory note has no rights to enforce the contract pursuant to the Massachusetts Uniform Commercial Code.
---
Is there anything else you'd like to add or adjust?
Start a new chat