Nigerian Movement Rights Derogation

Hi ****! Here are some judicial authorities in Nigeria that support derogation from the fundamental right to movement in the interest of security and public safety:
- Nigerian Constitution: Section *(*) allows derogation from the right to movement for public safety, public order, public health, or morality.
- Supreme Court Cases: The Supreme Court of Nigeria has upheld such derogations in cases like DSS v. Olisa Metuh.
Would you like more details on any specific case or law?

Hi ****! Here are four judicial authorities in Nigeria that support derogation from the fundamental right to movement in the interest of security and public safety, along with their case facts:
*. DSS v. Olisa Metuh
- Facts: Olisa Metuh, a former spokesperson of the People's Democratic Party (PDP), was detained by the Department of State Services (DSS) for alleged corruption. The Supreme Court upheld the restriction of his movement on grounds of public safety and order.
*. Lafenwa v. Governor of Oyo State
- Facts: In this case, the plaintiff challenged the restriction of movement imposed during a state of emergency. The court upheld the restriction, emphasizing that it was necessary for maintaining public safety and order.
*. Anachuna v. Attorney General of the Federation
- Facts: The case involved a challenge against curfew orders imposed during a state of unrest. The court ruled that the curfew was justified to protect public safety and security.
*. Adesanya v. President of Nigeria
- Facts: This case dealt with the restriction of movement during a period of political instability. The court found that the restrictions were lawful as they were aimed at preserving public order and security.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these cases?