Legal Interpretation Principles
Summary
The legal interpretation principles discussed include the purposive approach, which focuses on the purpose or object of legislation, and the mischief rule, which addresses the problem the legislation aims to solve. The supremacy of the Constitution is emphasized, requiring courts to interpret laws in light of constitutional principles. Various cases illustrate these principles, such as Venter v R, which allows deviation from literal meanings to avoid absurd results, and S v Makwanyane, which explains the concept of ubuntu. The importance of context, legislative intent, and the use of internal and external aids in statutory interpretation are highlighted.Full Conversation
In what case was the concept of ubuntu explained as: Generally translates as 'humaneness'. In its most fundamental sense, it translates as 'personhood' and 'morality'? While it envelopes the key values of group solidarity, compassion, respect, human dignity, conformity to basic norms and collective unity, in its fundamental sense it denotes humanity and morality. Its spirit emphasises respect for human dignity, marking a shift from confrontation to conciliation.
a.
Minister of Public Works v Haffajee * (*) SA * (A)
b.
S v Makwanyane * (*) SA * (CC)
c.
Novelty Machine Operators v Minister of Justice * (*) SA * (A)
d.
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security * (*) SA * (CC)
The concept of ubuntu as described is famously explained in the case of S v Makwanyane * (*) SA * (CC).
The mischief rule was laid down in the 16th century by Lord Coke in the famous Heydon's case (*). Four questions were asked in this case; which one was NOT asked?
a.
What was the historical context before legislation was adopted?
b.
What was the solution or remedy provided by the legislature to solve this problem?
c.
What was the mischief not provided for by the existing legislation or common law?
d.
What was the legal position before the legislation was adopted?
In Heydon's Case (*), the question that was NOT asked is:
a. What was the historical context before legislation was adopted?
a. What was the historical context before legislation was adopted?
In which case did the court emphasise the orthodox primary rule of interpretation that courts must give effect to the literal and grammatical meaning of the legislation, and that deviation from this rule will be allowed only in exceptional circumstances?
a.
Geyser v Msunduzi Municipality * (*) SA * (N) 32D-E.
b.
Mateis v Ngwathe Plaaslike Munisipaliteit * (*) SA * (SCA).
c.
Qoseleni v Minister of Law and Order * (*) SA * (E).
d.
Minister of Interior v Lockhat * (*) SA * (A) *.
Case Rating: *
The case in which the court emphasized the orthodox primary rule of interpretation to give effect to the literal and grammatical meaning of the legislation, allowing deviation only in exceptional circumstances, is:
d. Minister of Interior v Lockhat * (*) SA * (A) *.
The case in which the court emphasized the orthodox primary rule of interpretation to give effect to the literal and grammatical meaning of the legislation, allowing deviation only in exceptional circumstances, is:
d. Minister of Interior v Lockhat * (*) SA * (A) *.
In Public Carriers Association v Toll Road Concessionaries (Pty) Ltd Smalberger JA decided that?
a.
It may be accepted that the literal interpretation principle is NOT firmly entrenched in our law.
b.
It must not be accepted that the literal interpretation principle is firmly entrenched in our law and I do not seek to challenge it.
c.
It must be accepted that the literal interpretation principle is firmly entrenched in our law, this should be challenged.
d.
It must be accepted that the literal interpretation principle is firmly entrenched in our law and I do not seek to challenge it.
Case Rating: *
In the case of Public Carriers Association v Toll Road Concessionaries (Pty) Ltd, Smalberger JA decided that:
d. It must be accepted that the literal interpretation principle is firmly entrenched in our law and I do not seek to challenge it.
In the case of Public Carriers Association v Toll Road Concessionaries (Pty) Ltd, Smalberger JA decided that:
d. It must be accepted that the literal interpretation principle is firmly entrenched in our law and I do not seek to challenge it.
In which case did the court hold a literalist viewpoint that headings to chapters and sections may be used by courts to establish the purpose of the legislation only when the rest of the provision is not clear?
a.
Chotabhai v Union Government * AD *
b.
Bulawayo Municipality v Bulawayo Waterworks Ltd * CPD * *
c.
Brown v Cape Divisional Council * (*) SA * (A)
d.
Turffontein Estates v Mining Commissioner Johannesburg * AD *
Case Rating: *
The case where the court held a literalist viewpoint that headings to chapters and sections may be used by courts to establish the purpose of the legislation only when the rest of the provision is not clear is:
b. Bulawayo Municipality v Bulawayo Waterworks Ltd * CPD * *.
The case where the court held a literalist viewpoint that headings to chapters and sections may be used by courts to establish the purpose of the legislation only when the rest of the provision is not clear is:
b. Bulawayo Municipality v Bulawayo Waterworks Ltd * CPD * *.
In Keagile v Attorney-General, Transvaal * (*) SA * (T) that?
a.
the accused was charged with contravening the Road Traffic Act * of *.
b.
the court held that the power of the Attorney-General to issue a statement with regards to the refusal of bail was no longer effective.
c.
the accused?s application for a review of the denial of bail was granted.
d.
the court decided the matter in terms of section *(*)(d) of the Interpretation Act * of *.
Case Rating: *
In Keagile v Attorney-General, Transvaal * (*) SA * (T), the correct answer is:
b. the court held that the power of the Attorney-General to issue a statement with regards to the refusal of bail was no longer effective.
In Keagile v Attorney-General, Transvaal * (*) SA * (T), the correct answer is:
b. the court held that the power of the Attorney-General to issue a statement with regards to the refusal of bail was no longer effective.
In the case of__________the court held that a person who is party to a monogamous Muslim marriage is not included under the terms spouse and spouses in the Intestate Succession Act * of * and the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act * of *.
a.
Gory v Kolver (Starke and Others Intervening) * (*) SA * (CC)
b.
Daniels v Campbell * (*) SA * (CC)
c.
Ex parte Dow * (*) SA * (D)
d.
Bhe and Others v Magistrate, Khayelitsha and Others * (*) SA * (CC)
Case Rating: *
In the case of "Daniels v Campbell * (*) SA * (CC)," the court held that a person who is party to a monogamous Muslim marriage is not included under the terms "spouse" and "spouses" in the Intestate Succession Act * of * and the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act * of *.
In the case of "Daniels v Campbell * (*) SA * (CC)," the court held that a person who is party to a monogamous Muslim marriage is not included under the terms "spouse" and "spouses" in the Intestate Succession Act * of * and the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act * of *.
In which case did Langa DP explain the constitutional foundation of the new interpretation methodology as follows "Section *(*) of the Constitution means that all statutes must be interpreted through the prism of the Bill of Rights"?
a.
Keyter v Minister of Agriculture * NLR *
b.
Finbro Furnishers (Pty) Ltd v Registrar of Deeds, Bloemfontein * (*) SA * (A)
c.
Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd * (*) SA * (A)
d.
Investigating Directorate: Serious Economic Offences v Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd: In re Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd v Smit * (*) SA * (CC)
Case Rating: *
The case where Langa DP explained the constitutional foundation of the new interpretation methodology in terms of Section *(*) of the Constitution is:
d. Investigating Directorate: Serious Economic Offences v Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd: In re Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd v Smit * (*) SA * (CC).
The case where Langa DP explained the constitutional foundation of the new interpretation methodology in terms of Section *(*) of the Constitution is:
d. Investigating Directorate: Serious Economic Offences v Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd: In re Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd v Smit * (*) SA * (CC).
In S v Makhubela * (*) SA * (B)...
a.
the accused was charged with the performance of illegal abortions in terms of the Abortion and Sterilisation Act * of *.
b.
the case dealt with a claim for damages after a police vehicle had collided with a private motorcar.
c.
The Appellate Division held that the testimony of language experts was not admissable as an aid in construing legislation.
d.
the accused was charged with being behind the wheel of a vehicle that was being pushed by a group of people on a public without a driver's licence.
Case Rating: *
In S v Makhubela * (*) SA * (B), the correct answer is:
d. the accused was charged with being behind the wheel of a vehicle that was being pushed by a group of people on a public road without a driver's licence.
If you have any other legal questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
In S v Makhubela * (*) SA * (B), the correct answer is:
d. the accused was charged with being behind the wheel of a vehicle that was being pushed by a group of people on a public road without a driver's licence.
If you have any other legal questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Botha is of the opinion that the interpretation process begins with the reading of the legislation concerned. In which case did the court decide that ordinary meaning must be attached to the words?
a.
Principal Immigration Officer v Purshotam * AD *
b.
Principal Immigration Officer v Hawabu * AD *
c.
Union Government v Tonkin * AD *
d.
Union Government v Mack * AD *
Case Rating: *
The case in which the court decided that ordinary meaning must be attached to the words is:
a. Principal Immigration Officer v Purshotam * AD *
If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
The case in which the court decided that ordinary meaning must be attached to the words is:
a. Principal Immigration Officer v Purshotam * AD *
If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
In which cases did the court decide that although common law can be abrogated by disuse this cannot happen to legislation?
a.
S v Ndiki * (*) SACR * (Ck) and Nourse v Van Heerden * (*) SACR * (W)
b.
Nourse v Van Heerden * (*) SACR * (W)
c.
R v Sillas * (*) SA * (A) and Nourse v Van Heerden * (*) SACR * (W)
d.
S v Makwanyane * (*) SA * (CC) and Nourse v Van Heerden * (*) SACR * (W)
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
c. R v Sillas * (*) SA * (A) and Nourse v Van Heerden * (*) SACR * (W)
The correct answer is:
c. R v Sillas * (*) SA * (A) and Nourse v Van Heerden * (*) SACR * (W)
S v Mujee * (*) SA * (Z) is an example of the application of the______________rule.
a.
cessante ratione
b.
ex consequentibus
c.
eiusdem generis
d.
ex contrariis
Case Rating: *
S v Mujee * (*) SA * (Z) is an example of the application of the eiusdem generis rule.
S v Mujee * (*) SA * (Z) is an example of the application of the eiusdem generis rule.
In which cases did the courts decide that the intention of the legislature should be deduced from the words used in the legislation, in other words, the plain meaning of the text in an intentional disguise?
a.
Union Government v Mack * AD * and Qozeleni v Minister of Law and Order * (*) SA * (E)
b.
Union Government v Mack * AD * and Commissioner, SARS V Executor, Frith?s Estate * (*) SA * (SCA) *
c.
Union Government v Mack * AD * and Farrar?s Estate v CIR * TPD *
d.
Union Government v Mack * AD * and Ensor v Renscor Motors (Pty) Ltd * (*) SA * (A)
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
b. Union Government v Mack * AD * and Commissioner, SARS V Executor, Frith’s Estate * (*) SA * (SCA) *
The correct answer is:
b. Union Government v Mack * AD * and Commissioner, SARS V Executor, Frith’s Estate * (*) SA * (SCA) *
In Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security * (*) SA * (CC) the Constitutional Court stressed that a court is obliged to?
a.
develop common law in light of applicable legislation
b.
develop the common law in light of the Constitution.
c.
allow legislation to trump common law as is usually the practice
d.
allow common law and legislation to operate side-by-side
Case Rating: *
In Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security * (*) SA * (CC), the Constitutional Court stressed that a court is obliged to:
b. develop the common law in light of the Constitution.
In Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security * (*) SA * (CC), the Constitutional Court stressed that a court is obliged to:
b. develop the common law in light of the Constitution.
In University of Cape Town v Cape Bar Council * (*) SA * (A) it was held that?
a.
Right from the outset the interpreter may take the wider context of the provision (eg: its ambit and purpose) into consideration with the legislative text in question
b.
That if the text is ambiguous, the traditional rules of interpretation of statutes may be applied to find the ?intention of the legislature?
c.
The court had to examine all contextual factors in ascertaining the intention of the legislature, irrespective of whether or not the words of the legislation were clear and unambiguous
d.
The court did not have to examine all contextual factors in ascertaining the intention of the legislature, this is regardless of whether or not the words of the legislation were clear and unambiguous
Case Rating: *
In University of Cape Town v Cape Bar Council * (*) SA * (A), it was held that:
c. The court had to examine all contextual factors in ascertaining the intention of the legislature, irrespective of whether or not the words of the legislation were clear and unambiguous.
In University of Cape Town v Cape Bar Council * (*) SA * (A), it was held that:
c. The court had to examine all contextual factors in ascertaining the intention of the legislature, irrespective of whether or not the words of the legislation were clear and unambiguous.
In which case did Cameron J summarise the principles of supremacy of the Constitution by stating that 'the Constitution has changed the context of all legal thought and decision-making in South Africa'?
a.
Union Mack v Mack * AD *.
b.
Minister v Land Affairs v Slamdien * (*) BCLR * *.
c.
Limpopo Province v Speaker of the Limpopo Provincial Government * (*) SA * (CC).
d.
Holomisa v Argus Newspapers Ltd * (*) SA * (W).
Case Rating: *
The case in which Cameron J summarised the principles of the supremacy of the Constitution by stating that 'the Constitution has changed the context of all legal thought and decision-making in South Africa' is:
b. Minister v Land Affairs v Slamdien * (*) BCLR * *.
If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
The case in which Cameron J summarised the principles of the supremacy of the Constitution by stating that 'the Constitution has changed the context of all legal thought and decision-making in South Africa' is:
b. Minister v Land Affairs v Slamdien * (*) BCLR * *.
If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
In which case did the Constitutional Court confirm that the adoption of the purposive approach in our law has rendered obsolete all the previous attempts to determine whether a statutory provision is directory or peremptory on the basis of the wording and subject of the text of the provision?
a.
Prince v Cape Law Society * (*) SA * (CC)
b.
African Christian Democratic Party v Electoral Commission * (*) SA * (CC)
c.
S v Zuma * (*) SA * (CC)
d.
S v Jordan * (*) SA * (CC)
Case Rating: *
The case where the Constitutional Court confirmed the adoption of the purposive approach in law, rendering obsolete the previous attempts to determine whether a statutory provision is directory or peremptory based on the wording and subject, is:
b. African Christian Democratic Party v Electoral Commission * (*) SA * (CC).
If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
The case where the Constitutional Court confirmed the adoption of the purposive approach in law, rendering obsolete the previous attempts to determine whether a statutory provision is directory or peremptory based on the wording and subject, is:
b. African Christian Democratic Party v Electoral Commission * (*) SA * (CC).
If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
In which case did the court conclude that if there is irreconcilable conflict between various texts, the court will give preference to the one which benefits the person concerned?
a.
Bolnik v Chairman of the Board appointed by the SA Council of Architects * (*) SA * (C)
b.
Du Plessis v Southern Zululand Rural Licensing Board * (*) SA * (D)
c.
Khala v The Minister of Safety and Security * (*) SA * (W) *
d.
Kock v Scottburgh Town Council * (*) SA * (D)
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
c. Khala v The Minister of Safety and Security * (*) SA * (W) *
The correct answer is:
c. Khala v The Minister of Safety and Security * (*) SA * (W) *
In the case of _____________the court acknowledged the unqualified application of the Constitutions preamble.
a.
Chotabhai v Union Government * AD *
b.
Public Carriers Association v Toll Road Concessionaries (Pty) Ltd * (*) SA * (A)
c.
Qozeleni v Minister of Law and Order * (*) SA * (E)
d.
Brown v Cape Divisional Council * (*) SA * (A)
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
c. Qozeleni v Minister of Law and Order * (*) SA * (E)
The correct answer is:
c. Qozeleni v Minister of Law and Order * (*) SA * (E)
The revocation of legislation by the relevant competent lawmaker is known as?
a.
Disuse.
b.
concretization.
c.
Repeal.
d.
retroactivity.
Case Rating: *
The revocation of legislation by the relevant competent lawmaker is known as:
c. Repeal.
The revocation of legislation by the relevant competent lawmaker is known as:
c. Repeal.
The mischief rule was laid down in the 16th century by Lord Coke in the famous Heydon's case (*). Four questions were asked in this case; which one was not asked?
a.
What was the legal position before the legislation was adopted?
b.
What was the historical context before legislation was adopted?
c.
What was the mischief not provided for by the existing legislation or common law?
d.
What was the solution or remedy provided by the legislature to solve this problem?
Case Rating: *
The question that was NOT asked in Heydon's Case (*) is:
b. What was the historical context before legislation was adopted?
The question that was NOT asked in Heydon's Case (*) is:
b. What was the historical context before legislation was adopted?
The rule that states that when interpreting the meaning of a word, guidance should be sourced from those associated with it is known as?
a.
Primary Rule
b.
Mischief Rule
c.
Golden Rule
d.
Noscitur a sociis
Case Rating: *
The rule that states when interpreting the meaning of a word, guidance should be sourced from those associated with it is known as "Noscitur a sociis."
If you have more legal questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
The rule that states when interpreting the meaning of a word, guidance should be sourced from those associated with it is known as "Noscitur a sociis."
If you have more legal questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
What are the two exceptions to the presumption that legislation only applies to the future?
a.
If the enactment deals with common law and if the retro-effect favours the individual
b.
If the enactment deals with other constitutional rights and if the enactment deals with procedure
c.
If the enactment deals with procedure and if the retro-effect favours the individual
d.
If the enactment deals with procedure and if the future-effect favours the individual.
Case Rating: *
The two exceptions to the presumption that legislation only applies to the future are:
c. If the enactment deals with procedure and if the retro-effect favours the individual.
The two exceptions to the presumption that legislation only applies to the future are:
c. If the enactment deals with procedure and if the retro-effect favours the individual.
Before * the South African legal dispensation could be characterised as that of ?
a.
Executive sovereignty
b.
Parliamentary sovereignty
c.
Judicial sovereignty
d.
Constitutional sovereignty
Case Rating: *
Before *, the South African legal dispensation could be characterized as that of Parliamentary sovereignty. If you have more legal questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Before *, the South African legal dispensation could be characterized as that of Parliamentary sovereignty. If you have more legal questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Which one of the following internal aids to statutory interpretation deals with the technical detail that will otherwise clog up the main body of the Act?
a.
Sections
b.
Definitions
c.
Schedules
d.
Preamble
Case Rating: *
The correct answer is:
c. Schedules
Schedules are used in legislation to include detailed information that would otherwise make the main body of the Act more complex or cluttered. If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
The correct answer is:
c. Schedules
Schedules are used in legislation to include detailed information that would otherwise make the main body of the Act more complex or cluttered. If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Which of the following internal aids to statutory interpretation provides the circumstances of, the background to, and the reasons for the promulgation of the Act?
a.
Schedules
b.
Sections
c.
Chapters
d.
Preamble
Case Rating: *
The internal aid to statutory interpretation that provides the circumstances of, the background to, and the reasons for the promulgation of the Act is:
d. Preamble
The internal aid to statutory interpretation that provides the circumstances of, the background to, and the reasons for the promulgation of the Act is:
d. Preamble
In terms of one of the five interrelated dimensions of interpretation, the initial meaning of the text entails that?
a.
words with a technical meaning must be given that specialised meaning
b.
an extraordinary meaning must be attached to the words
c.
words must be given their ordinary, inaccurate meaning
d.
the interpretation process ends with the reading of the legislation concerned
Case Rating: *
For your question regarding the initial meaning of the text in terms of one of the five interrelated dimensions of interpretation, the correct choice is:
- a. words with a technical meaning must be given that specialised meaning
If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
For your question regarding the initial meaning of the text in terms of one of the five interrelated dimensions of interpretation, the correct choice is:
- a. words with a technical meaning must be given that specialised meaning
If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
What is the prevailing factor in terms of the purposive approach to statutory interpretation?
a.
The deconstruction of legislation
b.
The classification of the legislation
c.
The promotion of the intention of the legislature
d.
The purpose or object of the legislation
Case Rating: *
The prevailing factor in terms of the purposive approach to statutory interpretation is:
d. The purpose or object of the legislation.
The purposive approach focuses on understanding the intended purpose or objective behind the legislation to interpret its meaning. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
The prevailing factor in terms of the purposive approach to statutory interpretation is:
d. The purpose or object of the legislation.
The purposive approach focuses on understanding the intended purpose or objective behind the legislation to interpret its meaning. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
In terms of section * of the interim Constitution all?
a.
existing legislation is in force until repealed or amended by a competent authority
b.
legislation passed on or before * December * should be deleted from the statute books with immediate effect
c.
legislation shall be repealed including old legislation when the final constitution is adopted
d.
legislation should remain in force, at the behest of the President of the Republic of South Africa
Case Rating: *
In terms of section * of the interim Constitution, the correct answer is:
a. Existing legislation is in force until repealed or amended by a competent authority.
If you have any other legal questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
In terms of section * of the interim Constitution, the correct answer is:
a. Existing legislation is in force until repealed or amended by a competent authority.
If you have any other legal questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
According to the Constitution, the legislative menu consists of several items, such as municipal by-laws. Which of the following is not an item on the legislative menu?
a.
Assigned legislation
b.
Instruments of subordinate legislation, proclamations, and regulations
c.
Green Paper and White Paper policy legislation
d.
Provincial and national legislation
Case Rating: *
The item that is not part of the legislative menu according to the Constitution is:
c. Green Paper and White Paper policy legislation
The item that is not part of the legislative menu according to the Constitution is:
c. Green Paper and White Paper policy legislation
Which one of the following internal aids to statutory interpretation provides a short descriptive summary of the subject matter of the Act?
a.
Enacting provisions
b.
Table of contents
c.
Long title
d.
Short title
Case Rating: *
The correct answer to your question is:
c. Long title
The long title of an Act provides a short descriptive summary of the subject matter of the Act. If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
The correct answer to your question is:
c. Long title
The long title of an Act provides a short descriptive summary of the subject matter of the Act. If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
All of the options below are sections taken from the South African Schools Act * of *. Which section is an example of a peremptory provision?
a.
The governing body may allow the reasonable use of the facilities of the school for community, social and school fund-raising purposes, subject to such reasonable and equitable conditions as the governing body may determine which may include the charging of a fee or tariff which accrues to the school
b.
Subject to this Act, the Labour Relations Act, * (Act No. * of *), and any other applicable law, a public school may establish posts for non-educators and employ non- educator staff additional to the establishment determined in terms of the Public Service Act, * (Proclamation No. * of *)
Case Rating: *
In the South African Schools Act * of *, neither of the provided options represents a peremptory provision. A peremptory provision is one that mandates a specific action or outcome, leaving no room for discretion. Both options use the word "may," indicating discretion, which is characteristic of directory provisions. If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
In the South African Schools Act * of *, neither of the provided options represents a peremptory provision. A peremptory provision is one that mandates a specific action or outcome, leaving no room for discretion. Both options use the word "may," indicating discretion, which is characteristic of directory provisions. If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
c.
After consultation, as contemplated in section * of the National Education Policy Act, * (Act No. * of *), the Minister may determine norms and standards by notice in the Gazette regarding the funds used for the employment of staff referred to in subsections (*) and (*), but such norms and standards may not be interpreted so as to make the State a joint employer of such staff.
d.
When presenting the annual budget contemplated in section *, the governing body of a public school must provide sufficient details of any posts envisaged in terms of subsections (*) and (*), including the estimated costs relating to the employment of staff in such posts and the manner in which it is proposed that such costs will be met
Case Rating: *
It looks like you're seeking clarification on legal provisions related to education laws in South Africa. If you have specific questions or need further assistance with a particular legal matter, feel free to ask!
It looks like you're seeking clarification on legal provisions related to education laws in South Africa. If you have specific questions or need further assistance with a particular legal matter, feel free to ask!
Which one of the following theorists rejects the formalist position that law is rational, objective and neutral?
a.
Textual theorist
b.
Linguistic theorist
c.
Contextual theorist
d.
Critical theorist
Case Rating: *
The theorist who rejects the formalist position that law is rational, objective, and neutral is:
d. Critical theorist
The theorist who rejects the formalist position that law is rational, objective, and neutral is:
d. Critical theorist
Surrounding circumstances are those conditions prevailing before and during the adoption of legislation which led to its creation. Indicate which option is NOT seen as surrounding circumstances.
a.
mischief rule
b.
Ubuntu
c.
subsecuta observations
d.
case law
Case Rating: *
The option that is NOT seen as surrounding circumstances is:
b. Ubuntu
The option that is NOT seen as surrounding circumstances is:
b. Ubuntu
Traditionally, the South African rules of statutory interpretation were based on?
a.
fundamental values
b.
sovereignty of parliament
c.
a supreme constitution
d.
legal maxims
Case Rating: *
Traditionally, the South African rules of statutory interpretation were based on the "sovereignty of parliament" (b). If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Traditionally, the South African rules of statutory interpretation were based on the "sovereignty of parliament" (b). If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
The following term refers to the discussions during the drafting of an international treaty, but it is also increasingly used regarding the discussions of drafters of a Constitution.
a.
Ex accessorio eius de quo verba loquuntur
b.
Travaux Preparatoires
c.
Internal aids
d.
External aids
Case Rating: *
The term you're looking for is "b. Travaux Preparatoires." It refers to the preparatory work or the official record of negotiations and discussions during the drafting of an international treaty or constitution. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask!
The term you're looking for is "b. Travaux Preparatoires." It refers to the preparatory work or the official record of negotiations and discussions during the drafting of an international treaty or constitution. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask!