Jarnail Singh Case Analysis

It sounds like you are looking for the list of cases referred to in the Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (*) judgment. Here are some key cases that were referred to:
- Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (*)
- M. Nagaraj v. Union of India (*)
- E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh (*)
- K. Nagaraj v. State of Andhra Pradesh (*)
Is there a specific point or detail about these cases you'd like to know more about?

It seems you're looking for the table of statutes referred to in the Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (*) case. Here are some key statutes that were likely mentioned:
- Constitution of India (Articles *(*), *(4A), and *(4B))
- The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, *
- The Government of India Act, *
Is there a specific statute or provision you'd like to delve into further?

It seems like you need detailed information regarding the statutes referred to in the Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (*) case. Here are more details about the key statutes:
- Constitution of India:
- Article *(*): Provides for reservation in public employment for any backward class that is not adequately represented.
- Article *(4A): Empowers the State to make provisions for reservation in promotion for SCs/STs.
- Article *(4B): Allows the State to consider unfilled reserved vacancies from previous years as a separate class.
- The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, *:
- Aimed at preventing atrocities and providing relief and rehabilitation to victims of such offenses.
- The Government of India Act, *:
- Laid the foundation for the federal structure of India and provided for the establishment of provincial governments.
Would you like more detailed information about any specific provision or statute?

It appears you want to conduct a detailed review of the Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (*) case. Here are some key points for your own case review:
- Background: The case addresses the reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in government jobs.
- Key Judgements:
- Upheld the principle of reservations in promotions.
- Removed the need to demonstrate backwardness for SCs/STs, modifying the M. Nagaraj case.
- Referred Cases:
- Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (*)
- M. Nagaraj v. Union of India (*)
- E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh (*)
- K. Nagaraj v. State of Andhra Pradesh (*)
- Statutes Referenced:
- Constitution of India:
- Article *(*)
- Article *(4A)
- Article *(4B)
- The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, *
- The Government of India Act, ***
Would you like more in-depth analysis on any specific aspect of this case?

Sure! Which specific aspect of the Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (*) case would you like a more in-depth analysis on? For example, are you interested in understanding the implications of the judgment on reservation policies, the legal reasoning behind the decision, or any particular statute involved?

To provide a detailed review, consider focusing on these key aspects:
- Background and Context:
- Understand the historical context of reservation policies in India.
- Review the M. Nagaraj case and how Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta modified it.
- Legal Reasoning:
- Analyze the Court's rationale for removing the need to demonstrate backwardness for SCs/STs.
- Study the interpretation of Articles *(*), *(4A), and *(4B).
- Implications:
- Assess how this judgment affects current and future reservation policies.
- Consider the impact on government employment and the representation of SCs/STs.
Would you like guidance on any specific part of the analysis?

It sounds like you need help articulating why you chose the Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (*) case for analysis. Here are a few points to consider:
- Significant Impact: This judgment has a profound impact on reservation policies in India, particularly for SCs and STs in government jobs.
- Modification of Precedent: It modifies the earlier M. Nagaraj case, making it a pivotal case in Indian constitutional law.
- Legal Reasoning: The case offers rich insights into the interpretation of constitutional provisions related to reservations.
Would you like more details on any of these points?

Sure! Here are some points in simple English to explain why you chose the Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (*) case for your analysis:
- Big Impact: This judgment greatly affects how reservation policies work in India, especially for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in government jobs.
- Changed Old Rules: It changed the rules set by an earlier case (M. Nagaraj) and is now very important in Indian constitutional law.
- Deep Legal Insight: The case provides valuable insights into how constitutional provisions about reservations are interpreted.
Would you like more details on any of these points?

The Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (*) judgment is significant for several reasons:
- Big Impact: The judgment greatly affects reservation policies in India, especially for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in government jobs.
- Changed Old Rules: It modifies the rules set by the earlier M. Nagaraj case, making it a pivotal case in Indian constitutional law.
- Deep Legal Insight: The case offers valuable insights into the interpretation of constitutional provisions related to reservations.
Would you like more details on any specific aspect of this case?