Property Division In Divorce

Summary

Assets acquired before marriage, like your house and inheritance, are typically considered non-matrimonial property but may be divided to meet financial needs. Courts consider fairness, contributions, and housing needs under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Non-disclosure of assets, such as pensions, can be challenged if it impacts the settlement. Appeals are possible only if there was a legal or procedural error. Free legal resources like Citizens Advice, LawWorks, or Bar Pro Bono Unit can provide guidance. Consult a solicitor to assess the viability of an appeal or reconsideration.

Full Conversation

my house bought b4 marriage with 100k inherirance,mortgage in my name, i paid for extention double glazing kitchen boiler central heating, i earn 1k a month he earns 3k a month, he had 140k on leaving 2 years ago hes dissapated it. still has a 40k pension 50k in bank plus expensive motorbikes, i can not afford a solicitor he has a no win no fee, at the fdr judge said sell and split, this woll leave me homeless, * bed flat in my area is 220k house valued at 335k
It sounds like the financial settlement is causing significant concern. Here are some key points to consider:
- Matrimonial Property: Assets acquired during marriage are typically considered for division, but assets owned before marriage, like your house and inheritance, may be treated differently depending on the circumstances.
- Needs and Contributions: Courts consider each party's financial needs, contributions, and the welfare of any children.
- Housing Needs: You can argue that selling and splitting would leave you unable to secure suitable housing, especially if it impacts your ability to live reasonably.
If you can't afford legal representation, consider:
- Free Legal Advice: Look for services like Citizens Advice or LawWorks for free legal advice.
- McKenzie Friend: A McKenzie Friend can assist you in court (non-legally) at lower costs.
- Pro Bono Help: Some solicitors offer free initial consultations or take on cases pro bono under certain conditions.
Would you like guidance on finding free or low-cost legal support?
they have all those details but still descision was made
If the court has already made a decision, your next step is to consider whether you can appeal it or apply for it to be reconsidered. Appeals are only allowed if there was a legal or procedural error, not simply because the decision feels unfair.
Would you like guidance on how to explore an appeal or next steps in this process?
i thought no win no fee lawyers wernt allowed in marital financial remedy hearinngs
No win, no fee agreements (Conditional Fee Agreements) are generally not permitted in family proceedings, including financial remedy hearings. This is because these cases involve discretionary decisions rather than fixed compensation awards, making such agreements unsuitable. However, it’s possible the other party's lawyer is using a different kind of agreement.
Would you like help clarifying this or addressing the fairness of the financial decision?
also he omitted from his form e his main pension asset
Case Rating: *
Omitting a significant asset, like a pension, from Form E is serious and could be considered non-disclosure. Courts take financial non-disclosure very seriously in divorce cases.
Would you like guidance on how to address or report this omission to the court?
well i provided the statement * weeks later they amended it, with no consequences
Case Rating: *
Amending a financial disclosure after an omission, especially a significant asset like a pension, could still be challenged if it appears to have affected the fairness of the court's decision.
Would you like guidance on how to formally raise concerns about this omission or its impact on the settlement?
yes and no win no fee solicitor, i have put it all in sriging but its been ignored
Case Rating: *
It seems your case involves serious concerns about fairness and financial disclosure in a marital settlement.
Would you like help finding free or low-cost legal advice to pursue next steps, since no-win-no-fee isn't an option for these cases?
yes
Case Rating: *
To find free or low-cost legal help in England, consider these resources:
- Citizens Advice Bureau: Offers free guidance and can direct you to local legal aid.
- LawWorks: Connects you with solicitors who provide free legal advice.
- Bar Pro Bono Unit: Provides free legal representation in certain cases.
Would you like contact details for one of these services?
email for law eorks
Case Rating: *
LawWorks provides free legal advice and connections to pro bono lawyers. You can find more information or contact them directly here:

LawWorks~
Website: [www.lawworks.org.uk](https://www.lawworks.org.uk)
Let me know if you'd like further help!

im * will prob end up living in a camprr van with my w dogs
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're in a very difficult position. To challenge the decision or seek further advice on preserving your housing, continue engaging with free legal resources like LawWorks or Citizens Advice. Have you considered applying for legal aid or reaching out to a McKenzie Friend for court support?
is the judge allowed to make me homeless and that i walk away with less than i put in25 years sgo
Case Rating: *
A judge must consider fairness, needs, and contributions under English law, particularly under the Matrimonial Causes Act *. They should aim for an equitable outcome, but this doesn't always mean equal division. If the decision leaves you unable to meet housing needs, you might have grounds to challenge it.
Would you like guidance on appealing or applying for reconsideration?
why wont she use a mesher
Case Rating: *
A Mesher order allows a family home to remain unsold, typically until a significant event (e.g., children reaching adulthood). Courts avoid them if they think they won’t resolve the financial dispute fairly or practically. Judges prioritize finality and fairness. Would you like guidance on arguing for a Mesher order?
so house nought b4 marriage eith inheritancs means nothing but his pension and assttes are ringfenced
Case Rating: *
Assets acquired before marriage, like your house and inheritance, are usually considered non-matrimonial property but may still be divided if needed to meet both parties' financial needs. His pension and assets should also be considered in the settlement. Would you like advice on how to argue for a fairer division or reconsideration?
yes
Case Rating: *
To argue for a fairer division or reconsideration:
- Highlight your financial needs, including housing, and contributions during the marriage.
- Emphasize that the house, bought with inheritance, is non-matrimonial property.
- Stress the omission and later amendment of his pension disclosure.
Would you like guidance on filing for reconsideration or legal resources to assist?
iv done all tha
Case Rating: *
If you've already taken all these steps and the court has still ruled unfairly, the next step could be an appeal if there's a legal or procedural error. Have you consulted Citizens Advice or LawWorks again for next steps? They might support further action or guide you to escalate this.
does it sound liks grounds gir sn appeal
Case Rating: *
An appeal is only possible if there was a legal or procedural error, such as the court failing to consider key evidence or improperly applying the law. The amended pension disclosure and fairness concerns could potentially strengthen your case. Have you sought advice from LawWorks or another solicitor to assess appeal viability?