TRY ME!
Protecting Medical Records Confidentiality
Summary
Alton can file a motion to seal documents to protect his medical records, limiting access to case participants. In Massachusetts, sealed documents are available to all case participants, including opposing counsel. For a RICO case, federal jurisdiction applies due to federal questions. The nature of the suit involves racketeering and civil rights violations. When filling out forms, prioritize the primary nature of the claim, such as RICO, and include related cases on a separate sheet if needed. For damages, include property value and potential treble damages under RICO.Full Conversation
Please clarify whi case particpants are here- Additionally, he can request that these documents be limited to case participants only.
Case participants typically include:
- The appellant (Alton in this case)
- The appellee(s) (the opposing party or parties)
- The attorneys representing both sides
- The judge and court staff
If Alton wants to ensure his medical records remain confidential, he should file a motion to seal, specifying that access be limited to these participants only.
- The appellant (Alton in this case)
- The appellee(s) (the opposing party or parties)
- The attorneys representing both sides
- The judge and court staff
If Alton wants to ensure his medical records remain confidential, he should file a motion to seal, specifying that access be limited to these participants only.
I believe that the medical records can only be beteen the court and him and certaintly not the opposing counsel.
In Massachusetts, when you file a motion to seal documents, those documents are typically made available to all case participants, including the opposing counsel. However, the public will not have access to these sealed documents. If Alton wants to argue that his medical records should only be viewed by the court and himself, he will need to provide strong reasons for this request, emphasizing the sensitivity of the information.
Would you like guidance on how to draft such a motion, or any specific points to emphasize in your argument?
Would you like guidance on how to draft such a motion, or any specific points to emphasize in your argument?
they get to learn that their extortion techniguess are wearing Alton down by the medical records of his pychologist.
Case Rating: *
It seems like Alton is dealing with a sensitive issue regarding the confidentiality of his medical records. Here are some steps he can consider:
- File a motion to seal future documents, explaining the need for confidentiality and why only the court should have access.
- Highlight the sensitivity of the psychological records and the potential harm of disclosure.
Would you like guidance on drafting the motion or understanding the specific points to emphasize?
It seems like Alton is dealing with a sensitive issue regarding the confidentiality of his medical records. Here are some steps he can consider:
- File a motion to seal future documents, explaining the need for confidentiality and why only the court should have access.
- Highlight the sensitivity of the psychological records and the potential harm of disclosure.
Would you like guidance on drafting the motion or understanding the specific points to emphasize?
i am filing out the U.S. category form and it asks;*. Does the complaint in this case question the constitutionality of an act of congress affecting the public interest? (See * USC §*). The complaint being the plaintiff didi not raise a const question but I as a defenadant have and thats why i am removing the case. how do i answer the question?
Case Rating: *
If you, as the defendant, are raising a constitutional question about an act of Congress, you should answer "Yes" to that question on the U.S. category form. This indicates that your case involves a constitutional issue.
Would you like any further assistance with the details or steps for removing the case?
If you, as the defendant, are raising a constitutional question about an act of Congress, you should answer "Yes" to that question on the U.S. category form. This indicates that your case involves a constitutional issue.
Would you like any further assistance with the details or steps for removing the case?
next question- If so, is the U.S.A. or an officer, agent or employee of the U.S. a party? I am allegding that the Southeast housing Court denied me my constuitional rights and illegally seized my home based on fraud. how do I answer
Case Rating: *
If your complaint is against the Southeast Housing Court and not directly against the U.S.A. or an officer, agent, or employee of the U.S., you should answer "No" to that question. The U.S.A. or its agents are not parties in this situation.
Would you like help with drafting any documents related to your case?
If your complaint is against the Southeast Housing Court and not directly against the U.S.A. or an officer, agent, or employee of the U.S., you should answer "No" to that question. The U.S.A. or its agents are not parties in this situation.
Would you like help with drafting any documents related to your case?
and because i am not going to sue the judge
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a complex legal situation involving the confidentiality of your medical records and a constitutional claim. Here are a few steps you might consider:
- File a motion to seal documents, clearly outlining the sensitivity and need for confidentiality.
- Emphasize the potential harm of disclosure, especially regarding psychological records.
- Clarify the constitutional question and any relevant defenses in your removal case.
Would you like more detailed guidance on drafting the motion to seal or any other specific parts of your case?
It sounds like you have a complex legal situation involving the confidentiality of your medical records and a constitutional claim. Here are a few steps you might consider:
- File a motion to seal documents, clearly outlining the sensitivity and need for confidentiality.
- Emphasize the potential harm of disclosure, especially regarding psychological records.
- Clarify the constitutional question and any relevant defenses in your removal case.
Would you like more detailed guidance on drafting the motion to seal or any other specific parts of your case?
is a judge an employee of the U.S?
Case Rating: *
Judges are not employees of the U.S. in the traditional sense. They are appointed or elected to serve in their judicial capacity and have a unique role within the legal system.
Judges are not employees of the U.S. in the traditional sense. They are appointed or elected to serve in their judicial capacity and have a unique role within the legal system.
Would you like to know more about the roles and responsibilities of judges or have any other questions about your legal situation?
how do I naswer this . Is this case required to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges pursuant to title * USC §*?
Case Rating: *
Title * USC §* mandates a three-judge court for cases involving the constitutionality of congressional redistricting or statewide reapportionment.
- Does your case involve redistricting or statewide reapportionment?
- Are there any other constitutional issues you are raising?
Title * USC §* mandates a three-judge court for cases involving the constitutionality of congressional redistricting or statewide reapportionment.
- Does your case involve redistricting or statewide reapportionment?
- Are there any other constitutional issues you are raising?
I am citing violation of my constuitional rights to due process equal protestion and the 7th the right to a jury trail. So how do I anser this?
Case Rating: *
To answer the question about whether your case requires a three-judge court under Title * USC §*:
- If your case does not involve congressional redistricting or statewide reapportionment, you should answer "No."
Would you like more detailed guidance on drafting specific documents or arguments for your case?
To answer the question about whether your case requires a three-judge court under Title * USC §*:
- If your case does not involve congressional redistricting or statewide reapportionment, you should answer "No."
Would you like more detailed guidance on drafting specific documents or arguments for your case?
*. Do all * NO * of the parties in this action, excluding governmental agencies of the United States and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (“governmental agencies”), residing in Massachusetts reside in the same division? - (See Local Rule *.*(d)) - does this apply to me/
Case Rating: *
Based on the information provided, it seems like you have a complex legal situation involving the confidentiality of your medical records, a constitutional claim, and procedural queries. Here's a concise response to your question:
Local Rule *.*(d) pertains to the assignment and transfer of cases within different divisions of a court. It is relevant if your case is being heard in a federal court in Massachusetts, and it involves determining the proper division for your case.
To answer your question:
- Determine if all non-governmental parties involved in your case, who reside in Massachusetts, live in the same judicial division (e.g., Boston, Worcester, Springfield).
- If they do, then they reside in the same division. If not, they do not.
Would you like more assistance in understanding this rule or any other part of your case?
Based on the information provided, it seems like you have a complex legal situation involving the confidentiality of your medical records, a constitutional claim, and procedural queries. Here's a concise response to your question:
Local Rule *.*(d) pertains to the assignment and transfer of cases within different divisions of a court. It is relevant if your case is being heard in a federal court in Massachusetts, and it involves determining the proper division for your case.
To answer your question:
- Determine if all non-governmental parties involved in your case, who reside in Massachusetts, live in the same judicial division (e.g., Boston, Worcester, Springfield).
- If they do, then they reside in the same division. If not, they do not.
Would you like more assistance in understanding this rule or any other part of your case?
No the confidential of my medical records has to do with my friend Alton. Has nothing to do with my case. I am bringing a case pursuint to the RICIO stauatue which I have yet to name all of the parties but I know one's main head quartes is in Caloforna and the two culprable peopel of the racketeering live in Rhode island.
Case Rating: *
It looks like you're preparing to file a case under the RICO statute and have complex questions about procedural aspects. Here are some points to note for your RICO case:
- RICO aims to combat organized crime by allowing prosecution and civil penalties for racketeering activities performed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
- Parties involved in racketeering must show a pattern of criminal activity.
Would you like more information on how to structure your RICO complaint, or any specific questions about the parties involved?
It looks like you're preparing to file a case under the RICO statute and have complex questions about procedural aspects. Here are some points to note for your RICO case:
- RICO aims to combat organized crime by allowing prosecution and civil penalties for racketeering activities performed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
- Parties involved in racketeering must show a pattern of criminal activity.
Would you like more information on how to structure your RICO complaint, or any specific questions about the parties involved?
how do I answer this- *. Do all * NO * of the parties in this action, excluding governmental agencies of the United States and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (“governmental agencies”), residing in Massachusetts reside in the same division?
Case Rating: *
To answer question * about whether all nine parties, excluding governmental agencies, residing in Massachusetts reside in the same division:
- Identify the specific division (e.g., Boston, Worcester, Springfield) each party resides in.
- If all non-governmental parties live in the same division, answer "Yes."
- If they live in different divisions, answer "No."
Would you like more assistance with another part of your case?
To answer question * about whether all nine parties, excluding governmental agencies, residing in Massachusetts reside in the same division:
- Identify the specific division (e.g., Boston, Worcester, Springfield) each party resides in.
- If all non-governmental parties live in the same division, answer "Yes."
- If they live in different divisions, answer "No."
Would you like more assistance with another part of your case?
what nine parties are they referencing. i dont undersdtand.
Case Rating: *
It looks like the question is asking if all non-governmental parties in your case who reside in Massachusetts live in the same division (such as Boston, Worcester, Springfield).
To clarify, the nine parties likely refer to:
*. Plaintiff(s)
*. Defendant(s)
*. Any other parties involved in the case (e.g., co-defendants, third-party defendants, etc.)
Are there multiple individuals or entities involved in your case?
It looks like the question is asking if all non-governmental parties in your case who reside in Massachusetts live in the same division (such as Boston, Worcester, Springfield).
To clarify, the nine parties likely refer to:
*. Plaintiff(s)
*. Defendant(s)
*. Any other parties involved in the case (e.g., co-defendants, third-party defendants, etc.)
Are there multiple individuals or entities involved in your case?
yes there are multiple individaul involved in my case.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like your case involves multiple parties across different states and deals with the RICO statute. This adds complexity to the legal proceedings.
To answer the question about the nine parties:
- Identify if all non-governmental parties residing in Massachusetts live in the same division (e.g., Boston, Worcester, Springfield).
- If they all live in the same division, answer "Yes."
- If they live in different divisions, answer "No."
Would you like more specific guidance on any other aspect of your case?
It sounds like your case involves multiple parties across different states and deals with the RICO statute. This adds complexity to the legal proceedings.
To answer the question about the nine parties:
- Identify if all non-governmental parties residing in Massachusetts live in the same division (e.g., Boston, Worcester, Springfield).
- If they all live in the same division, answer "Yes."
- If they live in different divisions, answer "No."
Would you like more specific guidance on any other aspect of your case?
the parties in my case who live in massachusetts live in different districts. does this matter?
Case Rating: *
Yes, it does matter. Here's why:
- Different districts might affect where your case is filed or heard.
- You may need to ensure proper venue and jurisdiction.
- Be prepared for possible transfers to the appropriate district.
Would you like more information on how to handle this procedural aspect?
Yes, it does matter. Here's why:
- Different districts might affect where your case is filed or heard.
- You may need to ensure proper venue and jurisdiction.
- Be prepared for possible transfers to the appropriate district.
Would you like more information on how to handle this procedural aspect?
so because the parties who live in mA live in different disctricts i should answer no to question *. Is this right/
Case Rating: *
Yes, you should answer "No" to question * if the parties who live in Massachusetts reside in different districts.
Would you like more assistance with any other part of your case?
Yes, you should answer "No" to question * if the parties who live in Massachusetts reside in different districts.
Would you like more assistance with any other part of your case?
If no, in which division do the majority of the plaintiffs or the only parties, excluding governmental agencies, residing in Massachusetts reside? Eastern Division * Central Division * Western Division the majority of the parties live in the Bristol district of Ma so what division is that.
Case Rating: *
Bristol County, Massachusetts is part of the Eastern Division.
Would you like assistance with any other part of your case?
Bristol County, Massachusetts is part of the Eastern Division.
Would you like assistance with any other part of your case?
if i am sueing Godbout Law Inc and the * attornies do i include the * attorneys?
Case Rating: *
If you're suing Godbout Law Inc. and want to include the three attorneys in your lawsuit, you typically need to name each attorney individually in the complaint. This ensures that each party is properly notified and can respond to the claims against them.
Would you like guidance on drafting the complaint or any specific part of your lawsuit?
If you're suing Godbout Law Inc. and want to include the three attorneys in your lawsuit, you typically need to name each attorney individually in the complaint. This ensures that each party is properly notified and can respond to the claims against them.
Would you like guidance on drafting the complaint or any specific part of your lawsuit?
then they are located in Boston. * defendants and * attornies work and live in bristol. so waht is the majority
Case Rating: *
The majority of the parties residing in Massachusetts are in Bristol County, which is part of the Eastern Division.
Would you like assistance with any other aspect of your case?
The majority of the parties residing in Massachusetts are in Bristol County, which is part of the Eastern Division.
Would you like assistance with any other aspect of your case?
. If filing a Notice of Removal - are there any motions pending in the state court requiring the attention of this Court? (If yes, submit a separate sheet identifying the motions) There is a pending motion from the superior court Bristol from which i removed the case.
Case Rating: *
Since there is a pending motion in the Superior Court in Bristol, you should submit a separate sheet identifying the motions requiring attention.
Would you like assistance with drafting the notice or any other part of your case?
Since there is a pending motion in the Superior Court in Bristol, you should submit a separate sheet identifying the motions requiring attention.
Would you like assistance with drafting the notice or any other part of your case?
so can I attach the Notice To Appear for Motion Hearing which I recieved by mail by the superior court?
Case Rating: *
Yes, you can attach the Notice To Appear for the Motion Hearing that you received from the superior court. Just make sure to include it as an exhibit or attachment in your filing, clearly labeled and referenced in your document.
Would you like guidance on how to properly attach and reference this notice in your filing?
Yes, you can attach the Notice To Appear for the Motion Hearing that you received from the superior court. Just make sure to include it as an exhibit or attachment in your filing, clearly labeled and referenced in your document.
Would you like guidance on how to properly attach and reference this notice in your filing?
it concludes please type attorneys name- i am pro se.
Case Rating: *
You are doing a great job handling this complex case as a pro se litigant. If you need to include the names of attorneys, you can simply list them as follows:
- [Attorney's Full Name]
- [Attorney's Full Name]
- [Attorney's Full Name]
Would you like any further assistance with your case specifics or drafting documents?
You are doing a great job handling this complex case as a pro se litigant. If you need to include the names of attorneys, you can simply list them as follows:
- [Attorney's Full Name]
- [Attorney's Full Name]
- [Attorney's Full Name]
Would you like any further assistance with your case specifics or drafting documents?
You really think that I am doing a great job. Why do you think that?
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're navigating a complex legal situation with multiple parties and procedural requirements. You're asking precise and relevant questions, which shows you're thinking critically about the details of your case. Keep it up!
Is there any specific part of your case you'd like more help with?
It sounds like you're navigating a complex legal situation with multiple parties and procedural requirements. You're asking precise and relevant questions, which shows you're thinking critically about the details of your case. Keep it up!
Is there any specific part of your case you'd like more help with?
Thank you!!! So (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT) ATTORNEY'S NAME- do they mean Blake godbout Inc, opposing counsel or my name, karen Merritt
Case Rating: *
It seems like you are being asked to provide the name of the attorney handling the case. Since you are representing yourself pro se, you should put your name, Karen Merritt, in the space for the attorney's name.
Would you like help with any other part of your case?
It seems like you are being asked to provide the name of the attorney handling the case. Since you are representing yourself pro se, you should put your name, Karen Merritt, in the space for the attorney's name.
Would you like help with any other part of your case?
should i include the other defandant too James Cronan?
Case Rating: *
It depends on the role James Cronan plays in your case. If his actions are relevant to your claims and he is a necessary party to the litigation, then you should include him as a defendant.
Would you like more guidance on how to determine if he should be included?
It depends on the role James Cronan plays in your case. If his actions are relevant to your claims and he is a necessary party to the litigation, then you should include him as a defendant.
Would you like more guidance on how to determine if he should be included?
now i am filling out the CIVIL COVER SHEET and it first asks the plaintiff and defandant. Since Iam removing the case wherby I was the defandants. I am indeed the defandant here. Right?
Case Rating: *
Yes, you are indeed the defendant in this case since you are removing it to federal court. The plaintiff is the party who initially filed the case in state court.
Would you like assistance with any other part of your civil cover sheet or case?
Yes, you are indeed the defendant in this case since you are removing it to federal court. The plaintiff is the party who initially filed the case in state court.
Would you like assistance with any other part of your civil cover sheet or case?
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Pawtucket RI * . This is based on infromation that i got from the civil cover sheet filed in superior court. So would county of residence be pawtucket R.I.?
Case Rating: *
The county of residence for the first-listed plaintiff would be Pawtucket, RI if that is the information provided on the civil cover sheet filed in the superior court.
Would you like assistance with any other part of your case or form?
The county of residence for the first-listed plaintiff would be Pawtucket, RI if that is the information provided on the civil cover sheet filed in the superior court.
Would you like assistance with any other part of your case or form?
bais of jurisdiction Federal question since I want my case to be ajudicated under federal law, though diversit is an issue too.
Case Rating: *
To better assist you with your jurisdiction question, could you clarify if your case involves a federal question related to a specific federal law or constitutional issue?
To better assist you with your jurisdiction question, could you clarify if your case involves a federal question related to a specific federal law or constitutional issue?
RICO claims and i have * or so predicate acts which i am alledging. Additionally I am alledging a constitutional rights violation by housing court.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a multi-faceted case involving RICO claims and constitutional rights violations. Here are some points to keep in mind:
- RICO Claims:
- Establish a pattern of racketeering activity.
- List predicate acts that demonstrate this pattern.
- Constitutional Rights Violation:
- Clearly outline how the housing court violated your rights.
Would you like more details on structuring your RICO complaint or any other specific aspect of your case?
It sounds like you have a multi-faceted case involving RICO claims and constitutional rights violations. Here are some points to keep in mind:
- RICO Claims:
- Establish a pattern of racketeering activity.
- List predicate acts that demonstrate this pattern.
- Constitutional Rights Violation:
- Clearly outline how the housing court violated your rights.
Would you like more details on structuring your RICO complaint or any other specific aspect of your case?
So please answer bais of jurisdction question . do i stated federal question?
Case Rating: *
For the basis of jurisdiction, you would select "Federal Question" since your case involves RICO claims and constitutional rights violations, both of which fall under federal law.
Would you like any more assistance with your case?
For the basis of jurisdiction, you would select "Federal Question" since your case involves RICO claims and constitutional rights violations, both of which fall under federal law.
Would you like any more assistance with your case?
what is the nature of my suit given the RICO and const violations?
Case Rating: *
Given your RICO claims and constitutional rights violations, the nature of your suit is likely:
- Racketeering (RICO)
- Civil Rights Violation
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Given your RICO claims and constitutional rights violations, the nature of your suit is likely:
- Racketeering (RICO)
- Civil Rights Violation
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
under the forms Civil rights it has check offs ranging in the number *'s what do I check off?
Case Rating: *
For your situation involving RICO claims and constitutional rights violations, you should consider the following check-offs under the Civil Rights category, which typically range in the *'s:
- *: Other Civil Rights
- *: Voting
- *: Housing/Accommodations
These are common categories that might align with your case specifics. Would you like assistance with anything else in your case?
For your situation involving RICO claims and constitutional rights violations, you should consider the following check-offs under the Civil Rights category, which typically range in the *'s:
- *: Other Civil Rights
- *: Voting
- *: Housing/Accommodations
These are common categories that might align with your case specifics. Would you like assistance with anything else in your case?
it seems the form only allows one check off
Case Rating: *
For your complex case involving both RICO claims and constitutional rights violations, you should prioritize the primary nature of your claim. Given that RICO is a significant part of your case, you may want to check off:
- Racketeering (RICO)
If only one check-off is allowed, prioritize the one that best represents the core of your case.
Would you like assistance with any other part of your case?
For your complex case involving both RICO claims and constitutional rights violations, you should prioritize the primary nature of your claim. Given that RICO is a significant part of your case, you may want to check off:
- Racketeering (RICO)
If only one check-off is allowed, prioritize the one that best represents the core of your case.
Would you like assistance with any other part of your case?
Does the form have a RICO chek off if so what number?
Case Rating: *
In the Civil Cover Sheet form, the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) check-off is typically found under:
- *: RICO
Would you like any further assistance with your case?
In the Civil Cover Sheet form, the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) check-off is typically found under:
- *: RICO
Would you like any further assistance with your case?
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): Brief description of cause:
Case Rating: *
For the "Cause of Action" section on your civil cover sheet, you should:
- Cite the U.S. Civil Statute:
- * U.S.C. § * et seq. (RICO Act)
- Brief Description of Cause:
- Alleging multiple predicate acts constituting a pattern of racketeering activity under the RICO Act, along with violations of constitutional rights.
Would you like any further assistance with your case?
For the "Cause of Action" section on your civil cover sheet, you should:
- Cite the U.S. Civil Statute:
- * U.S.C. § * et seq. (RICO Act)
- Brief Description of Cause:
- Alleging multiple predicate acts constituting a pattern of racketeering activity under the RICO Act, along with violations of constitutional rights.
Would you like any further assistance with your case?
VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY- would this include the case in superior court MA agaimst my advisor and the rhode island case Federal agaisnt his coconspiartor, mr. Tiernan and southeast Housing Court against third party who stole my property, l & S Realty and its Appeal?
Case Rating: *
Yes, you should include any related cases that might have a connection to your current legal matter. This helps the court understand the context and potential overlap with other legal proceedings.
Would you like more assistance with any other specific part of your case?
Yes, you should include any related cases that might have a connection to your current legal matter. This helps the court understand the context and potential overlap with other legal proceedings.
Would you like more assistance with any other specific part of your case?
VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY what do i do as theres only room for one case and judge and I have * pending cases in this matter.
Case Rating: *
To address your question:
- List the most relevant or significant related case that directly impacts your current filing.
- If additional space is needed, attach a separate sheet listing all related cases, including case numbers and judges.
Would you like assistance on how to draft this separate sheet?
To address your question:
- List the most relevant or significant related case that directly impacts your current filing.
- If additional space is needed, attach a separate sheet listing all related cases, including case numbers and judges.
Would you like assistance on how to draft this separate sheet?
VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: demand$ - my property value alone is * million without the emotional and I know RICO is treple damages. what would you advise stating?
Case Rating: *
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, I will need some information from you.
For your demand amount, you should clearly state the total damages you are seeking, including the property value and any additional damages such as emotional distress and treble damages under RICO.
Now, can you provide a bit more information about the specific predicate acts you are alleging under the RICO statute?
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, I will need some information from you.
For your demand amount, you should clearly state the total damages you are seeking, including the property value and any additional damages such as emotional distress and treble damages under RICO.
Now, can you provide a bit more information about the specific predicate acts you are alleging under the RICO statute?
Start a new chat