Patent Eligibility Criteria

Summary

Certain inventions, such as game strategies, business methods, and standalone computer programs, are generally not patentable due to obviousness and non-patentable subject matter. However, computer-implemented inventions that solve a technical problem may qualify for patents. The inventive step requires creativity beyond simple changes to existing ideas.

Full Conversation

The inventive step requires the invention to be more than an obvious or simple change to what already exists. It should show creativity or a unique approach that a typical expert wouldn't immediately think of. legal english
The inventive step means an invention should be more than a simple or obvious change to existing ideas. It must display creativity or a unique approach that wouldn't be immediately obvious to a skilled person in the field.
Schemes, rules and methods of performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, and programs for computers): A new strategy for playing chess (method of playing games) or a novel marketing strategy (method of doing business) are not patentable. While computer programs as such are excluded, inventions that are implemented using a computer program and provide a technical solution to a technical problem might be patentable (often referred to as computer-implemented inventions). SIMPLIFY
Here's a simplified version of the information:
- Strategies for playing games or business methods, like a new chess strategy or marketing plan, can't be patented.
- Computer programs alone aren't patentable, but if they solve a technical problem, they might qualify for a patent as computer-implemented inventions.
WHY THEY ARE NOT PATENTABLE?
Case Rating: *
In general, the reasons why certain things are not patentable are:
- Obviousness: The invention must show creativity beyond simple or obvious changes to existing ideas.
- Non-patentable subject matter: Strategies for games, business methods, and computer programs alone are excluded from patentability unless they solve a technical problem.
Is there a specific invention or idea you're curious about regarding patent eligibility?
Section *: Prior Art - What Constitutes Existing Knowledge Interpretation: This section clarifies what constitutes "prior art," which is the body of knowledge against which an invention's novelty and inventive step are assessed. It includes two main categories: SIMPLIFY
Case Rating: *
Here's a simplified explanation of Section * on "Prior Art":
- Existing Knowledge: Prior art includes all information made public before a given date that might be relevant to an invention's claim of originality.
- Categories: It includes written publications, patents, and any public demonstrations or use.
Do you have any specific questions or need further information on this topic?