Summary
Rule 3.03 of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct requires lawyers to maintain candor toward the tribunal, avoiding false statements and disclosing necessary facts. Rule 3.04 emphasizes fairness, prohibiting obstructive conduct and falsifying evidence. If attorneys are working together without clear role definitions, it may raise ethical concerns, including unauthorized practice of law and confidentiality breaches. In such cases, maintaining clear communication and transparency is crucial. If you suspect unethical conduct, consider keeping detailed records and potentially filing a complaint with the Texas State Bar.Full Conversation
what if lawyers are working together and copying each other in filings but one of them is not officially representing the other attorney's client
If lawyers are working together and copying each other's filings, but one is not officially representing the other attorney's client, it could raise ethical concerns:
- Unauthorized Practice of Law: The non-representing lawyer should avoid actions that imply representation without proper client consent.
- Confidentiality: Both lawyers must maintain client confidentiality.
Would you like more detailed information on how this might affect your specific situation?
no only one of them is representing the client but the other one is representing the court reporter officially, but the one who is representing the other client is copying the other attorney on the filings when being served so it appears they are working together but one hasn't officially outlined his role.
It sounds like the situation involves potential ethical concerns. Here are a few key points to consider:
- Disclosure: The roles of both attorneys should be clearly stated to avoid any misunderstandings.
- Communication: Proper communication channels should be maintained to ensure transparency.
- Ethical Compliance: Both attorneys should adhere to ethical rules to avoid any potential conflicts.
Is there a specific issue you are facing due to this situation?
yeah I don't know for certain if they are working or colluding together or not, because one of them is claiming that they are only officially saying that they are representing the court reporter
Case Rating: *
It seems like there could be an ethical issue here if lawyers are not clearly defining their roles or are potentially colluding. It might be helpful to keep records of communications and filings as evidence.
Is there a specific outcome you are hoping to achieve or a particular concern you have regarding this situation?
Rule *.*: what does this rule say
Case Rating: *
Rule *.* of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct addresses "Fairness in Adjudicatory Proceedings." Here are the key points:
- Obstructive Conduct: Lawyers must not obstruct another party's access to evidence.
- Falsifying Evidence: Lawyers must not falsify evidence or assist in perjury.
- Disobeying Tribunal Rules: Lawyers must not disobey tribunal rules.
Is there a specific concern you have related to Rule *.*?
yeah does my current situation regarding the two attorneys who may be colluding against me apply to this rule
Case Rating: *
Rule *.* addresses fairness in adjudicatory proceedings, and your situation might involve obstructive conduct or disobeying tribunal rules. Keep detailed records of all communications and filings as evidence. You might want to consider filing a formal complaint with the Texas State Bar if you believe there is unethical conduct.
Would you like more guidance on how to file a complaint or any other steps you can take?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat