Understanding Constitutional Travel Rights

Summary

The discussion revolves around constitutional rights, particularly the right to travel without a license for non-commercial purposes. Key cases like Murdock v. Pennsylvania and Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham highlight the distinction between rights and privileges. For practical application and argument practice, local legal aid clinics or moot court groups in Arkansas, such as the Arkansas Legal Services Partnership and the University of Arkansas School of Law Legal Clinic, can provide valuable resources and guidance.

Full Conversation

*
Hi ****! To better assist you, could you please provide a brief description of your legal issue?
1491ldk@gmail.com
Hi ****! Could you please provide a brief description of your legal issue so I can guide you better?
*
It seems like you've provided your contact details twice but not the description of your legal issue. Could you please provide a brief description of your legal issue so I can guide you better?
US. SUPREME COURT DECISION - The commo law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the lan the code, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are "not the law”, [Self v. Rhay, * Wn (2d) * ... * US. SUPREME COURT DECISION - "All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accordance with God's laws. All codes, rules, and
Case Rating: *
Hi ****! It seems like you're referencing a Supreme Court decision and discussing common law versus statutory law. Are you currently dealing with a specific legal issue or case where this information is relevant? Understanding your exact situation will help me provide more accurate guidance.
: ALSO NOTE Rights and Property are ONE AND THE SAME THING-by the Honorable Justice LOUIS BRANDIS NOTICE AND ADVISORY OF RIGHTS CLAIMED No license or permission is required for TRAVEL when such TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE. Further, the Arkansas state, is FORBIDDEN BY LAW from converting a BASIC RIGHT into a PRIVILEGE and requiring a LICENSE and or a FEE CHARGED for the exercise of the BASIC RIGHT. Please SEE MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, * U.S. *, and if Arkansas, state does ERRONIOUSLY convert BASIC RIGHTS into E WITH TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR SUCH EXERCISE OF A BASIC RIGHT. Please see Schuttlesworth vs. BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, * U.S. *.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're raising constitutional arguments regarding the right to travel without a license for non-commercial purposes. These cases you mentioned highlight the distinction between rights and privileges, but practical application can vary.
Would you like to connect with local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Sure what i really need is someone to whom i can practice arguing my case with who can guide me and give advice
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you are preparing to argue a case involving constitutional rights, specifically the right to travel without a license for non-commercial purposes. Here are a few points to consider:
- Murdock v. Pennsylvania (* U.S. *) discusses that a state cannot impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right.
- Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham (* U.S. *) addresses that a state cannot convert the exercise of a constitutional right into a crime.
For practicing your arguments, you might want to consider joining a local legal aid clinic or moot court group, where you can get feedback and advice from legal professionals and peers. Do you have any specific questions about your arguments or need clarification on any legal points?
Not. E, but I know one thing after going through this * different times with you.I've learned that words mean everything.You're a lot more apt to what i'm trying to say with me saying , a whole lot less
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're well-versed in the legal principles you're discussing. To provide more specific guidance:
- Are you currently facing legal action or planning to challenge a specific law in court?
- Could you clarify if you're looking for assistance with legal research, or do you need help drafting legal documents?
Your response will help me guide you better.
I really don't know what I need.All I know, today is read the law.Understand it understand it and then try to articulated in a way that I Can properly convey that in which i'm trying to say
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're focused on understanding and articulating legal arguments, especially regarding constitutional rights. Here are some steps you can take:
- Legal Research: Continue reading case laws and legal texts.
- Local Resources: Join local legal aid clinics or moot court groups.
- Practice: Engage with legal professionals or peers to practice your arguments.
Would you like more specific information on legal resources available in Arkansas?
Yes
Case Rating: *
Sure, ****! Here are some resources in Arkansas that might be helpful:
- Arkansas Legal Services Partnership: Provides free legal help for low-income residents. Website: www.arlegalservices.org
- University of Arkansas School of Law Legal Clinic: Offers opportunities to practice legal arguments with law students and professors.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these resources?
Yes
Case Rating: *
Great, ****! Here are some more details on the resources available in Arkansas:
- Arkansas Legal Services Partnership
- Provides free legal assistance to low-income residents.
- Website: [www.arlegalservices.org](http://www.arlegalservices.org)
- University of Arkansas School of Law Legal Clinic
- Offers opportunities to practice legal arguments with law students and professors.
- Website: [law.uark.edu/academics/clinical-programs](https://law.uark.edu/academics/clinical-programs/)
Would you need further assistance with anything specific, ****?