Article 370 Revocation Analysis

Summary

The revocation of Article 370, which granted special autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir, is a legally complex issue involving constitutional interpretation. The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir ruled in 2015 that Article 370 has permanence, requiring the Constituent Assemblys recommendation for any repeal. However, the government revoked it in 2019, arguing it was temporary. The Basic Structure Doctrine, established by the Supreme Court, protects core constitutional principles and may influence the legal debate. Courts may ultimately decide on the constitutionality of the revocation.

Full Conversation

Do you think that the 'Basic Structure doctrine' of Indian Constitution introduced by the Supreme Court of India has made Indian Constitution unreasonably rigid? Give reasons for your answer.
The Basic Structure Doctrine, established by the Supreme Court of India in the Kesavananda Bharati case (*), asserts that certain fundamental features of the Constitution cannot be altered by amendments. This doctrine ensures the protection of core principles like democracy, secularism, and the rule of law, preventing potential misuse of power. While some argue it makes the Constitution rigid, it also serves as a safeguard against arbitrary changes.
Given the context of your question, do you believe the revocation of Article * conflicts with the Basic Structure Doctrine?