Paramount Duty Of Lawyers

Summary

In Australia, the paramount duty of lawyers to the court over the client is primarily outlined in the case of Giannarelli v Wraith (1988) 165 CLR 543. This High Court decision emphasizes that a lawyers duty to the court is paramount and overrides duties to the client. Another key case is DOrta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1, which reaffirmed this principle. Additionally, Rondel v Worsley [1969] 1 AC 191 further explores the concept that a lawyers duty to the court takes precedence over the duty to the client.

Full Conversation

what is another key case
Another key case that highlights the paramount duty of lawyers to the court over the client in Australia is D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (*) * CLR *. This case reaffirmed the principle that a lawyer's duty to the court is paramount and can sometimes conflict with the duty to the client.
any others
Another important case that addresses the paramount duty of lawyers to the court over the client in Australia is Rondel v Worsley [*] * AC *. This case further explores the concept that a lawyer's duty to the court takes precedence over the duty to the client.
what case is fundamental aside from giannarelli
Case Rating: *
Aside from Giannarelli v Wraith, another fundamental case regarding the paramount duty of lawyers to the court over the client is D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (*) * CLR *. This case reinforces the priority of a lawyer's duty to the court.