National Emergency Impact Analysis

Summary

Declaring a National Emergency in India significantly alters the governance structure, shifting power from state to central government, impacting federalism. Judicial review under Article 352 ensures the emergencys justification and prevents misuse. However, challenges in judicial oversight can affect accountability and prevent abuse of executive power. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for maintaining a balance between necessary emergency measures and safeguarding democratic principles.

Full Conversation

frame long questions on above matter
Sure, I can help with that. Here's a more detailed version of the questions on the matter:
*. Question:
Can you elaborate on the potential effects of declaring a National Emergency on the governance structure of India? Specifically, how does the distribution of powers between the central and state governments change during such a period, and what are the broader implications for federalism in India?
*. Question:
Could you assess the significance of judicial review with respect to Article * of the Constitution of India? How does the judiciary ensure that the declaration of a National Emergency is justified, and what mechanisms are in place to prevent misuse of this constitutional provision?
*. Question:
What are the primary challenges that the judiciary faces when exercising judicial review to uphold accountability during a National Emergency? How do these challenges impact the effectiveness of judicial oversight in preventing abuse of executive power?
These questions should provide a comprehensive framework for analyzing the complex issues surrounding the declaration of a National Emergency, judicial review, and accountability in India.