State Control Over Tribes

Summary

The state centralized power by controlling tribal rulers who managed land and people, under state oversight. Sections 2 and 3 of the Act allowed the State President to establish tribal authorities to govern tribes, which could have been artificially created under the BAA. Understanding these sections can provide insight into the implications of state control over tribal governance.

Full Conversation

please rephrase the followign so that I can understand it What served it most was power centralised in a tribal ruler who controlled the land and the people on it subject to the state’s control of the tribal ruler. Sections * and * of the Act permitted the State President to establish ‘tribal authorities’ to govern ‘tribes’ which, in terms of the BAA, could have been falsely formed.
The state benefited most from having power concentrated in a tribal ruler who managed the land and people, but was still under state control. Sections * and * of the Act allowed the State President to create 'tribal authorities' to govern 'tribes,' which could have been artificially created under the BAA.
Do you need more details about the Act or the implications of these sections?