Trademark Ownership Timeline
Summary
Grover first owns a trademark in February when he begins using the logo and name in commerce. Elmo owns a copyright at 3:00 on Monday when he finishes the song, even if not written down. Abbys patent ownership starts in 2024 upon approval, expiring in 2043. Prairie Dawn and Irvines trademark rights depend on distinctiveness and confusion likelihood. Cookie, Snuffy, and Gordon likely infringe Oscars patent. Zooeys patent expires in 2020, Burts copyright in 2100, and Ernies trademark can last indefinitely. Gina infringes Kermits copyright, while Mando and Natasha likely do not. Gonnigan and Susan may infringe Marias trademark. Luis likely infringes Marias trademark, while Hoots may risk confusion. Murrays patent belongs to Sesame Industries, and Wallys copyright to Count Newspapers.Full Conversation
The following sequence of events takes place:
• In January, Grover designs a logo and a catchy name for the bicycles he sells.
• In February, Grover begins using that logo and name to sell his bicycles.
• In March, Grover files an application for trademark registration for this logo and name.
*. In April, the USPTO informs Grover that his registration has been approved.
In what month does Grover first own a trademark in that logo and name?
Grover first owns a trademark in that logo and name in February when he begins using it in commerce.
Would you like more information on trademark laws or registration?
Would you like more information on trademark laws or registration?
This has * parts.
Hi there! It looks like you have two different scenarios involving intellectual property rights: one about trademarks and one about copyrights.
For Grover's trademark:
- Grover first owns a trademark in February when he begins using the logo and name in commerce.
For Elmo's copyright:
- Elmo first owns a copyright in the song at *:* on Monday when he finishes the song, even though it isn't written down yet.
Do you need more details on either trademarks or copyrights?
For Grover's trademark:
- Grover first owns a trademark in February when he begins using the logo and name in commerce.
For Elmo's copyright:
- Elmo first owns a copyright in the song at *:* on Monday when he finishes the song, even though it isn't written down yet.
Do you need more details on either trademarks or copyrights?
The following sequence of events takes place:
• At *:* Monday, Elmo gets the idea for a new song, and begins to think about it in his head.
• At *:*, Elmo gets out his guitar and begins working out chords, melodies, and lyrics.
• At *:*, Elmo finishes the song, although he hasn't written anything down.
• At *:*, Elmo begins using his music-composition software to transcribe the song.
• At *:*, Elmo finishes transcribing the song, although he as not yet saved it to disk (it is temporarily contained in his computer's random-access memory (RAM), and fortunately there are no power failures or other events that would erase it.) (RAM would be erased if electrical power were interrupted in a computer.)
Elmo first owns a copyright in the song at *:* on Monday when he finishes the song, even if it's not written down. Copyright protection begins as soon as the work is fixed in a tangible medium of expression.
Would you like more information on how to register a copyright or protect your intellectual property?
Would you like more information on how to register a copyright or protect your intellectual property?
• At *:*, Elmo saves the composition to his hard drive, as well as to a flash drive and to the "cloud."
• At *:*, Elmo completes an online copyright registration application with the U. S. Copyright office, which includes attaching a copy of the song and paying a fee.
• On Wednesday, the Copyright Office notifies Elmo that his registration application has been approved.
At what day and time did Elmo first own a copyright in the song?
Optional: If you wish, you may add some explanation or discussion.
Elmo first owns a copyright in the song at *:* on Monday when he finishes transcribing the song into a tangible form (i.e., saved in the computer's RAM). Copyright protection attaches as soon as the work is fixed in a tangible medium of expression.
Would you like more information on copyright laws or registration?
Would you like more information on copyright laws or registration?
The following sequence of events takes place:
• In *, Abby invents a new process for manufacturing insulin.
• In *, Abby files an application with the U. S. Patent Office for a patent for her new process.
• In *, the Patent Office approves Abby's application.
When is the date when Abby's ownership of the patent begins?
When will the patent expire?
What four things did the Patent Office need to determine before approving the patent?
- Abby's ownership of the patent begins in * when the Patent Office approves her application.
- The patent will expire 20 years from the filing date, so in *.
The four things the Patent Office needed to determine before approving the patent:
- Novelty
- Non-obviousness
- Utility
- Enablement
Do you need more details on patent laws or the application process?
- The patent will expire 20 years from the filing date, so in *.
The four things the Patent Office needed to determine before approving the patent:
- Novelty
- Non-obviousness
- Utility
- Enablement
Do you need more details on patent laws or the application process?
Prairie Dawn owns a pet store that specializes in lizards; she calls her store "Lizards," and she uses a picture of a lizard on the store's sign and in all her advertising. Irvine owns a company that specializes in house painting; he calls his company "Lizards", and he uses a picture of a lizard on his truck and all his advertising.
*. Which (if either) of Prairie Dawn and/or Irvine is entitled to a trademark in the word "Lizard" as s/he uses it in business?
For Prairie Dawn and Irvine, the entitlement to a trademark in the word "Lizard" depends on several factors:
- Distinctiveness: "Lizard" must be distinctive or have acquired secondary meaning.
- Likelihood of Confusion: Since both businesses are in different industries (pet store vs. house painting), there is less likelihood of confusion.
Does this adequately address your question, or do you need more details on trademark laws?
- Distinctiveness: "Lizard" must be distinctive or have acquired secondary meaning.
- Likelihood of Confusion: Since both businesses are in different industries (pet store vs. house painting), there is less likelihood of confusion.
Does this adequately address your question, or do you need more details on trademark laws?
whats the answer
For Prairie Dawn and Irvine's scenario:
- Both Prairie Dawn and Irvine cannot have exclusive rights to the word "Lizard" for their respective businesses if the term is generic or descriptive without acquiring distinctiveness.
- Trademarks are granted based on the uniqueness and association with specific goods/services.
Would you like more information on trademark distinctiveness or the application process?
- Both Prairie Dawn and Irvine cannot have exclusive rights to the word "Lizard" for their respective businesses if the term is generic or descriptive without acquiring distinctiveness.
- Trademarks are granted based on the uniqueness and association with specific goods/services.
Would you like more information on trademark distinctiveness or the application process?
Oscar has a patent in a new kind of trash disposal device. While the patent is still in effect, Cookie begins manufacturing this device, Snuffy begins retailing the device, and Gordon begins developing an improved device based on Oscar's device. None of them ask Oscar's permission first.
Which (if any) of them have infringed on Oscar's patent?
- Cookie: Likely infringed by manufacturing the device without Oscar's permission.
- Snuffy: Likely infringed by selling the device without permission.
- Gordon: Likely infringed by developing an improved device based on Oscar's patented device without permission.
Would you like more details on patent infringement laws?
- Snuffy: Likely infringed by selling the device without permission.
- Gordon: Likely infringed by developing an improved device based on Oscar's patented device without permission.
Would you like more details on patent infringement laws?
In *, Zooey gets a patent. In that same year, Burt gets a copyright. In that same year, Ernie gets a trademark. All three of them die in the year *, but their estates continue to use the patented idea, the copyrighted work, and the trademark in commerce (respectively) until the year *, when they stop.
When did Zooey's patent expire?
When did Burt's copyright expire?
When did Ernie’s trademark expire?
Optional: If you wish, you may add some explanation or discussion.
- Zooey's Patent Expiry: Patents filed after June *, *, expire 20 years from the filing date. Thus, Zooey's patent would expire in *.
- Burt's Copyright Expiry: Copyrights last for the life of the author plus 70 years. Burt's copyright would expire in *.
- Ernie's Trademark Expiry: Trademarks can last indefinitely as long as they are used in commerce and renewed periodically.
Do you have any other questions related to this?
- Burt's Copyright Expiry: Copyrights last for the life of the author plus 70 years. Burt's copyright would expire in *.
- Ernie's Trademark Expiry: Trademarks can last indefinitely as long as they are used in commerce and renewed periodically.
Do you have any other questions related to this?
whats the answer
- Zooey's Patent: Patents generally last for 20 years from the filing date. If Zooey got the patent in *, it would expire in *.
- Burt's Copyright: Copyrights typically last for the life of the author plus 70 years. Since Burt died in *, the copyright would expire in *.
- Ernie’s Trademark: Trademarks can last indefinitely as long as they are used in commerce and proper renewal filings are made. Therefore, it did not expire in *.
Do you need more information on any of these topics?
- Burt's Copyright: Copyrights typically last for the life of the author plus 70 years. Since Burt died in *, the copyright would expire in *.
- Ernie’s Trademark: Trademarks can last indefinitely as long as they are used in commerce and proper renewal filings are made. Therefore, it did not expire in *.
Do you need more information on any of these topics?
Kermit owns a copyright in a play he wrote, The Frog Ultimatum. He has appointed Dramatists' Play Service, Inc. (DPS) as his agent for performance rights and royalties. The following people do the following things:
• Gina, without asking Kermit, posts a complete copy of the play script on her blog.
• Mando, without asking Kermit, puts on a performance of the play in his (Mando's) living room, allowing only the members of his immediate family to see it.
• Smiley, without asking Kermit, contacts DPS about doing a production of the play; DPS quotes him a price for royalties, which Smiley pays; Smiley then puts on a performance of the play at a local theater, as described to DPS.
• Natasha, without asking Kermit, quotes one line of the play in an article she is writing which talks about the play, its meaning, and its relationship to other works.
Which (if any) of those mentioned above have infringed on Kermit's copyright?
- Gina: Yes, she infringed Kermit's copyright by posting the complete play script online without permission.
- Mando: Likely not, as it was a private performance for immediate family, which may fall under 'fair use.'
- Smiley: No, Smiley obtained the necessary permissions and paid royalties.
- Natasha: Likely not, as quoting a single line for commentary may be considered 'fair use.'
Need more info on fair use or copyright infringement?
- Mando: Likely not, as it was a private performance for immediate family, which may fall under 'fair use.'
- Smiley: No, Smiley obtained the necessary permissions and paid royalties.
- Natasha: Likely not, as quoting a single line for commentary may be considered 'fair use.'
Need more info on fair use or copyright infringement?
Maria owns a trademark in a green-and-black pattern which decorates all the cleaning supplies she sells; she doesn't use it for anything else. The following people do the following things:
• Gonnigan, without Maria's permission, uses the same exact pattern to decorate components he manufactures for use in nuclear power plants.
• Susan, who runs a professional housecleaning service, publishes advertisements showing her using Maria's cleaning supplies (with the pattern); in fact, Susan actually uses those supplies when she cleans houses, but she did not ask Maria's permission to use the pattern in her advertisements.
It looks like both Gonnigan and Susan may have infringed on Maria's trademark. Here are the key points:
- Gonnigan: Using the exact pattern in a completely different industry may still constitute infringement, as it could cause confusion about the origin of the products.
- Susan: Using Maria's trademarked pattern in advertisements without permission is likely an infringement, even though she uses the supplies legitimately.
Would you like more detailed information on trademark infringement?
- Gonnigan: Using the exact pattern in a completely different industry may still constitute infringement, as it could cause confusion about the origin of the products.
- Susan: Using Maria's trademarked pattern in advertisements without permission is likely an infringement, even though she uses the supplies legitimately.
Would you like more detailed information on trademark infringement?
Hoots, a rival manufacturer of cleaning supplies, displays Maria's cleaning supplies (with the pattern) along with his own (very differently decorated) cleaning supplies in advertisements where he claims that his supplies are superior to Maria's.
• Luis, a rival manufacturer of cleaning supplies, decorates his own supplies with a pattern that is not identical to Maria's, but which is so similar that many customers mistakenly buy Luis's supplies thinking that Maria manufactured them.
Which (if any) of the people above have infringed on Maria's trademark?
Luis has likely infringed on Maria's trademark. Trademark infringement occurs when a similar mark is used in a way that causes confusion among consumers about the source of the goods.
Hoots may also be at risk if his advertisements cause confusion or damage Maria's brand reputation.
Do you need more details on trademark infringement and potential legal actions?
Hoots may also be at risk if his advertisements cause confusion or damage Maria's brand reputation.
Do you need more details on trademark infringement and potential legal actions?
Murray works as a mechanical engineer for Sesame Industries; part of his job description includes the design and construction of new mechanical devices. While at Sesame Industries, Murray invents a new, patentable mechanical device. Wally works as a journalist for Count Newspapers; part of his job description includes writing news articles. Wally writes several news articles while working for Count Newspapers.
Who owns the patent (if one is granted) for Murray's new device?
Who owns the copyright for Wally's news articles?
- Murray's Patent: In most cases, inventions created by employees during the course of their employment are owned by the employer. Therefore, Sesame Industries likely owns the patent for Murray's new device.
- Wally's Copyright: Wally's news articles are considered "work made for hire," so Count Newspapers owns the copyright.
Do you need more details on employment-related intellectual property rights?
- Wally's Copyright: Wally's news articles are considered "work made for hire," so Count Newspapers owns the copyright.
Do you need more details on employment-related intellectual property rights?
whats the answer
- Murray: The patent for Murray's new device likely belongs to Sesame Industries, as it was invented as part of his job duties.
- Wally: The copyright for Wally's news articles typically belongs to Count Newspapers, given that they were created as part of his employment.
Would you like more information on patent and copyright ownership in employment scenarios?
- Wally: The copyright for Wally's news articles typically belongs to Count Newspapers, given that they were created as part of his employment.
Would you like more information on patent and copyright ownership in employment scenarios?