Legal Citation Formatting Guide

Summary

Legal citations must follow specific formats for books, journal articles, and case law. Books should have italicized titles and include the publisher and year. Journal articles need the starting page number and italicized journal titles. Case law citations should indicate the year, court, and law report citation. For statutes, include the chapter number and jurisdiction. Understanding these formats ensures clarity and precision in legal documents.

Full Conversation

is this citation correct Pickin v British Railways Board [*] AC * (HL)
Yes, the citation "Pickin v British Railways Board [*] AC * (HL)" is correct. It follows the standard format for UK case law citations, indicating the year of the decision, the volume, and the court (House of Lords).
is this citation correct HWR Wade, ‘The Basis of Legal Sovereignty’ (*) * Cambridge Law Journal
The citation "HWR Wade, ‘The Basis of Legal Sovereignty’ (*) * Cambridge Law Journal" is almost correct, but it should follow the standard legal citation format for journal articles:
- H.W.R. Wade, ‘The Basis of Legal Sovereignty’ (*) * *Cambridge Law Journal* *.
Make sure to include the starting page number. Also, italicize the journal title.
is this citation correct HLA Hart, The Concept of Law (2nd edn, Clarendon Press *
Case Rating: *
The citation you've provided is almost correct. It should be formatted as follows:
- H.L.A. Hart, *The Concept of Law* (2nd edn, Clarendon Press *).
Make sure to italicize the book title and include a closing parenthesis.
is this citation correct Stephen Sedley, ‘Human Rights: A Twenty-First Century Agenda’ [*] Public Law
Case Rating: *
The citation "Stephen Sedley, ‘Human Rights: A Twenty-First Century Agenda’ [*] Public Law" is almost correct. It should include the starting page number and italicize the journal title. Here's the correct format:
- Stephen Sedley, ‘Human Rights: A Twenty-First Century Agenda’ [*] *Public Law* *.
Make sure to include the starting page number.
is this correct Hunting Act *.
Case Rating: *
The citation "Hunting Act *" is almost correct but needs a bit more detail to align with standard legal citation practices. It should specify the chapter number and the jurisdiction. The correct format would be:
- Hunting Act *, c.* (UK).
Do you have any specific questions about the Hunting Act * or need further assistance?
is this it In the case of Jackson [*], there was a constitutional challenge to the Hunting Act *,* which received the sanction of the Parliament Acts * and *.
Case Rating: *
Your citation of the constitutional challenge in Jackson [*] seems fine for a general reference, but ensure you are clear about the court and year in formal contexts. If you have any specific questions about the case or need further details, feel free to ask!
is the hunting act * c.* uk in this In the case of Jackson [*], there was a constitutional challenge to the Hunting Act *,* which received the sanction of the Parliament Acts * and *.
Case Rating: *
Yes, the Hunting Act *, c.* (UK) was indeed challenged in the case of Jackson [*]. The challenge was based on the constitutional validity of the Act under the Parliament Acts * and *. If you need further details, feel free to ask!
are these citations correct Parliament Act *. Parliament Act *.
Case Rating: *
The citations "Parliament Act *" and "Parliament Act *" are correct for general reference. However, for a more formal citation, you might specify the chapter number and jurisdiction like this:
- Parliament Act *, c.* (UK)
- Parliament Act *, c.* (UK)
Let me know if you need more help!
are these Parliament Act *, c.* (UK) - Parliament Act *, c.* (UK) in here in this In the case of Jackson [*], there was a constitutional challenge to the Hunting Act *,* which received the sanction of the Parliament Acts * and *.
Case Rating: *
Yes, the Parliament Act *, c.* (UK) and the Parliament Act *, c.* (UK) are relevant to the case of Jackson [*], where there was a constitutional challenge to the Hunting Act *. These Acts were used to pass the Hunting Act, which was contested in the case. Let me know if you have any more questions!
is this citation correct Mark Elliott, ‘The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review’ (*) * Law Quarterly Review
Case Rating: *
The citation "Mark Elliott, ‘The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review’ (*) * Law Quarterly Review" is almost correct. You should include the starting page number and italicize the journal title. Here's the correct format:
- Mark Elliott, ‘The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review’ (*) * *Law Quarterly Review* *.
Make sure to include the starting page number. Let me know if you need further assistance!
is this citation correct R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [*] UKSC *, [*] * WLR *.
Case Rating: *
Yes, the citation "R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [*] UKSC *, [*] * WLR *" is correct. It follows the standard format for UK Supreme Court case citations, indicating the year, court, and the law report citation. Let me know if you have any other questions!
is this citation correct Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [*] QB * (DC).
Case Rating: *
Yes, the citation "Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [*] QB * (DC)" is correct. It follows the standard format for UK case law citations, indicating the year, law report, page number, and the court division (Divisional Court in this case). Let me know if you have any other questions!
is this citation correct Adam Tomkins, Public Law (Oxford University Press *) *–*.
Case Rating: *
The citation "Adam Tomkins, Public Law (Oxford University Press *) *–*" is almost correct. Here's a more precise format:
- Adam Tomkins, *Public Law* (Oxford University Press, *) *–*.
Make sure to italicize the book title. Let me know if you have any more questions!
is this correct yes or no In H v Lord Advocate [*], the Scotland Act * was recognised as a constitutional statute that guarantees devolved powers
Case Rating: *
Yes, in H v Lord Advocate [*], the Scotland Act * was indeed recognized as a constitutional statute that guarantees devolved powers. Let me know if you need further information!
is this citation correct H v Lord Advocate [*] UKSC *
Case Rating: *
Yes, the citation "H v Lord Advocate [*] UKSC *" is correct. It follows the standard format for UK Supreme Court case citations, indicating the year, the court, and the case number. Let me know if you have any further questions!
is this citation correct Scotland Act *.
Case Rating: *
The citation "Scotland Act *" is correct for a general reference. However, for formal legal citation, you may want to specify the chapter number and jurisdiction like this:
- Scotland Act *, c.* (UK)
If you have more questions, feel free to ask!
is this citation correct R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd (No *) [*] * AC * (HL).
Case Rating: *
Yes, the citation "R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd (No *) [*] * AC * (HL)" is correct. It follows the standard format for UK House of Lords case citations, indicating the year, the law report series, the page number, and the court. Let me know if you have any other questions!
is this correct yes or no The roots of this pluralism were exposed earlier in R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (No *) [*]*, where the House of Lords acknowledged that Community law had the potential to disapply an Act of Parliament.
Case Rating: *
No, the citation "R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (No *) [*]*" is incorrect because it lacks the full citation details. The correct format should be: "R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd (No *) [*] * AC * (HL)."
is this true The roots of this pluralism were exposed earlier in R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (No *) [*]*, where the House of Lords acknowledged that Community law had the potential to disapply an Act of Parliament.
Case Rating: *
Yes, it is true. In the case of R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (No *) [*], the House of Lords recognized that European Community law could, in certain circumstances, take precedence over UK domestic law, which was a significant development in legal pluralism. Let me know if you have more questions!
is this citation correct European Communities Act *.
Case Rating: *
The citation "European Communities Act *" is correct for general reference. For formal citation, it should specify the chapter number and jurisdiction like this:
- European Communities Act *, c.* (UK).
Let me know if you have any more questions!
is this citation correct European Union (Withdrawal) Act *.
Case Rating: *
The citation "European Union (Withdrawal) Act *" is correct for general reference. For a more formal legal citation, you might specify the chapter number and jurisdiction, like this:
- European Union (Withdrawal) Act *, c.* (UK).
If you have any more questions, feel free to ask!
is this citation correct Joseph Raz, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Virtue’ (*) * Law Quarterly Review
Case Rating: *
The citation "Joseph Raz, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Virtue’ (*) * Law Quarterly Review" is almost correct. For a formal legal citation, you should include the starting page number and italicize the journal title. Here's the correct format:
- Joseph Raz, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Virtue’ (*) * *Law Quarterly Review* *.
is this citation correct TRS Allan, Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press *)
Case Rating: *
The citation is almost correct. For a more precise format, make sure to italicize the book title and add a comma after the publisher's name. Here's the correct format:
- T.R.S. Allan, *Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law* (Oxford University Press, *).
Let me know if you need further assistance!
is this book real T.R.S. Allan, *Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law* (Oxford University Press, *).
Case Rating: *
Yes, the book "Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law" by T.R.S. Allan, published by Oxford University Press in *, is real. It's a well-regarded work in the field of constitutional law. If you have more questions about legal citations or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
is this citation correct R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [*] UKSC *, [*] AC *.
Case Rating: *
Yes, the citation "R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [*] UKSC *, [*] AC *" is correct. It follows the standard format for UK Supreme Court case citations, indicating the year, the court, and the law report citation. Let me know if you have any other questions!
is this citation correct R (Miller) v Prime Minister [*] UKSC *, [*] AC *.
Case Rating: *
Yes, the citation "R (Miller) v Prime Minister [*] UKSC *, [*] AC *" is correct. It follows the standard format for UK Supreme Court case citations, indicating the year, the court, and the law report citation. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask!
where is this from which case stautute or source Paul Craig finds in these rulings proof that constitutional fundamentals circumscribe the effective exercise of sovereignt
Case Rating: *
The perspective that constitutional fundamentals circumscribe the effective exercise of sovereignty is often discussed in the context of cases like R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [*] and R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [*]. Legal scholars like Paul Craig may explore this through analyses of such landmark cases where the interaction between UK law and EU law is examined, highlighting the limits on parliamentary sovereignty.
If you have a specific context or need further details about these cases, feel free to ask!
is this citation correct Nicholas Barber, The Constitutional State (Oxford University Press *)
Case Rating: *
The citation is almost correct. For a more precise format, italicize the book title and add a comma after the publisher's name. Here's the correct format:
- Nicholas Barber, *The Constitutional State* (Oxford University Press, *).
Let me know if you need any more help!
is this true Richard Ekins states that sovereignty is an essential ingredient of representative democracy, securing that ultimate legislative authority is vested in elected, not appointed, lawmakers
Case Rating: *
Yes, Richard Ekins has expressed the view that sovereignty is crucial to representative democracy, emphasizing that ultimate legislative authority should be held by elected lawmakers. This perspective aligns with the traditional understanding of parliamentary sovereignty in the UK. If you have more questions about this topic or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
is this citation correct Richard Ekins, The Nature of Legislative Intent (Oxford University Press *) *–*.
Case Rating: *
The citation you provided is almost correct. It should follow the standard format for citing books in legal contexts. Here's a more precise format:
- Richard Ekins, *The Nature of Legislative Intent* (Oxford University Press, *) *–*.
Make sure to italicize the book title and add a comma after the publisher's name.
is this true * A judicial qualification of this principle would, in both Ekins' and H.W.R. Wade's view, signify a constitutional revolution in that it would introduce a judges' constitution in the UK, vesting ultimate power in an unelected judiciary, rendering it undemocratic. This conflict persists at the heart of common law constitutionalism.
Case Rating: *
Yes, both Richard Ekins and H.W.R. Wade have expressed concerns that judicial qualification of certain principles could lead to a constitutional revolution in the UK. They argue it might shift ultimate power to an unelected judiciary, which they believe could undermine democratic principles.
is this true Nevertheless, the most significant challenge to Steyn’s constructive approach to the common law comes from Jeffrey Goldsworthy. Goldsworthy criticizes Steyn’s proposal of judicial power to qualify sovereignty based on the democratic foundation of the British constitution. According to Goldsworthy, the supremacy of parliament is not a product of judicial legislation, but a political arrangement founded on democratic legitimacy, the result of historical development rather than judicial innovation
Case Rating: *
Yes, it's true. Jeffrey Goldsworthy critiques Lord Steyn's view by emphasizing that parliamentary supremacy is rooted in democratic legitimacy and historical development, rather than judicial innovation. Goldsworthy argues that the British constitution is a political arrangement, not subject to judicial redefinition. If you have more questions or need further details, feel free to ask!
is this true Judicial interference in the determination of the limits of this supremacy, Goldsworthy submits, would invert the hierarchy of the British constitution, with unelected judges as the ultimate arbiters of parliament’s power.
Case Rating: *
Yes, it's true. Jeffrey Goldsworthy argues that judicial interference in determining the limits of parliamentary supremacy could invert the hierarchy of the British constitution, placing unelected judges as the ultimate arbiters of parliament's power. This perspective highlights concerns about maintaining democratic legitimacy. If you have more questions about this topic, feel free to ask!
is this true judicial interference in determining the limits of this supremacy, Goldsworthy submits, would invert the hierarchy of the British constitution by positioning unelected judges as the ultimate arbiters of parliament’s authority.
Case Rating: *
Yes, it's true. Jeffrey Goldsworthy argues that judicial interference in determining the limits of parliamentary supremacy could invert the hierarchy of the British constitution, positioning unelected judges as the ultimate arbiters of parliament’s authority. This highlights concerns about the balance of power and democratic legitimacy. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask!
is this citation correct dam Tomkins, Public Law (Oxford University Press *)
Case Rating: *
The citation "dam Tomkins, Public Law (Oxford University Press *)" seems to have a typo in the author's name. It should be "Adam Tomkins." Here's the correct format:
- Adam Tomkins, *Public Law* (Oxford University Press, *).
Make sure to italicize the book title and add a comma after the publisher's name. Let me know if you need further assistance!
is this citation correct Adam Tomkins, ‘In Defence of the Political Constitution’ (*) * Oxford Journal of Legal Studies *,
Case Rating: *
The citation "Adam Tomkins, ‘In Defence of the Political Constitution’ (*) * Oxford Journal of Legal Studies *" is correct. It follows the standard format for legal journal article citations, including the author's name, article title, year, volume, journal name, and starting page number. Let me know if you have any other questions!
is this correct David Feldman, ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Independence’ (*) * Public Law *
Case Rating: *
The citation "David Feldman, ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Independence’ (*) * Public Law *" is almost correct. It should include the starting page number, which you have provided as *, and the journal title should be italicized. Here's the correct format:
- David Feldman, ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Independence’ (*) * *Public Law* *.
is this citation correct R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [*] UKSC *
Case Rating: *
The citation "R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [*] UKSC *" is correct. It follows the standard format for UK Supreme Court case citations, indicating the year and court. Let me know if you have any other questions!