Debt Collector Foreclosure Limits

Summary

In Massachusetts, only the mortgage holder can initiate foreclosure, not a debt collector. If a debt collector claims to be the servicer, it could indicate a problem. To dispute a debt, write a letter within 30 days, request verification, and send it via certified mail. If the debt is a mortgage, request the original documents. Massachusetts law (940 CMR 7.00) may offer additional protections beyond the FDCPA. If foreclosure is scheduled, consider legal action to halt it. If discrepancies in documents suggest fraud, consult an attorney and consider filing a motion to vacate any judgment based on fraudulent evidence.

Full Conversation

I have received numerous letters from the alleged servicer of my alleged moThis communication from a debt collector is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained will be used for that purpose. New York City - Collection Agency License # 1170514rtgage loan containing the bolded statement at the end of the letter "
In Massachusetts, only the mortgage holder (lender) can initiate foreclosure, not a debt collector. However, if you're receiving letters from a debt collector claiming to be the servicer, it could be a sign of an issue.
Would you like guidance on disputing this debt or more information on foreclosure laws in Massachusetts?
I have received numerous letters from the alleged servicer of my alleged mortgage loan containing the bolded statement at the end of the letter "This communication from a debt collector is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained will be used for that purpose. New York City - Collection Agency License # *" On other occasions I have received letters from the same company claiming to be the servicer.
It sounds like there may be confusion or potential issues with the company claiming to be both a debt collector and a servicer. Here are some points to consider:
- In Massachusetts, only the mortgage holder can foreclose on a property.
- Debt collectors typically pursue unsecured debts, not mortgages.
Would you like guidance on disputing the validity of this debt with the alleged servicer or more information on your rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)?
Please tell me how to dispute the validity of this debt with the alleged servicer
You can dispute the validity of the debt with the alleged servicer by following these steps:
- Write a dispute letter within 30 days of receiving the debt notice.
- Include your contact information, account number, and a clear statement that you dispute the debt.
- Request verification and documentation proving the debt is yours.
- Send the letter via certified mail with a return receipt requested.
Would you like more information on drafting the dispute letter?
How to draft a dispute letter
Sure, here’s a general outline for drafting a dispute letter:
*. Your Contact Information
*. Date
*. Debt Collector’s Contact Information
*. Subject: Dispute of Debt (Account Number: XXXX)
*. Body:
- Clearly state you are disputing the debt.
- Request verification and documentation proving the debt.
- Ask for a response within 30 days.
*. Signature
Would you like a detailed template?
yes
Here's a detailed template for disputing the validity of the debt:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Debt Collector's Name]
[Debt Collector's Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Subject: Dispute of Debt (Account Number: XXXX)
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to dispute the validity of the debt referenced above. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), I request that you provide verification and documentation proving that this debt is mine.
Please provide the following within 30 days:
- Documentation of the original debt and the original creditor.
- Proof that you have the legal right to collect this debt.
Please consider this letter as a formal request to cease all collection activities until this dispute is resolved.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
---
Would you like additional information on what to do if the debt collector does not respond or provides insufficient documentation?
please provide additional information
If the debt collector does not respond or provides insufficient documentation:
- They must cease collection activities until they can verify the debt.
- You can file a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) or the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office.
- Consider consulting with a lawyer for further assistance.
Would you like information on how to file a complaint?
yes
If the debt collector does not respond or provides insufficient documentation within 30 days, you have options:
- Contact the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB): File a complaint.
- Consult an attorney: For legal advice specific to your situation.
- Cease communication: Send a cease communication letter under the FDCPA.
Would you like guidance on filing a complaint with the CFPB?
I have previously received a debt notice from the alleged attorney of the alleged servicer. I have responded that the debt is not validated. What are the specific debt validation requirements under FDCPA?
Under the FDCPA, a debt collector must provide the following when validating a debt:
- Amount of the debt
- Name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed
- Statement that unless you dispute the validity of the debt within 30 days, the debt will be assumed valid
- Statement that if you dispute the debt in writing within 30 days, the debt collector will obtain verification of the debt and mail it to you
- A copy of the judgment (if applicable)
Would you like more information on how to proceed if the debt collector fails to validate the debt?
What information must the debt collector provide to validate the debt
Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), a debt collector must provide the following to validate a debt:
- Amount of the debt
- Name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed
- Statement indicating that the debt will be assumed valid unless disputed within 30 days
- Statement that if you dispute the debt in writing within 30 days, the collector will obtain verification and mail it to you
- A copy of the judgment (if applicable)
Would you like more information on your rights under the FDCPA?
What id the debt is considered a mortgage debt? Is the debt collector required to provide the original mortgage document and the promissory note
In Massachusetts, if the debt is considered a mortgage debt, the debt collector (or servicer) is required to provide:
- The amount of the debt.
- The name of the creditor.
- Verification of the debt.
- The original mortgage document and the promissory note to prove ownership.
Would you like to know how to request these documents formally?
yes
To formally request these documents, you can draft a letter similar to the dispute letter. Here’s a template:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Debt Collector's Name]
[Debt Collector's Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Subject: Request for Validation of Mortgage Debt (Account Number: XXXX)
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to formally request validation of the mortgage debt referenced above. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), I request that you provide:
- The amount of the debt.
- The name of the creditor.
- Verification of the debt.
- The original mortgage document and the promissory note to prove ownership.
Please provide these documents within 30 days. Until then, please cease all collection activities.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
---
Would you like more information on what to do if they do not respond?
I also requested that the debt collector complies with the * CMR *.* debt collection requirements which is more stringent than FDCPA. Which avenue is better to pursue, federal or state validation?
In Massachusetts, both federal (FDCPA) and state (* CMR *.*) regulations can be pursued. State laws can provide additional protections, so it's beneficial to pursue both.
Here are some points to consider:
- * CMR *.* is more stringent and specific to Massachusetts.
- FDCPA is federal and provides a broader platform for complaints.
Would you like more details on Massachusetts's * CMR *.* requirements?
I sthere a document that compares FDCPA regulations to * CMR *.*?
I don't have a specific document comparing FDCPA to * CMR *.*, but I can provide a general comparison:
- FDCPA:
- Federal law
- Applies to third-party debt collectors
- Requires debt validation within 30 days
- Prohibits harassment, threats, and false statements
- * CMR *.*:
- Massachusetts regulation
- Covers both original creditors and debt collectors
- Requires additional disclosures and prohibits more conduct
- More stringent on harassment and misrepresentations
Would you like more detailed points on * CMR *.*?
Do alleged servicer's attorneys considered debt collectors?
In Massachusetts, an attorney who regularly collects debts on behalf of others, including mortgage servicers, can be considered a debt collector under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). This means they must comply with the FDCPA's debt collection rules and requirements.
Is there a specific concern you have with the attorney's actions or communications?
referenced attorney sent us a letter stating that according to SCOTUs decision Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP they are not debt collectors therefore FDCPA regulations do not apply to them in my case
In Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP, the Supreme Court ruled that businesses engaged in nonjudicial foreclosures are generally not considered "debt collectors" under the FDCPA, except for specific provisions.
However, Massachusetts state law (* CMR *.*) might still apply.
Would you like more information on * CMR *.* and how it may affect your situation?
However the attorney previously sent us debt validation letter under FDCPA asserting that this was an attempt to collect the debt
It appears the attorney's actions could be contradictory. Here are some points to consider:
- Federal Law (FDCPA): If the attorney sent a debt validation letter under the FDCPA, they might be considered a debt collector.
- State Law (* CMR *.*): Massachusetts regulations may still apply regardless of the Supreme Court decision.
Would you like to know more about how to challenge this based on Massachusetts law?
How about: FCDPA §1692f(*) which states: "A debt collector may not use unfair or unconscionable means to collect or attempt to collect any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section: (*)Taking or threatening to take any nonjudicial action to effect dispossession or disablement of property if— (A)there is no present right to possession of the property claimed as collateral through an enforceable security interest; (B)there is no present intention to take possession of the property; or (C)the property is exempt by law from such dispossession or disablement." It appears that the attorneys would be still liable for unfair or unconscionable behavior if (A) and possibly (C) were true? Is my interpretation correct?
Yes, your interpretation seems correct. Under FDCPA §1692f(*):
- If the attorneys have no present right to possession (A) or the property is legally exempt (C), their actions could be considered unfair or unconscionable.
- They could still be liable under the FDCPA.
Would you like guidance on how to formally address this issue with the attorneys?
Would "present right to possession" be questionable if mortgage and note were beyond the Statute of Limitation?
The "present right to possession" may indeed be questionable if the mortgage and note are beyond the Statute of Limitations. In Massachusetts, the statute of limitations for a mortgage foreclosure is typically 20 years.
- If the mortgage and note are beyond this period, the right to foreclose could be challenged.
- You can raise this as a defense if foreclosure action is initiated.
Would you like more information on how to assert this defense?
I thought that mortgage is obsolete after 5 years and the not after 6 years?
In Massachusetts, the statute of limitations for enforcing a mortgage is 20 years from the date of the breach of the mortgage contract. However, the statute of limitations for the underlying promissory note (typically 6 years for written contracts) could affect the enforceability of the debt.
Would you like more information on asserting this defense or dealing with the mortgage servicer?
Yes. However I need to also navigate the issue that the alleged servicer claims they are acting as debt collector. Can they be considered both by applicable laws?
In Massachusetts, a servicer can act as both a mortgage servicer and a debt collector under state and federal laws. Here's some guidance:
- FDCPA: If the servicer is collecting on behalf of another party, they may be considered a debt collector and must comply with FDCPA regulations.
- * CMR *.*: Massachusetts law may impose additional requirements on debt collectors and servicers.
Would you like more details on how to address this dual role in your dispute?
yes
If the servicer is acting as a debt collector, you can address both roles in your dispute. Here’s how:
- FDCPA Compliance: Assert that they must comply with federal debt collection laws.
- * CMR *.* Compliance: Highlight that Massachusetts law may impose stricter requirements.
Would you like specific steps on how to draft a combined dispute letter addressing both roles?
yes please
Here's how you can draft a combined dispute letter addressing both roles:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Servicer's Name]
[Servicer's Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Subject: Dispute of Debt and Request for Validation (Account Number: XXXX)
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to formally dispute the debt referenced above. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Massachusetts regulation * CMR *.*, I request that you provide the following:
- The amount of the debt.
- The name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed.
- Verification of the debt, including the original mortgage document and the promissory note.
- Proof that you have the legal right to collect this debt.
- Compliance with all additional requirements under * CMR *.*.
Please provide these documents within 30 days. Until then, please cease all collection activities. This letter serves as a formal request under both federal and state laws.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature][Your Printed Name]
---
Would you like more information on what to do if they do not respond or provide insufficient documentation?
yes, and i assume that currently scheduled foreclosure is considered as debt collection action
Yes, a scheduled foreclosure can be considered a debt collection action under certain circumstances. Here are your options:
- FDCPA Compliance: Assert that the servicer must comply with federal debt collection laws.
- * CMR *.* Compliance: Highlight that Massachusetts law imposes stricter requirements.
Would you like more information on how to halt the foreclosure process?
yes
To halt the foreclosure process, you can take the following steps:
- Temporary Restraining Order/Injunction: File for a restraining order or injunction in court to halt the foreclosure.
- Dispute the Debt: Send the dispute letter requesting validation of the debt as we've discussed.
- Consult an Attorney: Seek legal advice to explore all options and ensure proper procedures are followed.
Would you like more details on how to file for a restraining order or injunction?
yes
To file for a restraining order or injunction to halt the foreclosure process, follow these steps:
*. Prepare Documents: Gather all relevant documents, including your mortgage agreement, debt dispute letters, and communications from the servicer.
*. Draft a Petition: Write a petition outlining your request for a temporary restraining order (TRO) or preliminary injunction, detailing why foreclosure should be halted.
*. File with Court: Submit your petition to the appropriate Massachusetts court.
*. Attend Hearing: Be prepared to present your case at a court hearing.
Would you like more information on how to draft the petition?
yes
Sure! Here’s a basic outline for drafting a petition to seek a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) or preliminary injunction:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Court’s Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Petition for Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction to Halt Foreclosure
To the Honorable [Judge’s Name],
I, [Your Name], am the plaintiff in this matter and respectfully submit this petition for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction to halt the foreclosure of my property located at [Property Address].
Background:
- [Briefly describe your mortgage agreement, the servicer’s actions, and why you believe the foreclosure is unjust.]
Grounds for Relief:
*. Debt Dispute: I have formally disputed the debt under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Massachusetts regulation * CMR *.*. The servicer has not provided the required verification anddocumentation.
*. Unfair Practices: The servicer's actions may be in violation of FDCPA §1692f(*) and Massachusetts state law, as they lack the present right to possession of the property.
*. Irreparable Harm: Foreclosure will cause irreparable harm to me, as I will lose my home and suffer financial and emotional distress.
Request for Relief:
I respectfully request that this Honorable Court:
- Issue a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction halting the foreclosure process.
- Order the servicer to provide the requested debt validation and verification documents.
- Schedule a hearing to further address this matter.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, I request that the Court grant this petition to protect my legal rights and prevent the unjust foreclosure of my property.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
---
Would you like more information on what to expect at the court hearing?
yes
At the court hearing, you can expect the following:
- Presentation of Evidence: Present all documentation including your mortgage agreement, dispute letters, and communications from the servicer.
- Arguments: You and the servicer will present your arguments regarding the foreclosure and the validity of the debt.
- Judge’s Questions: The judge may ask questions to understand the situation better.
- Decision: The judge will decide whether to grant the TRO or preliminary injunction.
Would you like tips on how to prepare for your court hearing?
yes
To prepare for your court hearing:
*. Organize Documents: Ensure all relevant documents are organized and easily accessible.
*. Practice Your Statement: Prepare a clear and concise statement outlining your arguments.
*. Anticipate Questions: Be ready to answer possible questions from the judge.
*. Remain Calm and Professional: Stay calm, respectful, and professional throughout the hearing.
Would you like more information on specific questions the judge might ask?
In * the alleged servicer on behalf of the alleged mortgage loan owner, who was not the mortgage originator, filed a quiet title action against me in the Mass Land court seeking a missing mortgage assignment. My attorney at the time advised me to settle the case arguing that as the owner of the promissory note the servicer's client is entitled to the mortgage assignment. I initially agreed to that but later refused to sign the settlement. The court ended up enforcing the settlement. There is an existing judgment that servicer's client own the mortgage. However, I now have evidence that suggests that the servicer's filings at the onset of the action were fraudulent. For example they sent me copies of two different versions of the promissory note. The servicer also provided a similarly sounding but distinctly different name for the alleged owner of the promissory note from who is listed in the quiet title lawsuit. What should I do about that?
Case Rating: *
Given the potential for fraud in the servicer's filings, you might consider the following steps:
- Consult an Attorney: Seek legal advice to potentially file a motion to vacate the judgment based on fraud.
- Gather Evidence: Collect all documentation proving the discrepancies and fraud.
- Report to Authorities: Consider reporting the fraud to the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office.
Would you like more information on how to file a motion to vacate the judgment?
What about filing to invalidate the judgment in the land court?
To file a motion to invalidate the judgment in the Massachusetts Land Court, follow these steps:
- Consult an Attorney: Essential for legal guidance.
- Gather Evidence: Collect all documents indicating fraud.
- Draft Motion to Vacate: Outline fraud details and request to invalidate the judgment.
- File Motion with Land Court: Submit to the appropriate court.
Would you like a basic template for the motion to vacate?
yes
Here's a basic template for a motion to vacate a judgment based on fraud:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Court’s Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Motion to Vacate Judgment - Case No. [Your Case Number]
To the Honorable [Judge’s Name],
I, [Your Name], respectfully submit this Motion to Vacate the Judgment entered on [Judgment Date] in the matter of [Case Title/Case No.]. This request is based on newly discovered evidence of fraud perpetrated by the [Servicer's Name] and their client.
Background:
- In [Year], [Servicer's Name] filed a quiet title action against me seeking a missing mortgage assignment.
- The case was settled, and a judgment was entered despite my later refusal to sign the settlement.
Newly Discovered Evidence:
- [Servicer's Name] provided two different versions of the promissory note.
- Thereis a discrepancy in the name of the alleged owner of the promissory note between the one listed in the quiet title lawsuit and another document provided.
Grounds for Relief:
*. Fraudulent Filings: The discrepancies in the promissory note and the name of the owner suggest fraudulent actions by the servicer.
*. Inconsistent Documentation: The servicer provided conflicting information that undermines the validity of the previous judgment.
*. Legal Misrepresentation: The judgment was based on potentially fraudulent or misrepresented evidence.
Request for Relief:
I respectfully request that this Honorable Court:
- Vacate the judgment entered on [Judgment Date].
- Reopen the case for further examination based on the newly discovered evidence of fraud.
- Grant any other relief deemed just and proper.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, I request that the Court grant this motion to protect my legal rights and ensure a fair and just resolution.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
---
Would you like more information on how to proceed after filing the motion?
What MRCP rule should I use to vacate the jugdment?
To vacate a judgment based on fraud in Massachusetts, you would typically use Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure (MRCP) Rule *(b). This rule allows a party to seek relief from a final judgment under certain circumstances, including fraud.
- MRCP Rule *(b): This rule provides relief from a judgment due to reasons such as mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, as well as fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
Would you like more details on how to cite and apply this rule in your motion?
yes
To cite and apply MRCP Rule *(b) in your motion to vacate the judgment, follow these steps:
*. Title and Introduction:
- Start with the case title, your name, and the court's details.
- Introduce the motion and state that you are seeking relief under MRCP Rule *(b) due to fraud.
*. Background and Procedural History:
- Briefly describe the background of the case and the judgment in question.
- Mention the quiet title action and the settlement that was enforced.
*. Newly Discovered Evidence of Fraud:
- Detail the discrepancies you have found, such as the two different versions of the promissory note and the discrepancy in the name of the alleged owner.
*. Legal Basis for Relief under MRCP Rule *(b):
- Cite MRCP Rule *(b) explicitly: "Pursuant to Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure Rule *(b), a party may seek relief from a final judgment due to fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party."
- Explain how the fraudulent actions meet the criteria under MRCP Rule *(b).
*. Request for Relief:
- Clearly state the relief you are seeking: vacating the judgment, reopening the case, and any additional relief deemed just and proper.
*. Conclusion:
- Summarize your request and emphasize the need for a fair and just resolution.
Example:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Court’s Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Motion to Vacate Judgment - Case No. [Your Case Number]
To the Honorable [Judge’s Name],
I, [Your Name], respectfully submit this Motion to Vacate the Judgment entered on [Judgment Date] in the matter of [Case Title/Case No.] pursuant to Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure Rule *(b). This request is based on newly discovered evidence of fraud perpetrated by the [Servicer's Name] and their client.
Background:
- In [Year], [Servicer's Name] filed a quiet title action against me seeking a missing mortgage assignment.
- The case was
Your draft abruptly ended. Please finish the draft
Sure, I'll finish the draft for you:
---
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Court’s Name]
[Court’s Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Re: Motion to Vacate Judgment - Case No. [Your Case Number]
To the Honorable [Judge’s Name],
I, [Your Name], respectfully submit this Motion to Vacate the Judgment entered on [Judgment Date] in the matter of [Case Title/Case No.] pursuant to Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure Rule *(b). This request is based on newly discovered evidence of fraud perpetrated by the [Servicer's Name] and their client.
Background:
- In [Year], [Servicer's Name] filed a quiet title action against me seeking a missing mortgage assignment.
- The case was settled, and a judgment was entered despite my later refusal to sign the settlement.
Newly Discovered Evidence of Fraud:
- [Servicer's Name] provided two different versions of the promissory note.
- There is a discrepancy in the name of the alleged owner of the promissory note between theone listed in the quiet title lawsuit and another document provided.
Legal Basis for Relief under MRCP Rule *(b):
Pursuant to Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure Rule *(b), a party may seek relief from a final judgment due to fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party. The fraudulent actions by [Servicer's Name] meet the criteria under MRCP Rule *(b) as they involve inconsistent documents and potential misrepresentation.
Request for Relief:
I respectfully request that this Honorable Court:
- Vacate the judgment entered on [Judgment Date].
- Reopen the case for further examination based on the newly discovered evidence of fraud.
- Grant any other relief deemed just and proper.
Conclusion:
For the reasons stated above, I request that the Court grant this motion to protect my legal rights and ensure a fair and just resolution.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
---
Would you like more information on how to proceed after filing your motion to vacate?
yes
After filing your motion to vacate, follow these steps:
*. Notify All Parties: Ensure all relevant parties receive a copy of your motion.
*. Prepare for Hearing: Be ready to present your evidence and arguments to the judge.
*. Gather Supporting Documents: Bring all documents related to the case, including evidence of fraud.
*. Consult an Attorney: Seek legal advice to strengthen your case.
Would you like tips on presenting your evidence effectively in court?
what is the role and significance of the adjustable-rate rider in the mortgage loan documents?
An adjustable-rate rider in a mortgage loan document is significant because it:
- Specifies that the interest rate on the mortgage can change over time.
- Outlines the terms and conditions under which the interest rate can adjust.
- Details the index and margins used to determine rate changes.
- Affects your monthly payment amounts, which can increase or decrease.
Do you have specific concerns regarding an adjustable-rate mortgage you want to discuss?
is the adjustable rate rider part of the note or part of the mortgage?
The adjustable-rate rider is typically considered part of the mortgage (deed of trust) and not part of the promissory note itself. It modifies the terms of the mortgage to allow for changes in the interest rate.
Would you like more information on how this affects your mortgage or payments?
the adjustable rate rider is not recorded in the registry of deeds. is that an issue/
Yes, the adjustable-rate rider not being recorded in the registry of deeds can be an issue. In Massachusetts, the recording of all relevant mortgage documents, including riders, is essential to ensure the enforceability of the mortgage terms. This omission could potentially affect the lender's rights.
Would you like to know the steps to address this issue?
the servicer also sent me a copy of the mortgage and the adjustable rate rider with some substituted (not original) pages that do not have my initials on it. And the language of the document does not flow from original pages to the substituted ones. These documents were allegedly part of the servicer's "servicing file". They are clearly different from what was recorded. Is that a potential fraud I can additionally claim?
Yes, the discrepancies and substituted pages could be considered potential evidence of fraud. Here are steps you can take:
- Consult an Attorney: Essential for legal advice and action.
- Gather Evidence: Collect all documents showing the discrepancies.
- File a Complaint: Report the issue to the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office.
- Motion to Vacate: Include this new evidence in a motion to vacate the judgment.
Would you like more information on how to gather and present this evidence effectively?