TRY ME!
University Policy Discrimination Concerns
Summary
The universitys policy requiring proof of significant practical problems for caregivers may be indirectly discriminatory under the Equality Act 2010. Consider filing a formal complaint and consulting a solicitor specializing in discrimination law. Document all communications and seek support from your student union. If retaliation occurs, keep records and explore legal options. Waiting for the universitys response could provide clarity and strengthen your case.Full Conversation
e rule that “having dependants per se is not a reason for application for placement adjustments” and the requirement that students demonstrate “significant practical problems”
It sounds like the university's policy may impact students who are primary caregivers. Here are some points to consider:
- Equality Act *: This law protects individuals from discrimination based on characteristics like sex and disability. Caregivers may be covered under "associative discrimination."
- University Policies: Review the university's policy documents and any appeal processes they may have.
- Student Union: Contact your student union for support and advice.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these points?
- Equality Act *: This law protects individuals from discrimination based on characteristics like sex and disability. Caregivers may be covered under "associative discrimination."
- University Policies: Review the university's policy documents and any appeal processes they may have.
- Student Union: Contact your student union for support and advice.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these points?
I have argued that this is indirect discrimination based on the Equalities ACt * and
breach of Human Rights Act *, incorporating Article * of the European Convention on Human Right (Article * requires that the rights under the Convention be applied without discrimination on the grounds of, among other things, sex and family status) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women,
The request that “significant practical problems that are associated with caregiving and having a distant placement.” goes against the above.
Equalities Act * covers sex discrimination, which means it is illegal to treat someone unfairly based on their gender or because they are a mother or father.
For parents, the Act applies due to discrimination for caregiving responsibilities (e.g., if they are a mother or father with childcare responsibilities).
Does this make sense?
Yes, your argument makes sense. Here's a summary of the key points:
- Equality Act *: Protects against discrimination based on sex, which includes responsibilities as a caregiver. Indirect discrimination occurs when a policy disproportionately affects a particular group, like primary caregivers.
- Human Rights Act *: Incorporates Article * of the European Convention on Human Rights, prohibiting discrimination on various grounds, including sex and family status.
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: Supports your argument against discriminatory practices affecting women, particularly mothers.
The university's policy requiring "significant practical problems" for placement adjustments could indeed be seen as indirectly discriminatory against caregivers, potentially violating these protections.
Would you like guidance on the next steps to take or more details on any specific aspect?
- Equality Act *: Protects against discrimination based on sex, which includes responsibilities as a caregiver. Indirect discrimination occurs when a policy disproportionately affects a particular group, like primary caregivers.
- Human Rights Act *: Incorporates Article * of the European Convention on Human Rights, prohibiting discrimination on various grounds, including sex and family status.
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: Supports your argument against discriminatory practices affecting women, particularly mothers.
The university's policy requiring "significant practical problems" for placement adjustments could indeed be seen as indirectly discriminatory against caregivers, potentially violating these protections.
Would you like guidance on the next steps to take or more details on any specific aspect?
yes please
Case Rating: *
You could consider the following steps:
- Document Everything: Keep records of all communications and policies.
- Formal Complaint: File a formal complaint with the university.
- Legal Advice: Seek advice from a solicitor experienced in discrimination law.
Would you like more information on making a formal complaint or finding a solicitor?
You could consider the following steps:
- Document Everything: Keep records of all communications and policies.
- Formal Complaint: File a formal complaint with the university.
- Legal Advice: Seek advice from a solicitor experienced in discrimination law.
Would you like more information on making a formal complaint or finding a solicitor?
yes please
Case Rating: *
You can follow these steps to proceed:
- Document Everything: Keep all emails, letters, and notes from meetings.
- Formal Complaint: Follow your university's complaints procedure. This will usually involve writing to a specific department or office.
- Legal Advice: Consult a solicitor who specializes in discrimination law for professional advice.
Would you like more information on how to make a formal complaint or assistance in finding a solicitor?
You can follow these steps to proceed:
- Document Everything: Keep all emails, letters, and notes from meetings.
- Formal Complaint: Follow your university's complaints procedure. This will usually involve writing to a specific department or office.
- Legal Advice: Consult a solicitor who specializes in discrimination law for professional advice.
Would you like more information on how to make a formal complaint or assistance in finding a solicitor?
yes please
Case Rating: *
To make a formal complaint, you should:
- Identify the Correct Department: Usually, universities have a specific department (e.g., Student Support or Complaints Office) for handling complaints.
- Write a Formal Letter: Clearly outline your concerns, referencing relevant laws and university policies.
- Follow Procedures: Adhere to the university's complaints process.
For finding a solicitor:
- Law Society of England and Wales: You can search for solicitors specializing in discrimination law.
Would you like help finding a specific solicitor?
To make a formal complaint, you should:
- Identify the Correct Department: Usually, universities have a specific department (e.g., Student Support or Complaints Office) for handling complaints.
- Write a Formal Letter: Clearly outline your concerns, referencing relevant laws and university policies.
- Follow Procedures: Adhere to the university's complaints process.
For finding a solicitor:
- Law Society of England and Wales: You can search for solicitors specializing in discrimination law.
Would you like help finding a specific solicitor?
i want someone with specific expertise in this type of law
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a potentially strong case for discrimination based on the Equality Act * and Human Rights Act *.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
It sounds like you have a potentially strong case for discrimination based on the Equality Act * and Human Rights Act *.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
how much might they also cost
Case Rating: *
The cost of hiring a solicitor can vary widely depending on their experience, location, and the complexity of your case. Solicitors may charge an hourly rate, a flat fee, or offer a no-win-no-fee arrangement in some cases.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
The cost of hiring a solicitor can vary widely depending on their experience, location, and the complexity of your case. Solicitors may charge an hourly rate, a flat fee, or offer a no-win-no-fee arrangement in some cases.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
not at the moment because i am waiting to see if they will reply to my requoest for them to clarify what they mean by signicifact problems i essntially asked them the following below:
Thank you for your reply. I would be very grateful for some further information with regards to this.
Can you explain what is being defined as “significant practical problems that are associated with caregiving and having a distant placement.” Can you provide examples or further information on the committees understanding and justification for adopting this requests. Can you also explain why this is being required, given that having a dependent inherently requires caregiving that is protected under the law and given that students without dependents do not face any of these issues.
Can you also explain when this change was made, as previous years did not require this, what was the rationale for adopting this new requirement.
I look forward to your reply.
Many thanks,
Case Rating: *
It seems you have already taken some meaningful steps. While you are waiting for their response, ensure you document everything and prepare your case.
Would you like more advice on how to strengthen your argument or anything specific on the legal procedures?
It seems you have already taken some meaningful steps. While you are waiting for their response, ensure you document everything and prepare your case.
Would you like more advice on how to strengthen your argument or anything specific on the legal procedures?
yes please
Case Rating: *
To strengthen your argument, consider the following:
- Gather Evidence: Collect all relevant documents, emails, and policies.
- Consult Student Union: They may provide additional support and resources.
- Precedent Cases: Look for similar cases that have been successfully challenged.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these points?
To strengthen your argument, consider the following:
- Gather Evidence: Collect all relevant documents, emails, and policies.
- Consult Student Union: They may provide additional support and resources.
- Precedent Cases: Look for similar cases that have been successfully challenged.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these points?
can you give me some cases in the UK that have done this and won
Case Rating: *
While I can't provide specific case names, there have been successful legal challenges in the UK concerning indirect discrimination and the Equality Act *. These cases generally revolve around proving that a policy disproportionately affects a particular group protected under the Act, such as caregivers. Would you like guidance on how to find and research these cases?
While I can't provide specific case names, there have been successful legal challenges in the UK concerning indirect discrimination and the Equality Act *. These cases generally revolve around proving that a policy disproportionately affects a particular group protected under the Act, such as caregivers. Would you like guidance on how to find and research these cases?
can you see why the university might have brought this policy and how they can defend it at all under the law
Case Rating: *
The university might have introduced this policy to ensure that placements are allocated fairly and based on practical considerations. They could defend it by arguing:
- Operational Efficiency: Ensuring placements are logistically feasible for the university.
- Objective Justification: That the policy aims to address significant logistical challenges rather than discriminate.
Would you need more details on how to counter their potential defense?
The university might have introduced this policy to ensure that placements are allocated fairly and based on practical considerations. They could defend it by arguing:
- Operational Efficiency: Ensuring placements are logistically feasible for the university.
- Objective Justification: That the policy aims to address significant logistical challenges rather than discriminate.
Would you need more details on how to counter their potential defense?
yes please but i need to understand first what they can come up with and why and is it legal and then how to defend against it
Case Rating: *
Potential University Defense:
*. Operational Efficiency:
- The university may argue that the policy ensures placements are logistically feasible.
*. Objective Justification:
- They could claim the policy addresses significant logistical challenges and isn't discriminatory.
*. Operational Efficiency:
- The university may argue that the policy ensures placements are logistically feasible.
*. Objective Justification:
- They could claim the policy addresses significant logistical challenges and isn't discriminatory.
How to Counter:
- Proportionality: Argue that the policy disproportionately affects caregivers.
- Lack of Reasonable Adjustments: Emphasize that the university failed to consider less discriminatory alternatives.
Would you like more detailed information on preparing your counterarguments?
- Proportionality: Argue that the policy disproportionately affects caregivers.
- Lack of Reasonable Adjustments: Emphasize that the university failed to consider less discriminatory alternatives.
Would you like more detailed information on preparing your counterarguments?
yes please provide more detailed explanations on what they might say and if it is legal and how i can respectfully request that it does not negate the driscrimation
Case Rating: *
Sure, here are some more detailed explanations and counterarguments:
Sure, here are some more detailed explanations and counterarguments:
Potential University Defense:
*. Operational Efficiency:
- Argument: The university may argue that the placement policy ensures that all placements are logistically feasible and manageable for the institution.
- Legality: This argument can be legally valid if the policy is applied uniformly and not intended to discriminate against any specific group.
*. Objective Justification:
- Argument: The university could claim that the policy is in place to address significant logistical challenges and ensure the smooth operation of their placement scheme.
- Legality: To be legally valid, the university must prove that the policy is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
*. Operational Efficiency:
- Argument: The university may argue that the placement policy ensures that all placements are logistically feasible and manageable for the institution.
- Legality: This argument can be legally valid if the policy is applied uniformly and not intended to discriminate against any specific group.
*. Objective Justification:
- Argument: The university could claim that the policy is in place to address significant logistical challenges and ensure the smooth operation of their placement scheme.
- Legality: To be legally valid, the university must prove that the policy is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
How to Counter:
*. Proportionality:
- Argument: You could argue that the policy disproportionately affects students who are primary caregivers, creating an unequal burden on them.
- Request: Politely request the university to assess whether the policy's impact on caregivers is proportionate to the logistical benefits it claims to provide. Emphasize that less discriminatory alternatives should be considered.
*. Lack of Reasonable Adjustments:
- Argument: Highlight that the university has failed to make reasonable adjustments to accommodate students with caregiving responsibilities.
- Request: Respectfully ask the university to consider alternative solutions or adjustments that could mitigate the impact on caregivers without compromising operational efficiency.
Would you like more specific wording or guidance on how to frame your requests?
*. Proportionality:
- Argument: You could argue that the policy disproportionately affects students who are primary caregivers, creating an unequal burden on them.
- Request: Politely request the university to assess whether the policy's impact on caregivers is proportionate to the logistical benefits it claims to provide. Emphasize that less discriminatory alternatives should be considered.
*. Lack of Reasonable Adjustments:
- Argument: Highlight that the university has failed to make reasonable adjustments to accommodate students with caregiving responsibilities.
- Request: Respectfully ask the university to consider alternative solutions or adjustments that could mitigate the impact on caregivers without compromising operational efficiency.
Would you like more specific wording or guidance on how to frame your requests?
So the university is requesting caregivers provide a statement from a profesional to prove they have significant caregiving responsibilties such as from a teacher. Apriory there is the inherent discrimation and then the second layer which is asking to prove the significant problems and caregiving. They do not say what they consider to be significant and schools cant do more than prove that the child attends the school. What might the university be aiming at here, is this legal and how can i counter it resectfully without them saying im being unreosable
Case Rating: *
The university might be aiming to ensure that requests for placement adjustments are genuine and based on significant need. They might argue that this policy helps to manage placements effectively and fairly. However, their lack of clarity on what constitutes "significant" caregiving responsibilities can indeed be seen as indirectly discriminatory.
To counter this respectfully, consider the following steps:
- Seek Clarification: Politely ask the university to define "significant practical problems" and provide examples.
- Propose Alternatives: Suggest alternative proof mechanisms that could be less burdensome, such as a signed declaration from the caregiver.
- Highlight Legal Protections: Reference the Equality Act * and the need for reasonable adjustments for caregivers.
Would you like more specific wording or assistance with drafting your response?
The university might be aiming to ensure that requests for placement adjustments are genuine and based on significant need. They might argue that this policy helps to manage placements effectively and fairly. However, their lack of clarity on what constitutes "significant" caregiving responsibilities can indeed be seen as indirectly discriminatory.
To counter this respectfully, consider the following steps:
- Seek Clarification: Politely ask the university to define "significant practical problems" and provide examples.
- Propose Alternatives: Suggest alternative proof mechanisms that could be less burdensome, such as a signed declaration from the caregiver.
- Highlight Legal Protections: Reference the Equality Act * and the need for reasonable adjustments for caregivers.
Would you like more specific wording or assistance with drafting your response?
I have asked them what they deem significant caring responsibilies and I am awaiting their reply but i am to think what might they deem as such. I have a 4 year old child, I have a partner as well but i do not wish to be placed far away from home as i wont be able to do school drops off and school pick ups but also if the placemetn is very far away, i would have to spend time away from my child and home which i do not wish to do
Case Rating: *
Given your situation, here are some possible examples of "significant caring responsibilities" that the university might consider:
- Sole or primary caregiver for a young child.
- Responsibilities that require daily involvement (e.g., school drop-offs and pick-ups).
- Involvement in the child's educational or medical needs.
- Limited support from other caregivers.
Would you need more information on how to counter their policy if they do not provide clear definitions?
Given your situation, here are some possible examples of "significant caring responsibilities" that the university might consider:
- Sole or primary caregiver for a young child.
- Responsibilities that require daily involvement (e.g., school drop-offs and pick-ups).
- Involvement in the child's educational or medical needs.
- Limited support from other caregivers.
Would you need more information on how to counter their policy if they do not provide clear definitions?
I am not the sole caregiver as I share this with my partner who is also the child's father. I am the one that does do most of the childcare but i am not a single parent
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a strong basis for your argument but it might not be straightforward without further clarity from the university. Nevertheless, here are a few points to consider:
- Primary Caregiver Role: Emphasize that you handle most of the childcare responsibilities, which still qualifies as significant caregiving.
- Daily Responsibilities: Highlight the daily tasks like school drop-offs and pick-ups that you manage.
- Impact on Child and Family: Discuss how being placed far from home would disrupt your child's routine and family life.
Would you like more detailed advice on how to present these points in your communication with the university?
It sounds like you have a strong basis for your argument but it might not be straightforward without further clarity from the university. Nevertheless, here are a few points to consider:
- Primary Caregiver Role: Emphasize that you handle most of the childcare responsibilities, which still qualifies as significant caregiving.
- Daily Responsibilities: Highlight the daily tasks like school drop-offs and pick-ups that you manage.
- Impact on Child and Family: Discuss how being placed far from home would disrupt your child's routine and family life.
Would you like more detailed advice on how to present these points in your communication with the university?
i have the argument that the students who are also on my course who do not have children do no face this problem so although they face other problems, those with children should not be forced to comply with anything further than proving the child exists in your care
Case Rating: *
Your argument about the disproportionate impact on students with children compared to those without is valid. To strengthen this, you could:
- Highlight Equality of Treatment: Argue that requiring more from students with children creates an unfair burden.
- Propose Simplified Proof: Suggest that proving a child exists in your care should be sufficient without additional burdens.
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to frame this argument in your communication with the university?
Your argument about the disproportionate impact on students with children compared to those without is valid. To strengthen this, you could:
- Highlight Equality of Treatment: Argue that requiring more from students with children creates an unfair burden.
- Propose Simplified Proof: Suggest that proving a child exists in your care should be sufficient without additional burdens.
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to frame this argument in your communication with the university?
yes please
Case Rating: *
Sure, here’s how to frame your argument in your communication with the university:
Sure, here’s how to frame your argument in your communication with the university:
~Suggested Communication~##
Dear [University Contact],
I appreciate your attention to this matter. I would like to address the requirement for students with caregiving responsibilities to provide proof of “significant practical problems.”
Equality of Treatment:
- Requiring additional proof from students with children places an unequal burden on us compared to students who do not have children and do not face similar requirements. This disproportionate impact can be seen as indirectly discriminatory under the Equality Act *.
Simplified Proof:
- I propose that confirming the existence of a child in my care should be sufficient. As a primary caregiver, my responsibilities, which include daily tasks such as school drop-offs and pick-ups, inherently pose practical challenges that should be recognized without additional proof requirements.
Impact on Family Life:
- Placing me far from home would disrupt my child’s routine and our family life, which further highlights the significance of my caregiving responsibilities.
I respectfully request that the university considers these points and makes reasonable adjustments to support students with caregiving responsibilities.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Would you need any further assistance on this matter?
Dear [University Contact],
I appreciate your attention to this matter. I would like to address the requirement for students with caregiving responsibilities to provide proof of “significant practical problems.”
Equality of Treatment:
- Requiring additional proof from students with children places an unequal burden on us compared to students who do not have children and do not face similar requirements. This disproportionate impact can be seen as indirectly discriminatory under the Equality Act *.
Simplified Proof:
- I propose that confirming the existence of a child in my care should be sufficient. As a primary caregiver, my responsibilities, which include daily tasks such as school drop-offs and pick-ups, inherently pose practical challenges that should be recognized without additional proof requirements.
Impact on Family Life:
- Placing me far from home would disrupt my child’s routine and our family life, which further highlights the significance of my caregiving responsibilities.
I respectfully request that the university considers these points and makes reasonable adjustments to support students with caregiving responsibilities.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Would you need any further assistance on this matter?
ok can you make it more complelling as i have done this and they have said no asking me for the following:
Case Rating: *
Sure, I can help make it more compelling. Here is an enhanced version of your communication:
---
Dear [University Contact],
Thank you for your ongoing attention to this matter. I am writing to address the requirement for students with caregiving responsibilities to provide proof of “significant practical problems.”
Equality of Treatment:
Requiring additional proof from students with children places an unequal burden on us compared to students without children, who are not subject to similar requirements. This disproportionate impact can be seen as indirectly discriminatory under the Equality Act *.
Simplified Proof:
I propose that confirming the existence of a child in my care should be sufficient. As a primary caregiver, my responsibilities include daily tasks such as school drop-offs and pick-ups, which inherently pose practical challenges. These should be recognized without additional proof requirements.
Impact on Family Life:
Placing me far from home would disrupt my child’s routine and our family life, further highlighting the significance of my caregiving responsibilities. It's crucial to consider the psychological and emotional impacts on both the student and the child.
Legal Protections:
Under the Equality Act * and the Human Rights Act *, I am protected against indirect discrimination based on my caregiving responsibilities. The requirement for additional proof places an unjustifiable burden on caregivers, violating these protections.
I respectfully request the university to reconsider this requirement and make reasonable adjustments to support students with caregiving responsibilities. Simplifying the proof process and recognizing the inherent challenges faced by caregivers would promote fairness and inclusivity.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any further assistance on this matter?
Sure, I can help make it more compelling. Here is an enhanced version of your communication:
---
Dear [University Contact],
Thank you for your ongoing attention to this matter. I am writing to address the requirement for students with caregiving responsibilities to provide proof of “significant practical problems.”
Equality of Treatment:
Requiring additional proof from students with children places an unequal burden on us compared to students without children, who are not subject to similar requirements. This disproportionate impact can be seen as indirectly discriminatory under the Equality Act *.
Simplified Proof:
I propose that confirming the existence of a child in my care should be sufficient. As a primary caregiver, my responsibilities include daily tasks such as school drop-offs and pick-ups, which inherently pose practical challenges. These should be recognized without additional proof requirements.
Impact on Family Life:
Placing me far from home would disrupt my child’s routine and our family life, further highlighting the significance of my caregiving responsibilities. It's crucial to consider the psychological and emotional impacts on both the student and the child.
Legal Protections:
Under the Equality Act * and the Human Rights Act *, I am protected against indirect discrimination based on my caregiving responsibilities. The requirement for additional proof places an unjustifiable burden on caregivers, violating these protections.
I respectfully request the university to reconsider this requirement and make reasonable adjustments to support students with caregiving responsibilities. Simplifying the proof process and recognizing the inherent challenges faced by caregivers would promote fairness and inclusivity.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you like any further assistance on this matter?
Dear Dafina,
You need to demonstrate in your personal statement “significant practical problems that are associated with caregiving and having a distant placement.”
A letter from the professional to state that your child is attending school.
Kind regards
Allison
Case Rating: *
Sure, here’s a more compelling version of your communication:
---
Dear [University Contact],
Thank you for your recent response. I appreciate your attention to my request and would like to address the requirement to demonstrate “significant practical problems” associated with caregiving and having a distant placement.
Equality and Fairness:
- Requiring additional proof from students with caregiving responsibilities creates an unequal and unfair burden compared to those without such responsibilities. This disproportionate impact can be seen as indirectly discriminatory under the Equality Act *, which mandates that policies should not disproportionately affect a specific group.
Proportionality and Reasonable Adjustments:
- I propose that confirming the existence of a child in my care should be sufficient. The daily responsibilities as a primary caregiver, such as school drop-offs and pick-ups, inherently present practical challenges that should be recognized without the need for further burdensome proof.
Impact on Family Life:
- Being placed far from home would significantly disrupt my child’s routine and our family life. This would not only affect my ability to fulfill my caregiving responsibilities but also impact my child’s well-being and stability.
To meet your request for evidence, I can provide a letter from my child’s school confirming their attendance. However, I respectfully request that the university considers these points and makes reasonable adjustments to support students with caregiving responsibilities, in line with the principles of the Equality Act *.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you need any further assistance on this matter?
Sure, here’s a more compelling version of your communication:
---
Dear [University Contact],
Thank you for your recent response. I appreciate your attention to my request and would like to address the requirement to demonstrate “significant practical problems” associated with caregiving and having a distant placement.
Equality and Fairness:
- Requiring additional proof from students with caregiving responsibilities creates an unequal and unfair burden compared to those without such responsibilities. This disproportionate impact can be seen as indirectly discriminatory under the Equality Act *, which mandates that policies should not disproportionately affect a specific group.
Proportionality and Reasonable Adjustments:
- I propose that confirming the existence of a child in my care should be sufficient. The daily responsibilities as a primary caregiver, such as school drop-offs and pick-ups, inherently present practical challenges that should be recognized without the need for further burdensome proof.
Impact on Family Life:
- Being placed far from home would significantly disrupt my child’s routine and our family life. This would not only affect my ability to fulfill my caregiving responsibilities but also impact my child’s well-being and stability.
To meet your request for evidence, I can provide a letter from my child’s school confirming their attendance. However, I respectfully request that the university considers these points and makes reasonable adjustments to support students with caregiving responsibilities, in line with the principles of the Equality Act *.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
---
Would you need any further assistance on this matter?
I dont really want to comply with their requests as i view it discriminatory that they are asking for this in the first place. Am i correct in this
Case Rating: *
You are right to feel that the university's request might be discriminatory. Under the Equality Act *, policies that disproportionately impact a specific group, such as caregivers, can be seen as indirect discrimination. Here's what you could do:
- Formal Complaint: File a complaint with the university, citing the Equality Act *.
- Seek Legal Advice: Consult a solicitor who specializes in discrimination law.
Would you like more detailed guidance on filing a formal complaint or assistance in finding a solicitor?
You are right to feel that the university's request might be discriminatory. Under the Equality Act *, policies that disproportionately impact a specific group, such as caregivers, can be seen as indirect discrimination. Here's what you could do:
- Formal Complaint: File a complaint with the university, citing the Equality Act *.
- Seek Legal Advice: Consult a solicitor who specializes in discrimination law.
Would you like more detailed guidance on filing a formal complaint or assistance in finding a solicitor?
What would be your recommendation
Case Rating: *
Given the complexity and the potential indirect discrimination under the Equality Act *, it would be beneficial to:
- File a formal complaint with the university, citing the Equality Act *.
- Consult with a solicitor specializing in discrimination law.
Would you like more detailed guidance on filing a formal complaint or assistance in finding a solicitor?
Given the complexity and the potential indirect discrimination under the Equality Act *, it would be beneficial to:
- File a formal complaint with the university, citing the Equality Act *.
- Consult with a solicitor specializing in discrimination law.
Would you like more detailed guidance on filing a formal complaint or assistance in finding a solicitor?
I would like more information on what the implcations of my complaint can be and the impact towards me if i am going to complain as the university already view me as troublesome
Case Rating: *
Filing a complaint can have several implications:
- Positive Outcome: If your complaint is successful, the policy could be revised, potentially benefiting you and other caregivers.
- University Relations: The university may view you as more assertive. However, you have the right to challenge discriminatory policies.
- Retaliation Risk: While rare, there is a risk of subtle retaliation, but this can be legally challenged.
Do you need more information on the formal complaint process or further legal advice?
Filing a complaint can have several implications:
- Positive Outcome: If your complaint is successful, the policy could be revised, potentially benefiting you and other caregivers.
- University Relations: The university may view you as more assertive. However, you have the right to challenge discriminatory policies.
- Retaliation Risk: While rare, there is a risk of subtle retaliation, but this can be legally challenged.
Do you need more information on the formal complaint process or further legal advice?
What are my options if they retaliate? I am a 3rd year medical student in a 4 year graduate entry programme at swansea university
Case Rating: *
If you experience retaliation from the university, you have several options:
- Document Everything: Keep detailed records of any retaliatory actions.
- Formal Complaint: File a complaint with the university's complaints office.
- Seek Legal Advice: Consult a solicitor specializing in discrimination and retaliation cases.
- Student Union: Contact your student union for additional support and advocacy.
Would you like more detailed guidance on any of these options?
If you experience retaliation from the university, you have several options:
- Document Everything: Keep detailed records of any retaliatory actions.
- Formal Complaint: File a complaint with the university's complaints office.
- Seek Legal Advice: Consult a solicitor specializing in discrimination and retaliation cases.
- Student Union: Contact your student union for additional support and advocacy.
Would you like more detailed guidance on any of these options?
no thats ok. Should i wait for their reply expliaing what they mean before i send the complaint and contact a solicitor
Case Rating: *
It might be a good idea to wait for their reply to gain more clarity on what they mean by "significant practical problems." This could strengthen your complaint and provide more concrete grounds for your argument.
Would you like more detailed guidance on preparing your complaint once you receive their response?
It might be a good idea to wait for their reply to gain more clarity on what they mean by "significant practical problems." This could strengthen your complaint and provide more concrete grounds for your argument.
Would you like more detailed guidance on preparing your complaint once you receive their response?
Start a new chat