TRY ME!
Election Tro Filing Guidance
Summary
Filing a TRO to pause election certification requires naming all involved parties, including the election commission and individuals who tampered with the ballot. If your assigned judge is unavailable, request another judge to review your TRO. Courts typically address TRO requests promptly due to their urgent nature. Present your case effectively by highlighting the urgency, presenting evidence, and explaining the impact on election integrity. If someone was fraudulently kept off the ballot, consider filing a complaint with the State Board of Elections and seeking legal advice. Falsifying election documents can be a Class 4 felony under Illinois law. Ensure you have a strong strategy and consult legal advice for complex situations involving election interference and potential threats.Full Conversation
ok thank you! if my judge is not here today and i request another judge to order a tro?
In Illinois, if your assigned judge is unavailable, you can request another judge to hear your request for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO). You should go to the court where your case is filed and ask the clerk for assistance in getting another judge to review your TRO application.
Is your case already filed in a specific court?
Is your case already filed in a specific court?
yes chancery dupage county 18th circuit room *
Got it! Since your case is filed in the Chancery Division of DuPage County, 18th Circuit, room *, you can ask the clerk in that court for assistance in getting another judge to review your TRO application if your assigned judge is unavailable.
Do you need any additional information on how to proceed with your TRO request?
Do you need any additional information on how to proceed with your TRO request?
do they look at it within the day of filing. i will be in there in a couple of hours
Case Rating: *
The court generally tries to address TRO requests promptly due to their urgent nature. It is possible that they will review it on the day of filing, especially if you emphasize the urgency of your situation when speaking with the clerk.
Good luck with your filing!
The court generally tries to address TRO requests promptly due to their urgent nature. It is possible that they will review it on the day of filing, especially if you emphasize the urgency of your situation when speaking with the clerk.
Good luck with your filing!
ok so tomorrow is ballot certification in dupage. if my hearing is tomorrow can the court still pause the certification?
Case Rating: *
It's possible that the court could issue a TRO to pause the certification if your hearing is tomorrow. The urgency and the evidence you present will be crucial. Make sure to explain the time-sensitive nature of your request to the judge.
Would you like any more detailed information on how to present your case effectively during the hearing?
It's possible that the court could issue a TRO to pause the certification if your hearing is tomorrow. The urgency and the evidence you present will be crucial. Make sure to explain the time-sensitive nature of your request to the judge.
Would you like any more detailed information on how to present your case effectively during the hearing?
yes
Case Rating: *
To present your case effectively during the hearing, make sure to:
- Highlight the urgency due to the upcoming ballot certification.
- Clearly present your documented evidence of tampering.
- Explain how the tampering has affected the integrity of the election.
- Emphasize the need for immediate action to prevent certification.
Would you like more tips on presenting your case or have any other questions?
To present your case effectively during the hearing, make sure to:
- Highlight the urgency due to the upcoming ballot certification.
- Clearly present your documented evidence of tampering.
- Explain how the tampering has affected the integrity of the election.
- Emphasize the need for immediate action to prevent certification.
Would you like more tips on presenting your case or have any other questions?
ok so if fraudentially and intentionally kept somone off the ballot, is there any additional steps to this?
Case Rating: *
If someone was fraudulently and intentionally kept off the ballot, you may also consider:
- Filing a formal complaint with the State Board of Elections.
- Seeking legal advice for potential civil action against the individuals involved.
- Reporting the matter to law enforcement if criminal activity is suspected.
Is there anything specific you need more information on?
If someone was fraudulently and intentionally kept off the ballot, you may also consider:
- Filing a formal complaint with the State Board of Elections.
- Seeking legal advice for potential civil action against the individuals involved.
- Reporting the matter to law enforcement if criminal activity is suspected.
Is there anything specific you need more information on?
ok so i have a mound of evidence. what im gonna list is the two people and not the third and save that for the injunction and my ammended appeal. but i still list that third person. is there any legal loop holes or push back im gonna get. fyi im not alerting the other parties until after my hearing.
Case Rating: *
You might face some pushback or legal challenges by not naming all involved parties in your initial TRO filing. Courts generally prefer transparency and full disclosure. If you withhold information, it could potentially weaken your case or affect the court's perception of your credibility.
Would you like more information on how to handle the third party in your case?
You might face some pushback or legal challenges by not naming all involved parties in your initial TRO filing. Courts generally prefer transparency and full disclosure. If you withhold information, it could potentially weaken your case or affect the court's perception of your credibility.
Would you like more information on how to handle the third party in your case?
ok so for the tro ill stick with the two people and name the third guy in the appeal, then correct. ?
Case Rating: *
Yes, you can proceed by naming the two individuals in the TRO and address the third person in your amended appeal. However, be prepared for potential legal challenges due to not naming all involved parties initially. It's essential to have a robust strategy for explaining this to the court. Would you like more information on how to approach this during your hearing?
Yes, you can proceed by naming the two individuals in the TRO and address the third person in your amended appeal. However, be prepared for potential legal challenges due to not naming all involved parties initially. It's essential to have a robust strategy for explaining this to the court. Would you like more information on how to approach this during your hearing?
its just to stop the election.
Case Rating: *
To stop the election, you might face legal challenges. Ensure you have a strong strategy to explain why you are not naming all parties involved initially.
Would you like more tips on presenting your case or have any other questions?
To stop the election, you might face legal challenges. Ensure you have a strong strategy to explain why you are not naming all parties involved initially.
Would you like more tips on presenting your case or have any other questions?
yes i do. hard and solid
Case Rating: *
To effectively present your case during the TRO hearing, consider the following:
- Clearly outline the urgency and the immediate impact of the upcoming ballot certification.
- Present well-documented evidence of tampering.
- Articulate how the tampering compromised the election's integrity.
- Emphasize the need for an immediate halt to the certification.
Would you need any further details on how to present your evidence or other aspects of your case?
To effectively present your case during the TRO hearing, consider the following:
- Clearly outline the urgency and the immediate impact of the upcoming ballot certification.
- Present well-documented evidence of tampering.
- Articulate how the tampering compromised the election's integrity.
- Emphasize the need for an immediate halt to the certification.
Would you need any further details on how to present your evidence or other aspects of your case?
under illinois 720ilcs5/*-* which is threating public officals; human service providers. the park district lawyer sent out a threating letter to comiteeman and cridicts in the community. does this threat fall under this act?
Case Rating: *
Illinois * ILCS */*-*: Threatening Public Officials and Human Service Providers
- It criminalizes knowingly delivering threats to public officials or human service providers.
- The threat must be with the intent to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate against the performance of official duties.
To determine if the lawyer's letter falls under this act, consider:
- The content of the letter.
- Any explicit or implicit threats.
- The intent behind the letter.
Would you like more details on the elements required to prove a violation under this statute?
- It criminalizes knowingly delivering threats to public officials or human service providers.
- The threat must be with the intent to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate against the performance of official duties.
To determine if the lawyer's letter falls under this act, consider:
- The content of the letter.
- Any explicit or implicit threats.
- The intent behind the letter.
Would you like more details on the elements required to prove a violation under this statute?
yes, it was also a public statment as well
Case Rating: *
For a public statement to fall under Illinois * ILCS */*-*, it must meet specific criteria:
- The statement must be a threat.
- The intent behind the statement must be to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate against the performance of official duties.
Would you like more specific details on how to prove a violation under this statute?
For a public statement to fall under Illinois * ILCS */*-*, it must meet specific criteria:
- The statement must be a threat.
- The intent behind the statement must be to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate against the performance of official duties.
Would you like more specific details on how to prove a violation under this statute?
here ill give you the news article
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're dealing with a complex situation involving election interference and potential threats under Illinois law.
To better understand your case, can you summarize the main points or excerpts from the news article? This will help provide more accurate guidance.
It seems like you're dealing with a complex situation involving election interference and potential threats under Illinois law.
To better understand your case, can you summarize the main points or excerpts from the news article? This will help provide more accurate guidance.
Lawyer Warns Bensenville Official's Critics
Taxpayer-funded attorney told critics they may have defamed the official. She suggested they may be sued. Dickson was addressing the White Pines Community Alliance, which has criticized the park district.She focused on a recent newsletter from the group, in which the alliance said Johnson was seeking candidates to run for the Bensenville Village Board, a separate entity. The group said Johnson wanted to keep his opponents from running for the park board. ill send you the other haalf
Case Rating: *
Given the potential election interference and the possibility of threats under Illinois law, your case could be significant. However, it might benefit from professional legal advice.
To assess the threat under Illinois * ILCS */*-*, consider:
- Was the lawyer's statement intended to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate?
- Were there explicit or implicit threats made?
Would you like more information on how to proceed with this matter?
Given the potential election interference and the possibility of threats under Illinois law, your case could be significant. However, it might benefit from professional legal advice.
To assess the threat under Illinois * ILCS */*-*, consider:
- Was the lawyer's statement intended to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate?
- Were there explicit or implicit threats made?
Would you like more information on how to proceed with this matter?
"The statement is also actionable as placing President Johnson in a false light," Dickson said. "The fact that your newsletter has consistently attempted to besmirch Mr. Johnson’s reputation establishes a pattern of malice directed toward him."
Dickson said that if the alliance lacks the evidence, it should retract its statement and apologize to Johnson in its newsletter. "Lastly, for the record, we need to ask whether you are representing Mr. Johnson in his personal capacity or as the President of the Bensenville Park District," Brill said.
A day later, Dickson responded that she was representing the president in his official capacity only. She told Brill she had no further comment. Dickson and Johnson have not responded to Patch's messages.
Case Rating: *
This situation involves election interference and potential threats under Illinois law. Here are some key points:
- Illinois * ILCS */*-* criminalizes threats against public officials if intended to cause harm or influence actions.
- A TRO to pause election certification should name all relevant parties involved.
- Consider the urgency due to upcoming ballot certification.
Would you like more detailed information on how to present your case effectively during the hearing?
This situation involves election interference and potential threats under Illinois law. Here are some key points:
- Illinois * ILCS */*-* criminalizes threats against public officials if intended to cause harm or influence actions.
- A TRO to pause election certification should name all relevant parties involved.
- Consider the urgency due to upcoming ballot certification.
Would you like more detailed information on how to present your case effectively during the hearing?
im just curious does this fall under this code? yes they did it to surpress a local news outlet
Case Rating: *
In Illinois, for a statement to fall under * ILCS */*-*, it must be a threat intended to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate against the performance of official duties. The situation described involving the lawyer's statements might fall under this statute if it meets these criteria.
Could you provide more details on how the lawyer's statements were intended to cause harm or influence actions?
In Illinois, for a statement to fall under * ILCS */*-*, it must be a threat intended to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate against the performance of official duties. The situation described involving the lawyer's statements might fall under this statute if it meets these criteria.
Could you provide more details on how the lawyer's statements were intended to cause harm or influence actions?
they also sued us, the white pines group. we are also appointed republican comiteeman
Case Rating: *
It appears you have a complex situation involving potential election interference and possible threats under Illinois law. Here are some key points:
- Illinois * ILCS */*-* criminalizes threats against public officials if intended to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate.
- TRO to pause election certification should name all relevant parties.
- Emphasis on urgency due to upcoming ballot certification is crucial.
Would you like more detailed information on how to present your case effectively during the hearing?
It appears you have a complex situation involving potential election interference and possible threats under Illinois law. Here are some key points:
- Illinois * ILCS */*-* criminalizes threats against public officials if intended to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate.
- TRO to pause election certification should name all relevant parties.
- Emphasis on urgency due to upcoming ballot certification is crucial.
Would you like more detailed information on how to present your case effectively during the hearing?
10ilcs5/*-*
Case Rating: *
Illinois * ILCS */*-*: Interference with the election process
- Criminalizes acts like tampering with ballots or ballot boxes.
- Includes interfering with election officials' duties.
- Penalties range from fines to imprisonment.
Regarding your situation:
- Naming all parties in the TRO can strengthen your case.
- Document the urgency of halting the ballot certification.
- Present clear evidence of tampering.
Would you like any more specific advice on presenting your case?
- Criminalizes acts like tampering with ballots or ballot boxes.
- Includes interfering with election officials' duties.
- Penalties range from fines to imprisonment.
Regarding your situation:
- Naming all parties in the TRO can strengthen your case.
- Document the urgency of halting the ballot certification.
- Present clear evidence of tampering.
Would you like any more specific advice on presenting your case?
in my objectors statment . her decleration against my nominting petitions, she stated it for a full in fair election, since she perjured herself? she has a vendetta. her attorney is the same attorney for the body of government i filed to run for, he is the attorny for the electoral board which iwas before him and the board. the also slid in other objections after the orginals were already filed.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a detailed and complex legal situation involving potential election interference, conflicts of interest, and possible perjury. Here are some key points:
- Illinois * ILCS */*-*: Interference with the election process
- Criminalizes acts like tampering with ballots or ballot boxes.
- Includes interfering with election officials' duties.
- Penalties range from fines to imprisonment.
- Illinois * ILCS */*-*: Threatening Public Officials
- Criminalizes knowingly delivering threats to public officials or human service providers.
- The threat must be with the intent to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate against the performance of official duties.
For your TRO and any further legal actions, you should:
- Name all relevant parties involved.
- Document the urgency of halting the ballot certification.
- Present clear and documented evidence of tampering and conflicts of interest.
- Explain any potential perjury and conflicts of interest to the court.
Would you need more detailed advice on how to proceed with your TRO or any other specific aspect of your case?
It sounds like you have a detailed and complex legal situation involving potential election interference, conflicts of interest, and possible perjury. Here are some key points:
- Illinois * ILCS */*-*: Interference with the election process
- Criminalizes acts like tampering with ballots or ballot boxes.
- Includes interfering with election officials' duties.
- Penalties range from fines to imprisonment.
- Illinois * ILCS */*-*: Threatening Public Officials
- Criminalizes knowingly delivering threats to public officials or human service providers.
- The threat must be with the intent to cause harm, influence actions, or retaliate against the performance of official duties.
For your TRO and any further legal actions, you should:
- Name all relevant parties involved.
- Document the urgency of halting the ballot certification.
- Present clear and documented evidence of tampering and conflicts of interest.
- Explain any potential perjury and conflicts of interest to the court.
Would you need more detailed advice on how to proceed with your TRO or any other specific aspect of your case?
in that exact code if you knowing falasify and forge documents. (b) is used to be preserved for use in connection in any election pursant to this code, expect as permitted by provisions of this code shall be guilty of a class * felony etc. so with her falseafying her statment, this would fall under this law correct?
Case Rating: *
Yes, falsifying statements in connection with an election can fall under Illinois * ILCS */*-* as a Class * felony. Here are key points:
- Falsifying documents in connection with an election.
- Preserved for use in connection with the election.
- Penalties include fines and imprisonment.
What specific evidence do you have regarding the falsified statements?
Yes, falsifying statements in connection with an election can fall under Illinois * ILCS */*-* as a Class * felony. Here are key points:
- Falsifying documents in connection with an election.
- Preserved for use in connection with the election.
- Penalties include fines and imprisonment.
What specific evidence do you have regarding the falsified statements?
does it fall under 10ilcs5/*-*
Case Rating: *
In Illinois, * ILCS */*-* refers to unlawful acts related to voting machines or electronic voting systems. It addresses tampering, damaging, or interfering with voting machines or the results they produce.
Your situation might be more accurately covered under * ILCS */*-*, which deals with election fraud, including falsification of documents.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with your case or any other specific aspect of your legal issue?
In Illinois, * ILCS */*-* refers to unlawful acts related to voting machines or electronic voting systems. It addresses tampering, damaging, or interfering with voting machines or the results they produce.
Your situation might be more accurately covered under * ILCS */*-*, which deals with election fraud, including falsification of documents.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with your case or any other specific aspect of your legal issue?
Start a new chat