Legal Multiple Choice Insights

*. Which of the following is not true regarding costs orders against legal practitioners? (a) In making such an order, the Court will use its discretion judicially and cautiously. (b) Costs orders against legal practitioners can be levied on an indemnity basis. (c) Costs orders against practitioners are provided for by s * of the Civil Procedure Act * (NSW). (d) Costs orders can be made against legal practitioners who act in a case without reasonable prospects of success. *. In Samsung Electronics Co Limited v Apple Inc [*] FCAFC *; * FCR *; * ALR, the Full Federal Court of Australia articulated: (a) The calculation of costs in a Bullock Order. (b) Bases upon which it might hear an appeal from an interlocutory order. (c) The calculation of costs in a Sanderson Order. (d) Two bases upon which costs might be ordered on an indemnity basis.

*. The case of Leach v The Nominal Defendant [*] NSWCA * revolved around: (a) Calderbank offers. (b) Mareva orders. (c) Anton Piller orders. (d) Offers of compromise under the UCPR. *. Which of the following actions would be commenced by way of a summons? (a) Proceedings for the appointment of a tutor. (b) Proceedings for the damages for breach of contract. (c) Proceedings for the possession of land. (d) Proceedings relief in relation to a tort.