Mitsubishi Commercial Contract Dispute

Summary

The interpretation of PR in your contract can vary, and if the commercials use exceeds agreed terms, you might have a claim for additional compensation. Consulting with a California attorney specializing in entertainment or contract law could provide more tailored guidance.

Full Conversation

I was an actor in a Mitsubishi commercial that shot in *, the contract I signed allowed them to use the commercial in all forms of media (broadcast, internet) for 1 year from the first airdate (October *, *), except for 'PR' (public relations) which was in perpetuity. Recently, I discovered that all these years later, the video is still public on the brand's Youtube channel, as well as posted on a page on their website. The usage fee was $*,* per year buyout, so I was wondering if I could validly claim against the ad agency that they pay me for each year beyond the first, or would they be able to claim that the Youtube video posting and website page are covered under the PR in perpetuity clause? I thought PR meant like trade shows, internal meetings, emails to other businesses, but some people I've spoken to say it can cover Youtube videos if it hasn't been reposted.
It seems like you have a complex situation involving contract interpretation. Here's some general information that might help:
- Contract Terms: The interpretation of "PR" can vary. If the contract doesn't clearly define it, it might be open to interpretation.
- Usage Fees: If the commercial's use exceeds the agreed terms, you might have a claim for additional compensation.
- Legal Advice: Consulting with an attorney specializing in entertainment or contract law in California could provide more tailored guidance.
Would you like help connecting with a local lawyer who can assist you further?